Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Onkologie, S. Karger AG, Vol. 33, No. 11 ( 2010), p. 3-3
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1423-0240 , 0378-584X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1483097-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2749752-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 549601-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 2776-2776
    Abstract: Introduction. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after cytoreductive induction is considered standard of care for younger patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). However, 40% of pts fail to achieve remission to standard cytotoxic regimens obviously necessitating improvement. Bortezomib (Vel) is considered the most potent single agent MM therapy. Bortezomib-containing induction treatments have already been shown to be superior to vincristine, adriamycine, and dexamethasone. Methods. As previously reported, 30 pts were included in the dose finding study to determine the optimum dose of intravenous cyclophosphamide (C) in conjunction with Vel and dexamethasone (D). Here we report on the results of the planned interim analysis with an additional 70 pts up to 60 years of age with untreated MM. They were enrolled between 03/2006 and 03/2008 to receive a maximum of 3 three-week cycles of induction treatment with Vel 1.3 mg/m2 IV d1,4,8,11; D 40 mg/d d1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12; and C 900mg/m2 IV d1 before scheduled ASCT as a consolidation. Primary study objective is response rate (≥ PR) to VelCD before ASCT according to the stringent EBMT criteria. Results. Data from the first consecutively completed 100 pts (mean age, 52 years; 78% stage III) from 22 German centers were analyzed. Molecular cytogenetic analysis was available for 79% with the most frequent cytogenetic abnormalities being 13q− (34%), 17p− (14%) and t[4;14] (8%). All 100 pts (84% of whom completed three cycles) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Overall response rate was 79% with 11% CR and 68% PR + VGPR; only 2 subjects (2%) progressed. Typically VAD induces app. 60% response. Additionally, response by cytogenetic risk group was assessed. Response was documented in 73.5% of the subjects with 13q−, in 100% with t(4;14) and in 57.1% with 17p−. 42 SAEs were reported: 18 pts had a SAE associated with Vel, 17 had a SAE associated with C, and for 10 pts SAE associated with D was established. One patient died due to gastric hemorrhage possibly related to dexamethasone. This is a remarkably low rate of early deaths (1%) in this setting. 53% of the patients experienced grade 3 + 4 AE with leucopenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (6%), neutropenia (5%), anaemia (4%), nausea (3%) and bone pain (3%) being the most frequent. Infections of grade 3 and 4 have been reported in 2% and a low incidence of grade 3 (2%) but no grade 4 paraesthesia occurred while 13% of pts developed peripheral neuropathy (only of grades 1 and 2). Conclusion. This analysis demonstrates Bortezomib combined with D and intravenous C is a highly effective treatment regimen regardless of cytogenetic risk factors for newly diagnosed MM with acceptable toxicity. Given the importance of high-quality response prior to ASCT, VelCD is considered a very active induction regimen. Table 1. Response to study therapy (intent-to-treat set, n=100) Response to VelCD n (%) CR 11 PR + VGPR 68 MR 8 SD 11 PD 2 Table 2. Response by result of cytogenetic analysis (intent-to-treat set, n=100) Responding patients (≥ PR) N % No FISH abnormality 15/17 88.2 13q− 25/34 73.5 t(4;14) 8/8 100 17p− 8/14 57.1 Other 26/29 89.7
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 2775-2775
    Abstract: In myeloma therapy retreatment after successful therapy is frequently considered. Here we present pooled data from a German and Swiss multicenter, retrospective survey (26866138MMY4014). The survey started in Germany and was later extended to Switzerland. German data have already been published before. Here we report on the entire cohort of patients for the first time. For inclusion into this analysis, patients with MM had to have had preceding bortezomib treatment, resulting in at least partial remission and a second therapy with Bortezomib on relapse. The intention of this trial was to provide further evidence of the value of a retreatment with bortezomib, description of predisposing factors and comparison of response quality and remission duration in this predefined patient group of bortezomib responders. Data from 36 centers and 94 patients were available for safety analysis. 34 patients had to be excluded from the efficacy analysis due to major deviations from the inclusion criteria, i.e. concomitant antineoplastic treatment, retreatment with bortezomib not being completed, no response during initial bortezomib treatment or missing information about MM-specific interim therapy. Thus 60 patients were left for the per protocol population (PP). Patients had a mean age of 65.5 years (40–89), 56.4% being male. Patients had received a mean of 3.7 prior therapies for multiple myeloma before initial bortezomib therapy, most frequently melphalan-prednisone (44.7%), dexamethasone (38.3%) and/or vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone (31.9%). Stem cell transplantation was undertaken in 26.6% of the patients. Mean cycle numbers for initial bortezomib therapy and retreatment were 5.8 and 4.5, respectively. The majority of patients (85.1% and 78.7%, respectively) received a bortezomib dose of 1.3 mg/m2. Concomitant dexamethasone therapy was administered to 43.6% and 62.8% of the patients, respectively. Between the initial bortezomib therapy and bortezomib retreatment 13.8% of the patients received other MM-specific interim therapy. The efficacy analysis was based on the PP population and revealed very encouraging responses. Overall response (OR) was defined as complete response (CR), nearly complete response (nCR) and partial response (PR). With a pre-defined OR of 100% for the initial bortezomib therapy, 63% (49.9–75.4%) responded again to retreatment. Best response is summarized in the table below. Subgroup analyses of the rates of clinical benefit (CR, nCR, PR or SD) were performed by treatment free interval (TFI) after initial bortezomib therapy ( & lt;= 6 months versus & gt; 6 months) and by concomitant dexamethasone treatment. In patients with TFI & gt; 6 months a higher rate of clinical benefit (89.7%) could be achieved as compared to TFI & lt;= 6 months (61.9%). Concomitant dexamethasone treatment was associated with a lower rate of clinical benefit (76.5%) than without (84.6%). For 44 patients (46.8%) a total of 125 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were documented. 21 serious ADRs were documented in 11 (11.7%) patients. 30 patients had died at the time of analysis. 2 patients died due to adverse events (pneumonia and pulmonary oedema) assessed as at least possibly related to bortezomib. For one fatal outcome (pneumonia) causality assessment has not been provided. This binational retrospective survey suggests that the safety profile is in line with the current summary of product characteristics of Velcade and that high remission rates and durable TFIs can be achieved by bortezomib retreatment. A TFI & gt; 6 months could be a good clinical marker for a higher rate of clinical benefit. Results of an ongoing prospective trial on bortezomib retreatment are awaited to confirm these results. Initial bortezomib therapy (N=60) Bortezomib retreatment (N=60) * based on n=47 patients responding to bortezomib retreatment. Complete response (CR) 12 (20%) 8 (13.3%) Nearly complete response (nCR) 7 (11.7%) 3 (5%) Partial response (PR) 41 (68.3%) 27 (45%) Stable disease (SD) - (not allowed by selection criteria) 10 (16.7%) Progressive disease (PD) - (not allowed by selection criteria) 12 (20%) Median time to response 3.1 months 3.3 months* Median duration of response 6.9 months 6.1 months* Median treatment free interval 8.6 months 5.7 months
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: ESMO Open, Elsevier BV, Vol. 5, No. 2 ( 2020), p. e000628-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2059-7029
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2844985-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. TPS3180-TPS3180
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. TPS3180-TPS3180
    Abstract: TPS3180 Background: Oncogenic neuregulin 1 ( NRG1) gene fusions occur in ̃0.2% of solid tumors overall and in up to 31% of cases of invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma [Laskin et al. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(12):1693–1703; Cadranel et al. Oncologist. 2021;26(1):7–16]. NRG1 fusion proteins provide an extracellular anchor for the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain of NRG1 to bind to ErbB3 (HER3), leading to HER3 heterodimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways, resulting in oncogenesis. Afatinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor, represents a potential treatment for NRG1-fusion positive ( NRG1+) tumors. This study aims to examine the safety and efficacy of afatinib in patients with NRG1+ solid tumors, for which no authorized targeted therapy exists. Methods: This prospective, decentralized, US study (NCT05107193) will include 40 evaluable patients aged ≥18 years. Participating molecular test providers across the USA will identify eligible fusions in the course of routine diagnostic assays. When a patient with an NRG1 fusion is identified, participating test providers will notify the treating physician of the study as a treatment option for the patient. Patients’ primary oncologists will then contact the trial sponsor to confirm patient eligibility. Once approved by the central Institutional Review Board, patients will receive afatinib on a single-patient protocol basis, until disease progression or treatment is no longer tolerated. The recommended dosage per SmPC is 40 mg orally QD. Patients will be screened and enrolled into the study at their existing point-of-care setting. Inclusion criteria include a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of an advanced, unresectable/metastatic, non-hematologic malignancy with an NRG1 fusion, evaluable per RECIST 1.1. Any coding gene as the NRG1 fusion partner is permitted. Fusion status will be confirmed prospectively by a contracted molecular test provider. Exclusion criteria include prior systemic anti-cancer therapy or investigational drug within 14 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter) of the start of afatinib treatment; an actionable driver mutation other than NRG1 fusion for which FDA-approved targeted therapy is available; and prior treatment with an ErbB-targeted therapy. The primary endpoint of the study is confirmed objective response (OR) by independent central review per RECIST 1.1, defined as best overall response of either complete response or partial response and analysed as the proportion of patients with an OR. The key secondary endpoint is duration of response, defined as the time from the first documented OR to progression or death. Secondary endpoints include time to OR and disease control per investigator assessment. Safety will also be assessed. The study is open for recruitment. Clinical trial information: NCT05107193.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages