Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 7, No. 7 ( 2023-04-11), p. 1137-1145
    Abstract: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP); however, one-third of patients experience refractory or relapsed disease. Studies comparing R-CHOP with modified regimens replacing R with obinutuzumab (O) or adding lenalidomide (L) did not result in improved outcomes; however, L and O together may enhance natural killer-cell mediated antibody-dependent cellular toxicity when paired with CHOP. Here, we report on a phase 1b/2 study of 53 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who received 6 cycles of LO-CHOP. The end of treatment overall and complete response rates of the 50 evaluable patients were 98% and 90%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, the 4-year progression free and overall survival rates were 87.4% and 91.3%, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were experienced by 70% of patients, including neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (17%), fatigue (13%), and neutropenic fever (13%). Of the 33 patients profiled with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing, 31 (94%) had detectable pretreatment ctDNA with cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing, 24 (73%) were classifiable by the LymphGen classifier, and 15/20 (75%) and 12/17 (71%) patients achieved early and major molecular responses after 1 and 2 cycles, respectively. Using phased variant enrichment and detection sequencing, 16/18 evaluable patients (89%) showed no detectable ctDNA after at least 5 cycles of LO-CHOP. LO-CHOP demonstrates high efficacy and tolerability in newly diagnosed DLBCL, leading to a high rate of undetectable minimal residual disease by ctDNA. This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02529852.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2876449-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 18, No. 10 ( 2018-10), p. 673-678
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Leukemia & Lymphoma, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 63, No. 1 ( 2022-01-02), p. 74-83
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1042-8194 , 1029-2403
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030637-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 7-8
    Abstract: Background Patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can achieve cure with platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC) and autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT). Only half of pts respond to PCC based on a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan after 2 cycles, but most experience significant toxicity. Minimizing exposure to PCC for non-responders in favor of other treatments such as anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy (CART19) is important. We hypothesized that PET/CTs performed earlier during salvage therapy could predict end-of-treatment (EOT) response and survival. We conducted an investigator initiated single-institution pilot study (NCT02405078) where 2 early PET/CTs were obtained during cycle 1 (C1) of salvage PCC. Methods Adult R/R DLBCL pts eligible for PCC with a pre-therapy PET/CT were eligible for enrollment. The PCC regimen was selected by the treating physician. The primary endpoint was EOT response. PET/CTs were obtained on D4 and D21 of C1 of PCC, and at EOT after 2-3 cycles. Treating physicians were not blinded to early PET/CT results. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was defined as time from D1 of C1 of salvage PCC to death from DLBCL. Results A total of 25 pts with a median age of 61 years (range 25-82) at relapse treated with PCC between 2/5/2016 and 10/30/2018 were included in the analysis, with data cutoff as of 2/29/2020. Selected baseline pt characteristics are as follows: 68% were GCB cell-of-origin by Hans algorithm, 60% were stage III/IV, 88% had an ECOG PS & lt; 2, 44% an international prognostic index (IPI) ≥3, and 32% double-hit lymphoma. Median time from initial diagnosis to first progression was 5.8 months. Therapies received were R-DHAP (44%), R-ICE (36%), and other regimens (20%). Ten (40%) pts had a therapy change after C1 and before EOT evaluation due to early treatment failure or progression based on early PET/CT result as interpreted by the treating physician. Twelve (48%) continued with a second cycle of the same regimen, and 3 discontinued therapy. Sixteen (64%) pts were evaluable for EOT response by PET/CT, while 7 (28%) pts were missing an EOT PET/CT due to early progression and 2 for other reasons. The only baseline characteristic different between EOT responders, non-responders, and pts missing EOT evaluation due to early progression was time from initial diagnosis to progression (8.6 vs. 5.3 vs. 4.5 months, p=0.035). Overall response (OR; complete or partial response) by Lugano criteria or decrease in maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUVmax) ≥50% at D4 or D21 was not associated with EOT response. Median follow up was 19.7 months (range 0.7-40.9) from start of PCC. Median progression free survival was 2.7 months. Eleven pts died, 9 (36%) from progressive DLBCL and 2 from transplant complications. DSS was 61% at 24 months. DSS was worse for pts with an ECOG PS & gt; 1 (p=0.002), IPI ≥3 (p=0.046), and who did not receive R-ICE or R-DHAP (p=0.006). There was no difference in DSS based on the D4 or D21 PET/CT individually, by OR or ΔSUVmax. DSS was better for pts who had a persistent OR on both D4 and D21 vs. pts without a persistent OR (p=0.042) and was 100 vs. 47% at 24 months (Fig). Of the 6 pts with a persistent OR, 4 had a late first relapse (range 23.1-78.9 months after diagnosis) and 2 had an early first relapse (1.9-9.0 months). A total of 28% of pts had autoSCT and 8% allogeneic SCT, and 28% eventually had CART19 if not responsive to salvage treatment. Of the 10 pts who changed therapy after C1, 2/3 of the CART19 recipients were alive at data censoring compared to 1/7 of the pts who did not receive CART19. Discussion This pilot study is the first of its kind to investigate early PET/CT during salvage therapy for R/R DLBCL. Early PET/CT result did not predict the primary endpoint of EOT response, confounded as therapy was changed for some pts before final response evaluation due to early progression. Persistent OR on early PET/CTs during C1 predicted excellent DSS, even if pts were refractory to frontline treatment. Early therapy change after C1 based on unsatisfactory early PET/CTs to spare pts from ineffective therapy was feasible, with possible benefit to switching to CART19, but numbers were low and CART19 was not uniformly available during the study period. Risk for chemotherapy failure can be predicted early during salvage therapy, which may be important to change therapy to non-chemotherapy treatments such as CART19. Figure Disclosures Nastoupil: Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Gilead/KITE: Honoraria; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lee:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics: Research Funding; Guidepoint Blogal: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Speakers Bureau. Neelapu:Incyte: Other: personal fees; N/A: Other; Unum Therapeutics: Other, Research Funding; Calibr: Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Karus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Cell Medica/Kuur: Other: personal fees; Celgene: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: personal fees; Legend Biotech: Other; Allogene Therapeutics: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Adicet Bio: Other; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Other: personal fees. Flowers:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chuang:Sage-Evidence=Based Medicine & Practice: Consultancy. Westin:47 Inc: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Unum: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. 5 ( 2022-08-04), p. 504-515
    Abstract: Patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (rrLBCL) can achieve long-term remission after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART19). However, more than half of recipients will experience treatment failure. Thus, approaches are needed to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from alternative or consolidative therapy. We evaluated low-pass whole-genome sequencing (lpWGS) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) before CART19 as a new approach for risk stratification. We performed lpWGS on pretreatment plasma samples from 122 patients at time of leukapheresis who received standard-of-care CART19 for rrLBCL to define DNA copy number alterations (CNAs). In multivariable selection, high focal CNA score (FCS) denoting genomic instability was the most significant pretreatment variable associated with inferior 3-month complete response rates (28% vs 56%, P = .0029), progression-free survival (PFS; P = .0007; hazard ratio, 2.11), and overall survival (OS; P = .0026; hazard ratio, 2.10). We identified 34 unique focal CNAs in 108 (89%) patients; of these, deletion 10q23.3 leading to loss of FAS death receptor was the most highly associated with poor outcomes, leading to inferior PFS (P  & lt; .0001; hazard ratio, 3.49) and OS (P = .0027; hazard ratio, 2.68). By combining FCS with traditional markers of increased tumor bulk (elevated lactate dehydrogenase and & gt;1 extranodal site), we built a simple risk model that could reliably risk stratify patients. Thus, lpWGS of cfDNA is a minimally invasive assay that could rapidly identify high-risk patients and may guide patient selection for and targeted therapies to evaluate in future clinical trials.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 8609-8610
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 5-6
    Abstract: Background The median age of diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the US is 70 years, and less than 2% of patients (pts) are diagnosed before age 45. No prior studies have investigated adolescent and young adult (AYA) pts with CLL in the era of next generation sequencing (NGS) gene mutation analysis and novel oral therapies. This retrospective study examines disease characteristics that affect outcomes of AYA pts with CLL, including those treated with novel agents. Methods Pts aged 15 to 39 years at the time of diagnosis of CLL/SLL, diagnosed between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2019, and evaluated at least once at our institution (MDACC) were included in the analysis. The primary objective was to evaluate how disease characteristics predict outcomes for AYA pts with CLL. Baseline characteristics (labs, Rai stage) were recorded if documented pre-treatment and within 12 months of diagnosis; other characteristics (FISH, cytogenetics, CD38, ZAP-70, gene mutations) could be documented any time pre-treatment. IGHV mutation status could be documented at any time. The outcomes of pts who received novel oral agents (defined as BTK, BCL2, or PI3K inhibitors) at any time during their disease course were specifically evaluated as a secondary objective. Time-to-first treatment (TTFT) was assessed as the time from CLL diagnosis to start of first therapy. Overall survival (OS) was assessed as the time from CLL diagnosis to death from any cause. Results A total of 227 pts were identified and summarized. Median age at diagnosis was 37 years (range, 17-39). Median follow-up time from diagnosis was 7.1 years (range, 0-19.3) with data cutoff as of 6/30/2020. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. Pre-treatment hierarchical FISH categories were as follows for 167 pts with available data: 65 (39%) had del(13q), 26 (16%) trisomy 12, 24 (14%) del(11q), 7 (4%) del(17p), and 45 (27%) no FISH abnormality. Of the 159 pts with available data, 82 (52%) had mutated and 77 (48%) unmutated IGHV. A first degree relative with CLL was present for 3% of pts. Gene mutation was identified in 2/59 (3%) of pts for TP53, 8/45 (18%) NOTCH1, 7/45 (16%) SF3B1, 4/45 (9%) POT1, 3/45 (7%) BIRC3, and 5/45 (11%) MYD88 (due to limited number of pts with available gene mutation data, outcomes by mutation status were not analyzed). A total of 161 (71%) pts received CLL treatment, and median TTFT was 26 months (Fig. 1A). A total of 39 (17%) pts died, and 5- and 10-year OS rates were 90% and 78%, respectively. Characteristics predictive of TTFT and OS are described in Table 2. A total of 72 (32%) pts received novel therapy at any time during their disease course, and 89 (39%) pts were treated only with agents other than novel therapies during their entire treatment course. As expected, OS was longer for pts who received novel therapy at any time vs. pts who did not (p=0.001, hazard ratio 0.32, Fig. 1B), with a 10-year OS rate of 92% vs. 64%, respectively. Pts who received novel therapies were diagnosed later (the median year of diagnosis was 2010 for pts treated with novel therapies, and 2003 for pts treated without novel therapy). All other baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The survival advantage of novel therapy exposure was lost when only evaluating treated pts with mutated IGHV (p=0.63). A total of 18 (8%) pts underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). Pts aged & lt;30 (p=0.03) and with del(11q) or del(17p) (p=0.007) were more likely to undergo allo-SCT. A total of 10 (4%) pts developed Richter's transformation (RT). Pts aged & lt;30 (p=0.02) and with del(11q) or del(17p) (p=0.03) had higher risk of RT. t-MDS/AML developed in 3 (1%) pts; all had received prior chemoimmunotherapy. A second primary malignancy, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, occurred in 8 (4%) pts. Discussion This retrospective analysis is the first to evaluate AYA pts with CLL in the era of NGS gene mutation analysis and widespread utilization of novel oral agents. Most prognostic laboratory and molecular markers established in older adults pts with CLL were predictive for young pts as well. Notably, OS was improved for treated pts who received novel therapies at any time during their disease course. The benefit of novel therapy seemed to be lost when analyzing IGHV mutated pts only. This study suggests that novel therapies should be considered as the preferred treatment choice over chemotherapy for AYA pts with CLL, especially for pts with unmutated IGHV. Disclosures Sasaki: Otsuka: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pfizer Japan: Consultancy. Thompson:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Burger:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. O'Brien:Gilead, Pharmacyclics, TG Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, Regeneron, Acerta: Research Funding; Amgen, Astellas, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Oncology, Aptose Biosciences Inc. Vaniam Group, AbbVie, Alexion, Verastem, Eisai, Juno Therapeutics, Vida Ventures: Consultancy. Jain:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Precision Bioscienes: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 4, No. 18 ( 2020-09-22), p. 4508-4511
    Abstract: An incidental histologic diagnosis of DLBCL was identified during temporary interruption of ibrutinib treatment in patients with CLL. In contrast to an aggressive clinical course typical of Richter transformation, these patients responded to reinitiation of ibrutinib alone.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2876449-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 394-394
    Abstract: Introduction Long-term follow up of prospective studies has shown that continuous Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy leads to durable remissions in previously untreated TP53-altered CLL. Additionally, combining BTKi with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) achieves deep remissions with similar rates of undetectable measurable residual disease in these high-risk patients (pts) compared to those with wildtype TP53. Without randomized data, it is unclear which pts would benefit most from combined targeted therapy over BTKi monotherapy. It is also unknown how size of the TP53-altered clone influences efficacy of BTKi therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of pts with CLL with baseline deletion 17p [del(17p)] and/or mutated TP53 (TP53-m) treated with BTKi +/- VEN +/- CD20 mAb in the first-line setting. Methods Pts with CLL/SLL and pretreatment testing (FISH and TP53 sequencing by NGS assay in & gt;95% of pts with 1% limit of detection) performed at our institution (MDACC) demonstrating del(17p) and/or TP53-m who received first-line BTKi-based therapy were included. Pts started treatment between March 2012 and June 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from therapy start. Pts were categorized into those who received first-line BTKi +/- CD20 mAb versus combined BTKi and fixed-duration VEN +/- CD20 mAb. Outcomes were analyzed by baseline characteristics, including size of the TP53-altered clone (% cells with del(17p) and variant allele frequency [VAF] for TP53-m). Results A total of 140 pts with TP53 alteration who received first-line BTKi-based treatment for CLL were included. Pretreatment characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median follow-up was 3.0 years (range, 0.1 to 9.0). Overall, a total of 38 (27%) pts experienced a progression event, 18 (13%) pts died, and 10 (7%) experienced RT. The 4-year PFS rate was 72.7% and median PFS was 6.3 years (Fig. 1A). The 4-year OS rate was 87.2% (Fig. 1B). A total of 112/140 (80%) pts had pretreatment del(17p). The median % of cells with del(17p) was 60.5% (range, 3.5-99). TP53-m was noted in 100 of the 120 (83%) tested. There were 120 unique TP53 mutations, of which 115 had an available VAF; the median VAF was 34.1% (range, 1-99.5). Among the pts tested for both del(17p) and TP53-m (n=120), 42 (35%) pts had a single alteration [del(17p) or single TP53-m] and 78 (65%) had multiple alterations [both del(17p) and TP53-m or multiple TP53-m] . By univariable analyses, no baseline characteristic was significantly associated with PFS. PFS was not different for TP53-m pts based a VAF threshold of 10% (Fig. 2A) and del(17p) pts based on a threshold of 25% cells affected (Fig. 2B). No baseline characteristic was associated with OS. A total of 101 (72%) pts received a BTKi +/- CD20 mAb without VEN; 39 (28%) received BTKi and VEN (+/- CD20 mAb) (4 pts included who did not get VEN due to early study withdrawal or data censoring). PFS was significantly longer for BTKi + VEN pts vs. BTKi only pts (p=0.009, Fig. 3A) with a HR of 0.18 (95% CI 0.04-0.77) and there was a trend for longer OS in BTKi + VEN pts (p=0.092, Fig. 3B) with a HR of 0.21 (95% CI 0.03-1.57). BTKi + VEN pts were less likely to harbor TP53-m (69% v 90%, p=0.008) or multi-alteration TP53 (44% v 75%, p & lt;0.001), but no other baseline characteristics were significantly different (Table 1). A total of 28/140 (20%) pts received a CD20 mAb. There was no significant association of CD20 mAb with PFS (p=0.54). Conclusions We report favorable 4-year PFS and OS rates of 72.7% and 87.2% in a large retrospective cohort of pts with TP53-altered CLL receiving first-line BTKi-based therapy. The clone size either by % FISH+ or by TP53-m VAF was not associated with PFS, which may reflect the high efficacy of BTKi. PFS appears longer for pts treated with BTK + VEN compared to BTKi only pts, and there was a trend towards improved OS. Though the BTKi + VEN group had lower rates of TP53-m and multiple TP53 alterations, neither characteristic was associated with shorter PFS. Heterogeneity in patient follow-up and response assessment schedule across this pt cohort could be a confounding factor. Whether combination fixed-duration BTKi + VEN is preferable over sequential treatment with these agents remains an unanswered question; this is especially pertinent in pts with high-risk genomics. Therefore, studies dedicated to enrolling such patients are needed to formally clarify optimal treatment for these high-risk patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Burger: Beigene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Speakers Bureau. Thompson: Genentech: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Amgen: Other: Institution: Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding, Expert Testimony; Gilead: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding. Ferrajoli: Janssen: Other: Advisory Board ; AstraZeneca: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Sasaki: Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian: Immunogen: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Jazz: Research Funding; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. Wierda: Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; KITE Pharma: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology, Inc.: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; GSK/Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme Corporation: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding. Jain: Beigene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Cellectis: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 200, No. 1 ( 2023-01), p. 35-44
    Abstract: Salvage chemotherapy followed by high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory large B‐cell lymphoma (rrLBCL) with chemosensitive disease. A 18 F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scan after salvage chemotherapy is used to assess response and eligibility for ASCT, but metrics for chemosensitivity in patients with residual disease are not well defined. We performed a single‐centre retrospective analysis of 92 patients with a partial response or stable disease after salvage chemotherapy for rrLBCL who received ASCT to investigate PET‐derived parameters and their prognostic utility. The Deauville 5‐point Scale (D‐5PS) score, maximum standardised uptake value (SUV max ), total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated from the post‐salvage/pre‐ASCT PET scan. The 5‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 40% and 54% respectively. A D‐5PS score of 5 ( p  = 0.0082, hazard ratio [HR] 2.09), high SUV max ( p  = 0.0015, HR 2.48), TMTV ( p  = 0.035, HR 1.83) and TLG ( p  = 0.0036, HR 2.27) were associated with inferior PFS. A D‐5PS score of 5 ( p  = 0.030, HR 1.98) and high SUV max ( p  = 0.0025, HR 2.55) were associated with inferior OS. PET‐derived parameters may help prognosticate outcomes after ASCT in patients with rrLBCL with residual disease after salvage chemotherapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages