In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 17, No. 1 ( 2022-1-14), p. e0262185-
Abstract:
Projectile technology is commonly viewed as a significant contributor to past human subsistence and, consequently, to our evolution. Due to the allegedly central role of projectile weapons in the food-getting strategies of Upper Palaeolithic people, typo-technological changes in the European lithic record have often been linked to supposed developments in hunting weaponry. Yet, relatively little reliable functional data is currently available that would aid the detailed reconstruction of past weapon designs. In this paper, we take a use-wear approach to the backed tool assemblages from the Recent and Final Gravettian layers (Levels 3 and 2) of Abri Pataud (Dordogne, France). Our use of strict projectile identification criteria relying on combinations of low and high magnification features and our critical view of the overlap between production and use-related fractures permitted us to confidently identify a large number of used armatures in both collections. By isolating lithic projectiles with the strongest evidence of impact and by recording wear attributes on them in detail, we could establish that the hunting equipment used during the Level 3 occupations involved both lithic weapon tips and composite points armed with lithic inserts. By contrast, the Level 2 assemblage reflects a heavy reliance on composite points in hunting reindeer and other game. Instead of an entirely new weapon design, the Level 2 collection therefore marks a shift in weapon preferences. Using recent faunal data, we discuss the significance of the observed diachronic change from the point of view of prey choice, seasonality, and social organisation of hunting activities. Our analysis shows that to understand their behavioural significance, typo-technological changes in the lithic record must be viewed in the light of functional data and detailed contextual information.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g016
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g017
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g018
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g019
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g020
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g021
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g022
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g023
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.g024
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.t013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262185.s010
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Bookmarklink