Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Language
  • 1
    In: Nature, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 600, No. 7889 ( 2021-12-16), p. 472-477
    Abstract: The genetic make-up of an individual contributes to the susceptibility and response to viral infection. Although environmental, clinical and social factors have a role in the chance of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and the severity of COVID-19 1,2 , host genetics may also be important. Identifying host-specific genetic factors may reveal biological mechanisms of therapeutic relevance and clarify causal relationships of modifiable environmental risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcomes. We formed a global network of researchers to investigate the role of human genetics in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. Here we describe the results of three genome-wide association meta-analyses that consist of up to 49,562 patients with COVID-19 from 46 studies across 19 countries. We report 13 genome-wide significant loci that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe manifestations of COVID-19. Several of these loci correspond to previously documented associations to lung or autoimmune and inflammatory diseases 3–7 . They also represent potentially actionable mechanisms in response to infection. Mendelian randomization analyses support a causal role for smoking and body-mass index for severe COVID-19 although not for type II diabetes. The identification of novel host genetic factors associated with COVID-19 was made possible by the community of human genetics researchers coming together to prioritize the sharing of data, results, resources and analytical frameworks. This working model of international collaboration underscores what is possible for future genetic discoveries in emerging pandemics, or indeed for any complex human disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0028-0836 , 1476-4687
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 120714-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1413423-8
    SSG: 11
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 1956-1956
    Abstract: Achieving a molecular response after imatinib treatment is considered today the gold standard on Ph+ CML therapy. However, only a restrict group of patients is able to achieve a complete molecular response (CMR). Based on a mathematic model, it has been suggested that imatinb reduces the rate at which differentiated cells are produced from leukaemic stem cells, with no significant effect in reduction of Ph+ stem cells (Michor F et al, Nature 2005). So, cure of the disease is still considered to be restricted to allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Clinical data obtained in patients who stop treatment can be of great value in evaluating the degree of suppression of the neoplastic clone. We report 6 cases of patients with CML in complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) who interrupted imatinib treatment. Stop was due in 5 cases to some degree of toxicity whereas one male patient decided to stop for personal reasons. All patients were in chronic phase and previously achieved a CCyR within 12 months after imatinib start; major molecular remission (MMR) was observed in 5 cases, and 4 of them also showed a CMR in at least one occasion. After discontinuation, three patients had a molecular or cytogenetic relapse in a period of 3 to 6 months. In these cases, CMR was never reached, or in one case it was delayed in time, being observed after 3 years of treatment, and not confirmed in all subsequent samples. All patients responded again to imatinib treatment. Three other patients did not relapse and are PCR-negative with a follow-up of 18, 22 and 39 months respectively. One of them received imatinib for cytogenetic relapse after IFN + ARA-C, whereas two patients were treated with Peg-IFN and imatinib front-line; Peg-IFN was stopped for toxicity in both cases. At imatinib stop, they all were in sustained complete molecular remission, as defined by undetectable BCR-ABL transcript at RT- and RQ-PCR both on BM and PB samples, in multiple serial samples. In these three patients, CCyR was reached whithin 3 months of imatinib therapy and CMR was achieved after 1 year, 6 months, and 9 months respectively, and never lost. The median duration of treatment before discontinuation was 45,5 months, while the median time of PCR negativity on imatinib was 39 months. In most reported cases, imatinib discontinuation results in relapse after few months (Cortes J et al, Blood 2004; Michor F et al, Nature 2005; Mauro MJ et al, Leuk Res 2004). However, both time of treatment and duration of molecular response were relatively short in these reports. Recently, 12 patients who stopped treatment when in CMR for more than two years have been published (Rousselot P et al, Blood 2007): 6 of them relapsed early whereas 6 remain in CMR after a median follow-up of 18 months. We describe 3 cases who are persistently PCR-negative after imatinib discontinuation, with a median follow-up of 26 months; all of them were characterized by a rapid clearance of leukemic cells after start of imatinib, which allowed to obtain a stable CMR within the first 12 months of treatment. Less than 5% of early CP patients on imatinib achieve CMR in the first year (Brandford S et al, Blood 2006). These data suggest that kinetics of molecular response achievement may predict prolonged response after imatinib discontinuation, possibly reflecting a decline in leukemic stem cell compartement.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Drug Safety, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 44, No. 12 ( 2021-12), p. 1247-1269
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0114-5916 , 1179-1942
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2023894-0
    SSG: 15,3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Human Molecular Genetics, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 31, No. 22 ( 2022-11-10), p. 3789-3806
    Abstract: Here, we describe the results of a genome-wide study conducted in 11 939 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive cases with an extensive clinical information that were recruited from 34 hospitals across Spain (SCOURGE consortium). In sex-disaggregated genome-wide association studies for COVID-19 hospitalization, genome-wide significance (P  & lt; 5 × 10−8) was crossed for variants in 3p21.31 and 21q22.11 loci only among males (P = 1.3 × 10−22 and P = 8.1 × 10−12, respectively), and for variants in 9q21.32 near TLE1 only among females (P = 4.4 × 10−8). In a second phase, results were combined with an independent Spanish cohort (1598 COVID-19 cases and 1068 population controls), revealing in the overall analysis two novel risk loci in 9p13.3 and 19q13.12, with fine-mapping prioritized variants functionally associated with AQP3 (P = 2.7 × 10−8) and ARHGAP33 (P = 1.3 × 10−8), respectively. The meta-analysis of both phases with four European studies stratified by sex from the Host Genetics Initiative (HGI) confirmed the association of the 3p21.31 and 21q22.11 loci predominantly in males and replicated a recently reported variant in 11p13 (ELF5, P = 4.1 × 10−8). Six of the COVID-19 HGI discovered loci were replicated and an HGI-based genetic risk score predicted the severity strata in SCOURGE. We also found more SNP-heritability and larger heritability differences by age ( & lt;60 or ≥60 years) among males than among females. Parallel genome-wide screening of inbreeding depression in SCOURGE also showed an effect of homozygosity in COVID-19 hospitalization and severity and this effect was stronger among older males. In summary, new candidate genes for COVID-19 severity and evidence supporting genetic disparities among sexes are provided.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0964-6906 , 1460-2083
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1474816-2
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 2592-2592
    Abstract: Consensus has been achieved that standardized molecular quantitative analysis (RQ-PCR) on peripheral blood (PB) is a suitable method for monitoring residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, BM is still obtained at specific timepoints, and in a number of cases, only bone marrow (BM) sample collected for cytogenetic analysis is available. Being one of the laboratory involved in the standardization process of molecular monitoring for CML patients, we decided to perform a comparative analysis of BM and PB samples in order to evaluate the consistency of the results. Methods Between March 2009 and January 2013, 230 consecutive RQ-PCR tests to assess BCR-ABL transcript levels from simultaneously collected PB and BM samples were performed (for a total of 460 analysis) on 77 patients affected by Ph+ CML in chronic phase treated in our center. All samples were analyzed in the same laboratory following international guidelines (Cross N, Leukemia 2012) and results were expressed according to the International Scale; ABL1 was used as control gene. Time from blood-drawn to processing was within 3-4 hours. Results Among the 230 pairs, 3 were considered as not evaluable because of inadequate material; for the purpose of this study, the remaining 227 pairs were considered as “evaluable”. 204 pairs were classified as “fit” when both BM and PB ABL amplification resulted in more than 10.000 copies; 23 pairs were considered unfit for ABL1 〈 10.000 in either one of the two samples (21) or both (2). The mean number of ABL1 copies in all evaluable samples was 35.639 for BM (SD 21.465) and 30.958 for PB samples (SD 18.696). Correlation analysis was performed on the whole population and in 4 subgroups: No Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR, 22%), CCyR without Major Molecular Response (MMR), (21.6%), CCyR with MMR (excluding patients with MR4 or better,19.8%), and CCyR with MR4 – MR4.5 (32,6%). Cytogenetic response was not available in 9 BM samples (4%), not included in the subgroup analysis. Spearman correlation of BCR/ABL ratio values between PB versus BM paired samples resulted in a statistically significant correlation in all groups, both for evaluable and fit pairs. Correlation was stronger in samples that were not in MMR or better (table 1 and figure 1). The Wilcoxon test showed that the mean difference of BCR/ABL values between paired PB and BM samples was not significantly different from zero (in evaluable and fit pairs by considering the whole population). Concordance was further analyzed by the K test which resulted in a coefficient equal to 0.627, corresponding to a notable degree of concordance. For patients in CCyR, agreement on classification of response (MMR, MR4, MR4.5) between paired PB and BM samples was observed in 125/168 evaluable pairs; 22 out of the 43 evaluable cases of disagreement were due to technical failures (in 10 BM and 12 PB samples). In 14 of the remaining 21 cases, PB was more sensitive. Conclusions In a single center experience of molecular analysis, BCR/ABL ratio was highly consistent in BM and PB samples. In less than 10% of the cases a single test did not reach the required sensitivity of 10.000 ABL copies and the double testing allowed to obtain a valid result. This may be especially valuable in evaluating an early response (i.e. at 3 months), when the amount of disease has prognostic relevance. The analysis will be expanded to include samples coming from different centers to evaluate a possible role of timing and transport on data consistency. Disclosures: Saglio: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 1043-1043
    Abstract: Background Imatinib (standard dose, SD, 400mg/d) is standard therapy in CP CML. Several observations suggest that initial therapy with high-dose (HD) imatinib might be more effective. We previously reported that HD imatinib (800mg/d) leads to significantly better rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and complete molecular response (CMR), and improved event-free survival compared to SD. However, HD imatinib is associated with more frequent grade 3–4 hematological toxicity compared to SD. In addition, 36% pts required dose reduction due to toxicities. We investigated the outcome of pts who were maintained on 800mg/d compared to those whose dose was reduced from 800mg/d. Methods Pts enrolled in 3 sequential trials using imatinib for frontline therapy for CP CML were analyzed: 208 treated with HD and 50 with SD. Primary end points were event-free survival (EFS) and transformation-free survival (TFS). Results The median age was 48 years (range 17–84 years). Median follow up was 49 months. 4 year event-free survival (EFS) and transformation-free survival (TFS) were significantly better for pts treated with HD imatinib compared to SD (EFS: 92% vs. 77%, p=0.01; TFS: 98% vs. 89%, p=0.0045). Among pts treated with HD, 100 (48%) had a dose reduction at any time [600mg/d (n=50), 400mg/d (n=38), 300mg/d (n=12)]. Of them, 45 (45%) were dose-reduced after achieving CCyR including 26 (26%) after MMR. The median time to dose reduction was 3 months (range 1–60 months). For pts starting with HD imatinib, there was no difference between pts continuing with HD and those with a dose reduction in terms of EFS at 4 years (92% in both groups, p=0.65) and TFS at 4 years (98% vs. 97%, respectively, p=0.36). However, EFS at 4 years was significantly worse if the dose reduction was done prior to achievement of CCyR (84% vs. 100%, p=0.02). Similarly, patients who were dose-reduced before MMR had significantly worse 4 year EFS (88% vs. 100%, p=0.02). EFS curve for patients who had dose reduction done prior to CCyR was similar to that of pts treated with SD imatinib (p=0.59). Conclusions These results indicate that pts treated with HD imatinib can be safely dose reduced once they have achieved CCyR (preferably MMR) without having any impact on EFS or TFS. Such dose reduction may help decrease side effects as well as cost of the treatment. A prospective evaluation of this approach is warranted.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 1680-1680
    Abstract: Abstract 1680 Background. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the BCR-ABL1 hybrid gene. Different types of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts can be found, but the most frequent are the e13a2 (b2a2) and the e14a2 (b3a2). In the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) era, few data about the prognostic significance of the transcript type in early chronic phase (ECP) CML are available. Three larger studies suggested that the e13a2 transcript may have an adverse prognostic impact in ECP CML patients treated with imatinib (IM): Vega-Ruiz et al. (251 patients, ASH 2007) reported inferior molecular responses; Lucas et al. (71 patients, Haematologica 2009) reported lower cytogenetic response rates and lower event-free survival (EFS); the GIMEMA CML WP (493 patients, EHA 2011) reported a slower time to major molecular response (MMR) with inferior EFS and progression-free survival (PFS). To our knowledge this is the first evaluation of the prognostic influence of the BCR-ABL1 transcript type on the responses and the outcome of ECP CML treated frontline with nilotinib (NIL). Methods. The CML Italian Registry of Nilotinib includes 215 patients treated with NIL-based regimens. The patients were enrolled within 2 multicenter phase II studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00481052 and NCT00769327) or treated at the “S. Orsola-Malpighi” University Hospital (Bologna, Italy), with NIL 300 mg BID or 400 mg BID as initial treatment. All the registered patients were analyzed. Patients expressing rare transcripts and patients with both b2a2 and b3a2 transcripts were excluded: 201 out of 215 patients were evaluable, 81 (40%) with e13a2 transcript and 120 (60%) with e14a2 transcript. Differences between groups were tested using χ2 test, Fisher exact test or t-test, as appropriate. Response monitoring: conventional cytogenetic examination (bone marrow) and QPCR (peripheral blood). Definitions: MMR: BCR-ABLIS ratio 〈 0.1% (International Scale); failures: according to 2009 ELN recommendations; events: failure or treatment discontinuation for any reason. The time-to-response and the outcome were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by log-rank test. Results. The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable (no significant differences in age, Sokal/Hasford/EUTOS score distribution, clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells, NIL dose), except for the percentage of basophils in the peripheral blood, higher in patients with e14a2 transcript (3.4% vs 2.3%, p=0.01). The median observation was 29 months (range 18–47); 92% of the patients had at least 2 year observation. The CCgR and MMR rates at 12 months were comparable in the 2 groups. The time to MMR was longer for patients with e13a2 transcript (6 months vs 3 months, p=0.04), but the overall CCgR rates (93.8 vs 91.7, p=0.79) and the overall MMR rates (85.1 vs 90.0, p=0.38) were not significantly different in patients with e13a2 or e14a2 transcript, respectively. The probability of Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Failure-Free Survival (FFS) were comparable: 91.4% vs 95.8% (p=0.61), 90.7% vs 95.0% (p=0.51), and 90.7% vs 88.7% (p=0.40) in patients with e13a2 and e14a2 transcript, respectively. Conclusions. In our experience, based on 201 early CP CML patients treated frontline with NIL with a minimum follow-up of 18 months, the BCR-ABL transcript type did not show any relevant prognostic impact. The time to MMR was longer in patients with e13a2 transcript, but no response and outcome differences have been observed so far. The number of observed events was low and a longer observation is required. Acknowledgments. European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures: Castagnetti: Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Cavazzini:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Turri:Novartis: Consultancy, Novartis Other; Bristol Myers Squibb: Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb Other, Consultancy. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 5530-5530
    Abstract: Background Dasatinib has been recently licensed for first line treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, very few data are available as to toxicity and efficacy of dasatinib in unselected elderly CML patients. Aim To address this issue, we revised a “real-life” cohort of 43 CML patients in chronic phase aged 〉 65 years treated with frontline dasatinib in 19 Italian Centers from 6/2012 to 6/2014 focusing on toxicity and efficacy data. Methods The main clinical features of the patients at diagnosis were as follows: M/F 20/23 (46.5%/53.5%), median age 75.2 years [interquartile range (IQR) 70.3 – 79.8), median Hb 12.5 g/dl (IQR 11.0 – 13.7), median WBC 57.7 x 109/l (IQR 29.5 – 100.0), median PLTS 466 x 109/l (IQR 249 – 758). According to Sokal risk classification, 3 patients (6.9%) were low risk, 26 (60.4%) intermediate risk, 10 (23.2%) high risk while 4 (9.5%) were not classificable. 20/43 patients (46.5%) had ≥ 2 comorbidities requiring concomitant therapies: according to ECOG scale, performance status at baseline was 0 – 1 in 36 patients (83.7%) and 2 in 7 patients (16.3%). Results Median interval from diagnosis to dasatinib start was 23 days (IQR 14 – 32). Dasatinib starting dose was 140 mg/day in 1 patient (2.3%), 100 mg/day in 33 patients (76.7%) and 〈 100 mg/day in 9 patients (21.0%), respectively. After a median period of treatment of 9.7 months (IQR 4.3 – 17.5) all patients were evaluable for toxicity; on the whole, grade 3 – 4 hematological and extra-hematological toxicities were reported in 4 (9.3%) and 6 (13.9%) patients, respectively. Overall, 7 patients (16.2%) permanently discontinued dasatinib due to toxicity (2 patients in the first 3-month period of treatment and 5 beyond that period). Pleural effusions of all WHO grades occurred in 7 patients (16.2%): in 2 of them the pleural effusion occurred during the first 3-month period of treatment. As to treatment efficacy, 6 patients were considered too early to be evaluated ( 〈 3 months of treatment) and 37 were evaluable for cumulative response; on the whole, 33/37 patients (89.1%) achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and 23/37 (62.1%) also a major molecular response (MMolR). Response to treatment at different time-points is shown on Table.3rd month6th month12th monthNot evaluable: Too early Not performed11651311219190Evaluable323024Discontinuation2 (6.2%)4 (13.3%)6 (25%)Less than CCyR6 (18,7%)2 (6.7%)0CCyR only17 (53.1%)5 (16.6%)4 (16.6%)MMolR7 (21.9%)19 (63.3%)14 (58.4%) Conclusions Present data shows that dasatinib could have a major role in the treatment of unselected patients aged 〉 65 years; indeed, dasatinib seems very effective and has a favourable safety profile also in elderly subjects with comorbidities. Disclosures Latagliata: Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 3617-3617
    Abstract: Introduction Treatment of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) proved to be almost equally effective in young and elderly patients. Three TKIs, imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS) and nilotinib (NIL), are approved for frontline therapy in Italy. Choice of frontline TKI is based on a combined evaluation of patient's characteristics and expectations, with age usually playing a prominent role. However, to date, few data are available on patterns of TKI selection in very elderly patients. Aim To analyse the use of frontline TKI therapy in a large and unselected cohort of very elderly CP-CML patients Methods We retrospectively evaluated 332 patients aged ≥75 year diagnosed from 1/2012 to 12/2019 at 36 Hematology Centres participating at the "Campus CML" project. Results Clinical features at diagnosis for the whole cohort and according to frontline TKI are reported in Table 1. As to frontline TKI, 285 patients (85.8%) received IM and 47 (14.2%) a 2G-TKI (DAS n=28, 59.5%; NIL n=19, 40.5%). Of the 285 IM-treated patients, 192 (67.3%) started with standard dose (400 mg/day) and 93 (32.7%) with a reduced dose (300 mg/day n=64, 22.5%; & lt;300 mg/day n=29, 10.2%). Among the 47 patients starting a 2G-TKIs, 35 (74.4%) received standard dose and 12 (25.6%) a reduced dose (NIL & lt;600 mg/day n=3; DAS 80 mg/day n=4 and 50 mg/day n=5). There were no differences between patients treated with imatinib or 2G-TKI (Table 1); only a previous cerebrovascular event was reported in a significantly higher rate of IM-treated patients. It is however evident that the distinct toxicity profiles of NIL and DAS had an impact on TKI choice as, for example, no patient with diabetes or ischemic heart disease received NIL. Following widespread introduction of generic IM in Italy in early 2018, patients were divided in 2 groups: among 238 patients diagnosed from 2012 to 2017, 198 (83.1%) received IM and 40 (16.9%) a 2G-TKI, while patients diagnosed in 2018-2019 were treated with IM in 87/94 (92.5%) cases and with a 2G-TKI in 7 (7.5%) cases only (p=0.028). Conclusions IM remains the frontline drug of choice in very elderly CML patients, and this trend seems to increase after the introduction of the generic formulation. However, 2G-TKI are used in a small but sizeable group of patients, without a clear correlation with baseline CML features, thus probably reflecting a physician's evaluation of patient's fitness and/or expectation. Efficacy and safety of initial reduced TKIs doses in the setting of very elderly patients warrant further analyses. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Latagliata: Novartis: Honoraria; BMS Cellgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Bonifacio: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Elena: CELGENE: Other: funding for meeting participation; PFIZER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Iurlo: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Sportoletti: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stagno: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; InCyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding. Abruzzese: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages