feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: eClinicalMedicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 65 ( 2023-11), p. 102260-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2589-5370
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2946413-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 17, No. 1 ( 2022-12)
    Abstract: In individuals suffering from a rare disease the diagnostic process and the confirmation of a final diagnosis often extends over many years. Factors contributing to delayed diagnosis include health care professionals' limited knowledge of rare diseases and frequent (co-)occurrence of mental disorders that may complicate and delay the diagnostic process. The ZSE-DUO study aims to assess the benefits of a combination of a physician focusing on somatic aspects with a mental health expert working side by side as a tandem in the diagnostic process. Study design This multi-center, prospective controlled study has a two-phase cohort design. Methods Two cohorts of 682 patients each are sequentially recruited from 11 university-based German Centers for Rare Diseases (CRD): the standard care cohort (control, somatic expertise only) and the innovative care cohort (experimental, combined somatic and mental health expertise). Individuals aged 12 years and older presenting with symptoms and signs which are not explained by current diagnoses will be included. Data will be collected prior to the first visit to the CRD’s outpatient clinic (T0), at the first visit (T1) and 12 months thereafter (T2). Outcomes Primary outcome is the percentage of patients with one or more confirmed diagnoses covering the symptomatic spectrum presented. Sample size is calculated to detect a 10 percent increase from 30% in standard care to 40% in the innovative dual expert cohort. Secondary outcomes are (a) time to diagnosis/diagnoses explaining the symptomatology; (b) proportion of patients successfully referred from CRD to standard care; (c) costs of diagnosis including incremental cost effectiveness ratios; (d) predictive value of screening instruments administered at T0 to identify patients with mental disorders; (e) patients’ quality of life and evaluation of care; and f) physicians’ satisfaction with the innovative care approach. Conclusions This is the first multi-center study to investigate the effects of a mental health specialist working in tandem with a somatic expert physician in CRDs. If this innovative approach proves successful, it will be made available on a larger scale nationally and promoted internationally. In the best case, ZSE-DUO can significantly shorten the time to diagnosis for a suspected rare disease. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT03563677; First posted: June 20, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03563677 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1750-1172
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2225857-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 73, No. 01 ( 2023-01), p. 9-15
    Abstract: Ziel der Studie Die Zeit bis zu einer korrekten Diagnosestellung einer Seltenen Erkrankung kann sich über mehrere Jahre erstrecken. Patient*innen, bei denen der Verdacht auf eine Seltene Erkrankung besteht, haben oft bereits einen langen und belastenden Weg durch das Gesundheitssystem hinter sich. Bis heute ist wenig über die Lebensqualität von Patient*innen mit Verdacht auf eine Seltene Erkrankung bekannt. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist es, die gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität sowie die wahrgenommene Stressbelastung von Patient*innen mit Verdacht auf eine Seltene Erkrankung zu beschreiben und mit populationsbasierten Referenzwerten zu vergleichen. Methodik Achtzig Patient*innen mit Verdacht auf eine Seltene Erkrankung wurden im Rahmen der bundesweiten Interventionsstudie „ZSE-DUO“ rekrutiert und zu ihrer Lebensqualität und wahrgenommenen Belastung anhand des SF-8 und des Distress-Thermometers inklusive Problemliste befragt. Ergebnisse Die befragten Patient*innen bewerteten alle acht Dimensionen der Lebensqualität sowie die körperlichen und psychischen Summenskalen des SF-8 signifikant niedriger als die Allgemeinbevölkerung. Die wahrgenommene Belastung wurde signifikant höher bewertet. Zudem gaben über 90% der Stichprobe einen Wert im klinisch auffälligen Bereich an. Erschöpfung, Schmerzen, eingeschränkte Mobilität sowie Sorgen und Ängste wurden am häufigsten als konkrete Probleme genannt, mit Anteilen jeweils zwischen 73 und 90% der Gesamtstichprobe. Diskussion Im Vergleich zu deutschen Referenzdaten berichten Patient*innen mit dem Verdacht auf eine Seltene Erkrankung eine massive Beeinträchtigung ihrer Lebensqualität und eine hohe Belastung, die besonders durch körperliche und emotionale Probleme gekennzeichnet ist. Das Fehlen einer Diagnose könnte den hohen Anteil emotionaler Probleme erklären, da durch diese eine Form der Legitimation des eigenen Krankheitserlebens entstehen kann. Schlussfolgerung Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse unterstreichen die dringende Notwendigkeit der Forschung zu den psychosozialen Auswirkungen beim möglichen Vorliegen einer Seltenen Erkrankung.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0937-2032 , 1439-1058
    RVK:
    Language: German
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 800571-0
    SSG: 2,1
    SSG: 5,2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: BMC Pediatrics, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 23, No. 1 ( 2023-04-11)
    Abstract: Continuous medical care is particularly important in childhood and adolescence. Since there are gaps in regular care in Germany, various health insurance providers offer to cover additional examinations (e.g., U10, U11, J2) to ensure ongoing paediatrician visits. However, the question arises as to whether these examinations are effective. Thus, the main objective of this study is to determine whether participation in the U10, U11 or J2 examinations leads to more frequent and earlier diagnosis and treatment of age-specific diseases. Methods The analyses are based on administrative claims data from a statutory health insurance fund. For each examination, an intervention group (IG) is formed and matched with a corresponding control group (CG). Descriptive analyses include proportion with diagnosis and treatment, average age of diagnosis and treatment initiation. Hypothesis testing is performed using methods appropriate to each. In addition, subgroup analyses and binominal logistic regression models are conducted. Results More diagnoses are detected in IG, irrespective of subgroups. Additionally, diagnoses are made slightly earlier on average in IG. In the total samples, more therapies are initiated in IG, and slightly earlier. Considering only diagnosed cases, more therapies are initiated in CG but continue to be started earlier in IG. Regression models show that participation in the examinations has the highest predictive power for detecting a diagnosis. The presence of a chronic disease and sex - male at the U10 and U11 and female at the J2 - are also significantly associated. The models further show that nationality, unemployment of parents and region also have a significant influence in some cases, whereas school-leaving qualification, vocational qualification and income of parents do not. Considering the initiation of treatment in overall samples, the models show similar results, but here the presence of a chronic illness has the highest predictive power. Conclusion The results indicate that participation in the examinations leads to significantly more diagnoses and, in the overall samples, significantly more treatments. In addition, diagnoses were made somewhat earlier and therapies were initiated somewhat earlier. In the future, it would be useful to investigate the U10, U11 and J2 examinations over a longer time horizon to determine whether the statistically significant difference found is also clinically relevant, i.e., earlier diagnosis and initiation of therapy lead to prevention of manifestation or progression of the diagnosed diseases and to avoidance of secondary diseases. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS-ID: DRKS00015280. Prospectively registered on 18 March 2019.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1471-2431
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041342-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Archives of Public Health, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 81, No. 1 ( 2023-08-29)
    Abstract: Early detection examinations and prevention are particularly important in childhood and adolescence, as certain diseases are already developing and health-related attitudes and behaviour patterns are formed and implemented. Despite the importance of screening and prevention, not all families use the available services and programmes. The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with participation in an early detection and prevention programme for children and adolescents, as well as factors associated with actual uptake of an examination. The analyses are based on questionnaire data of an online survey of participants and non-participants. Descriptive analyses and logistic regression models are conducted on a defined sample ( n  = 1,289). The results show that both groups differ with regard to several factors: age, chronic diseases, federal state, living space, number of siblings, country of birth, migration background, language spoken at home, mother’s occupational status, household income, treatment duration, and trust in treating physician. Regression I shows that participation in the programme is significantly associated with higher age, language spoken at home, mother’s occupational status and greater trust in the treating physician. The latter demonstrates the highest predictive power. Regression II indicates that the actual uptake of an examination among participants is significantly affected by age, federal state and father’s occupational status. Overall, the results of this study show that social background partly plays a role in participation, but that factors such as trust in the treating physician also have a significant impact. For the future, further research on the factors influencing participation in screening and prevention services or programmes for children and adolescents is important in order to develop strategies to overcome existing barriers and thus reach groups that have not been reached yet. In this context, trust in the treating physician and his or her influence on decision-making should in particular be considered.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2049-3258
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2133388-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages