Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Elsevier BV, Vol. 98, No. 3 ( 2023-03), p. 451-457
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0025-6196
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2052617-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 22, No. 12_Supplement ( 2023-12-01), p. A111-A111
    Abstract: KRAS is the most frequently mutated gene in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Over the past decade, targeting KRAS has emerged as a promising approach for PDAC treatment. However, the associations between KRAS mutations status and comutation landscape with clinical outcomes remain understudied. We investigated the impact of KRAS mutant allelic status and genomic co-mutations with clinical outcomes. 803 patients with PDAC who underwent CLIA somatic tumor mutation testing at MDACC from 1997 to 2023 were identified after an IRB approval. Tumor genomic alterations, demographics, clinical, molecular, and pathological data were extracted from electronic medical records and tumor registry through the Palantir Foundry platform. An external cohort from PanCAN’s Know Your Tumor® dataset with 408 patients served as the validation cohort. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Pearson’s chi-squared tests (or Fisher’s exact tests) were used to determine the association between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median OS. 703 patients had KRAS gene included in the mutation testing at MDACC from 1997 to 2023. KRAS was the top mutated gene (82%), followed by TP53 (69%), then CDKN2A (20%). In KRAS mutant patients, G12D was the most common variant (39%), followed by G12V (31%), then G12R (14%), and Q61 (6%). In patients tested with multi-gene panels, a co-mutation analysis revealed that the most common co-occurring mutations with KRAS mutation was TP53 (75%), followed by CDKN2A (22%), SMAD4 (14%) and ARID1A (10%). The median follow-up was 41 months and median OS was 19 months in the overall population. KRAS mutation status and subtypes was prognostic of OS (p & lt;0.001). Patients with KRAS wildtype had median OS of 38 months and KRASG12R had median OS of 34 months (HR:1.0, 95% CI 0.71-1.5, p=0.88), while patients with KRASQ61 had worst median OS of 20 months (HR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0, p=0.006) and KRASG12D had median OS of 22 months (HR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.3, p & lt;0.001). Similar findings were observed in patients with stage IV disease (n=302),  KRASG12D  remained associated with significantly worse OS (HR= 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.009). There was a significant enrichment of KRASG12D mutation in metastatic disease compared to localized disease (stage I-III) (OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p=0.001) and enrichment of KRASG12R mutation in well and moderately differentiated tumors versus poorly differentiated tumors (OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.05-2.99, p=0.04). In the external cohort (PanCAN’s Know Your Tumor® dataset), similar findings were observed. KRASG12R was associated with longer median OS (32 months), while KRASQ61 (16 months, HR: 2.6, 95% CI 0.88-7.8, p=0.02) and KRASG12D (23 months, HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.06-2.65, p=0.04) were associated with significantly worse median OS. Allele specific associations of KRAS mutation with clinical outcomes were identified in PDAC. We found better OS with G12R and worse OS with G12D and Q61. Citation Format: Abdelrahman Yousef, Mahmoud Yousef, Saikat Chowdhury, Kawther Abdilleh, Mark Knafl, Paul Edelkamp, Kristin Alfaro-Munoz, Ray Chacko, Jennifer Peterson, Brandon Smaglo, Robert Wolff, Shubham Pant, Michael Lee, Jason Willis, Michael Overman, Sudheer Doss, Lynn Matrisian, Mark Hurd, Rebecca Snyder, Matthew Harold Katz, Huamin Wang, Anirban Maitra, John Paul Shen, Dan Zhao. Impact of KRAS mutations and co-mutations on clinical outcomes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A111.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-8514
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2062135-8
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: npj Precision Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 8, No. 1 ( 2024-02-03)
    Abstract: The relevance of KRAS mutation alleles to clinical outcome remains inconclusive in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a retrospective study of 803 patients with PDAC (42% with metastatic disease) at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Overall survival (OS) analysis demonstrated that KRAS mutation status and subtypes were prognostic ( p 〈 0.001). Relative to patients with KRAS wildtype tumors (median OS 38 months), patients with KRAS G12R had a similar OS (median 34 months), while patients with KRAS Q61 and KRAS G12D mutated tumors had shorter OS (median 20 months [HR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.0, p = 0.006] and 22 months [HR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.3, p 〈 0.001], respectively). There was enrichment of KRAS G12D mutation in metastatic tumors (34% vs 24%, OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.2–2.4, p = 0.001) and enrichment of KRAS G12R in well and moderately differentiated tumors (14% vs 9%, OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.05–2.99, p = 0.04). Similar findings were observed in the external validation cohort (PanCAN’s Know Your Tumor® dataset, n = 408).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2397-768X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2891458-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 8557-8557
    Abstract: 8557 Background: MPeM is a rare and aggressive cancer with very limited treatment options. Lack of dedicated research has impeded improvements in outcomes. Defining prevalent GAs is a critical unmet need for use of targeted therapies in these patients. Although MPeM is notably distinct from MPM vis-à-vis epidemiologic and clinical attributes, the genomic underpinings of these differences have yet to be established. We aimed at describing a comprehensive genomic profile (CGP) of MPeM in comparison to MPM. Methods: We performed a retrospective comparative analysis between 89 patients with MPeM and 241 patients with MPM (N = 330) who underwent CGP using CLIA certified next-generation sequencing assays. The cohort was generated using mesothelioma patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center (N = 223) and supplemented by additional mesothelioma patients (N = 107) from a publicly available database from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the MSK-IMPACT database. Essential clinicopathological variables were collected. Descriptive statistics, Fisher’s exact and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. Kaplan-meier method and log rank tests were used for overall survival (OS) estimates. Results: MPeM cohort (vs. MPM) had more women (54% vs. 31%, P 〈 0.001) and younger age at diagnosis (56 vs. 69 years, P 〈 0.001). Histology was epithelioid, biphasic and sarcomatoid in 86%, 7% and 7% cases, a distribution similar to MPM cohort. At least 1 GA was found in 64 (72% vs. 82% in MPM, P = 0.044) of MPeM patients with a median of 1 (range 1 – 12) (vs. a median of 2, range 1 – 24, P 〈 0.001) GA per patient. A significantly lower proportion of MPeM patients had ≥ 3 mutations (14% vs. 26%, OR 2.1, P = 0.028) per patient. The most frequent mutations were present in the following genes: TP53 (24%), BAP1 (16%), NF2 (15%), MET (9%) and TRAF7, KIT and PIK3CA (each 6%). MPeM patients harbored more mutations in MET (9% vs. 〈 1%, P 〈 0.001) and TRAF7 (6% vs. 〈 1%, P = 0.02) but fewer mutations in BAP1 (16% vs. 32%, P = 0.003) and CDKN2B (0% vs. 5%, P = 0.041). The most common copy number variations (CNVs: amplifications or deletions) were seen in BAP1, MCL1, SETD2, WT1 (each 2%) and AURKA (1%) genes. Among genes with CNVs, MPeM had a lower rate of deletions in CDKN2A (1% vs. 6%, P = 0.040). Among more common GAs, only BAP1 mutations appeared to be associated with poor OS (45.7 vs. 127.1 months, HR 2.5, 95%CI: 0.6 – 10.1, P = 0.050) in patients with MPeM. Conclusions: In this large cohort with CGP, we identified potential molecular drivers in MPeM and demonstrated key genomic differences between MPeM and MPM. MPeM is frequently driven by GAs involved in cell cycle control, a potentially targetable pathway. Despite this insight from CGP, a large subset of patients do not have actionable GAs and for these patients, further collaborative trans-“omic” research efforts are needed to advance potential therapeutic options.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 3539-3539
    Abstract: 3539 Background: Appendiceal adenocarcinomas (AA) are both rare and heterogeneous diseases. Cytoreductive (CRS) surgery followed by heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains the best treatment for AA patients with peritoneal metastasis. This study seeks to investigate the clinical utility of pre- and post-operative plasma tumor markers (TM, CEA, CA19-9, CA-125) by association with survival outcomes. Methods: Under an approved IRB protocol the Palantir Foundry software system was used to query MD Anderson internal database to identify patients with AA who underwent CRS between 2016 to 2022. Elevation of TM was defined as above the laboratory upper limit of normal (CEA 〉 3 ng/mL, CA 19-9 〉 37 U/mL, and CA-125 〉 37 U/mL). Relationship between normal and elevated serum TM and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis, considering multiple clinicopathologic variables. Results: 296 patients were identified; preoperative CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 was elevated in 60%, 29% and 28% of patients, respectively. Preoperative elevation of any TM was associated with higher PCI score (22 vs. 15, p 〈 0.0001). Moreover, elevated preoperative TM was associated with incompleteness of cytoreduction (OR = 6.5, p 〈 0.0001). Compared to preoperative measurements, all TM levels dropped after surgery (Mean score 31 vs 11 for CEA, 136 vs 32 for CA19-9 and 36 vs 17 for CA125). Preoperative elevation of any TM (HR = 1.5, p= 0.0288) and post-op elevation of any TM were with poor PFS on univariate analysis, however only post-op elevated TM levels (HR = 2.3, p= 0.0001) were associated with poor PFS on multivariate analysis. Interestingly, elevated TM was not associated with OS. Post-op TM levels were analyzed to evaluate the positive and negative predictive value in prediction of relapse in 6 months from surgery, PPV was 45% and NPV was 84%. Conclusions: Preoperative elevation of TM can identify patients at higher risk for incomplete cytoreduction and relapse after surgery. Postoperative elevation of TM is a risk factor for relapse. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 32, No. 12_Supplement ( 2023-12-01), p. C078-C078
    Abstract: Background: Racial disparities in survival of Colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as differing frequency of driver gene mutation, have been observed before. Here we observe that self-reported race is associated with overall survival (OS) in a single institutional cohort of 47,178 patients with CRC. we conducted a systematic investigation of molecular, Socioeconomic (SES) and Disease covariates to quantitate the degree to which each influences OS. Methods: Under an approved IRB protocol, the Palantir-Foundry software system was used to query the MD Anderson (MDA) patient database to identify CRC patients and extract outcomes data and covariates. Genetic mutations that showed significant difference were included with other SES and Disease covariates in Cox-proportional hazard regression model for OS. Preliminary mediation analysis was done to quantify the contribution of each covariate to the OS disparity. Results: 47,178 patients with CRC adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1973 and 2023 were identified and race (self-reported) was extracted (Asian 1433, 3.0%; African American (AA) 4126, 8.7%; Hispanic 4166, 8.8%; non-Hispanic White (NHW) 37453, 79.4%). Relative to NHW, AA had worse OS (HR=1.22, P= 8.03E-8), while Asians and Hispanics had better OS (HR=0.68, P= 1.06E-8 and HR=0.88, P= 7E-4). Restricting to stage 4 patients, these disparities persisted; AA HR 1.2 (p=1.7E-4) Asian HR 0.67 (p= 1.64E-5), Hispanic HR 0.88 (p= 1.4E-2) relative to NHW. Among 7,628 patients with clinical mutational testing, five genes had significant differences in mutation frequency; APC (45% Asian, 62% AA, 44% NHW, 57% Hispanics, P= 5.83E-3), KRAS (43%, 57%, 44%, 50%, P=3.43E-9), PIK3CA (13%, 23%, 17%, 17%, P=3.37E-3), BRAF (8%, 3%, 8%, 4%, P=1.15E-8), KIT (3%, 2%, 5%, 2%, p=0.046). In multivariate analysis the survival difference between Asians, Hispanics or AA compared to NHW was no longer significant (HR= 0.91, P=0.59, HR= 0.87, P=0.21 and HR=1.14, P= 0.18). In contrast KRAS (HR= 1.5, P=9.22E-9), BRAF (HR= 1.64, P=1E-4) APC mutation (HR= 0.77, P=1E-4) were independently associated with OS, as was higher ECOG (HR= 1.39, P=7.14E-23), higher stage (HR= 1.5, P=3.57E-20), higher national area deprivation index (ADI) quantile (HR=1.08, P= 2.7E-3), being married (HR=1.2, P= 1.52E-2), right side colon tumor (HR=1.22, P= 1.03E-2), poorly differentiated tumors (HR= 1.2, P=1.47E-2), undergoing surgical intervention (HR= 0.47, P=1.54E-29) and MSI-high (HR= 0.41, P=2.16E-6). In our single institution study preliminary mediation analysis showed that ADI, marital status, right sided affection, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation were the main drivers of the survival disparities in contrast to stage, grade, performance status, surgical intervention and MSI-status. Conclusions: Racial survival disparity is complex and multifactorial. Our single center systematic evaluation showed that SES, driver gene mutations and site of colon affected by the tumor made an important contribution to the racial survival disparity. Further investigation of germline variation, and treatment response is warranted. Citation Format: Mahmoud Yousef, Abdelrahman Yousef, Mohammad Zeineddine, Saikat Chowdhury, Mohammad Fanaeian, Naoko Little-Jackson, Mark Knafl, Kristin Alfaro-Munoz, Abinheet Uppal, Scott Kopetz, Wenyi Wang, Jason Willis, John Paul Shen. Comprehensive evaluation for contribution of molecular, socioeconomic and disease covariates to colorectal cancer racial survival disparity of 47,178 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C078.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 10907-10908
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Discovery, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 11, No. 11 ( 2021-11-01), p. 2738-2747
    Abstract: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a rare but aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. VEGF inhibition enhances efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors by reworking the immunosuppressive tumor milieu. Efficacy and safety of combined PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and VEGF (bevacizumab) blockade (AtezoBev) was assessed in 20 patients with advanced and unresectable MPeM with progression or intolerance to prior platinum–pemetrexed chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate per RECISTv1.1 by independent radiology review was 40% [8/20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 19.1–64.0] with median response duration of 12.8 months. Six (75%) responses lasted for & gt;10 months. Progression-free and overall survival at one year were 61% (95% CI, 35–80) and 85% (95% CI, 60–95), respectively. Responses occurred notwithstanding low tumor mutation burden and PD-L1 expression status. Baseline epithelial–mesenchymal transition gene expression correlated with therapeutic resistance/response (r = 0.80; P = 0.0010). AtezoBev showed promising and durable efficacy in patients with advanced MPeM with an acceptable safety profile, and these results address a grave unmet need for this orphan disease. Significance: Efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab vis-à-vis response rates and survival in advanced peritoneal mesothelioma previously treated with chemotherapy surpassed outcomes expected with conventional therapies. Biomarker analyses uncovered epithelial–mesenchymal transition phenotype as an important resistance mechanism and showcase the value and feasibility of performing translationally driven clinical trials in rare tumors. See related commentary by Aldea et al., p. 2674. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2159-8274 , 2159-8290
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2607892-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 83, No. 8_Supplement ( 2023-04-14), p. CT148-CT148
    Abstract: Purpose: Preclinical evidence supporting immunomodulatory effect of MEK inhibition that augments anti-tumor activity of PD-1 inhibitors is a compelling rationale for investigating combined MEK and PD-L1 inhibition in advanced microsatellite-stable (MSS) SBA wherein immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have little clinical benefit. We conducted a prospective, phase 2 trial evaluating efficacy and safety of COTEZO regimen in treatment refractory SBA. Procedures: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with metastatic MSS SBA, ECOG PS 0 - 2, and disease progression on prior systemic chemotherapy were enrolled and treated with cobimetinib (60 mg orally once daily for days 1 - 21) and atezolizumab (840 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) every 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1. by independent radiology review. Key pre-specified secondary endpoints were safety, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. Pre/on-treatment biopsies were examined for response biomarkers. Results: Between 4/2017 and 7/2020, 20 patients were enrolled. The confirmed ORR per RECISTv1.1 was 10% [2/20; 95%CI: 1.2 - 31.7] (1 complete response and 1 partial response). Seven patients had stable disease for a DCR of 45% (95%CI: 23.1 - 68.5). Median PFS and OS were 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-3.5) and 8.8 (95% CI 5.6 - 12) months, respectively. Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (no grade 4/5) occurred in 7 (35%) patients; most common being elevated CPK (15%) and vomiting (10%). One (5%) patient had grade 3 vomiting, necessitating treatment discontinuation. There appeared to be a marked difference in OS between patients with increased pre-treatment tumor immune infiltration as compared to those lacking immune infiltration amongst patients with RNASeq data available (n=13). Specifically, increased immune infiltration as assessed by computational deconvolution of RNASeq data pointed to increased macrophage and monocyte infiltration as prognostic factors. This was additionally assessed via application of a global “immune score” algorithm, ESTIMATE. In order to generalize our findings, we expanded our computational deconvolution analysis to include additional small bowel adenocarcinoma patients who received standard-of-care treatment (n=7). For the combined standard-of-care and experimentally treated patients we saw that those with immune infiltration had significantly better OS (9 months vs greater than 3 years, HR 5.7, Padj = 0.017), suggesting that immune infiltration is a prognostic, rather than predictive biomarker. Conclusions: Although our study did not meet its primary endpoint of ORR, we identified tumor immune infiltration as a prognostic biomarker in SBA, which could select patients with better outcomes on immunotherapy. Citation Format: Nicholas Hornstein, John P. Shen, Andrew J. Pellatt, Suyu Liu, Mark Knafl, Anneleis F. Willett, Haifeng Zhu, Dipen M. Maru, Walter Darbonne, Ignacio I. Wistuba, Andy Futreal, James C. Yao, Scott E. Woodman, Michael J. Overman, Kanwal P. Raghav. Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of combined MEK (Cobimetinib) and PD-L1 (Atezolizumab) inhibition (COTEZO) in advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT148.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Neuro-Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 23, No. Supplement_6 ( 2021-11-12), p. vi49-vi49
    Abstract: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy has demonstrated overall limited efficacy in the treatment of GBM. Mechanisms of resistance to checkpoint blockade need to be better elucidated. Analysis of the tumor microenvironment is critical to identify correlates of response to immune checkpoint blockade. 60 newly diagnosed GBM patients unselected for MGMT status underwent treatment with concurrent atezolizumab with radiation therapy and TMZ followed by adjuvant atezolizumab and TMZ (NCT03174197). Clinical data has been reported previously. METHODS Tissue image immunoprofiling was conducted using 2 multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) panels against; CD3, CD8, PD-1, PD-L1, Granzyme B, FOXP3, CD45RO, CD68, and GFAP antibodies. PDL-1 (Clone SP263) malignant cells expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Correlations between mIF biomarkers co-expressions, IHC PD-L1, and clinical outcome including OS, radiographic response, and PFS were evaluated. RESULTS Of 60 patients enrolled, image immunoprofiling was performed successfully on pre-treatment tissue in 48 patients. 20 of 60 patients underwent re-resection for suspected recurrent disease of which 10 patients had immunoprofiling performed successfully on pre and post treatment samples. An analysis of CD3CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes was consistent with prior work, showing no or relatively low levels at baseline, and no association with clinical outcome. PDL-1 expression by IHC, at thresholds of & gt;1% or & gt;5%, was not associated with clinical outcome. Tumors with a higher number of GFAP-expressing cancer cells had a significantly lower tumor response (p & lt; 0.05) and median OS (430 vs. 799 days, p & lt; 0.01). CONCLUSIONS For newly diagnosed GBM patients treated with standard of care radiation and temozolomide in combination with atezolizumab, T-cell levels and PDL-1 expression were not predictive of outcome. GFAP may represent a novel predictive biomarker of overall survival. Ongoing studies to evaluate the gut microbiome and tumor genomic (WES, CNA) and transcriptomic (RNAseq) features of these and matched tumors are underway.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1522-8517 , 1523-5866
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2094060-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages