Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Language
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 31_suppl ( 2013-11-01), p. 228-228
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 31_suppl ( 2013-11-01), p. 228-228
    Abstract: 228 Background: Patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) who are HBsAg+ are at risk of HBV reactivation if rituximab is administered in the absence of antiviral treatment. Recently, it has been reported that patients with so-called “resolved HBV infection”(HBsAg-/cAb+) may also be at risk; however, the degree of risk is not known. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the English and Chinese language literature in Medline (1996 to June week 3 2013) and Embase (1996 to 2013 week 26) using the MeSH terms “lymphoma” and “hepatitis B”. Eligible studies were limited to those reporting primary data on HBV reactivation rates in HBsAg-/cAb+ patients receiving rituximab. We excluded case series with less than 5 patients. Pooled estimates were calculated for HBV reactivation and the impact of HBsAb status on HBV reactivation rate was explored. We also examined reactivation in HBsAg+ patients receiving rituximab by performing a systematic review of the English language literature in PubMed (1997 to June 21, 2013) using the terms “hepatitis B virus”, “reactivation” and “lymphoma”. Results: Data from 550 HBsAg-/cAb+ patients in 12 studies were included. Using a standardized definition of HBV reactivation, (increase in HBV DNA from baseline or HBsAg seroreversion +/- ALT 〉 3 x upper limit of normal), the pooled estimate for the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/cAb+ patients was 8.1% (I 2 = 55%, P = 0.007). Significant heterogeneity was apparent. Exploratory analyses suggested that patients were less likely to reactivate if they were HBsAb+ (OR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.85, P = 0.0285). In HBsAg+ patients we meta-analyzed prospective, controlled studies. Without antiviral prophylaxis, the reactivation rate for HBsAg+ lymphoma patients was 51.0% (I 2 = 0%, P = 0.93). Conclusions: Our meta-analyses confirm that there is a risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/cAb+ patients exposed to rituximab. HBsAb+ patients may be at lower risk than those who are HBsAb-. However, heterogeneity in the risk estimates limits their generalizability. Without prophylaxis, significant reactivation in HBsAg+ patients exists. Large prospective studies are needed to clarify the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/cAb+ patients and to inform decisions about best practice.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2014
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 32, No. 30_suppl ( 2014-10-20), p. 11-11
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 30_suppl ( 2014-10-20), p. 11-11
    Abstract: 11 Background: The seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among Canadian was 0.4%, and 1.6% among immigrants. Most infected individuals have clinically silent disease. Cytotoxic chemotherapy causes reactivation in 30% of the HBV infected patients. This can be severe and fatal, may also lead to interruption of chemotherapy. HBV screening before adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) for breast cancer (BC) seems to be a plausible strategy. Our objective is to estimate the health and economic effects of HBV screening strategies. Methods: We developed a state transition microsimulation model to examine the cost effectiveness of 3 strategies for 55 year old BC patients undergoing ADJ: (1) No screen; (2) Screen Imm: Screen immigrant only and treat; (3) Screen all: Screen all and treat; with antiviral therapies. In the model, health states were constructed to reflect the natural history of BC and HBV. Model data were obtained from published literature. We used a payer perspective, a lifetime time horizon, and used a 5% discount rate. Results: Screen all would prevent 43 severe reactivations (SR), 9 deaths from reactivation (DR), 22 chemotherapy interruptions (CI), 36 decompensated cirrhosis (DC), 48 HCCs, and 67 HBV deaths per 100,000 persons screened over the lifetime of the cohort. Screen Imm would prevent 34 SR, 4 DR, 20 CI, 30 DC, 41 HCCs, and 52 HBV deaths. Screen all was associated with an increase of at least 0.00368 quality adjusted life years (QALY) and cost C$116 more per person, translating to an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of C$31,518-51,276/QALY gained compared with No screen, depends on different antiviral therapies. Screen all was the most cost effective, while Screen Imm was ruled out due to extended dominance (ED) by No Screen and Screen all. Conclusions: HBV screening before ADJ for BC patients would prevent a significant number of reactivations, and is likely be cost effective. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 6592-6592
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 6592-6592
    Abstract: 6592 Background: Patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) who are HBsAg+ are recognized to be at risk of HBV reactivation if rituximab is administered in the absence of antiviral treatment. Recently, it has been reported that patients with so-called “resolved HBV infection”(HBsAg-/cAb+) may also be at risk; however, the degree of risk is not known. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the English and Chinese language literature in Medline (1996 to July week 2 2012) and Embase (1996 to 2012 week 29) using the MeSH terms “lymphoma” and “hepatitis B”. Eligible studies were limited to those reporting primary data on HBV reactivation rates in HBsAg-/cAb+ patients receiving rituximab. We excluded case series with less than 5 patients. Pooled estimates were calculated for HBV reactivation and the impact of HBsAb status on HBV reactivation rate was explored. Results: Data from 445 patients in 12 studies were included. Using a standardized definition of HBV reactivation, (ALT 〉 3 x upper limit of normal AND either an increase in HBV DNA from baseline OR HBsAg seroreversion), the pooled estimate for the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/cAb+ patients was 5.4% (I 2 = 63%, P = 0.009). Significant heterogeneity was apparent. Exploratory analyses suggested that patients were less likely to reactivate if they were HBsAb+ (OR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.85, P = 0.0285). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis confirms that there is a measurable risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/cAb+ patients exposed to rituximab HBsAb+ patients may be at lower risk than those who are HBsAb-. However, heterogeneity in the risk estimates limits their generalizability. Large prospective studies are needed to clarify the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/cAb+ patients and to inform decisions about best practice.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 28_suppl ( 2022-10-01), p. 167-167
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 28_suppl ( 2022-10-01), p. 167-167
    Abstract: 167 Background: In many jurisdictions patients with new hematological cancers, or those receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant or immunosuppressive agents, were prioritized for COVID vaccination due to increased risk of infection and death. In Ontario, Canada those residing in congregate settings, or regions with high positivity rates or high proportions of essential workers were also prioritized. While vaccine inequities exist, it remains unclear whether they persisted amongst the prioritized cancer population. Methods: We undertook a retrospective, population-based study to evaluate factors associated with COVID vaccination in patients residing in Ontario, Canada, 〉 18 years of age, and diagnosed with cancer between 01/2010 and 09/2020. Factors associated with time from vaccine approval to full vaccination (two doses) and third doses were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: The cohort consisted of 356,535 patients; as of 30 January 2022 of which 86.8% had received at least two doses. Compared to patients with more remote diagnoses ( 〉 1 year), newly diagnosed patients rate of vaccination was lower (HR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.88-0.91, p 〈 0.01) and a greater proportion were unvaccinated (13.6% vs 11.8%; p 〈 0.01). Conversely, rate of vaccination was higher in patients treated with systemic therapy in the last 6 months (HR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.03-1.05, p 〈 0.01). Rate of vaccination was 25% lower in recent (HR:0.74,95% CI: 0.72-0.76, p 〈 0.01) and non-recent immigrants (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.79-0.81, p 〈 0.01), and a greater proportion remained unvaccinated, compared to those who were Canadian-born (20.1 and 16.6% vs 10.9%; p 〈 0.01). Compared to the most advantaged quintiles, quintiles with the lowest socioeconomic status (14.5% vs 9.4%; p 〈 0.01), or highest residential instability (13.3% vs 10.8%; p 〈 0.01), material deprivation (10.5% vs 9.6%; p 〈 0.01), or ethnic concentration quintiles (13.7% vs 10.4%; p 〈 0.01) had higher proportions of unvaccinated patients. Rate of vaccination was 20% lower in patients with the lowest socioeconomic status (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81-0.84, p 〈 0.01) and those with highest material deprivation (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.79-0.82, p 〈 0.01) relative to more advantaged groups. Similar trends were observed for receipt of third doses in the eligible cohort. Conclusions: Despite direct government funding of COVID vaccines and distribution policies aimed a prioritizing high-risk populations marginalized patients with cancer were less likely to be vaccinated than other cancer patients. Differences in receipt of vaccination are likely due to the interplay between systemic barriers to access (low trust, transportation barriers, work schedules), and cultural/ social influences impacting uptake. Future efforts should work directly members of high-risk communities to understand how to improve vaccine delivery among these communities.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 7_suppl ( 2016-03-01), p. 138-138
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 7_suppl ( 2016-03-01), p. 138-138
    Abstract: 138 Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) affects over 250 million people worldwide. Most people with chronic HBV (HBsAg positive) have no signs or symptoms of infection. However, when exposed to immunosuppression they are at risk of HBV reactivation which can cause hepatitis, liver failure and death. The risk of HBV reactivation in patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors, the efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis, and the clinical impact of HBV reactivation in this setting are uncertain. Primary Aim: To estimate the risk of clinical HBV reactivation (increased HBV DNA + transaminitis) among HBsAg-positive patients administered chemotherapy for a solid tumor. Secondary Aims: To estimate the efficacy of anti-viral prophylaxis and the risk of death from HBV reactivation in patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the English language literature on HBV reactivation was completed (OVID Medline, 1946 to Aug 2013). All citations were reviewed by two or more authors. Data from patients with hematologic malignancies were excluded. Pooled probabilities of HBV reactivation risk, death from HBV reactivation, and odds ratio for the impact of anti-viral prophylaxis were estimated with a random effects model. Results: 2,667 citations were identified; 19 were eligible for inclusion. The pooled estimate for clinical HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients receiving chemotherapy for a solid tumor was 21.9% (95% CI; 16.5% to 27.3%) in those not receiving anti-viral prophylaxis, and 2.4% (95% CI 0.7% to 4.2%) in those receiving anti-viral prophylaxis. The odds ratio for clinical HBV reactivation with antiviral prophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis was 0.12 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.25). In the absence of viral prophylaxis, the risk of dying from HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive solid tumor patients was estimated at 1.3% with a 95% CI of 0.3% to 2.3%. Conclusions: Patients with chronic HBV who are administered chemotherapy for a solid tumor appear to be at substantial risk of clinical HBV reactivation; this risk may be mitigated by anti-viral prophylaxis. In the absence of anti-viral therapy, patients may experience a small but important risk of dying from HBV reactivation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2014
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 32, No. 15_suppl ( 2014-05-20), p. 6627-6627
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 15_suppl ( 2014-05-20), p. 6627-6627
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 5992-5992
    Abstract: Background: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) both have relatively high curative-potential with contemporary treatment strategies. Despite this, a substantial number of patients will relapse, and a principal objective of follow-up is to identify recurrent disease. The optimal method for detection of relapsed disease has been debated extensively in the literature. Previous guidelines recommended routine surveillance imaging (SI) as a means to detect relapsed disease; however, recent recommendations have de-emphasized routine SI. Nonetheless, controversy remains and approaches vary dramatically across different regions. Aim:We completed a comprehensive systematic review to evaluate whether routine surveillance with computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET) for patients in complete remission following curative intent therapy for HL and/or aggressive NHL identifies more relapses than clinical vigilance strategies, and if it improves progression free (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS). Methods: We searched Medline, [1946 to Oct 18, 2015] andEMBASE [1980 to Oct 18, 2015] for English-language studies assessing one or more surveillance strategies in adult and/or pediatric patients in remission from HL and/or aggressive NHL. Reviews, conference abstracts, case reports, letters, comments, books, and editorials were excluded. Results: Our search identified 8719 potentially relevant titles for review. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts. A total of 120 papers were selected for full text review; of these, thirty-two papers (30 adult, 2 pediatric) were included and four were unavailable for full text review. Twenty-seven retrospective studies, four prospective cohort studies, and one randomized control trial were included. A majority of adult studies (29/30) reported on surveillance strategies in NHL/HL survivors (16/16 NHL, 11/12 HL, 2/2 evaluating both NHL and HL) as well as all pediatric studies (1/1 NHL, 1/1 HL). Almost all studies (15/16 adult NHL, 11/12 adult HL, 2/2 pediatric) reported patient-level data on the number of asymptomatic relapses identified through SI versus clinical signs or symptoms. There were a total of 797 documented relapses in the adult NHL studies and 523 relapses in the adult HL studies. Of the relapsed adult NHL patients, 78.2% (623/797) were diagnosed clinically and 19.6% (156/797) were diagnosed by SI. Among the adult HL patients, 63.1% (330/523) of relapses were diagnosed clinically and 36.5% (191/523) were diagnosed by SI. Of the two pediatric studies included, one NHL study showed that all 3 relapses were detected clinically, and one HL study showed 76.0% (19/25) of relapses were detected clinically or due to lab abnormalities, and 24.0% (6/25) were detected by SI. Fifteen adult studies reported comparative data on PFS and/or OS rates with SI versus clinical surveillance strategies (9 NHL studies, 4 HL studies, 2 NHL/HL studies). The majority of studies (12/15) documented no difference in PFS and/or OS with imaging versus clinical surveillance strategies (8/9 NHL, 3/4 HL, 1/2 NHL/HL). In the remaining three studies, the first demonstrated a significant reduction in risk of death (HR 0.47 for HL, 0.57 for DLBCL) with SI on univariate analysis, but this was not seen on multivariate analysis for DLBCL (data not analyzed for HL). A second study in NHL patients demonstrated a non-significant trend towards improved PFS (p = 0.12) and OS (p = 0.13) with SI, while the third suggested that asymptomatic individuals with HL do not benefit from SI, with the exception of those with a morphological residual mass (p 〈 0.00016, HR = 3.84) or advanced stage (p = 0.03644, HR 1.99). Conclusions: The preliminary analysis of this systematic review indicates that even when routine imaging surveillance is employed, a majority of NHL and HL relapses come to attention due to the development of clinical signs and/or symptoms. A small number of comparative studies have reported on PFS and/or OS, with the vast majority demonstrating no improvement in PFS or OS with routine imaging surveillance. Our study supports clinical vigilance as the predominant strategy for follow-up in asymptomatic patients following curative intent therapy for HL and aggressive NHL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2023
    In:  JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute Vol. 115, No. 2 ( 2023-02-08), p. 146-154
    In: JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 115, No. 2 ( 2023-02-08), p. 146-154
    Abstract: In many jurisdictions, cancer patients were prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination because of increased risk of infection and death. To understand sociodemographic disparities that affected timely receipt of COVID-19 vaccination among cancer patients, we undertook a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. Methods Patients older than 18 years and diagnosed with cancer January 2010 to September 2020 were identified using administrative data; vaccination administration was captured between approval (December 2020) up to February 2022. Factors associated with time to vaccination were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results The cohort consisted of 356 535 patients, the majority of whom had solid tumor cancers (85.9%) and were not on active treatment (74.1%); 86.8% had received at least 2 doses. The rate of vaccination was 25% lower in recent (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 0.76) and nonrecent immigrants (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.81). A greater proportion of unvaccinated patients were from neighborhoods with a high concentration of new immigrants or self-reported members of racialized groups (26.0% vs 21.3%, standardized difference = 0.111, P  & lt; .001), residential instability (27.1% vs 23.0%, standardized difference = 0.094, P  & lt; .001), or material deprivation (22.1% vs 16.8%, standardized difference = 0.134, P  & lt; .001) and low socioeconomic status (20.9% vs 16.0%, standardized difference = 0.041, P  & lt; .001). The rate of vaccination was 20% lower in patients from neighborhoods with the lowest socioeconomic status (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.84) and highest material deprivation (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.81) relative to those in more advantaged neighborhoods. Conclusions Despite funding of vaccines and prioritization of high-risk populations, marginalized patients were less likely to be vaccinated. Differences are likely due to the interplay between systemic barriers to access and cultural or social influences affecting uptake.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-8874 , 1460-2105
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2992-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1465951-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2016
    In:  Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports Vol. 11, No. 4 ( 2016-8), p. 303-310
    In: Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 11, No. 4 ( 2016-8), p. 303-310
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1558-8211 , 1558-822X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2374151-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    MDPI AG ; 2010
    In:  Current Oncology Vol. 17, No. 6 ( 2010-11-01), p. 32-38
    In: Current Oncology, MDPI AG, Vol. 17, No. 6 ( 2010-11-01), p. 32-38
    Abstract: Introduction: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a recognized complication of chemotherapy. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that all patients be screened for the HBV surface antigen (HBSAG) before chemotherapy. We sought to determine the frequency of hbsag testing before chemotherapy at our hospital and to increase the frequency of testing to more than 90% of patients starting chemotherapy. Methods: Using a retrospective electronic chart review, we identified the frequency of HBSAG testing for patients initiated on intravenous chemotherapy at out institution between March 2006 and March 2007. The frequency of left ventricular function testing in the subgroup of patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy was identified as a comparator. An educational intervention was developed and delivered to the multidisciplinary oncology team. The frequency of HBSAG testing was determined post intervention. Qualitative interviews were conducted with the members of the oncology team to identify risk perception and barriers to testing. Results: Of 208 patients started on intravenous chemotherapy between March 2006 and March 2007, only 28 (14%) were tested for HBSAG. All 138 patients scheduled for cardiotoxic chemotherapy (100%) underwent left ventricular function testing. In the post-intervention phase, of 74 patients started on intravenous chemotherapy, 24 (31%) underwent HBSAG testing, with 1 patient testing positive. Conclusions: The frequency of testing for HBSAG before chemotherapy was very low at our institution. An educational intervention resulted in only a modest improvement. Potential barriers to routine screening include lack of awareness about existing guidelines, controversy about the evidence that supports HBSAG testing guidelines, and a perception by physicians that HBV reactivation does not occur with solid tumours.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1718-7729
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2270777-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages