feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, Wiley, Vol. 61, No. 2 ( 2020-02), p. 216-223
    Abstract: DNA adducts of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) play a critical role in the etiology of gastrointestinal tract cancers in humans and other species orally exposed to PAHs. Yet, the precise localization of PAH‐DNA adducts in the gastrointestinal tract, and the long‐term postmortem PAH‐DNA adduct stability are unknown. To address these issues, the following experiment was performed. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with the PAH carcinogen benzo[ a ]pyrene (BP) and euthanized at 24 h. Tissues were harvested either at euthanasia (0 time), or after 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 168 hr (7 days) of storage at 4°C. Portions of mouse tissues were formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded, and immunohistochemically (IHC) evaluated by incubation with r7,t8‐dihydroxy‐t‐9,10‐epoxy‐7,8,9,10‐tetrahydrobenzo[ a ]pyrene (BPDE)‐DNA antiserum and H‐scoring. The remaining tissues were frozen, and DNA was extracted and assayed for the r7,t8,t9‐trihydroxy‐c‐10‐( N 2 ‐deoxyguanosyl)‐7,8,9,10‐tetrahydrobenzo[ a ]pyrene (BPdG) adduct using two quantitative assays, the BPDE‐DNA chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA), and high‐performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC‐ES‐MS/MS). By IHC, which required intact nuclei, BPdG adducts were visualized in forestomach basal cells, which included gastric stem cells, for up to 7 days. In proximal small intestine villus epithelium BPdG adducts were visualized for up to 12 hr. By BPDE‐DNA CIA and HPLC‐ES‐MS/MS, both of which used DNA for analysis and correlated well ( P = 0.0001), BPdG adducts were unchanged in small intestine, forestomach, and lung stored at 4°C for up to 7 days postmortem. In addition to localization of BPdG adducts, this study reveals the feasibility of examining PAH‐DNA adduct formation in wildlife species living in colder climates. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:216–223, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0893-6692 , 1098-2280
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1497682-1
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Nature Medicine, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 26, No. 2 ( 2020-02), p. 181-187
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-8956 , 1546-170X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1484517-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 31_suppl ( 2017-11-01), p. 205-205
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 31_suppl ( 2017-11-01), p. 205-205
    Abstract: 205 Background: Rates of illicit substance use and misuse of opioid medications are high in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) general population. Despite this, screening for substance use and opioid misuse is not standard in the care of AYA oncology supportive/palliative care. To inform our clinical practice, we sought to determine the prevalence of illicit substance use and potential opioid misuse in AYA cancer patients relative to adult patients and to examine correlates of use and misuse. Methods: We conducted retrospective chart review of patients newly referred to an outpatient palliative care clinic between 2014 and 2016. Results: Consecutive patients (N = 963) underwent urine drug testing as part of their initial visit; 16% of patients were between 18 and 39 years of age. Rate of illicit drug use was 31% for AYAs and 19% for adults. AYAs were nearly 2 times more likely to have positive results for marijuana (OR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.19 – 2.69) and nearly 3 times more likely to test positive for amphetamines (OR = 2.94; 95% CI = 1.15 – 7.49). AYAs were no more likely than adults to test positive for cocaine, barbiturates or heroin. In univariate analyses, only male sex and being single, and no clinical characteristics or symptom scores, were significantly associated with illicit substance use (ps 〈 .05). AYAs were no more likely than adults to test positive for the presence of opioids, not currently prescribed (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.70 – 1.65). No symptoms scores or demographic and clinical characteristics were significantly associated with misuse. Conclusions: AYA patients demonstrated a high rate of illicit substance use and similar rate of potential opioid misuse relative to adult patients. Findings suggest AYAs may benefit from consistent screening, support and treatment for substance use and potential opioid misuse during anticancer and cancer-related therapies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 4_Supplement ( 2020-02-15), p. PD8-01-PD8-01
    Abstract: Background: The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project (MBCproject) is a research study that directly engages patients (pts) through social media and advocacy groups, and empowers them to share their samples, clinical information, and experiences. The goal is to create a publicly available dataset of linked genomic, clinical, and pt-reported data to enable research. Methods: In collaboration with pts, advocates, and advocacy groups, a website (MBCproject.org) was developed that allows pts with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) anywhere in the U.S. or Canada to register. Registered pts are sent an online consent form that asks for permission to obtain and analyze their medical records and samples. Once enrolled, pts are sent a saliva kit and a blood kit and asked to mail back a saliva sample, which is used to extract germline DNA, and/or a blood sample, which is used to extract germline DNA and cell free DNA (cfDNA). We contact participants’ medical providers and obtain medical records and a portion of their stored tumor biopsies. Whole exome sequencing (WES) is performed on tumor DNA, germline DNA, and cfDNA; transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) is performed on tumor RNA. Medical records and pt-reported data are abstracted to create a detailed clinical record for each pt. All de-identified data are shared regularly via public databases (cbioportal.org, mbcproject.org, dbGaP, NCI Genomic Data Commons) without restrictions. Study updates are shared with participants regularly. Results: From 10/20/15-7/8/19, 5357 women and men with MBC registered. 3290 pts receiving care at over 1700 different institutions consented to share medical records and tumor/saliva/blood samples, and to have genomic analysis performed. Details of clinical data collection, biospecimen acquisition, and genomic data generation to date are outlined in the Table. WES from 463 tumors obtained from 326 pts have been generated (with matched germline WES), including 61 pts with 2 timepoints, 19 pts w 3 timepoints, and 11 pts w 4+ timepoints. 278 tumor exomes were from the breast/regional lymph nodes, 63 from distant metastatic sites and 122 from cfDNA. 110 tumor exomes were from samples obtained before the diagnosis of MBC, 258 from after the diagnosis of MBC, and 95 to be determined (TBD). 161 tumor exomes were obtained prior to any therapy, 204 following some therapy, and 98 TBD. Clinically annotated genomic data are used to study specific pt cohorts (including rare subsets and outliers) and to identify mechanisms of response and resistance to therapies. Examples of the clinical and genomic analyses that will be presented include: - Pts diagnosed & lt;40 yrs of age (1108 pts enrolled; 120 with tumor WES) - de novo MBC (1122 pts enrolled; 121 with tumor WES) - Late recurrence, & gt;5 yrs after diagnosis (830 pts enrolled; 77 with tumor WES) - Long-term survivors, & gt;10 yrs with MBC (159 pts enrolled; 11 with tumor WES) - Resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors (709 pts enrolled; 148 with tumor WES) Conclusions: Partnering directly with pts enables rapid identification of thousands of pts willing to share tumors, blood, saliva, and medical records to accelerate research. This approach allows for identification of patients with specific phenotypes, who have been challenging to identify with traditional approaches. Remote acquisition of medical records and saliva/blood/tumor samples is feasible. This clinically annotated dataset is a shared resource for the research community. Table 1Clinical data collection, biospecimen acquisition, and genomic data generation:NumberConsent signed3290 ptsSurvey #1 submitted3290 pts(demographics, diagnosis details, receptor status, clinical experiences)Survey #2 submitted1435 pts(pathology details, sites of metastasis, treatments with start and stop dates)Medical record received1307 ptsSaliva sample received1976 ptsBlood sample received1121 ptsTumor samples received482 tumor samples from 346 ptsDigital image of tumor slide H & E generated482 tumor samplesWES from germline complete310 germline samplesWES from tumor sample complete341 tumor samplesRNA-seq from tumor sample complete229 tumor samplesULP-WGS from cfDNA complete947 blood samplesWES from circulating tumor DNA complete122 blood samples Citation Format: Nikhil Wagle, Corrie Painter, Elana Anastasio, Michael Dunphy, Mary McGillicuddy, Esha Jain, Tania G Hernandez, Sara Balch, Beena Thomas, Dewey Kim, Alyssa L. Damon, Shahrayz Shah, Brett N. Tomson, Rachel Stoddard, Colleen Nguyen, Jorge Buendia-Buendia, Ofir Cohen, Jorge Gomez Tejeda Zanudo, Netsanet Tsegai, Lauren Sterlin, Ulcha Fergie Ulysse, Kathryn Sine, Oyin Alao, Jacqueline Lucia, Eric S. Lander, Todd R. Golub. The metastatic breast cancer project: Generating the clinical and genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer through patient-partnered research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-01.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cell Genomics, Elsevier BV, Vol. 2, No. 9 ( 2022-09), p. 100169-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2666-979X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3110160-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 4_Supplement ( 2021-02-15), p. OT-18-01-OT-18-01
    Abstract: The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project (MBCproject) is an ongoing research study that directly engages patients (pts) through social media and advocacy groups, and empowers them to share their samples, clinical information, and experiences. The goal is to create a publicly available dataset of linked genomic, clinical, and pt-reported data to enable research. In collaboration with pts, advocates, and advocacy groups, a website (MBCproject.org) was developed that allows pts with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) anywhere in the US or Canada to register. From 10/20/15-3/31/20, 5708 women and men with MBC registered for the MBCproject. Registered pts are sent an online consent form that asks for permission to obtain and analyze their medical records and samples. Consented pts are sent a saliva and/or blood kit and asked to mail back a saliva sample, which is used to extract germline DNA, and/or a blood sample, which is used to extract germline DNA and cell free DNA (cfDNA). We contact participants’ medical providers to obtain medical records and a portion of their stored tumor biopsies. 3245 pts receiving care at over 1700 different institutions have consented to share medical records and tumor/saliva/blood samples and to have genomic analysis performed. Whole exome sequencing (WES) is performed on tumor DNA, germline DNA, and cfDNA; transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) is performed on tumor RNA. Medical records and pt-reported data are abstracted to create a detailed clinical record for each pt. Table 1 highlights clinical data collection, biospecimen acquisition, and genomic data generation to date. Examples of clinicogenomic analyses are shown in Table 2. De-identified linked genomic, clinical, and pt-reported data is shared regularly via public and semi-public databases (mbcproject.org, cBioPortal, dbGaP, NCI Genomic Data Commons). To date, this data has been cited in over 20 published journal articles. Study updates are shared with participants regularly. The MBCproject continues to enroll new patients, generate additional data, and perform integrated clinical and genomic analyses with the goal of building a dataset that is representative of patients with MBC. We have partnered with over 30 non-profit breast cancer advocacy groups. We also have several community engagement efforts underway to more directly reach patients in underrepresented communities, including partnerships with faith-based organizations and colleges/universities, as well as targeted engagement with the African American community. In addition, in partnership with Latinx patients, advocates, and researchers, the project has been translated into Spanish and is expected to launch in late 2020. Partnering directly with pts rapidly enables thousands of pts to remotely share tumors, blood, saliva, and medical records to accelerate research. The resulting publicly shared clinically annotated database is a resource that allows researchers to identify patients with specific phenotypes, who have often been challenging to identify with traditional approaches. Clinical data collection, biospecimen acquisition, and genomic data generation:NumberConsent signed (US & CA)3245 ptsSurvey #1 submitted(demographics, diagnosis details, receptor status, clinical experiences)3245 ptsSurvey #2 submitted(pathology details, sites of metastasis, treatments with start and stop dates)1638 ptsMedical record received1352 ptsSaliva sample received2004 ptsBlood sample received1121 ptsTumor samples received585 tumor samples from 424 ptsDigital image of tumor slide H & E generated585 tumor samplesWES from germline complete458 germline samplesWES from tumor (primary and metastatic) samples complete343 tumor samplesRNA-seq from tumor (primary and metastatic) samples complete228 tumor samplesULP-WGS from cfDNA (taken in metastatic setting) complete993 blood samplesWES from circulating tumor DNA (taken in metastatic setting) complete143 blood samples CohortConsented (US & CA)Tumor WES completeTumor RNA-seq completePts diagnosed & lt; 40 yrs of age107312071De novo MBC112712183Late recurrence ( & gt;5 years after dx)8307752Long term survivors (MBC & gt; 10yrs)158115Resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors70914839NED at time of f/u survey4238939Triple Negative Breast Cancer3107531Patients with 2 or more tumor biopsies / cfDNA samples collected by the MBCproject2876138 Citation Format: Nikhil Wagle, Corrie Painter, Elana Anastasio, Michael Dunphy, Mary McGillicuddy, Esha Jain, Brett Tomson, Tania G. Hernandez, Beena Thomas, Dewey Kim, Alyssa L. Damon, Shahrayz Shah, Rafael Ramos, Colleen Nguyen, Lee O'Neil, Sarah Winnicki, Sara Balch, Rachel Stoddard, Taylor Cusher, Parker Chastain, Jorge Gomez Tejeda Zanudo, Jorge Buendia-Buendia, Ofir Cohen, Netsanet Tsegai, Lauren Sterlin, Ulcha F. Ulysse, Imani Boykin, Kate Sine, Oyin Alao, Jacqueline Lucia, Eric S. Lander, Todd R. Golub. The metastatic breast cancer project: Generating the clinical and genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer through patient-partnered research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-18-01.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. OT1-19-01-OT1-19-01
    Abstract: The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project (MBCproject) is an ongoing research study that directly engages patients (pts) through social media and advocacy groups, and empowers them to share their samples, clinical information, and experiences. The goal is to create a publicly available dataset of linked genomic, clinical, and pt-reported data to enable research. In collaboration with pts, advocates, and advocacy groups, a website (MBCproject.org) was developed that allows pts with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) anywhere in the US or Canada to register. From 10/20/15-6/1/21, 6100 patients with MBC registered for the MBCproject. Registered pts are sent an online consent form that asks for permission to obtain and analyze their medical records and samples. Consented pts are sent a saliva and/or blood kit and asked to mail back a saliva sample, which is used to extract germline DNA, and/or a blood sample, which is used to extract germline DNA and cell free DNA (cfDNA). We contact participants’ medical providers to obtain medical records and a portion of their stored tumor biopsies. 3456 pts receiving care at over 1700 different institutions have consented to share medical records and tumor/saliva/blood samples and to have genomic analysis performed. Whole exome sequencing (WES) is performed on tumor DNA, germline DNA, and cfDNA; transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) is performed on tumor RNA. Medical records and pt-reported data are abstracted to create a detailed clinical record for each pt. Table 1 highlights clinical data collection, biospecimen acquisition, and genomic data generation to date. Examples of clinicogenomic analyses are shown in Table 2. De-identified linked genomic, clinical, and pt-reported data is shared regularly via public databases (mbcproject.org, cBioPortal, dbGaP, NCI Genomic Data Commons). To date, this data has been cited in over 40 publications. Study updates are shared with participants regularly. The MBCproject continues to enroll new patients, generate additional data, and perform integrated clinical and genomic analyses with the goal of building a dataset that is representative of patients with MBC. We have partnered with over 30 non-profit breast cancer advocacy groups. We also have several community engagement efforts underway to more directly reach patients in underrepresented communities, including partnerships with faith-based organizations and colleges/universities, as well as targeted engagement with the African American community. In addition, in partnership with Latinx patients, advocates, and researchers, a Spanish-language version of the MBCproject was launched in June 2021. Partnering directly with pts rapidly enables thousands of pts to remotely share tumors, blood, saliva, and medical records to accelerate research. The resulting publicly shared clinically annotated dataset is a resource that allows researchers to identify patients with specific phenotypes, who have often been challenging to identify with traditional approaches. Clinical data collection, biospecimen acquisition, and genomic data generation:NumberConsent signed (US & CA)3456 ptsPatient-reported data collected (demographics, diagnosis details, receptor status, clinical experiences, pathology details, sites of metastasis, treatments with start and stop dates3456 ptsMedical record received from clinical institution1365 ptsSaliva sample received from pt2124 ptsBlood sample received from pt1114 ptsTumor samples received from clinical institution631 tumor samples from 398 ptsWES from germline complete505 germline samplesWES from tumor (primary and metastatic) samples complete429 tumor samplesRNA-seq from tumor (primary and metastatic) samples complete351 tumor samplesULP-WGS from cfDNA (taken in metastatic setting) complete953 blood samplesWES from circulating tumor DNA (taken in metastatic setting) complete144 blood samples CohortConsented (US & CA)Tumor WES completeTumor RNA-seq completePts diagnosed & lt; 40 yrs of age114615292De novo MBC1207158109Late recurrence ( & gt;5 years after dx)9099141Long term survivors (MBC & gt; 10yrs)163138Resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors70914839NED at time of f/u survey4305445Triple Negative Breast Cancer3304632Patients with 2 or more tumor biopsies/cfDNA samples collected by the MBCproject29810882 Citation Format: Nikhil Wagle, Corrie Painter, Elana Anastasio, Mary McGillicuddy, Esha Jain, Tania G. Hernandez, Brett N. Tomson, Beena Thomas, Daniel Abravanel, Dewey Kim, Sara Balch, Alyssa L. Damon, Shahrayz Shah, Rafael Ramos, Delia Sosa, Ilan Small, Colleen Nguyen, Sarah Winnicki, Taylor Cusher, Parker Chastain, Michael Dunphy, Jorge Gomez Tejeda Zanudo, Netsanet Tsegai, Lauren Sterlin, Ulcha F. Ulysse, Imani Boykin, Oyin Alao, Todd R. Golub. The metastatic breast cancer project: Generating the clinical and genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer through patient-partnered research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-19-01.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Plant Health Progress, Scientific Societies, Vol. 22, No. 4 ( 2021-01-01), p. 483-495
    Abstract: Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill) yield losses as a result of plant diseases were estimated by university and government plant pathologists in 29 soybean producing states in the United States and in Ontario, Canada, from 2015 through 2019. In general, the estimated losses that resulted from each of 28 plant diseases or pathogens varied by state or province as well as year. Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) caused more than twice as much loss as any other disease during the survey period. Seedling diseases (caused by various pathogens), Sclerotinia stem rot (white mold) (caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [Lib.] de Bary), and sudden death syndrome (caused by Fusarium virguliforme O’Donnell & T. Aoki) caused the next greatest yield losses, in descending order. Following SCN, the most damaging diseases in the northern United States and Ontario differed from those in the southern United States. The estimated mean economic loss from all soybean diseases, averaged across the United States and Ontario, Canada was US$45 per acre (US$111 per hectare). The outcome from the current survey will provide pertinent information regarding the important soybean diseases and their overall severity in the soybean crop and help guide future research and Extension efforts on managing soybean diseases.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1535-1025
    Language: English
    Publisher: Scientific Societies
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2115009-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Plant Health Progress, Scientific Societies, Vol. 21, No. 4 ( 2020-01-01), p. 238-247
    Abstract: Annual reductions in corn (Zea mays L.) yield caused by diseases were estimated by university Extension-affiliated plant pathologists in 26 corn-producing states in the United States and in Ontario, Canada, from 2016 through 2019. Estimated loss from each disease varied greatly by state or province and year. Gray leaf spot (caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis Tehon & E.Y. Daniels) caused the greatest estimated yield loss in parts of the northern United States and Ontario in all years except 2019, and Fusarium stalk rot (caused by Fusarium spp.) also greatly reduced yield. Tar spot (caused by Phyllachora maydis Maubl.), a relatively new disease in the United States, was estimated to cause substantial yield loss in 2018 and 2019 in several northern states. Gray leaf spot and southern rust (caused by Puccinia polysora Underw.) caused the most estimated yield losses in the southern United States. Unfavorable wet and delayed harvest conditions in 2018 resulted in an estimated 2.5 billion bushels (63.5 million metric tons) of grain contaminated with mycotoxins. The estimated mean economic loss due to reduced yield caused by corn diseases in the United States and Ontario from 2016 to 2019 was US$55.90 per acre (US$138.13 per hectare). Results from this survey provide scientists, corn breeders, government agencies, and educators with data to help inform and prioritize research, policy, and educational efforts in corn pathology and disease management.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1535-1025
    Language: English
    Publisher: Scientific Societies
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2115009-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Health Expectations, Wiley, Vol. 19, No. 6 ( 2016-12), p. 1277-1289
    Abstract: Migrant and seasonal farmworking (MSFW) women patients experience substantially more intimate partner violence (IPV) than the general population, but few health‐care providers screen patients for IPV. While researchers have examined screening practices in health‐care settings, none have exclusively focused on MSFW women. Objective The aim of this phenomenological study was to explore the experiences of health‐care providers who have screened for and/or addressed IPV with MSFW women patients. Design Researchers utilized descriptive phenomenology to capture the lived experiences of these health‐care providers. Data were analysed using Colaizzi's seven‐stage framework. Setting and participants Interviews were conducted with nine female participants – all of whom: (i) were clinically active health‐care providers within the MSFW community, (ii) were bilingual in English and Spanish or had access to a translator, (iii) had treated MSFW patients who had experienced IPV and (iv) were at least 18 years of age. Results Participants' experiences were reflected in four emergent themes: (i) provider‐centered factors, (ii) patient‐centered factors, (iii) clinic‐centered factors and (iv) community‐centered factors. Participants described barriers to establish routine IPV assessment, decrease patient ambivalence and increase on‐site support and community resources. Discussion and conclusions This study aimed to generate a greater understanding of the experiences of health‐care providers with screening for and addressing IPV with MSFW patients. Implications and recommendations for research, clinical practice and policy are provided.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1369-6513 , 1369-7625
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2006357-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages