Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: European Neuropsychopharmacology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 68 ( 2023-03), p. 78-88
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0924-977X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019305-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2023
    In:  CNS Spectrums Vol. 28, No. 2 ( 2023-04), p. 247-248
    In: CNS Spectrums, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 28, No. 2 ( 2023-04), p. 247-248
    Abstract: Treatments for bipolar disorder are often associated with increased rates of metabolic syndrome (MetSy). MetSy is defined as meeting 3 of the following 5 criteria: waist circumference 〉 40in (men) or 〉 35in (women), triglycerides ≥150mg/dL, high density lipoprotein cholesterol 〈 40mg/dL (men) or 〈 50mg/dL (women), systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥130mmHg or diastolic BP ≥85mmHg, fasting glucose ≥100mg/dL. MetSy elevates the risk of developing type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and premature morbidity. Lumateperone (LUMA), a mechanistically novel antipsychotic that simultaneously modulates serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission, is FDA-approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. This distinct pharmacological profile has been associated with favorable tolerability and a low risk of adverse metabolic effects in clinical trials. LUMA 42-mg monotherapy was evaluated in 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled studies (Study 401 [NCT02600494]; Study 404 [NCT03249376] ) in patients with a major depressive episode (MDE) associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. This post hoc pooled analysis of these studies compares rates of MetSy with LUMA 42 mg and PBO in the treatment of bipolar depression. Methods The incidence and shift in MetSy were analyzed in data pooled from 2 studies that recruited patients aged 18–75 years with a confirmed diagnosis of bipolar I or bipolar II disorder who were experiencing an MDE (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] Total score ≥20 and Clinical Global Impression Scale-Bipolar Version-Severity [CGI-BP-S] score ≥4). Patients in these studies were randomized 1:1 to LUMA or PBO and treated for 6 weeks. Results The safety population comprised 746 patients (LUMA, 372; PBO, 374). Rates of MetSy were similar between groups at baseline (LUMA, 20.7%; PBO, 22.2%) and at the end of treatment (EOT, LUMA, 21.8%; PBO, 23.8%). More LUMA patients (36.4%) compared with PBO patients (30.1%) improved from having MetSy at baseline to no longer meeting MetSy criteria at EOT. The individual criteria that shifted the most from meeting MetSy criteria at baseline to no longer meeting criteria at EOT was BP for LUMA (46.8%) and glucose for PBO (43.2%). The rate of MetSy developed during treatment was similar for LUMA (10.8%) and PBO (10.7%) with approximately half of these patients (LUMA, 43.8%; PBO, 45.2%) shifting due to a change in ≥2 criteria. Conclusion In this post hoc analysis of 2 randomized, PBO-controlled trials in patients with a MDE associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder, LUMA 42 mg had similar rates of MetSy compared with PBO. These results suggest that LUMA 42 mg is a promising new treatment for bipolar depression with a favorable metabolic profile. Funding Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1092-8529 , 2165-6509
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2149753-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2023
    In:  CNS Spectrums Vol. 28, No. 2 ( 2023-04), p. 238-238
    In: CNS Spectrums, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 28, No. 2 ( 2023-04), p. 238-238
    Abstract: In patients with bipolar disorder, depression symptoms are associated with greater reduction in function and quality of life than hypomania/mania symptoms. Lumateperone (LUMA), is an FDA-approved antipsychotic to treat schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. In a recent phase 3 clinical trial (Study 404, NCT03249376) in people with bipolar depression, LUMA 42 mg monotherapy significantly improved symptoms of depression compared with placebo (PBO). This analysis of Study 404 investigated the effects of LUMA on functional disability and quality of life as measured using the secondary outcome measure, the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). Methods Patients (18–75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] Total score ≥20 and Clinical Global Impression Scale-Bipolar Version-Severity [CGI-BP-S] score ≥4) were randomized to LUMA 42 mg or PBO orally, once daily in the evening for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Day 43 in MADRS Total score, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) approach in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). This post hoc analysis evaluated the mean change from baseline to Day 43 in the Q-LES-Q-SF individual item scores using an analysis of covariance with last observation carried forward (ANCOVA-LOCF) in the ITT. Categorical shifts in individual items were also analyzed. Results The ITT comprised 376 patients (LUMA 42 mg, 188; PBO, 188). Patients in the LUMA 42 mg group had significantly greater improvement on MADRS Total score change from baseline to Day 43 compared with PBO (least squares mean difference vs PBO [LSMD], −4.585; 95% CI, −6.344 to −2.826; effect size vs PBO [ES] , −0.56; P 〈 .0001). LUMA 42 mg treatment significantly improved Q-LES-Q-SF Total score from baseline to Day 43 compared with PBO (LSMD, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.15 to 4.59; P =.001). The Q-LES-Q-SF items with the lowest mean scores at baseline in both groups were mood, leisure time activities, and sexual drive, interest, and/or performance. By Day 43, LUMA 42 mg treatment significantly improved 8 of the 14 items in the Q-LES-Q-SF ( P 〈 0.05). Overall life satisfaction also significantly improved with LUMA treatment ( P =.0016). The largest improvements with LUMA 42 mg compared with PBO (ES 〉 0.3,) were seen for the ability to function in daily life, family relationships, household activities, leisure time activities, and mood (all LSMD=0.3; all P 〈 .01). Conclusion In patients with bipolar depression, treatment with LUMA 42 mg compared with PBO significantly improved patient quality of life and functional impairment. These results support LUMA 42 mg as treatment of MDEs associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder in adults. Funding Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1092-8529 , 2165-6509
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2149753-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc ; 2023
    In:  The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Vol. 84, No. 3 ( 2023-04-24)
    In: The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc, Vol. 84, No. 3 ( 2023-04-24)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1555-2101
    Language: English
    Publisher: Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
    Publication Date: 2023
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: CNS Spectrums, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 26, No. 2 ( 2021-04), p. 150-150
    Abstract: Approved treatments for bipolar depression are limited and associated with a spectrum of undesirable side effects. Lumateperone (lumateperone tosylate, ITI−007), a mechanistically novel antipsychotic that simultaneously modulates serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission, is FDA-approved for the treatment of schizophrenia. Lumateperone is currently being investigated for the treatment of bipolar depression (major depressive episodes [MDE] associated with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder). This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled multinational study (NCT03249376) investigated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone in patients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a MDE. Method Patients (18 75 years) with a clinical diagnosis of bipolar I or bipolar II disorder who were experiencing a MDE (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] Total score =20 and a Clinical Global Impression Scale-Bipolar Version-Severity [CGI-BP-S] score =4 at screening and baseline) were randomized to lumateperone 42mg or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in MADRS total score and CGI-BP-S scores, respectively. Secondary efficacy outcomes included response (MADRS improvement = 50%) and remission (MADRS total score =12) at Day 43. Safety assessments included treatment emergent adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and suicidality. Results In this study, 377 patients received treatment (placebo, n=189; lumateperone 42mg, n=188) and 333 completed treatment. Patients in the lumateperone 42-mg group had significantly greater mean improvement on MADRS total score change from baseline to Day 43 compared with placebo (least squares mean difference [LSMD]=-4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] =-6.34, −2.83; effect size vs placebo [ES]=-0.56; P 〈 .0001). Lumateperone treatment was associated with significant MADRS improvement in both patients with bipolar I (LSMD=-4.0; 95% CI=-5.92, −1.99; ES=-0.49; P 〈 .0001) and bipolar II (LSMD=-7.0; 95% CI=-10.92, −3.16; ES=-0.81; P=.0004). The lumateperone 42-mg group also had significantly greater mean improvement in CGI-BP-S total score compared with placebo (LSMD=-0.9; 95% CI=-1.37, −0.51; ES=-0.46; P 〈 .001). Lumateperone compared with placebo had significantly greater MADRS response rate (51.1% vs 36.7%; odds ratio=2.98; P 〈 .001) and remission rates (P=.02) at Day 43. Lumateperone treatment was well tolerated, with minimal risk of EPS, metabolic, and prolactin side effects. Conclusions Lumateperone 42 mg significantly improved depression symptoms in both patients with bipolar I and bipolar II depression. Lumateperone was generally well tolerated. These results suggest that lumateperone 42 mg may be a promising new treatment for bipolar depression associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. Funding Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1092-8529 , 2165-6509
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2149753-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Bipolar Disorders, Wiley, Vol. 25, No. 6 ( 2023-09), p. 478-488
    Abstract: This phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study (NCT02600507) evaluated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate in patients with bipolar depression. Methods Patients (18–75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode (MDE), with inadequate therapeutic response to lithium or valproate, were randomized 1:1:1 to 6 weeks adjunctive therapy with lumateperone 28 mg ( n  = 176), lumateperone 42 mg ( n  = 177), or placebo ( n  = 176). The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score and the Clinical Global Impression Scale‐Bipolar Version‐Severity Scale (CGI‐BP‐S) depression subscore. Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory evaluations, vital signs, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and suicidality. Results Patients treated with adjunctive lumateperone 42 mg showed significantly greater improvement compared with adjunctive placebo in MADRS Total score (LS mean difference vs placebo [LSMD], −2.4; p =  0.02) and CGI‐BP‐S depression subscore (LSMD, −0.3; p =  0.01), while adjunctive lumateperone 28 mg showed numerical improvement in MADRS Total score (LSMD, −1.7; p =  0.10) and improvement in the CGI‐BP‐S depression subscore (LSMD, −0.3; p =  0.04). Adjunctive lumateperone treatment was well tolerated; treatment‐emergent adverse events reported at rates 〉 5% and twice placebo for lumateperone 42 mg were somnolence (11.3%), dizziness (10.7%), and nausea (8.5%), with minimal risk of EPS, metabolic abnormalities, or increased prolactin. Conclusions Lumateperone 42‐mg treatment adjunctive to lithium or valproate significantly improved depression symptoms and was generally well tolerated in patients with MDEs associated with either bipolar I or bipolar II disorder.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1398-5647 , 1399-5618
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2001157-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: American Journal of Psychiatry, American Psychiatric Association Publishing, Vol. 178, No. 12 ( 2021-12), p. 1098-1106
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-953X , 1535-7228
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Psychiatric Association Publishing
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500554-9
    SSG: 5,2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Neurology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 84, No. 5 ( 2015-02-03), p. 508-515
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0028-3878 , 1526-632X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2015
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, No. 22 ( 2010-06), p. 10256-10261
    Abstract: The ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is the major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but limited work has suggested that APOE genotype may modulate disease phenotype. Carriers of the ε4 allele have been reported to have greater medial temporal lobe (MTL) pathology and poorer memory than noncarriers. Less attention has focused on whether there are domains of cognition and neuroanatomical regions more affected in noncarriers. Further, a major potential confound of prior in vivo studies is the possibility of different rates of clinical misdiagnosis for carriers vs. noncarriers. We compared phenotypic differences in cognition and topography of regional cortical atrophy of ε4 carriers ( n = 67) vs. noncarriers ( n = 24) with mild AD from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, restricted to those with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) molecular profile consistent with AD. Between-group comparisons were made for psychometric tests and morphometric measures of cortical thickness and hippocampal volume. Carriers displayed significantly greater impairment on measures of memory retention, whereas noncarriers were more impaired on tests of working memory, executive control, and lexical access. Consistent with this cognitive dissociation, carriers exhibited greater MTL atrophy, whereas noncarriers had greater frontoparietal atrophy. Performance deficits in particular cognitive domains were associated with disproportionate regional brain atrophy within nodes of cortical networks thought to subserve these cognitive processes. These convergent cognitive and neuroanatomic findings in individuals with a CSF molecular profile consistent with AD support the hypothesis that APOE genotype modulates the clinical phenotype of AD through influence on specific large-scale brain networks.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-8424 , 1091-6490
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 209104-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1461794-8
    SSG: 11
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages