Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 71, No. 2 ( 2011-08), p. 323-329
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-5282
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2001856-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Hematology ; 2012
    In:  Blood Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 4249-4249
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 4249-4249
    Abstract: Abstract 4249 Background: Despite the paucity of randomized controlled trials and strong observational studies supporting the efficacy of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention, indications for placement of IVCFs have increased. Further, evidence-based guidelines for removal of retrievable filters do not exist. The purpose of this study was to characterize contemporary IVCF practices in the prevention and management of VTE, and clarify the stakeholders in IVCF placement and retrieval among trauma centers across the United States. Methods: In September 2011 a web-based survey was distributed to 1206 members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) in 3 waves over 3 weeks. This 31-question multiple choice and open-ended survey addressed: 1) provider and practice characteristics, 2) trauma patient population, 3) clinical practice of IVCF placement and retrieval, and 4) pharmacologic prophylaxis (PP). Results: Of the 1059 eligible providers that care for trauma patients on a routine basis, 281 completed the survey (27% response rate); 27% were identified as trauma directors. Seventy-two percent of all responents practiced in an academic setting and 74.7% in a level-1 trauma center. Sixty percent of trauma directors reported more than 1,000 trauma admissions per year. Familiarity with the 2002 EAST and 2008 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for IVCF placement was noted by 84.3% and 63.0% of respondents, respectively. The majority of trauma centers placed IVCFs (98.9%), of which 3.6% placed only permanent IVCFs, 27.3% only retrievable IVCFs, and 67.3% both. Only 28.4% of centers had an institutional clinical protocol for IVCF placement and 25.5% for removal of IVCFs. The most common indication for IVCF placement was acute VTE and contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation (32.4%). Prophylactic IVCFs (pIVCFs) in high-risk patients without known VTE were utilized by 97.6% of respondents. Indications for pIVCFs included inability to receive PP (26.5%), incomplete spinal cord injury (19.8%), and complex pelvic fracture with long bone fracture (19.6%). Filter insertion was performed by interventional radiologists (48.1%), vascular surgeons (35.6%), and/or trauma surgeons (15.5%) at each institution. Ultrasound guidance was used in 23.3% of IVCFs placed and 14.0% of insertions occured at the bedside. Acute and long-term complications encountered by providers included filter migration (21.0%), recurrent VTE (15.5%), hematoma (15.5%), and inferior vena cava thrombosis (13.8%). Surveillance for lower extremity deep vein thromboses in trauma patients was performed by 52% of centers. A registry to track patients with IVCFs was maintained by 38% of centers. Decisions to refer patients for IVCF removal were made by the proceduralist service (37.7%), ordering service (38.7%), and/or service following patients after discharge (12.7%). Only 2.5% of respondents removed IVCFs prior to hospital discharge. Screening for VTE prior to IVCF removal was performed with ultrasound (28%), venogram (14.4%), or computed tomography (2.5%), however 43.3% were uncertain of the screening method. In addition to IVCFs, adjunctive VTE prophylaxis indicated by respondents were sequential compression devices (26.7%), low molecular weight heparin (39.0%), unfractionated heparin (25.2%), fondaparinux (5.4%), or aspirin (2.0%). Only 1% of respondents indicated not using PP in trauma patients with IVCFs. Formal institutional PP guidelines existed in 92.9% of institutions. The most common reasons for contraindication to PP included pelvic or retroperitoneal hematoma requiring transfusion of blood products (20.0%), traumatic brain injury (18.3%), ocular injury with hemorrhage (16.3%), coagulopathy (13.6%), and solid intra-abdominal organ injury (11.4%). Sixty-one providers (7.1%) did not indicate any absolute contraindications for PP outside of acute phase of the above injuries. Conclusion: This study confirms the widespread use of IVCFs for both acute VTE and prophylactic indications. However, considerable variation in practice patterns with regards to institutional protocols for IVCF placement and retireval as well as utilization of adjunctive pharmacologic prophylaxis exists. These differences highlight the need for well-designed randomized controlled trials to address the efficacy and safety of IVCFs in trauma patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 32, No. 1 ( 2011-7), p. 40-46
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0929-5305 , 1573-742X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2017305-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2014
    In:  The American Surgeon Vol. 80, No. 12 ( 2014-12), p. 1237-1244
    In: The American Surgeon, SAGE Publications, Vol. 80, No. 12 ( 2014-12), p. 1237-1244
    Abstract: Inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) for thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients are being increasingly used despite a lack of strong clinical data in support of their efficacy and conflicting clinical practice guidelines. This national survey elucidates practice patterns of IVCF use across U.S. trauma centers. A web-based survey was administered to members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma between September 2011 and October 2011. The survey queried: 1) background and professional practice; 2) trauma patient population; 3) IVCF placement; 4) IVCF retrieval and follow-up; and 5) pharmacologic prophylaxis. Two hundred eighty-one of 1059 eligible providers completed the survey (27%). Respondents were from a wide spectrum of training backgrounds and clinical practice settings. IVCFs were used by 98.9 per cent of respondents. IVCFs in patients without known venous thromboembolism were considered by 93.2 per cent of respondents. Indications and timing of IVCF retrieval vary. Follow-up care of patients with IVCFs was not uniform. An IVCF registry was maintained by 38 per cent of trauma programs. Adjunctive pharmacologic prophylaxis was used by 96.8 per cent of respondents. This study elucidates the gaps and variations in contemporary practices of IVCF use in trauma patients. Identification of best practices in IVCF use and retrieval awaits well-designed comparative effectiveness studies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-1348 , 1555-9823
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2014
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 190 ( 2019-06), p. 115-125
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0960-0760
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482780-3
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Transplantation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 73, No. 6 ( 2002-03), p. 907-910
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0041-1337
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2002
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2035395-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 5594-5594
    Abstract: Improvements in pediatric care since the 1970s as a result of Comprehensive Sickle Cell Centers, newborn screening, and prophylactic penicillin has led to an increase in life expectancy for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and has resulted in an increase in the number of adults with progressive end-organ damage/dysfunction. The inability of the U.S. Health Care system to adequately address the needs of this increasing patient population, along with stereotyping of SCD patients, has inevitably led to disparities in care, with an ever increasing disease burden and cost of care. Recognition of these issues has led U.S. Federal Health Care and Biomedical Research agencies (CDC, NIH, HRSA) to develop and implement programs to tackle this growing problem. Recently, NHLBI and NIMHD issued an RFA (HL-16-010) to address through implementation science the unmet health care needs of adolescents and adults (ages ≥15 years) with SCD. This program seeks to improve the health care and outcomes of this population through rigorous implementation of evidence-based guidelines. This initiative prompted us to analyze the demographic characteristics of the adult SCD population served by the GRU Sickle Cell Center, in an effort to better understand the opportunities and challenges posed by this initiative. The GRU Sickle Cell Center has been in existence since 1972, and serves ~1500 pediatric and adult SCD patients through its clinical program. Although based at the GRU campus in Augusta, GA (the second largest metropolitan area in the state with a population of 〉 540,000), the Center has operated extensive outreach activities in rural south Georgia for the last 30 years, covering both pediatric and adult patients. The adult program holds monthly or every other month clinics in 5 sites in central, eastern, and southern Georgia. As of 2015, the Center has 580 active adult patients ( 〉 18 years). Fifty six percent are female and 44% male. Over half (54%) are followed at the Augusta clinic, and the remaining 46% in primarily rural outreach sites. The distribution of different genotypes is as follows: SS 392 (69%), SC 114 (20%), S-β+-thal 37 (6%), S-β0-thal 16 (3%) and others 11 (2%). The median age of the male patients is 31 (17-82), whereas for females is 34 (18-68). The median age for SS patients is 32 (17-65), and for SC is 34 (19-71). Overall, 62% of the population is in the 18-40 age group. Only 10% of the patients are 〉 50. There is an age dependent increase in the proportion of female patients (70.6% 〉 61). Similarly, the proportion of SC patients increases to 56.3%, while SS decreases to 31.3% among subjects 〉 61 years of age. Fifty-one percent of all patients (mostly SS) were prescribed hydroxyurea (HU). However, as reported earlier (Chand et al, ASH poster, 2014), only 59.9% had an adequate response; 26.3% were non-adherent, and 13.9% were on suboptimal doses. These data show that the adult SCD population in Georgia is young, with median age in the lower 30s. It also confirms the well-known observations that SC genotype and female gender are overrepresented in the older age groups. The opportunities to improve the health of this patient population in the next 5-10 years include: the existing outreach infrastructure, the partnership forged between the GRU Sickle Cell Center and some primary care practices (Family Medicine) and Hematology/Oncology practices in various outreach sites, and the implementation of an emergency department fast track pathway to treat vaso-occlusive crises in two of these outreach sites. The challenges, on the other hand, are persisting barriers to adequate/appropriate use of HU, partnering with community providers in the provision of appropriate pain management, implementation of evidence based transfusion practices in outlying hospitals and implementation of long-term evidence based health maintenance and primary care. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 246-246
    Abstract: Abstract 246 Biologically based diagnostics and therapeutics underpin the field of hematology and oncology. During clinical fellowship training, biological and biochemical concepts have typically been presented in lecture formats and research electives. Based on trainee serial subjective self-assessments of knowledge (SAK) and graduate surveys, traditional pedagogy were deemed inadequate in supporting contemporary training and practice needs. Optimal assimilation of knowledge requires clinical context, experience, and performance. It was thus hypothesized that an active training method providing first-hand participation, such as a wet laboratory (wetlab), would increase fund of biomedical knowledge in hematology and oncology. Single-day wetlab sessions were developed, incorporating hands-on laboratory procedures linked to clinical vignettes. The procedures were designed to expose the molecular and biochemical basis, utility and limitations of current laboratory tests, such as coagulation monitoring, electrophoresis, flow cytometry and DNA-based assays. The curriculum rotated each of the three years so that each fellow would participate in all laboratory assays throughout fellowship training. Between July 2004 and June 2009, all fellows completed serial subjective SAKs (score 1–5) at 6-month intervals. SAKs inquire about all cognitive and procedural-based individual knowledge based on ASH and ASCO core curriculum, but only data relevant to basic science concepts and laboratory assays were included in this analysis. Midway through this time period, the wetlab curriculum was implemented. Fellows were given pre- and post-lab tests to assess their baseline and acquisition of biomedical knowledge. All results were compared between those who randomly did or did not participate. Fellow evaluation of the wetlab was also collected. Sixteen individual fellows (10 female; 6 male) were included in the analysis. Only one had significant pre-fellowship lab experience. Wetlab participation was mandatory, but randomly assigned during the course of each trainee's time. All but one fellow participated at least once during their training. SAK scores were significantly increased for those fellows who participated (mean 3.23 vs. 2.73; P 〈 0.045), independent of fellow year (P=NS). Pre- and post-wetlab testing reflected increased objective assimilation of molecular biology knowledge for all participants (64% vs. 80%; P 〈 0.014). Test scores for both groups improved over the course of each academic year (P=NS). Participants uniformly rated the wetlab experience as positive with 100% desiring to repeat it again the following year and recommending it to a peer who was not in attendance. In-training exam scores reflected outstanding overall performance for fellows in the Basic Science category (Hematology mean 74%; Oncology mean 73%). All board eligible fellows from this analysis have subsequently achieved Board Certification as first time test takers (100%). Implementation of an annual hematology and oncology biomedical wetlab for clinical fellows is feasible and results in significant improvement in trainee subjective knowledge and confidence gained. Objective measures of biomedical fund of knowledge appear increased as a result of this intervention. This method of teaching may advance understanding of relevant diagnostic tests utilized in the clinical practice of hematology and medical oncology. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Hematology ; 2007
    In:  Blood Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 79-79
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 79-79
    Abstract: Background: Efficacy of hydroxyurea (HU) was demonstrated in the Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia (MSH) placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with a reduction in average crisis rate (weighted mean difference −2.80; CI −4.74 to −0.86). HU was FDA-approved in 1998 for treatment of adults with sickle cell anemia experiencing recurrent painful episodes. An observational 9 year follow-up study of the MSH cohort demonstrated improved survival for patients taking HU. Purpose: To examine adoption and utilization of HU in SCD patients in a Medicaid population. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Florida Medicaid eligibility, medical and pharmacy data for January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2005. The Medicaid database consists of medical and outpatient pharmacy utilization and reimbursement claims. SCD patients aged between 16 and 64 years with at least one inpatient or two outpatient SCD diagnosis claims (ICD-9-CM 282.6x), and meeting continuous eligibility criteria were included. HU adoption was determined by the presence of at least one HU pharmacy claim using National Drug Codes. Adherence to HU was calculated using the medication possession ratio (MPR) defined as the cumulative daily dose dispensed (excluding the last prescription refill and hospitalizations) divided by the time period between the first and last HU prescription (Rx) dispensed. Descriptive and bi-variate analyses were used to assess the relationship between patient characteristics, treatment and utilization of medical resources. Results: The mean age of the 2,301 SCD patients identified is 25 years ± 10.9(SD). Of those, the majority were female (64%) and younger than 25 years of age (60%). During the study eligibility period, 72% had at least one SCD-related emergency department visit, 88% at least one hospitalization and 53% at least one inpatient claim for SCD with pain crisis. During the study period, 33.4% of the patients had ≥ 3 hospitalizations for SCD with pain crisis in any 12 month period. Approximately one-third of patients had red blood cell transfusions (36%) but only 4.4% had a claim for iron-chelation. Of all SCD patients 26% used outpatient opioid medications with 65.4% receiving slow-release formulations. Nearly 17% of the cohort (n=384) had at least one pharmacy claim for HU. Compared to non-HU users, HU users were more likely to be males (OR 1.79; CI 1.44–2.23), aged ≥ 25 years (OR 1.35; CI 1.08–1.71), with a history of using slow-release opioid medications (OR 5.95; CI 4.65–7.59) or receiving red cell transfusions (OR 4.21; CI 3.35–5.31). Of those SCD patients eligible to receive HU according to the MSH criteria (≥ 3 hospitalizations a year for SCD crisis), only 38% received at least one HU Rx (OR 11.78, CI: 8.26–16.80). For those patients receiving at least two HU Rx, only 30.2% had a MPR of ≥ 0.60 (see Table). Conclusions: The prevalence of HU use in this Medicaid population is low. Our results suggest that only a small subset of SCD patients receive HU prescriptions consistently. Early therapy drop out and low adherence rates are common in patients prescribed HU. Interventions to promote physician adoption and prescribing of HU are needed, as are efforts to increase patient adherence. HU Possession Ratio Number of patients (%) 0 – 〈 0.2 69 (28.6) 0.2 – 〈 0.4 46 (19.1) 0.4 – 〈 0.6 53 (22.0) 0.6 – 〈 0.8 36 (14.9) 〉 0.8 37 (15.4) Total 241 (100)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 2309-2309
    Abstract: Background: Hydroxyurea (HU) therapy in adults with sickle cell anemia (SCA) increases total hemoglobin (Hb) and percent fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels, reduces total white cell (WBC) and neutrophil (ANC) count, and increases the mean corpuscular volume (MCV). Case management and community health workers are both evidence-based health management strategies. Patient navigators (PN) are community health workers trained specifically in case management for patients with SCA. We therefore hypothesized that HU-eligible patients exposed to patient navigators (PN) would have improved laboratory characteristics reflecting improved uptake and adherence to HU. Methods: We enrolled 224 adult patients eligible for HU into the Start Healing in Patients with Hydroxyurea (SHIP-HU) Randomized Controlled Trial. All patients received care from trained physicians who implemented use of a standardized HU prescribing protocol using NIH guidelines. Pateints were randomized to either PN intervention (which included case management and education through home, telephone, and/or other visits from PNs) plus standard care by their treating physician (Experimental, E), or standard care by their physician alone (Control, C). Study physicians were blinded to study arm. At baseline, 6 months and 12 months we assessed: Complete Blood Count including WBC, ANC, total hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count (plt), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and; HbF via HPLC and electrophoresis. Main analyses consisted of comparisons of the hematological variables between arms. Mixed model analysis of variance was used to analyze follow-up visits, controlling for site and baseline value of outcome variable. Any missing baseline values for subjects were imputed. Results: 206 of 224 patients had at least one lab value at follow-up. Patients had mean age 30.1, 45.6% were male, 82.5% had been prescribed HU at baseline. HbF was higher at the 6 month visit for group E vs. group C when controlled for baseline values. Neither WBC, ANC, Hb, Hb F, Plt, nor MCV were different between groups E and C at any other time point (Table). Conclusions: In our sample, there were no differences in hematological variables among patients who were exposed to PNs vs those who weren't. Several factors may have impacted these outcomes. HU was prescribed to 82.5% of enrolled patients at baseline, with higher % HbF than anticipated in study design. The intention to study change in % HbF as a singular marker for HU uptake and adherence did not assume high utilization of HU at baseline. We are currently analyzing data to enable comparisons between patients who were on HU at baseline and those who were not, which we believe will be able to speak to the true impact of the PN intervention. Future analyses will examine these and other factors influencing outcomes. Table Disclosures Smith: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Villella:Pfizer: Other: Site PI for the Rivipansel Clinical Trial; Emmaus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liles:Novartis: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Shire: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Imara: Other: PI on Clinical trial- Sickle cell.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages