In:
Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 2010-2010
Abstract:
Background: Although erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended in clinical guidelines to treat anemia in patients with lower-risk MDS, ESAs are not widely approved for this indication due to a lack of PBO-controlled trials. Aim: To evaluate the use of darbepoetin alfa (DAR) to treat anemia in patients with IPSS low / int-1 risk MDS in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial (EudraCT2009-016522-14, NCT01362140). Methods: Patients, enrolled from 12/2011 to 8/2014 in 9 European countries, had MDS per WHO 2008 criteria with IPSS low/int-1 risk, anemia [hemoglobin (Hb) ≤10 g/dL] , low transfusion burden [ 〈 4 units in 2 consecutive 8-week (wk) periods prior to randomization], no previous treatment with ESAs or biologic-response modifiers, and serum EPO ≤500 mU/mL. Patients were randomized 2:1 to 24 wk of SC DAR 500 µg or PBO every 3 wk (Q3W), stratified by IPSS risk, followed by 48 wk of open-label (OL) DAR (dose frequency could be increased to Q2W during that time), and follow-up to assess survival and AML progression for 3 years (ongoing). The dose was withheld for Hb 〉 12 g/dL and decreased if Hb increased by 〉 1.5 g/dL in 3 wk without transfusions. Key endpoints were transfusion incidence from wk 5-24 and erythroid response (HI-E) per IWG 2006 criteria (≥1.5 g/dL Hb increase from baseline sustained for 8 wk without transfusions). Results: Randomized patients [N = 147, 55% male, all Caucasian, median age 74 (min-max: 28-88) years] had median Hb of 9.3 (min-max: 5.5-10.6) g/dL and median baseline EPO level of 69 (min-max: 4.3-497) mU/mL; 50.7% were IPSS low risk and 49.3% int-1 risk, IPSS-R rates were very low: 10%, low: 61%, intermediate: 23%, and high: 3%, IPSS karyotype rates were good: 91% and intermediate: 9%, and WHO classification was RA: 15%, RARS: 14%, RCMD: 44%, del5q: 9%, RAEB-1: 16%, and MDS-U/unknown: 2%. Completion rates for the 24-wk double-blind portion were DAR: 89% (87/98) and PBO: 80% (39/49). Transfusion incidence from wk 5-24 was significantly reduced with DAR [DAR: 36.1% (35/97) vs. PBO: 59.2% (29/49), p = 0.008] . In the 48-wk OL DAR period, 50.8% (64/126) of patients had transfusions. More DAR patients achieved HI-E in the double-blind period [DAR: 14.7% (11/75 evaluable) vs. PBO: 0% (0/35 evaluable), p = 0.016]. All 11 patients with HI-E had baseline EPO ≤100 mU/mL, 4/11 had a dose withheld for Hb 〉 12 g/dL, and 10/11 had no transfusions in the 16 wk prior to randomization (none had transfusions in the 8 wk prior). In the 48-wk OL DAR period, 34.7% (34/98) of patients achieved HI-E; 11/38 (29%) prior PBO arm, 23/87 (26%) prior DAR arm (10 of the prior DAR had HI-E in the 24-wk portion); 6/34 had transfusions in the 16 wk prior to randomization, 30/34 received Q2W dosing at some point, 30/34 had baseline EPO ≤100 mU/mL, and 26/34 had doses withheld. Improved HI-E and transfusion responses were seen with more favorable status for IPSS-R but not IPSS (Figure). In the 48-wk OL DAR period, dose frequency increased from Q3W to Q2W in 81% (102/126) of patients; doses were held or reduced frequently (Table). Safety results from this trial (Table) were consistent with the previous DAR phase 2 MDS trial (Gabrilove BJH 2008, 142:379-393), with similar AML rates observed in PBO and DAR arms. Conclusion/Summary: In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial in anemic IPSS low/int-1 risk MDS patients, 24 wk of darbepoetin alfa Q3W significantly reduced transfusions and increased HI-E rates with no new safety signals. Most patients met criteria to change to Q2W dosing during the 48-wk OL period, suggesting that Q2W dosing may offer more benefit. The true clinical benefit of darbepoetin alfa may have been underestimated in this trial due to the nature of IWG 2006 HI-E criteria and the trial design (Hb measured Q3W, dose held if Hb 〉 12 g/dL and decreased if Hb increased by 〉 1.5 g/dL); additional ad hoc analyses are underway. Disclosures Platzbecker: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Symeonidis:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Oliva:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; La Jolla: Honoraria; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Goede:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria. Delforge:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria. Mayer:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Badre:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gasal:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0006-4971
,
1528-0020
DOI:
10.1182/blood.V128.22.2010.2010
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Hematology
Publication Date:
2016
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1468538-3
detail.hit.zdb_id:
80069-7
Bookmarklink
