In:
Annals of Plastic Surgery, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 85, No. 6 ( 2020-12), p. e59-e65
Abstract:
To evaluate the cosmetic result of using incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) compared with standard postsurgical dressings in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery (CD). Methods Postcesarean scars were objectively evaluated 6 and 12 months postsurgery by a plastic surgeon using the Manchester Scar Scale and the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. Subjective scar evaluation and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale and the EQ-5D-5L instrument, respectively. Main outcome measures were the cosmetic and functional outcome of treating a standardized surgical wound with iNPWT compared with standard dressings, changes in scar rating over time, and testing different scar scales for cosmetic evaluation. Results The study found no difference in long-term cosmetic outcomes between iNPWT and standard dressings. The study demonstrated a statistically significant positive change in scar rating from surgery to 12 months postsurgery. A strong association was found between the scar scales with a high correlation between the objective scar scales ( R approximately 0.80) and a moderate correlation between the subjective scale and each objective scale ( R approximately 0.50). Conclusions Prophylactic iNPWT has been found to reduce the risk of surgical site infection following CD. Conversely, this study was not able to detect a difference in the long-term cosmetic result after CD when compared with standard dressings.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1536-3708
,
0148-7043
DOI:
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002468
Language:
English
Publisher:
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2063013-X
Bookmarklink