Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 3287-3287

Abstract: Introduction: Systemic steroids with their strong immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects are the current gold standard for initial treatment of the graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). But, the effectiveness of high-dose steroids comes along with an increased susceptibility to infections and other secondary malignancies. Extracorporeal photophoresis (ECP), an immunotherapeutic therapy, is currently being used as a clinically well-established second-line treatment for GvHD. Contrary to steroid treatment, there is no clinical data showing that ECP is associated with an increased risk of infection. However, the exact mechanism of action how ECP preserves the anti-viral and anti-leukemic effects on the cellular level has not been discovered yet. Materials and methods: Thirty-four patients with steroid-refractory/resistant aGvHD ≥ II and moderate to severe cGvHD were treated with ECP at the University Hospitals in Heidelberg, Greifswald in Germany and Chaim Sheba Medical Center in Israel. A comprehensive analysis of cell subsets was performed using multi-parametric flow cytometry. Additionally, the quantity and quality of CMV-specific T cells was determined by tetramer staining and interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay. The NK activity in terms of killing functionality and cytokine release was analyzed by intracellular cytokine staining and chromium-51 release assay, respectively. The proliferative capacity of effector cells was determined by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) staining. Results: ECP therapy was effective with an overall response rate of 75% for patients with aGvHD (x/y) and 78% (x/y) for patients with cGvHD. Of note, all patients showed neither the increased susceptibility to infections nor the reactivation of CMV nor the tumor relapse. Overall, the frequency of well-established protective cell subsets in terms of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, CD4+CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells, NK cells and NKT cells remained constant under the ECP therapy. Specifically, no significant influence of ECP therapy on the CD56dimCD57+NKG2C+ NK cells, a specialized anti-viral/tumor population, and the CMV+CD8+ T cells could be observed. The further phenotyping of CMV+CD8+ T cells showed that CD45RA+CCR7-CMV+CD8+ TE cells and CD45RA-CCR7-CMV+CD8+ TEM cells could keep stable under the ECP therapy. Besides these, priming, differentiation and maturation of NK cells through upregulation of CD57 by ECP therapy bridged the T-cell-deficient period after HSCT in order to control the viral infections and eliminate the residual malignant cells. Moreover, ECP could reduce the CD62L expression on TE population which not only facilitates the hematopoietic engraftment and contributes to the phenotypic and functional T cell reconstitution after transplantation without causing GvHD, but also enhances the functional immune reconstitution against tumor and viral antigens. Functionally, neither IFN-g released by virus specific T cells nor production of TNF-a and IFN-g by NK cells in response to K562 cells was hampered by ECP. Of note, the functions of NK cells in terms of the MFI of cytokines and the polyfunctionality of NK cells were stable under ECP treatment. Additionally, the proliferation of NK cells, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells providing an expanded pool of effector cells against the pathogens was not hampered by ECP therapy as well. Conclusions: ECP therapy constitutes an effective strategy to treat GvHD. In addition, ECP appears to be a safe therapy compared to continued steroid use. Our current results suggest that ECP allows to maintain immunity against infections and tumors. Disclosures Schönland: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medac: Other: Travel Grant. Dreger:Neovii, Riemser: Research Funding; AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Consultancy; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia. Schmitt:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia; Therakos Mallinckrodt: Other: Financial Support. Schmitt:Therakos Mallinckrodt: Other: Financial Support .

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-125049

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 3446-3446

Abstract: Background: During the last years, based on its efficacy and favourable toxicity profile the hypomethylating agent (HMA) Azacitidine (Aza) has proven to be a valuable treatment option for patients with AML or MDS who relapse after allo-SCT. In contrast to Aza, reports on the use of Decitabine (DAC), the second HMA approved in Europe for the treatment of AML, as salvage therapy for relapse after allo-SCT are scarce covering a total of 9 patients so far. This prompted us to perform a retrospective survey in order to gather more experience on the use of DAC after allo-SCT. Patients and Methods: Retrieving information from the EBMT Med-A form and a study-specific questionnaire we were able to analyze data of 36 patients (median age 56 years, range 21-72 years) from 6 German transplant centers who had received at least one cycle of DAC for the treatment of relapse of AML (n=29) or MDS (n=7) after allo-SCT. Median time to haematological (n=34) or molecular (n=2) relapse was 370 days (range 43-2623 days). Results: Overall, DAC was the first treatment for relapse in 16 pts (44%), whereas 20 pts (56%) had previously received one (n=14), two (n=2) or three (n=4) lines of salvage therapy for relapse after allo-SCT. This included 16 pts treated with Aza, 3 pts with intensive chemotherapy and 2 pts with radiation. Five pts had received a second allo-SCT and 9 pts donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) before DAC therapy. Patients received a median of 2 DAC cycles (range, 1-10) with 24 pts (67%) treated with the approved dose of 20 mg/m2 for 5 days and 12 pts (33%) treated with 20 mg/m2 for 10 days based on the local policy of the individual transplant center. In addition to DAC, DLI (median number of DLI =1, range: 1-5) were administered to 22 pts (61%). Following treatment with DAC +/- DLI the median survival was 5 months (range 1 - 40 months). Six pts achieved a complete remission (CR, 17%) and 3 pts achieved a partial remission (PR, 8%) leading to an overall response rate of 25%. Median time to documentation of CR was 157 days (range: 47-255 days) and 4 DAC cycles (range: 1-8 cycles). Of 6 patients achieving CR after DAC, 3 had received DAC as first salvage therapy and 3 had previously received Aza, including 2 pts not responding to Aza and 1 patient switched to DAC therapy due to Aza intolerability. With a median follow-up of 12 months (range: 5-40 months), 3 of 6 patients remain in ongoing remission for 4, 23, and 33 months respectively without any further antileukemic therapy, while the other 3 patients died in remission due to infectious complications after second transplant. The 2-year overall survival rate of the entire group as calculated from the start of DAC therapy was 9%. Incidence and severity of acute GvHD (overall: 19%, grade I: 3%, grade II: 8%, grade III: 5%, grade IV: 0%, missing: 3%) and chronic GvHD (overall: 6%, limited 6%, extensive 0%) were low and mild. Conclusion: Our analysis shows, that also the second HMA DAC exerts relevant clinical efficacy in patients with AML or MDS relapsing after allo-SCT and can induce durable remissions in individual pts. Given the heterogeneity of our patient group and the limitations of a retrospective analysis this asks for confirmation in a prospective trial. Disclosures Platzbecker: Onconova, Teva, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kobbe:Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.3446.3446

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: The Lancet Haematology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 10, No. 9 ( 2023-09), p. e777-e784

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2352-3026

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00114-X

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2023

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 3399-3399

Abstract: Introduction: Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), a severe complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), results in post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Steroids with strong immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects remain the gold standard for initial management of GvHD. However, high doses of steroids are usually accompanied by an increased risk of infections and secondary malignancies. ECP, due to its good clinical response, is recommended as a second-line treatment for GvHD. Notably, no clinical data showed that ECP therapy results in relapse and infection. However, the mechanism of action behind that is barely known. Therefore, we conducted this study to figure out how ECP preserves the anti-viral and anti-leukemia effects. Materials and Methods: 34 patients with steroid-refractory/resistant aGvHD ≥ °II and moderate to severe cGvHD received ECP therapy at the University Hospitals Heidelberg, Greifswald and Tel Hashomer. ECP therapy was performed according to the current European guidelines. For clinical staging of aGvHD under ECP treatment patients were evaluated according to Glucksberg criteria, for quality of life according to Karnofsky and for clinical staging of cGvHD according to NIH criteria. Phenotypical analysis of different cellular subsets was evaluated by multicolor flow cytometry. The quantity and quality of virus-specific CD8+ T cells were evaluated by Tetramer staining and IFN-γ-ELISPOT. NK activity in terms of killing function and cytokine release function was monitored by chromium-51 release assay and intracellular cytokine staining. Results: ECP seems to be favorable in the treatment of GvHD. Clinically, an overall response of 75% for aGvHD and 78% for cGvHD patients was achieved. A steroid-sparing effect in addition to the resolution of GvHD manifestations was observed in responders. Our patients showed no increased susceptibility to infections. On the cellular level, the frequency of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, the most important mediators of GvL activity, as well as CD4+CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells, NKT cells and CD56dimCD57+NKG2C+ NK cells as other well-established protective cell subsets remained constant under ECP therapy. Moreover, neither frequency nor IFN-γ release of CMV specific CD8+ T cells was hampered by ECP. 51Cr-release assay revealed stable functional cytotoxicity of NK cells. Additionally, ECP therapy did not affect the capacity of cytokine release by NK cells, including quality, quantity and multifunctional release. Furthermore, no significant influence of ECP therapy on antigen recall function of NK cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells could be observed. Conclusion: ECP therapy represents an attractive strategy to treat GvHD. Moreover, our results reflect that ECP therapy preserves immunity against infections as well as the GvL effect via maintaining the quality and quantity of effector cells. Disclosures Hilgendorf: Novartis: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Medac: Other: Travel support, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-113277

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 1810-1810

Abstract: In patients with steroid-refractory/resistant graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been identified as a promising therapeutic strategy due to its safety profile and convincing clinical response rates. While previous studies have reported on the role of Th1, Th2 and Treg cells in ECP therapy, further comprehensive analysis of T helper cells is necessary to provide better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In this study, we thus investigated the influence of long-term ECP treatment on both Th cells as well as on immune checkpoint molecules and apoptosis. Overall, we investigated 27 patients with GvHD treated by ECP therapy, containing 13 patients with acute GvHD and 14 patients with chronic GvHD. 10/13 (76.9%) of aGvHD and 9/14 (64.3%) of cGvHD patients clinically responded to ECP therapy. Three (23.1%) patients reached CR and seven (53.8%) patients achieved PR under ECP treatment in patients with aGvHD, while in patients with cGvHD CR was achieved in one (7.1%) and PR in eight (57.1%) patients. Stabilization of disease was observed in five (35.7%) patients. On an immunological level, aGvHD, cGvHD and healthy donors (HD) patients showed different profiles of Th populations. In GvHD patients, significantly higher levels for Th2 (aGvHD vs. HD: 36.26% vs. 13.88%, p = 0.014; cGvHD vs. HD: 30.71% vs. 13.88%, p = 0.026), Th17 (aGvHD vs. HD: 19.21% vs. 7.49%, p = 0.038), Th22 (aGvHD vs. HD: 1.22% vs. 0.11%，p = 0.011; cGvHD vs. HD: 0.64% vs. 0.11%, p = 0.012) and GM-CSF + Th cells (aGvHD vs. HD: 1.15% vs. 0.14%, p = 0.022; cGvHD vs. HD: 0.84% vs. 0.14%，p = 0.012) and clearly lower levels for T follicular helper (Tfh) cells including Th1- (aGvHD vs. HD: 0.37% vs. 2.04%, p = 0.002; cGvHD vs. HD: 1.28% vs. 2.04%, p = 0.03) and Th2-like cells (aGvHD vs. HD: 1.17% vs. 4.19%, p = 0.033) were observed in comparison to HDs. This suggests Th cells account for a crucial role in GvHD pathogenesis. ECP therapy was able to accelerate recovery of Tfh cells, including Th1- (Time point 1 vs. Time point 2 in aGvHD: 0.37% vs. 0.97%, p = 0.028), Th2- (T1 vs. T2 in aGvHD: 1.17% vs. 1.35%, p = 0.049; T1 vs. T2 in cGvHD: 2.08% vs. 3.15%, p = 0.048) and Th17-like Tfh cells (T1 vs. T2 in aGvHD: 1.82% vs. 2.70%, p = 0.034), facilitating immune reconstitution after allo-HSCT and thereby alleviating GvHD. Clinical response in aGvHD patients was strongly associated with elevation of Th22 cells by ECP therapy showing 51% upregulation (T1 vs. T2: 0.86% vs. 1.3%，p=0.007). In addition, we also found that the expression of the Fas receptor on effector T cells could be further upregulated with ECP treatment (T1 vs. T2 in cGvHD: 49.65% vs. 56.46%, p = 0.011), which increases the susceptibility of these effectors T cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis. This could lead to the elimination of these overactivated effector T cells and the perseverance of immunological tolerance by triggering activation-induced cell death. In addition, a reduction of Tim-3-expressing effector T cells, which are associated with the severity of GvHD, with ECP therapy (T1 vs. T2 for aGvHD: 18.09% vs. 15.10%, p = 0.044) was discovered. In conclusion, ECP therapy exerts immunomodulatory effects by promoting balanced immune reconstitution and inducing immune tolerance, making it an attractive and promising treatment option for patients with GvHD. Disclosures Schubert: Gilead: Consultancy. Hegenbart: Alnylam: Honoraria; Akcea: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Schönland: Prothena: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Müller-Tidow: Pfizer: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dreger: Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schmitt: MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hexal: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Kite Gilead: Other: Travel grants; TolerogenixX: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Bluebird Bio: Other: Travel grants; Novartis: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Apogenix: Research Funding. Schmitt: Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; TolerogenixX Ltd: Current Employment; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel grant; Hexal: Other: Travel grant.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-150106

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 3817-3817

Abstract: Introduction Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in complete hematological remission (CR) offers a potential therapeutic window allowing early interventions in order to prevent overt hematological relapse. Due to the absence of generic markers in AML/MDS, MRD assessment seems to be a complex procedure. As prospective clinical studies are sparse, we initiated a retrospective survey within the SAL (Study Alliance Leukemia) study group and members of the German Cancer Consortium to evaluate the current clinical use of the approach and related clinical outcome of treated patients. Patients Based on questionnaires we analyzed 84 patients from five clinical centers (pts, m/f=46/38; median age 52 yrs (19-74)) with either AML (n=77) or MDS (n=7) in CR after conventional intensive chemotherapy (CTx; n=23) or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT; n=61), undergoing preemptive therapy. Mutations, cytogenetic aberrations or donor chimerism analysis for transplanted pts were monitored as MRD markers. Thirty-three pts had a normal and 14 pts - a complex karyotype; 6 pts carried -7 and/or inv(3); other aberrations were detected in 29 pts; in 2 pts no data were available. Among molecular aberrations, NPM1 (n=23) and FLT3-ITD (n=13) were the most frequent, followed by CBFβ/MYH11 (n=8), RUNX1/RUNX1T1 (n=8) and MLL/AF6 (n=3). In 20 pts no mutations were found. For 5 pts data on molecular diagnostics were not available and MRD was assessed by chimerism. Results The median time to MRD positivity after completion of intensive therapy was 12 months (range, 1-97). Subsequent MRD-guided therapy in pts treated only with CTx included hypomethylating agents (HMA, 34%), clofarabine (17%), additional intensive CTx (9%), targeted therapy (gemtuzumab ozogamycin, 9%), low-dose cytarabine (9%), and allo-HSCT (22%). Other treatment strategies included interferon alfa and sorafenib. In transplanted patients the most preferred treatment for the molecular relapse was donor lymphocyte infusion (26 pts, 43%; median number of DLI=3, range, 1-6), alone or in combination (54% with HMA). 32 MRD-based treated pts (43%) did not experience a hematological relapse and were either alive (23 pts, median observation time 953 days, range, 30-3660), or died due to another cause (9 pts) with median survival of 359 days (range, 125-954). In 9 pts without hematological relapse more than one MRD recurrence was observed. In the remaining 57% relapsing patients, median time to hematological relapse was 252 days (range, 24-1161) after MRD positivity. Interestingly, in some pts the hematological relapse was observed in the absence of the known mutation, indicating that the disease probably progressed due to another subclone. Thus, an accurate initial diagnostic is essential, ideally a multiple gene approach and comprehensive follow-up. Conclusions The retrospective analysis demonstrates that MRD-guided therapies have already entered routine practice in patients with AML and MDS. The heterogeneous nature of both cancer entities is reflected by the variety of MRD surveillance protocols among clinical centers. Therefore, clinical trials are needed to better define molecular markers and subsets of patients who might benefit from this approach. Disclosures Mayer: Janssen: Research Funding. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Equity Ownership. Platzbecker:Novartis: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen, Inc.: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.3817.3817

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 33-33

Abstract: Background In a recent phase-III trial CPX-351 (Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA), a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin, has shown higher remission rates and longer overall survival (OS) in patients aged 60 to 75 years with AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) or therapy-related AML (t-AML) in comparison to conventional 7+3 regimen. Based on this CPX-351 has been approved in the USA 2017 and in Europe 2018 for adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML. Still, several issues such as age ( & lt;60 years), measurable residual disease (MRD), molecular subgroups and outcome after allo-HCT were not addressed in the phase-III trial. Aiming to investigate these open aspects and to provide more clinical experience with CPX-351, we performed a real-world analysis of patients with AML treated with CPX-351 as first-line therapy. Design/Methods: For this retrospective analysis, we collected data on baseline characteristics, treatment details including allo-HCT and outcome from patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML, who were treated with CPX-351 according to the EMA label between 2018 and 2020 in 25 German centers participating in the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL), German Cooperative Transplant Study Group and the AML Study Group (AMLSG). Results: A total of 188 patients (median age 65 years, range 26 to 80) with t-AML (29%) or AML-MRC (70%) including 46 patients (24%) & lt;60 years could be analyzed. Eigthy-six percent received one, 14% two induction cycles and 10% received consolidation with CPX-351. Following induction, CR/CRi rate was 47% including 64% of patients with available information achieving measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity ( & lt;10-3) as measured by flow cytometry at local laboratories. Additionally, 35 patients were categorized as MLFS at first remission control, which achieved CRi (n=16) or CR (n=10) in the further course without additional therapy. After median follow-up of 9.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was 21 months and 1-year OS rate was 64%. In multivariate analysis, complex karyotype predicted lower response (p=.0001), and pretreatment with hypomethylating agents (p=.02) and adverse European LeukemiaNet 2017 genetic risk (p & lt;.0001) were associated with lower OS. Allo-HCT was performed in 116 patients (62%) including 101 of these patients with CR prior transplant and resulted in 1-year OS of 73% (median survival not reached), especially in MRD negative patients (p=.048). With 69% of patients developing grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity following induction and a day 30-mortality of 8% the safety profile was consistent with previous findings. Conclusion: The results from this real-world analysis confirm CPX-351 as an efficient treatment for these high-risk AML patients bridging to facilitating allo-HCT in many patients with encouraging outcome after transplantation. Disclosures Röllig: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gaidzik: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Unglaub: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee; JazzPharma: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee. Thol: Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Haenel: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy. Vucinic: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; MSD: Honoraria. Fransecky: Novartis: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Holtick: Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Kobbe: Celgene: Research Funding. Holderried: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Therakos: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Other: Travel support; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; Eurocept Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Medac: Other: Travel support. Heuser: Astellas: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BergenBio: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tolremo: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Sauer: Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member. Goetze: Abbvie: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios and Astex: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Helsinn: Honoraria; GEMoaB: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Berlin-Chemie: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedica: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Schetelig: Roche: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees . Germing: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: advisory activity, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Schroeder: JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-153440

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 4533-4533

Abstract: Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibition with antibodies targeting programmed death protein 1 (PD1) was well tolerable and highly effective in pivotal phase II and III trials in relapsed or refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We aimed to evaluate emerging therapeutic sequences and the safety and efficacy of anti-PD1 antibodies in the rapidly changing routine care of r/r cHL. Methods: GHSG-affiliated hemato-oncology departments and practices in Germany were invited to participate in this retrospective study. Patients ≥18 years of age receiving anti-PD1 antibodies for r/r cHL in routine care were eligible. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics were documented by the treating physicians with standardized case report forms. Locally assessed response rates were reported as complete (CR) or partial (PR) remission, stable (SD) or progressive (PD) disease and summarized as objective response rate (ORR: CR + PR). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier from the start of anti-PD1 treatment in routine care to PD (PFS) or death from any cause (PFS + OS). All analyses were done descriptively and conducted in SAS V9.4. Results: A total of 58 r/r cHL patients (pts.) with a median age of 48 years (range 19-89 years) and male predominance (57%) initiated anti-PD1 treatment between 11/2014 and 01/2021 at 15 sites. Median time from 1 st-line to anti-PD1 treatment was 5.5 years (0.8-26.0). The majority had received prior brentuximab vedotin (BV, 86%) or an autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT, 62%) and 16% undergone prior alloSCT. Relevant co-morbidities including HIV, pre-existing autoimmune conditions, cardiovascular diseases and dialysis-dependent kidney failure were documented in 49% of patients. An impaired ECOG performance status of ≥1 was present in 57% of patients (ECOG 2: 12%, ECOG 3: 4%). At initiation of anti-PD1 treatment, 74% of patients presented with stage III/IV disease and 35% did not achieve a response to their latest prior therapy. The median duration of anti-PD1 treatment was 18.1 (0.5-79.3) months and 50% of patients still received an anti-PD1 antibody at data collection. One third (31.6%) of patients experienced grade III/IV treatment-related toxicities and a treatment delay of & gt;6 weeks due to toxicity occurred in 15.5% of patients. Investigator-assessed ORR was 66.7% with 20.4% of patients achieving a CR and 46.3% a PR as best response (Figure 1A). With a median follow-up of 19.1 (0-74.7) months and 26.7 (0-74.7) for PFS and OS, respectively, median PFS (mPFS) and OS were 12.3 months and 32 months, respectively (Figure 1B+C). Corresponding 2-year PFS and OS estimates were 38.3% (95%CI 24.4-52.2) and 78.5% (95%CI 67.2-89.8). Median PFS was more favorable in patients achieving either a CR (30.1 months) or PR (24.9 months) compared to SD (9.3) or PD (3.4, Figure 1D), with similar trends also observed for OS. Two thirds (67%) of the 29 patients eventually experiencing PD, continued anti-PD1 treatment beyond progression at least once, with a median duration of 9.9 (3.0-25.8) until 2 nd PD. Overall, 28% patients received concomitant add-on treatments with radiotherapy (62.5%) and chemotherapy (25%) administered simultaneously most commonly. Best response to combination treatment was PR in 84.6% and SD in 15.4% of patients, and 75% of patients receiving add-on treatments achieved their best response only thereafter. Most common consecutive treatments were allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (N=5), BV-based therapy (N=5), Gemcitabine-based regimens (N=4) radiotherapy (N=4) and N=13 patients did not receive further treatment after anti-PD1 failure. Most common cause of death was cHL (58% of deaths reported), followed by non-anti-PD1 treatment-related causes (16%), infections and cardiac diseases (11% each) and second neoplasms (5%). Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort of older and frailer r/r cHL patients receiving anti-PD1 antibodies in routine care, safety and efficacy data including ORR, mPFS and mOS was similar to data reported from pivotal phase II trials. Anti-PD1 treatment for r/r cHL thereby appears feasible and able to induce meaningful clinical benefit in a broad range of patients. Despite various concomitant and subsequent treatments administered, however, cHL or subsequent treatments are by far the leading cause of death. Failure of anti-PD1 in r/r cHL hence constitutes an unmet need. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Trautmann-Grill: GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kobbe: Celgene: Research Funding. Heinrich: Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Astra: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Schmidt: Incyte: Honoraria; Biotest: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Hüttmann: Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Lead Discovery Center GmbH: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fuchs: Lukon: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. von Tresckow: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pentixafarm: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: congress and travel support. Borchmann: Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotech: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Engert: MSD: Honoraria; Hexal: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Tessa Therapeutics: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Bröckelmann: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-153200

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Diabetes Care, American Diabetes Association, Vol. 45, No. 12 ( 2022-12-01), p. 2991-2998

Abstract: Finerenone reduced the risk of kidney and cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes in the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD phase 3 studies. Effects of finerenone on outcomes in patients taking sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) were evaluated in a prespecified pooled analysis of these studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥30 to ≤5,000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2 were randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo; SGLT2is were permitted at any time. Outcomes included cardiovascular composite (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and kidney composite (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% eGFR decline, or renal death) end points, changes in UACR and eGFR, and safety outcomes. RESULTS Among 13,026 patients, 877 (6.7%) received an SGLT2i at baseline and 1,113 (8.5%) initiated one during the trial. For the cardiovascular composite, the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.96) without SGLT2i and 0.67 (95% CI 0.42–1.07) with SGLT2i. For the kidney composite, the HRs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.92) without SGLT2i and 0.42 (95% CI 0.16–1.08) with SGLT2i. Baseline SGLT2i use did not affect risk reduction for the cardiovascular or kidney composites with finerenone (Pinteraction = 0.46 and 0.29, respectively); neither did SGLT2i use concomitant with study treatment. CONCLUSIONS Benefits of finerenone compared with placebo on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes were observed irrespective of SGLT2i use.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0149-5992 , 1935-5548

URL: Article

DOI: 10.2337/dc22-0294

Language: English

Publisher: American Diabetes Association

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490520-6

In: Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, IOP Publishing, Vol. 135, No. 1048 ( 2023-06-01), p. 068001-

Abstract: Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least 4 m. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the 6.5 m James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astronomers will celebrate their accomplishments for the life of the mission, potentially as long as 20 yr, and beyond. This report and the scientific discoveries that follow are extended thank-you notes to the 20,000 team members. The telescope is working perfectly, with much better image quality than expected. In this and accompanying papers, we give a brief history, describe the observatory, outline its objectives and current observing program, and discuss the inventions and people who made it possible. We cite detailed reports on the design and the measured performance on orbit.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0004-6280 , 1538-3873

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

Language: Unknown

Publisher: IOP Publishing

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003100-2

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2207655-4

SSG: 16,12