Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 59, No. 10 ( 2006-10), p. 1056.e1-1056.e4

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0895-4356

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.016

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2006

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500490-9

In: Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 117, No. 12 ( 2017), p. 2415-2424

Abstract: Background The perioperative management of patients who take a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation and require treatment interruption for an elective surgery/procedure is a common clinical scenario for which best practices are uncertain. The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) study is designed to address this unmet clinical need. We discuss the rationale for the PAUSE design and analysis plan as well as the rationale supporting the perioperative DOAC protocol. Methods PAUSE is a prospective study with three parallel cohorts, one for each DOAC, to assess a standardized but patient-specific perioperative management protocol for DOAC-treated patients with atrial fibrillation. The perioperative protocol accounts for DOAC type, patient's renal function and surgery/procedure-related bleeding risk. The primary study aim is to demonstrate the safety of the PAUSE protocol for the perioperative management of each DOAC. The secondary aim is to determine the effect of the pre-procedure interruption on residual anticoagulation when measured by the dilute thrombin time for dabigatran and anti-factor Xa levels for rivaroxaban and apixaban. The study hypothesis is that the perioperative management protocol for each DOAC is safe for patient care, defined by expected risks for major bleeding of 1% (80% power to exclude 2%), and for arterial thromboembolism of 0.5% (80% power to exclude 1.5%) in each DOAC group. Conclusion The PAUSE study has the potential to establish a standard-of-care approach for the perioperative management of DOAC-treated patients. The PAUSE management protocol is designed to be easily applied in clinical practice, as it is standardized and also patient specific.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0340-6245 , 2567-689X

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1160/TH17-08-0553

Language: English

Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Publication Date: 2017

In: Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 119, No. 03 ( 2019-03), p. 500-507

Abstract: Background The Bridging ITP Trial is an open-label randomized trial designed to compare the oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag and intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) for patients with immune thrombocytopaenia (ITP) who require an increase in platelet count before elective surgery. Here, we report the study methods and rationale. Methods We designed a multi-centre, non-inferiority randomized trial comparing daily oral eltrombopag starting 3 weeks pre-operatively, and IVIG administered 1 week pre-operatively for patients with ITP requiring a platelet count increase prior to surgery. Starting dose of eltrombopag is 50 mg daily with a weekly pre-operative dose titration schedule, and treatment is continued for 1 week after surgical haemostasis is achieved. IVIG is administered at a dose of 1 to 2 g/kg 1 week pre-operatively with the allowance for a second dose within 1 week after surgical haemostasis. The objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of eltrombopag for the primary endpoint of achieving the pre-operative platelet count threshold (50 × 109/L for minor surgery; or 100 × 109/L for major surgery) and sustaining platelet count levels above the threshold for 1 week after surgical haemostasis is achieved, without the use of rescue treatment. Secondary endpoints include thrombosis, bleeding and patient satisfaction. Conclusion The Bridging ITP Trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag as an alternative to IVIG in the peri-operative setting for patients with ITP. The protocol was designed to provide a management strategy that can be applied in clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01621204.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0340-6245 , 2567-689X

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677531

Language: English

Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Publication Date: 2019

In: Thrombosis Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 222 ( 2023-02), p. 31-39

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0049-3848

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.11.016

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500780-7

In: Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 92, No. 12 ( 2004), p. 1312-1319

Abstract: Although antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are associated with thrombosis, it is not known who with aPL is at higher risk for thrombosis. It was the aim of this cross-sectional study to investigate how thrombophilic factors contribute to venous or arterial thrombosis in aPL-positive individuals. In outpatient test centres at two tertiary care hospitals, two hundred and eight (208) persons requiring aPL testing were matched by age, gender and centre to 208 persons requiring a complete blood count. Persons were classified as aPL-positive (having anticardiolipin, lupus anticoagulant and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies) or aPL-negative. Several thrombophilic factors were studied using logistic regression modelling. Results showed that the aPL-positive group had three-fold more events (37%) than the aPL-negative group (12%). In unadjusted analyses, clinically important associations were observed between factor V Leiden and venous thrombosis, hyperhomocysteinemia and arterial thrombosis, and activated protein C resistance (APCR) and venous thrombosis (OR, 95% CI = 4.00, 1.35-11.91; 4.79, 2.03-11.33; and 2.03, 1.03-3.97, respectively). After adjusting for recruitment group, persons with both APCR and aPL had a three-fold greater risk (OR, 95% CI = 3.31, 1.30-8.41) for venous thrombosis than those with neither APCR nor aPL. Similarly, after adjusting for hypertension, family history of cardiovascular disease, gender and recruitment group, persons with both hyperhomocysteinemia and aPL had a five-fold increased risk (OR, 95% CI = 4.90, 1.37-17.37) for arterial thrombosis compared to those with neither risk factor. In conclusion, APCR phenotype and hyperhomocysteinemia are associated with a higher risk of venous and arterial thrombosis, respectively, in the presence of aPL.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0340-6245 , 2567-689X

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1160/TH04-03-0138

Language: English

Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Publication Date: 2004

In: Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 101, No. 01 ( 2009), p. 100-107

Abstract: Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are associated with vascular events, but the magnitude of this risk, alone, or in combination with other atherogenic and thrombophilic risk factors, remains unclear. A prospective cohort of 415 persons was studied for arterial and venous events (AE and VE) over a median time of 7.4 years. aPL and coagulation abnormalities were measured upon beginning of the study and annually for the first four years. Within the cohort, a nested case-control study was conducted to investigate the role of endothelial and inflammatory markers in predicting new vascular events. Forty-five individuals had new vascular events: 18 occurred during the first year of follow-up. The proportion of event-free survivors at eight years was 90% (95%CI = 87%, 94%) for aPL-negative and 72% (60%, 85%) for aPL-positive individuals, respectively. Predictors for new AE were previous AE (HR=5.7 [2.7, 12.0]), diabetes (5.6 [2.4, 13.2] ), aPL positivity (2.6 ([1.2, 5.9]), and age (1.04 [1.01, 1.07] ). New VE were predicted by previous VE (6.1 [1.9, 19.9]), anti-β2-glyco-protein I (aβ2GPI) positivity (5.8 [1.4, 24.1] ), activated protein C resistance (APCR) (4.1 [1.1, 15.1]), and gender (3.7 [1.1, 12.9] ). In the nested case-control study, similar predictors were observed for AE, while abnormal APCR (OR=5.5 [1.1, 26.6]) and elevated von Willebrand factor (vWF) (OR=5.0 [1.2, 19.8] ) best predicted VE. We demonstrate that aPL independently predict new vascular events and discriminate between individuals with and without events in the first two years of follow-up, indicating that aPL are associated with a short-term risk of developing new and recurrent vascular events.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0340-6245 , 2567-689X

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1160/TH08-06-0384

Language: English

Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Publication Date: 2009

In: The Lancet Haematology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 4, No. 11 ( 2017-11), p. e534-e543

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2352-3026

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30168-0

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2017

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. LBA-5-LBA-5

Abstract: Introduction: The perioperative management of patients who are taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and require an elective surgery/procedure is uncertain. No studies have addressed the timing of perioperative DOAC interruption and resumption, and if perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing are needed. The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study hypothesized that a simple, standardized perioperative management strategy, based on DOAC-specific interruption and resumption intervals, that foregoes perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing, is safe for patient care, with associated low rates of major bleeding (1%) and arterial thromboembolism (0.5%). We postulated that this management yields a high proportion of patients ( 〉 90%) with a minimal to no DOAC level at surgery/procedure. Methods: PAUSE is a prospective study with 3 parallel DOAC cohorts of patients with AF taking apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban and requiring anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure. Patients were managed using a standardized protocol based on DOAC pharmacokinetic properties, procedure-associated bleeding risk (Appendix 1) and creatinine clearance (CrCl). DOACs were interrupted for 1 day before and after surgery for a low bleed risk surgery and 2 days before and after a high bleed surgery; longer interruption was done in patients on dabigatran with a CrCl 〈 50 mL/min (Figure 1). A blood sample was obtained just before the procedure to measure residual DOAC levels (Appendix 2). Heparin bridging and preoperative coagulation testing were not used to manage patients. Patient follow-up occurred weekly for 30 days post-procedure for the primary clinical outcomes of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism (Appendix 3). The incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of clinical outcomes was determined for each DOAC cohort using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (interrupted at least 1 DOAC dose) and per-protocol analysis (adhering to DOAC interruption and resumption protocol). Results: We enrolled 3007 patients from 23 sites in Canada, the U.S. and Europe (Appendix 4). The patient characteristics were (Figure 2): mean age 72.5 years; 66.1% male; 33.5% high bleeding risk surgery/procedure, with 1257 patients in the apixaban cohort, 668 in the dabigatran cohort and 1082 in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 1). DOAC interruption and resumption intervals are shown in Table 2. The 30-day postoperative rate (95% CI) of major bleeding was 1.35% (0-2.00) in the apixaban cohort, 0.90% (0-1.73) in the dabigatran cohort and 1.85% (0-2.65) in the rivaroxaban cohort; the rate (95% CI) of arterial thromboembolism was 0.16% (0-0.48) in the apixaban cohort, 0.6% (0-1.33) in the dabigatran cohort and 0.37% (0-0.82) in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 3). There were 2541 (84.5%) patients with preoperative DOAC levels measured: a level 〈 50 ng/ml occurred in 90.5% of patients in the apixaban cohort, in 95.1% of the dabigatran cohort and in 96.8% of the rivaroxaban cohort. Of 1007 patients having a high bleeding risk procedure, 832 (82.6%) had DOAC levels measured: 98.8% had a level 〈 50 ng/mL (Table 4). Rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism in the per protocol analysis were comparable to those of the ITT analysis (Table 5). Conclusions: In patients with AF who were taking a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) and required anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure, using a standardized DOAC-specific perioperative management strategy was safe for patient care, with associated low rates of perioperative MB ( 〈 2%) and ATE ( 〈 1%). Further, a high proportion of patients ( 〉 90% overall; 98.8% at high bleeding risk) had a minimal or no residual DOAC level at the time of the surgery/procedure. PAUSE is the largest study, to date, that addresses how to manage the common problem of perioperative DOAC management. It is likely to have a practice-changing impact and will inform future practice guidelines in perioperative care. Study Funding: CIHR (313156) and the H & S Foundation of Canada (G-14-0006136). Aniara-Hyphen Biomed (assays). Acknowledgments: We thank Drs. Walter Ageno, David Garcia, Lehana Thabane, Wendt Lim, Lori Linkins, William Ristevski, and Demetrios J. Sahlas. Also, Kayla Lucier, Grace Wang, Tara McDougall, and HRLMP and CRLB. Supported by CanVector and REDCap. Disclosures Douketis: Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Biotie: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; The Medicines Company: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Astra-Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board; Portola: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board. Spyropoulos:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy. Carrier:Bayer: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vanassche:Bayer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; BMS/Pfizer: Consultancy. Verhamme:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medtronic: Honoraria; Portola: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shivakumar:Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria. Gross:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Lee:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Le Templier:BMS-pfizer: Honoraria. Wu:Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS-Pfizer: Honoraria. Coppens:Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Other: non-financial support, Research Funding; Uniqure BV: Research Funding. Arnold:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Caprini:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recovery Force: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen R & D: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Summer:Octapharma: Honoraria. Schulman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-120770

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 2201-2201

Abstract: Autologous transplantation for acute leukemia is complicated by an elevated risk of leukemia relapse. Effective purging of stem cell grafts along with dose-intensive consolidation may be beneficial to patients who are ineligible for allogeneic transplantation. In pre-clinical studies, the photosensitizing agent benzoporphyrin derivative-monoacid A (BPD-MA) (QLT, Vancouver, Canada) demonstrated the ability to selectively target leukemia cells, generating fluorescence levels 2- to 20-fold higher on these cells than on normal cells. When exposed to light, BPD-MA induced in vitro photodynamic killing that was drug-dose, light-dose and cell-density dependent. This agent eliminated 3 to 6 logs of leukemia cell lines among normal hematopoietic cells as evaluated using in vitro limiting dilution assays and in vivo infusion of such treated grafts in murine recipients. In contrast, BPD-MA used in the same conditions was toxic to only one log of normal hematopoietic progenitors. These impressive results prompted us to perform a clinical Phase I trial to address the feasibility and safety of BPD-MA photodynamic therapy (PDT) for purging of marrow grafts prior to autologous transplantation in patients with high risk acute leukemia. Patients with acute leukemia in second or subsequent complete remission (CR), or with initial refractory disease were eligible. We evaluated 11 patients (6 female) with relapsed (n=10) or refractory (n=1) acute leukemia (acute myeloid leukemia = 10 pts; acute lymphoblastic leukemia = 1 pt) who were ineligible for allogeneic transplantation due to lack of an appropriate donor (8 patients) or age 〉 55 (3 patients). Median age at transplant was 44 years (range 17–63). All patients were transplanted with marrow grafts harvested immediately before the transplant and exposed to increasing doses of BPD-MA (10, 20 and 25 ng/ml) under a constant light dose (15 joules/cm2). Photodynamic treatment reduced mononuclear cell number by 28 ± 4.9%. Hematopoietic precursors in the graft were decreased by 59–81% (CFU-GM: 10.3 to 4.2x104/kg, p=0.018; BFU-E: 6.0 to 2.1x104/kg, p=0.007; and CFU-GEMM: 2.0 to 0.4x103/kg, p=0.015). Patients received busulphan (16 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg) as myeloablative conditioning followed by infusion of the PDT treated stem cell graft. Median time to neutrophil ( 〉 0.5 x 109/l) and platelet engraftment ( 〉 20 x 109/l) was 27 days (range 17–68) and 81 days (51–224), respectively. Failure to engraft with neutrophils ( 〉 0.5 x 109/l) on day 40 occurred in 2 patients at 25 ng/ml BPD-MA, and maximum tolerated PDT dose was defined as 20 ng/ml BPD-MA. There was no procedure-related mortality, we observed usual rates of infectious complications, and non-hematologic toxicity was not identified. The estimated 5-year overall and disease-free survival is identical at 36 ± 14% with 4 patients alive in CR 41 to 91 months (median, 60 months) after transplantation. These results show that marrow purging with BPD-MA allows hematopoietic engraftment and adds no significant toxicity to the transplant procedure. The long-term follow-up in our study indicates that autologous marrow transplantation with photodynamic purging using BPD-MA is feasible and associated with encouraging rates of disease-free survival for patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V106.11.2201.2201

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2005

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 393-393

Abstract: Abstract 393 Background: The post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a burdensome, costly complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Investigating strategies to prevent PTS is important, as treatments for PTS are limited. To date, randomized trials of elastic compression stockings (ECS) to prevent PTS were small, single-center, none used a placebo control and results are conflicting. Objective: To determine whether ECS, compared with inactive (placebo) stockings, are effective to prevent PTS in patients with proximal DVT. Methods: We conducted a multicenter (24 centres, Canada and U.S.) randomized placebo controlled trial of active ECS (A-ECS) vs. placebo ECS (P-ECS) to prevent PTS after a first, symptomatic proximal DVT. A-ECS were knee length 30–40 mm Hg (Class II) graduated ECS. P-ECS were manufactured to look identical to A-ECS but lacked therapeutic compression. Stockings were mailed directly to patients and worn on the DVT-affected leg daily for up to 2 years. Patients did not wear their stockings at study follow-up visits (1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) to maintain study personnel blinding. The primary study outcome, PTS, was diagnosed at or after the 6 month visit using the Ginsberg measure (leg pain and swelling of 3 1 month duration and typical in character: worse end of day or after prolonged sitting/standing and improved after rest/leg elevation). All PTS diagnoses were confirmed by the local study physicians. Secondary outcomes were incidence and severity of PTS using the Villalta scale, venous ulcers, VTE recurrence and death from VTE. A sample size of 800 patients was targeted based on a hypothesized cumulative incidence of the primary outcome of 30% in P-ECS vs. 20% in A-ECS, 2-tailed a of 0.05 and 80% power, and anticipated 25% rate of death/withdrawal/lost-to-follow-up. Using a modified intent to treat approach, we performed a time-to-event analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for center to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare rates of the primary outcome in A-ECS vs. P-ECS. A similar time-to-event analysis was performed for Villalta PTS (Villalta score ≥ 5 at or after the 6 month visit). Results: From 2004–2010, 398 patients were randomized to A-ECS and 408 to P-ECS. 3 patients found to be ineligible soon after randomization were excluded from the analysis. Median time from DVT diagnosis to randomization was 4 days. Baseline features were similar in the 2 groups; overall, 60% were male, mean age was 55 years, and most proximal extent of DVT was iliac or femoral vein in 70% and popliteal vein in 30% of patients. The cumulative incidence of PTS (primary outcome) by 750 days was 14.8% in A-ECS vs. 12.3% in P-ECS (Figure) (HRadj 1.17; 95% CI 0.75–1.81; p=0.49). The cumulative incidence of Villalta PTS (secondary outcome) was 52.1% in A-ECS vs. 52.2% in P-ECS (HRadj 0.96; 95% CI 0.78–1.19; p=0.69). Additional outcomes were also similar in the two intervention groups (Table). Rates of loss to follow-up (5.5% vs. 5.4%) and withdrawal (8.3% vs. 9.1%) were similar in A-ECS and P-ECS. Overall, ∼70% of patients in both groups continued the intervention throughout study follow-up, and of these, 〉 80% of patients in both groups reported use for ≥ 3 days per week. Conclusions: In a large randomized placebo-controlled trial, ECS did not prevent the occurrence of PTS after a first proximal DVT and did not influence the severity of PTS or rate of recurrent VTE. The reported benefits of ECS to prevent PTS in some prior studies could be due, at least in part, to bias from open-label design. Whether ECS may be of benefit to manage symptoms of established PTS should be evaluated in future studies. Disclosures: Kahn: NIH: Research Funding; Canadian Institutes for Health Research: Research Funding; Sigvaris: Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V120.21.393.393

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2012

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7