In:
Haemophilia, Wiley, Vol. 28, No. 3 ( 2022-05), p. 437-444
Abstract:
Data are limited on prostate cancer (PC) management in patients with haemophilia (PWH). Aim To describe PC screening and diagnosis, treatment modalities and bleeding complications in a group of unselected PWH followed at French Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) Patients and methods PC screening, management and bleeding complications were retrospectively investigated at 14 French HTCs between 2003 and 2018. Results Among 〉 1549 〉 50‐year‐old PWHs, 73 (4.7%) underwent PC screening (median age 71.1 years; 67/6 HA/HB, 17/56 severe‐moderate/mild). At diagnosis, haematuria was infrequent. Prophylaxis was administered during 76/86 (88%) prostate biopsies (PB) ( n = 67 clotting factor concentrates, CFC; n = 9 desmopressin; n = 17 associated with tranexamic acid, TA). Bleeding (11/86, 12.8%) occurred mainly post‐prophylaxis (median delay: 7 days): haematuria (9/11, 81.8%), and rectal bleeding (2/11, 18.2%) including one major (1.2%). PC was confirmed in 50/86 PB and in two prostatectomy specimens (total n = 50 patients, n = 6 with only active surveillance). Surgery ( n = 28/44 patients) was managed with CFC. Fifteen patients had radiotherapy/brachytherapy, 10 had hormone therapy; CFC‐based prophylaxis was only prescribed for brachytherapy ( n = 2). Major bleedings occurred in 3/28 (10.7%) and 2/15 (13.3%) patients who underwent surgery and radio/brachytherapy, respectively. No bleeding risk factor was found. Conclusion Our data indicate that PB requires prophylaxis for atleast 7 days, using CFC, desmopressin or TA in function of haemophilia severity. PC surgery should be considered at high bleeding risk. Long‐term post‐procedural CFC or oral TA could be discussed. Radiotherapy/brachytherapy also should be managed with prophylaxis (CFC or TA).
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1351-8216
,
1365-2516
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2006344-1
Bookmarklink