In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 18, No. 5 ( 2023-5-24), p. e0284785-
Abstract:
We describe a process of restitution of nine unethically acquired human skeletons to their families, together with attempts at redress. Between 1925–1927 C.E., the skeletonised remains of nine San or Khoekhoe people, eight of them known-in-life, were removed from their graves on the farm Kruisrivier, near Sutherland in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. They were donated to the Anatomy Department at the University of Cape Town. This was done without the knowledge or permission of their families. The donor was a medical student who removed the remains from the labourers’ cemetery on his family farm. Nearly 100 years later, the remains are being returned to their community, accompanied by a range of community-driven interdisciplinary historical, archaeological and analytical (osteobiographic, craniofacial, ancient DNA, stable isotope) studies to document, as far as possible, their lives and deaths. The restitution process began by contacting families living in the same area with the same surnames as the deceased. The restitution and redress process prioritises the descendant families’ memories, wishes and desire to understand the situation, and learn more about their ancestors. The descendant families have described the process as helping them to reconnect with their ancestors. A richer appreciation of their ancestors’ lives, gained in part from scientific analyses, culminating with reburial, is hoped to aid the descendant families and wider community in [re-]connecting with their heritage and culture, and contribute to restorative justice, reconciliation and healing while confronting a traumatic historical moment. While these nine individuals were exhumed as specimens, they will be reburied as people.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s016
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s017
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s018
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s019
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s020
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s021
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s022
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s023
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s024
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s025
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s026
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s027
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s028
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s029
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s030
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s031
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s032
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s033
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s034
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s035
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s036
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s037
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284785.s038
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Bookmarklink