Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Oncology, S. Karger AG, Vol. 60, No. 4 ( 2001), p. 303-307
    Abstract: 〈 i 〉 Background: 〈 /i 〉 This phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with an anthracycline- or anthracenedione-containing regimen as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. 〈 i 〉 Patients and Methods: 〈 /i 〉 Forty-seven patients with MBC were enrolled in five French centers. Patients were eligible if they had received one prior chemotherapy regimen with an anthracycline or anthracenedione for metastatic disease, if they had responded to that prior regimen, and if they had relapsed at least 6 months after the first response. Fifteen patients received more than one prior anthracycline regimen; thus, gemcitabine was third-line therapy for 30% of patients. Gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m 〈 sup 〉 2 〈 /sup 〉 was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for a maximum of eight cycles after the best response was obtained. 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 Objective responses were seen in 12 of 41 assessable patients (4 complete responses and 8 partial responses), for an objective response rate of 29% (95% confidence interval, 16–46%). The median response duration was 8.1 months (range: 2.5–27.4 months). Serious hematological toxicity was minimal, with grade 4 neutropenia in 2% of the patients (no neutropenic fever), grade 3 neutropenia in 28% of the patients, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 6% of the patients. Among the nonhematological toxicities, asthenia was the most common. 〈 i 〉 Conclusions: 〈 /i 〉 Gemcitabine given at this dose and schedule is a well-tolerated treatment with definitive antitumor activity in pretreated MBC patients. This result warrants future exploration of the use of gemcitabine as a single agent and in combination in patients with MBC.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0030-2414 , 1423-0232
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1483096-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 250101-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 17, No. 6 ( 1999-06), p. 1751-1751
    Abstract: PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of ≤2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m 2 for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m 2 for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m 2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m 2 in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m 2 plus irinotecan 250 mg/m 2 in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m 2 . At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 1999
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages