feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 8845-8847
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 2629-2629
    Abstract: Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an anti-CD22 antibody linked to calicheamicin, approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD22+ B-cell precursor adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) at starting dose of 1.8 mg/m2/course. A phase I study in pediatric patients (pts) is being performed and sponsored by Erasmus MC in collaboration with Pfizer, registered in the Dutch Trial Registry (NTR57360). Study design: Children aged 1-18 years with R/R CD22+ BCP-ALL (ALL) were included after IRB approval and informed consent was obtained. Key inclusion criteria consisted of M2/M3 marrow and adequate liver and kidney function. The study aimed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of single agent InO; secondary objectives included safety, response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Dose escalation followed the Rolling-6 design, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation during course 1 and defined as delay in hematological (hem) recovery after D42 in responding pts and grade (gr) ≥3 non-hem toxicities 〉 48 hours (or 〉 7 days for liver tests). DL1 was 1.4 mg/m2 (0.6-0.4-0.4 mg/m2). Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as CR, CRp (ANC 〉 0.5x10.9/l but PLT ≤50x10.9/l) and CRi (ANC ≤0.5x10.9/l and/or PLT ≤50,000/µL). Central minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis by flow cytometry and RQ-PCR was considered negative if 〈 0.01% or 〈 1x10-4. PK samples were measured with validated HPLC/MS/MS methods. In the first cohort, 2 patients at DL2 experienced a DLT per protocol definition, however these toxicities were considered non-dose limiting; both pts achieved CR. An IRB-approved amendment allowed repeating the DL1 and DL2 DLT assessment in a 2nd cohort. Survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method. Results are based on a database snapshot on June 22, 2019. Results: 25 pts were enrolled (Jan 2017-Apr 2019), median age 11 years (range 1.7-16.9); 3 (12%) were refractory, 15 (60%) ≥2nd relapsed ALL and 7 (28%) 1st relapse post-HSCT (median 2 prior treatment regimens, range 2-7). Eleven (44%) pts were previously transplanted; median baseline WBC 3.5 x109/L (range 0.2-8.6). In total, 46 courses of InO were administered (median 2/pt, range, 1-4). 23 of 25 treated pts were DLT-evaluable. In the first cohort, 1/6 and 2/5 pts at DL1 and DL2 experienced a DLT per protocol definition (transaminases elevation and no hem. recovery), but considered non-dose limiting. After the IRB-approved amendment, in the 2nd cohort, 0/6 and 1/6 pts in DL1 and DL2 had a DLT (no hem recovery). All 25 pts had at least 1 adverse event (AE) in Course 1 [24 gr 3-4]: 20 pts experienced ≥1 gr 3-4 hem AE, 15 pts a gr 3-4 non-hem AE (13 treatment-related, mainly febrile neutropenia/infections and lab abnormalities). Gr 3-4 transaminases elevation related to InO was seen in 3 pts (12%) and bilirubin in 2 (8%) in Course 1. 2 cases of VODs (gr 3-4) were reported after InO, both after follow-up chemotherapy (including HD-MTX) for R/R disease. None of these pts received any HSCT. After Course 1, 75% of pts responded at DL1 and 85% at DL2; ORR 80% (CR n=15, CRp n=1, CRi n=4). MRD was available in 19/20 responding pts: 15 (79%) reached MRD-negative CR as best response (6/9 at DL1 and 9/10 at DL2). Consolidation treatment with HSCT (n=6) or CAR-T cells (n=2) was given a median time of 61 days (range 23-125) after the last InO dose. None of these pts had been previously transplanted. The median follow-up for responding pts was 13.3 months (mos), median duration of response 8 mos (range 1.1-14.0). EFS was 66.7% (95% CI 47.9-93.0) and 33.4% (95% CI: 16.5 − 67.4), while the OS 63.3% (95% CI: 45.8−87.6) and 38.7% (95% CI: 21.3 - 70.4) at 6 and 12 mos, respectively. During follow-up, at relapse 13 pts had material available and sufficient ALL cells for reliable CD22 analysis: 2/13 showed CD22-negativity. After multiple doses, observed Ino medium maximum concentrations in DL1 (n=9) and DL2 (n=5) were 217 and 246 ng.hr/mL, comparable to the simulated adult concentration 234 ng.hr/mL at 1.8 mg/m2 dose. Conclusions: InO was well tolerated and showed remarkable activity in these heavily pretreated pts. The RP2D was established at 1.8 mg/m2/course (0.8-0.5-0.5 mg/m2), confirming the dose used in adults. Two cases of VOD were recorded after follow-up chemotherapy. The ORR was 80%; 79% of responding pts had MRD-negative CR, with 40% of pts being alive after 1 year of follow-up. A phase II single agent study in R/R pediatric ALL is ongoing and a Phase 1 of InO in combination with chemotherapy will start soon. Disclosures Díaz de Heredia: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rossig:Amgen, Celgene,EUSA Pharma, Genetech, Novartis, Roche: Other: advisory board; BMS, Pfizer, Roche: Other: speaker honoraria. van der Velden:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; BD Biosciences: Research Funding. van der Sluis:medac: Consultancy; jazz farmaceuticals: Consultancy. Chen:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Sleight:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nysom:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Teaching and lectures. Øra:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Locatelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zwaan:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Jazz pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 137, No. 12 ( 2021-03-25), p. 1582-1590
    Abstract: This phase 1 study investigated the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a CD22-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in pediatric patients with multiple relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD22+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Patients (age ≥1 year or & lt;18 years) received 3 doses of InO (days 1, 8, and 15) per course. Dose escalation was based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during course 1. Dose level 1 (DL1) was 1.4 mg/m2 (0.6, 0.4, 0.4 mg/m2) and DL2 was 1.8 mg/m2 (0.8, 0.5, 0.5 mg/m2). Secondary end points included safety, antileukemic activity, and pharmacokinetics. Twenty-five patients (23 evaluable for DLTs) were enrolled. In course 1, the first cohort had 1 of 6 (DL1) and 2 of 5 (DL2) patients who experienced DLTs; subsequent review considered DL2 DLTs to be non–dose-limiting. Dose was de-escalated to DL1 while awaiting protocol amendment to re-evaluate DL2 in a second cohort, in which 0 of 6 (DL1) and 1 of 6 (DL2) patients had a DLT. Twenty-three patients experienced grade 3 to 4 adverse events; hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was reported in 2 patients after subsequent chemotherapy. Overall response rate after course 1 was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59% to 93%) (20 of 25 patients; DL1: 75% [95% CI, 43% to 95%] , DL2: 85% [95% CI, 55% to 98%]). Of the responders, 84% (95% CI, 60% to 97%) achieved minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response, and 12-month overall survival was 40% (95% CI, 25% to 66%). Nine patients received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor T cells after InO. InO median maximum concentrations were comparable to simulated adult concentrations. InO was well tolerated, demonstrating antileukemic activity in heavily pretreated children with CD22+ R/R ALL. RP2D was established as 1.8 mg/m2 per course, as in adults. This trial was registered at https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as EUDRA-CT 2016-000227-71.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Leukemia, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 36, No. 6 ( 2022-06), p. 1516-1524
    Abstract: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin is a CD22-directed antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, approved in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Patients aged 1–18 years, with R/R CD22 + BCP-ALL were treated at the RP2D of 1.8 mg/m 2 . Using a single-stage design, with an overall response rate (ORR) ≤ 30% defined as not promissing and ORR  〉  55% as expected, 25 patients needed to be recruited to achieve 80% power at 0.05 significance level. Thirty-two patients were enrolled, 28 were treated, 27 were evaluable for response. The estimated ORR was 81.5% (95%CI: 61.9–93.7%), and 81.8% (18/22) of the responding subjects were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. The study met its primary endpoint. Median follow up of survivors was 16 months (IQR: 14.49–20.07). One year Event Free Survival was 36.7% (95% CI: 22.2–60.4%), and Overall Survival was 55.1% (95% CI: 39.1−77.7%). Eighteen patients received consolidation (with HSCT and/or CAR T-cells therapy). Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) occurred in seven patients. MRD negativity seemed correlated to calicheamicin sensitivity in vitro, but not to CD22 surface expression, saturation, or internalization. InO was effective in this population. The most relevant risk was the occurrence of SOS, particularly when InO treatment was followed by HSCT.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0887-6924 , 1476-5551
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008023-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 6, No. 3 ( 2022-02-8), p. 1004-1014
    Abstract: The safety and efficacy of blinatumomab, a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific molecule, were examined in an open-label, single-arm, expanded access study (RIALTO). Children ( & gt;28 days and & lt;18 years) with CD19+ relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) received up to 5 cycles of blinatumomab by continuous infusion (cycle: 4 weeks on/2 weeks off). The primary end point was incidence of adverse events. Secondary end points included complete response (CR) and measurable residual disease (MRD) response within the first 2 cycles and relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) after treatment. At final data cutoff (10 January 2020), 110 patients were enrolled (median age, 8.5 years; 88% had ≥5% baseline blasts). A low incidence of grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome (n = 2; 1.8%) and neurologic events (n = 4; 3.6%) was reported; no blinatumomab-related fatal adverse events were recorded. The probability of response was not affected by the presence of cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities. Median OS was 14.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.0-not estimable) and was significantly better for MRD responders vs MRD nonresponders (not estimable vs 9.3; hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI: 0.08-0.39). Of patients achieving CR after 2 cycles, 73.5% (95% CI: 61.4%-83.5%) proceeded to alloHSCT. One-year OS probability was higher for patients who received alloHSCT vs without alloHSCT after blinatumomab (87% vs 29%). These findings support the use of blinatumomab as a safe and efficacious treatment of pediatric R/R B-ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02187354.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2876449-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 1375-1375
    Abstract: Introduction Despite a high cure rate for pediatric ALL, the prognosis for pts who suffer from r/r disease remains poor. Pediatric pts with r/r ALL face multiple lines of therapy, acute and long-term treatment toxicities, and have limited survival. New agents that are able to provide durable disease control and long-term survival with limited toxicity are needed. Blinatumomab (blin) is a bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE®) antibody construct that redirects CD3+ cytotoxic T cells to lyse CD19+ B cells. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of blin in pediatric pts with B-cell precursor r/r ALL enrolled in an expanded access study initiated in 2014 (NCT02187354). Methods Eligible pts with r/r CD19+ ALL (≥ 2 relapses, relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant [HSCT], or refractory to prior treatment) were 〉 28 days to 〈 18 years of age and had ≥ 5% blasts or 〈 5% blasts but with a minimal residual disease (MRD) level ≥ 10-3. Prior treatment with blin was allowed if the pt was not blin-refractory or intolerant (study re-enrollment was not allowed). Blin was dosed by continuous infusion (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles: 15 µg/m2/d for pts with ≤ 25% blasts; 5 µg/m2/d on days 1−7 of cycle 1, 15 µg/m2/d thereafter for pts with 〉 25% blasts. Subsequent therapy, including HSCT, was off protocol and per investigator preference. The primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent (TE) and treatment-related (TR) adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included morphologic complete response (CR; 〈 5% blasts) and MRD response ( 〈 10-4 leukemic blasts by PCR or flow cytometry) in the first 2 cycles, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and HSCT rate after blin treatment. Results Of 98 treated pts (median age, 8.5 [range 0.4-17.0] years), 93% were enrolled in Europe, 54% had 〉 25% blasts at baseline, 41% had ≥ 50% blasts, and 48% had a cytogenetic abnormality. Prior treatments included HSCT (44%), radiotherapy (15%), and blin (4%); 56% of pts had ≥ 2 relapses, 41% had relapsed after HSCT, 14% were primary refractory and 20% were refractory to reinduction therapy. At data cutoff (March 9, 2018), 37 pts were on study. The median number of completed treatment cycles was 2 (range 1-5), with 4 pts completing 5 cycles of blin. Overall, 99% of pts experienced a TEAE, with a rate of 64% for grade ≥ 3. TRAEs were reported in 77% of pts (26% for grade ≥ 3); 21% were deemed serious. The most frequent TEAEs (any grade) included pyrexia (83%), vomiting (27%), headache (24%), and anemia (19%). Among TEAE categories of interest, rates of any grade/grade ≥ 3 were 67%/9% for infusion reactions, 44%/16% for infections, 43%/5% for neurologic events, 40%/31% for cytopenias, 18%/12% for elevated liver enzymes, 16%/2% for cytokine release syndrome, 8%/0% for decreased immunoglobulins, 4%/2% for tumor lysis syndrome, and 1%/0% for capillary leak syndrome. Dose interruption due to a TRAE was required by 19% of pts, and 4% discontinued blin due to a TRAE. There were 9 fatal AEs, all unrelated to blin. In the first 2 cycles of treatment, 60% of all 98 pts achieved CR, 40% achieved CR with full recovery of peripheral blood counts (PBC), and 48% achieved MRD response. Of 2 pts with t(17;19), both achieved CR with full PBC recovery and MRD response; of 4 pts with Down syndrome, 3 achieved CR (2 full PBC recovery) and MRD response; of 4 pts who had received prior blin treatment, 3 achieved CR (3 full PBC recovery) with blin retreatment and 2 achieved MRD response. Among 59 pts who achieved CR within 2 cycles, 27 (46%) proceeded to HSCT; 19 relapsed and 5 died after a median follow-up 5.3 (range, 0.3-13.2) months for a median RFS of 8.5 (95% CI, 2.9-NE) months from the time of CR. Among all 98 pts, median follow-up was 12.2 (range, 0.5-14.1) months; there were 38 deaths (32 disease related), and median OS was 13.0 (95% CI, 9.3-NE) months. Conclusions The safety profile of single-agent blin in this expanded access study was generally consistent with profiles reported in prior controlled trials of blin in pediatric and adult pts with r/r ALL. Blin was active in this pediatric r/r ALL population. Blin induced MRD response in almost half of the pts, including pts with t(17;19) or prior blin treatment. Pts with a lower leukemia burden ( 〈 50% blasts) had a better probability of response to blin vs pts with a higher burden. These data further support blin as a treatment option for pediatric pts with r/r ALL. Table. Table. Disclosures Locatelli: Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zugmaier:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Employment, Patents & Royalties: 20170327581, 9688760, 20170122947, 9486475, 20160208001, 9192665, 20150071928, 8840888, 20140227272, 20140228316, 20130323247, 20130287774, 20130287778, 20110262440, 20100112603, 7700299, 20070037228. Bader:Riemser: Research Funding; Neovii: Research Funding; Cellgene: Consultancy; Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bourquin:Amgen: Other: Travel Support. Handgretinger:Miltenyi Biotec: Patents & Royalties: Co-patent holder of TcR alpha/beta depletion technologies, Research Funding. Rossig:Genetech: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; EUSA Pharm: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 61-61
    Abstract: Minimal residual disease (MRD) has been demonstrated to be of high and independent prognostic value prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) by several studies. Within the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 trial, MRD of 10-3 has been identified as the best prognostic cut-off before HSCT in children with relapsed ALL. In this study we have investigated, whether interventional treatment intensification in patients with persisting MRD at a level of =/ 〉 10-3 is capable of reducing MRD prior to HSCT and improving survival. In the trial ALL-REZ BFM 2002 (recruitment of patients between 01'2002 and 09'2012) online MRD-monitoring has been performed in patients with ALL relapse and indication for allogeneic HSCT since 2010. MRD results obtained during the consolidation treatment phase and before HSCT have been disclosed to the treating centers. Treatment courses consisting of Clofarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Etoposide, Daunoxome or Idarubicine/Fludarabine/Cytarabine, or in case of T-ALL Nelarabine alone or with Cyclophosphamide/Etoposide were offered as interventional elements and administered to patients at the discretion of the treating physician aiming at reducing MRD and improving survival. A total of 30 patients with first ALL relapse and persisting MRD at a level of =/ 〉 10-3 at the end of consolidation treatment received an interventional intensification before HSCT (Intervention Group, IVG). Sixty patients with first relapse and persisting MRD at a level of 10-3 at the end of consolidation treatment did not receive an interventional intensification before proceeding to HSCT (non-IVG). MRD reduction of at least one log step was achieved in 78% and of two log steps in 59% of patients after interventional intensification. Relevant clinical characteristics as time to relapse, site of relapse, immunophenotype, consolidation treatment arm and type of HSCT were equally distributed between the IVG and the non-IVG. However, the proportion of patients with an MRD levels 〈 10-3 and 〈 10-4 was significantly higher in the IVG with 83% and 71% than in the non-IVG with 48% and 18%, respectively (p=0.005 and p 〈 0.001). There were no significant differences in the probability of event-free survival at 5 years (60% +/-11% vs 45% +/-7%, Figure 1A), and the cumulative incidence of subsequent relapse (31% +/-9% vs 46% +/-7%, Figure 1B) or of therapy related death (0% +/-0% vs 8% +/-4%) between the IVG and non-IVG. Including only patients with MRD reduction of at least two log steps after interventional intensification (n=16), the probability was 59% +/-16% in the IVG compared to 45% +/-7% in the non-IVG (p=0.24). In conclusion, persisting MRD during consolidation treatment can be efficiently reduced by interventional intensified chemotherapy. However, this does not translate into a significant improvement of survival. MRD persistence after intensive conventional chemotherapy seems to identify particularly aggressive leukemias which are not successfully treated by further reduction of the MRD load. Therefore, targeted therapies need to be investigated and prospective controlled studies should be given preference to individualized interventions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures von Stackelberg: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Medicine, MDPI AG, Vol. 10, No. 22 ( 2021-11-14), p. 5292-
    Abstract: Children with other extramedullary relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia are currently poorly characterized. We aim to assess the prevalence and the clinical, therapeutic and prognostic features of extramedullary localizations other than central nervous system or testis in children with relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) treated on a relapsed ALL protocol. Patients and Methods: Patients with relapse of ALL and LBL, treated according to the multicentric ALL-REZ BFM trials between 1983 and 2015, were analyzed for other extramedullary relapse (OEMR) of the disease regarding clinical features, treatment and outcome. Local treatment/irradiation has been recommended on an individual basis and performed only in a minority of patients. Results: A total of 132 out of 2323 (5.6%) patients with ALL relapse presented with an OEMR (combined bone marrow relapse n = 78; isolated extramedullary relapse n = 54). Compared to the non-OEMR group, patients with OEMR had a higher rate of T-immunophenotype (p 〈 0.001), a higher rate of LBL (p 〈 0.001) and a significantly different distribution of time to relapse, i.e., more very early and late relapses compared to the non-OEMR group (p = 0.01). Ten-year probabilities of event-free survival (pEFS) and overall survival (pOS) in non-OEMR vs. OEMR were 0.38 ± 0.01 and 0.32 ± 0.04 (p = 0.0204) vs. 0.45 ± 0.01 and 0.37 ± 0.04 (p = 0.0112), respectively. OEMRs have been classified into five subgroups according to the main affected compartment: lymphatic organs (n = 32, 10y-pEFS 0.50 ± 0.09), mediastinum (n = 35, 10y-pEFS 0.11 ± 0.05), bone (n = 12, 0.17 ± 0.11), skin and glands (n = 21, 0.32 ± 0.11) and other localizations (n = 32, 0.41 ± 0.09). Patients with OEMR and T-lineage ALL/LBL showed a significantly worse 10y-pEFS (0.15 ± 0.04) than those with B-Precursor-ALL (0.49 ± 0.06, p 〈 0.001). Stratified into standard risk (SR) and high risk (HR) groups, pEFS and pOS of OEMR subgroups were in the expected range whereas the mediastinal subgroup had a significantly worse outcome. Subsequent relapses involved more frequently the bone marrow (58.4%) than isolated extramedullary compartments (41.7%). In multivariate Cox regression, OEMR confers an independent prognostic factor for inferior pEFS and pOS. Conclusion: OEMR is adversely related to prognosis. However, the established risk classification can be applied for all subgroups except mediastinal relapses requiring treatment intensification. Generally, isolated OEMR of T-cell-origin needs an intensified treatment including allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as a curative approach independent from time to relapse. Local therapy such as surgery and irradiation may be of benefit in selected cases. The indication needs to be clarified in further investigations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2077-0383
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2662592-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 151 ( 2021-07), p. 175-189
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8049
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1120460-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468190-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 82061-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2009
    In:  Experimental Cell Research Vol. 315, No. 13 ( 2009-08), p. 2165-2180
    In: Experimental Cell Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 315, No. 13 ( 2009-08), p. 2165-2180
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0014-4827
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466780-0
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages