Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Neuro-Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 23, No. Supplement_6 ( 2021-11-12), p. vi69-vi69
    Abstract: Ruxolitinib is a novel, potent, selective inhibitor of JAK1 (Janus kinase 1) and JAK2 with modest to marked selectivity against TYK2 (tyrosine kinase 2) and JAK3. Ruxolitinib interferes with the signaling of a number of cytokines and growth factors that are important for hematopoiesis and immune function. JAK signaling involves recruitment of signal transducers and activators of transcription to cytokine receptors, activation, and subsequent localization of STATs to the nucleus leading to modulation of gene expression. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with MGMT not hypermethylated, Glioblastoma or grade III glioma were recruited to Arm 1. Every patient received ruxolitinib and 60 Gy radiation for 6 weeks (2Gy x 30). The dose of Ruxolitinib was administered given the 3 + 3 design. Level 1 or starting dose was 10 mg twice daily, level 2 was 15 mg twice daily, level 3 was 20 mg twice daily. Patients with MGMT hypermethylated glioblastoma or grade III glioma were eligible for Arm 2. Every patient received ruxolitinib + radiation x 60 Gy + daily temozolomide at 75 mg/m2 for 6 weeks. RESULTS 45 patients had survival data, 25 patients were in Arm I and 20 arm in II. The median OS and PFS were 18.2 (95% CI: 3.6-NA) months for Arm 1 and were not reached for Arm 2. OS and PFS Rate at 1 year was 61% (95% CI: 43-85%) and 51% (35-76%) for Arm 1, and 95% (85-100%) for Arm 2 (p=0.01 and p= 0.002), respectively. 9 patients had partial response, 16 patients were stable, and 28 patients had progression. CONCLUSION Patients that received ruxolitinib + radiation x 60 Gy + daily temozolomide at 75 mg/m2 for 6 weeks over 6 weeks (Arm 2) had significantly better PFS and OS than those that received ruxolitinib + radiation x 60 Gy alone..
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1522-8517 , 1523-5866
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2094060-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 2060-2060
    Abstract: 2060 Background: Ruxolitinib is a novel, potent, and selective inhibitor of JAK1 (Janus kinase 1) and JAK2 with modest to marked selectivity against TYK2 (tyrosine kinase 2) and JAK3, respectively. Ruxolitinib interferes with the signaling of a number of cytokines and growth factors that are important for hematopoiesis and immune function. JAK signaling involves recruitment of signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) to cytokine receptors, activation, and subsequent localization of STATs to the nucleus leading to modulation of gene expression. Dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway has been associated with several types of cancer and increased proliferation and survival of malignant cells. Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with unmethylated MGMT Glioblastoma or grade III glioma were recruited to Arm 1. Every patient received ruxolitinib and 60 Gy radiation for 6 weeks over 6 weeks (2Gy x 30). The dose of Ruxolitinib was administered given the 3+3 design. Level 1 or starting dose was 10 mg twice daily, level 2 was 15 mg twice daily, level 3 was 20 mg twice daily and level -1 was 5 mg twice daily. Arm 2 was started once safe dose was established for Arm 1 for each dose level. Patients with methylated MGMT glioblastoma or grade III glioma were eligible for Arm 2. Every patient received ruxolitinib + radiation x 60 Gy + daily temozolomide at 75 mg/m2 for 6 weeks over 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimate by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank test. Results: 45 patients had survival data, 25 patients were Arm I and 20 arm II. The median OS and PFS were 18.2 (95% CI: 3.6-NA) months for Arm 1 and were not reached for Arm 2. OS and PFS Rate at 1 year was 61% (95% CI: 43-85%) and 51% (35-76%) for Arm 1, and 95% (85-100%) for Arm 2 (p = 0.01 and p = 0.002), respectively. Conclusions: Patients that received ruxolitinib + radiation x 60 Gy + daily temozolomide at 75 mg/m2 for 6 weeks over 6 weeks (Arm 2) had significantly better PFS and OS than those that received ruxolitinib + radiation x 60 Gy alone. Clinical trial information: NCT03514069.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Neuro-Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 22, No. Supplement_2 ( 2020-11-09), p. ii51-ii51
    Abstract: Ruxolitinib is a novel, potent, and selective inhibitor of JAK1 (Janus kinase 1) and JAK2 with modest to marked selectivity against TYK2 (tyrosine kinase 2) and JAK3, respectively. Dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway has been associated with several types of cancer and increased proliferation and survival of malignant cells. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with unmethylated MGMT Glioblastoma or grade III glioma were recruited to Arm I. Every patient received ruxolitinib and 60 Gy radiation for 6 weeks over 6 weeks (2Gy x 30). The dose of Ruxolitinib was administered given the 3 + 3 design. Level 1 or starting dose was 10 mg twice daily, level 2 was 15 mg twice daily, level 3 was 20 mg twice daily and level -1 was 5 mg twice daily. Arm two was started once safe dose was established for Arm 1 for each dose level. Patients with methylated MGMT glioblastoma or grade III glioma were eligible for Arm 2. Every patient received ruxolitinib + radiation x 60 Gy + daily temozolomide at 75 mg/m2 for 6 weeks over 6 weeks. RESULTS 30 patients were randomized to Arm I and 16 to arm II. There was one partial response in the methylated Arm and one partial response in the unmethylated arm. The maximum tolerated dose of Ruxolitinib was 20 mg BID in both methylated and unmethylated arm. There were 14 incidences of Grade 3 toxicity including respiratory distress, seizure, gait disturbance, weakness, thrombocytopenia, cognitive disturbance, urinary retention, and bacterial meningitis. There were 4 incidences of Grade 4 toxicity including seizure, respiratory distress, somnolence and thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION This is an ongoing clinical trial and final results will be presented once the trial is complete. We will perform single cell sequencing on good and poor responders, that data will be presented in the meeting.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1522-8517 , 1523-5866
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2094060-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages