In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 17, No. 1 ( 2022-1-25), p. e0262944-
Abstract:
Latent class analysis is a widely used statistical method for evaluating diagnostic tests without any gold standard. It requires the results of at least two tests applied to the same individuals. Based on the resulting response patterns, the method estimates the test accuracy and the unknown disease status for all individuals in the sample. An important assumption is the conditional independence of the tests. If tests with the same biological principle are used, the assumption is not fulfilled, which may lead to biased results. In a recent publication, we developed a method that considers the dependencies in the latent class model and estimates all parameters using frequentist methods. Here, we evaluate the practicability of the method by applying it to the results of six ELISA tests for antibodies against the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus in pigs that generally follow the same biological principle. First, we present different methods of identifying suitable starting values for the algorithm and apply these to the dataset and a vaccinated subgroup. We present the calculated values of the test accuracies, the estimated proportion of antibody-positive animals and the dependency structure for both datasets. Different starting values led to matching results for the entire dataset. For the vaccinated subgroup, the results were more dependent on the selected starting values. All six ELISA tests are well suited to detect antibodies against PRRS virus, whereas none of the tests had the best values for sensitivity and specificity simultaneously. The results thus show that the method used is able to determine the parameter values of conditionally dependent tests with suitable starting values. The choice of test should be based on the general fit-for-purpose concept and the population under study.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.t004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262944.s009
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Bookmarklink