In:
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 15, No. 7 ( 2021-7-14), p. e0009517-
Abstract:
In Peru, the information regarding sand fly vectors of leishmaniasis and bartonellosis in the Amazon region is limited. In this study, we carried out sand fly collections in Peruvian lowland and highland jungle areas using different trap type configurations and screened them for Leishmania and Bartonella DNA. Methodology/Principal findings Phlebotomine sand flies were collected in Peruvian Amazon jungle and inter Andean regions using CDC light trap, UV and color LED traps, Mosquito Magnet trap, BG Sentinel trap, and a Shannon trap placed outside the houses. Leishmania spp. screening was performed by kDNA PCR and confirmed by a nested cytochrome B gene ( cytB ) PCR. Bartonella spp. screening was performed by ITS PCR and confirmed by citrate synthase gene ( gltA ). The PCR amplicons were sequenced to identify Leishmania and Bartonella species. UV and Blue LED traps collected the highest average number of sand flies per hour in low jungle; UV, Mosquito Magnet and Shannon traps in high jungle; and Mosquito Magnet in inter Andean region. Leishmania guyanensis in Lutzomyia carrerai carrerai and L . naiffi in Lu . hirsuta hirsuta were identified based on cytB sequencing. Bartonella spp. related to Bartonella bacilliformis in Lu . whitmani , Lu . nevesi , Lu . hirsuta hirsuta and Lu . sherlocki , and a Bartonella sp. related to Candidatus B. rondoniensis in Lu . nevesi and Lu . maranonensis were identified based on gltA gene sequencing. Conclusions/Significance UV, Blue LED, Mosquito Magnet and Shannon traps were more efficient than the BG-Sentinel, Green, and Red LED traps. This is the first report of L . naiffi and of two genotypes of Bartonella spp. related to B . bacilliformis and Candidatus B. rondoniensis infecting sand fly species from the Amazon region in Peru.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1935-2735
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0009517.s010
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2021
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2429704-5
Bookmarklink