In:
Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 24, No. 18_suppl ( 2006-06-20), p. 13537-13537
Abstract:
13537 Background: Recently, a high expression of TIMP-1 was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer (CRC). TIMP-1 can also be detected in plasma of those patients (pts). We investigated the longitudinal concentrations of TIMP-1 in 37 pts with advanced CRC and correlated the monitoring performance of TIMP-1 to CEA and CA 19–9 as established markers of tumor load in CRC. In addition, the plasma level of TuM2-PK as novel marker of disease activity was integrated into the analysis. Methods: Plasma TIMP-1 (Bayer Diagnostics/Oncogene Science, Tarrytown/Boston, USA) and TuM2-PK (Schebo Biotech, Giessen, Germany) levels were measured using standardized ELISA assays while serum CEA and CA 19–9 were determined using chemiluminescence immunoassays (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown/NY). The nonparametric analysis of variance for repeated measurements by Brunner was used to test for time effects between the selected 3 time points: 1. baseline at initiation of systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease; 2: best response; 3: later progression. Results: We grouped 37 pts with regard to best response to chemotherapy as follows: complete or partial remission (CR/PR): n=10; stable disease (SD): n=21; primary progressive disease (PD): n=6. TIMP-1 and TuM2-PK concentrations increased significantly from baseline to progression (p 〈 0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). The plasma levels of patients with objective response (CR/PR) dropped significantly for TuM2-PK (p=0.001) and TIMP-1 (p=0.001), while CA 19–9 and CEA did not change (p=0.94 and p=0.10, respectively). No significant change could be demonstrated in the SD group for TuM2-PK (p=0.26), TIMP-1 (p=0.69) and for CEA (p=0.25), whereas CA 19–9 concentrations decreased significantly (p=0.04). Conclusions: Innovative markers like TIMP-1 and TuM2-PK provided a much higher monitoring quality than established markers like CEA and CA 19–9 in advanced CRC. As the later cancer-associated proteins are recommended by internationally acknowledged guidelines, larger comparative trials are warranted asking the important question whether a replacement of CEA by one or a panel of new markers may provide additional clinical information. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0732-183X
,
1527-7755
DOI:
10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.13537
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publication Date:
2006
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2005181-5
Bookmarklink