In:
Journal of Medical Ethics, BMJ, Vol. 46, No. 9 ( 2020-09), p. 632-633
Abstract:
Johnson and Degeling have recently enquired whether one health (OH) requires a comprehensive normative framework, concluding that such a framework, while not necessary, may be helpful. In this commentary, we provide a context for this debate, and describe how pragmatism has been predominant in the OH literature. We nevertheless argue that articulating a comprehensive normative theory to ground OH practice might clear existing vagueness and provide stronger guidance in relevant health dilemmas. A comprehensive theory will also be needed eventually to ground notions such as universal good. We, thus, call for the systematic articulation of a comprehensive, metaethical theory, concomitantly with already ongoing normative work.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0306-6800
,
1473-4257
DOI:
10.1136/medethics-2019-105859
Language:
English
Publisher:
BMJ
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2026397-1
SSG:
0
SSG:
1
SSG:
5,1
Bookmarklink