In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 15, No. 11 ( 2020-11-30), p. e0242725-
Abstract:
Pre-mRNA splicing is critical for achieving required amounts of a transcript at a given time and for regulating production of encoded protein. A given pre-mRNA may be spliced in many ways, or not at all, giving rise to multiple gene products. Numerous splicing factors are recruited to pre-mRNA splice sites to ensure proper splicing. One such factor, the 60 kDa poly(U)-binding splicing factor (PUF60), is recruited to sites that are not always spliced, but rather function as alternative splice sites. In this study, we characterized the interaction of PUF60 with a splice site from the adenovirus major late promoter (the AdML 3' splice site, AdML 3’). We found that the PUF60– AdML 3’ dissociation constants are in the micromolar range, with the binding affinity predominantly provided by PUF60’s two central RNA recognition motifs (RRMs). A 1.95 Å crystal structure of the two PUF60 RRMs in complex with AdML 3’ revealed a dimeric organization placing two stretches of nucleic acid tracts in opposing directionalities, which can cause looping of nucleic acid and explain how PUF60 affects pre-mRNA geometry to effect splicing. Solution characterization of this complex by light-scattering and UV/Vis spectroscopy suggested a potential 2:1 (PUF60 2 : AdML 3’) stoichiometry, consistent with the crystal structure. This work defines the sequence specificity of the alternative splicing factor PUF60 at the pre-mRNA 3’ splice site. Our observations suggest that control of pre-mRNA directionality is important in the early stage of spliceosome assembly, and advance our understanding of the molecular mechanism by which alternative and constitutive splicing factors differentiate among 3’ splice sites.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.g010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s016
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0242725.s017
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Bookmarklink