Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 4452-4452
    Abstract: Abstract 4452 Imatinib (IM) is now used world-wide as a first line chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. Although some time lack may exist between diagnosis and IM treatment. Earlier (Blood 2009, 114: Abstract 4278) we have shown that in CML chronic phase (CP) pts with very long history of the disease(more than five years)the pretreatment by Busulfan was the adverse prognostic factor on Imatinib therapy. Now we extend our study by a population of pts recently and for rather short time pretreated by busulfan. Aim. To investigate the effect of busulfan pretreatment on survival and responses to imatinib in CML pts in late CML CP. Materials and methods. In retrospective study 85 pts with CML CP from St-Petersburg, Leningrad region (Russian Federation) and several Ukrainian centers were included. The main inclusion criteria were: CML late CP (the duration of the disease more than 6 mos before IM start), IM therapy in routine clinical practice at least 12 months. The median time of IM therapy was 42,9 mos (12–97 mos), the median age of pts at the IM start was 49,5 years (19–83), male/female ratio 31/54. 23 patients were pretreated with busulfan (the study group) and 62 were not (control group). These groups were equal by age, sex, the median time from diagnosis to the IM start (28,3 mos in the study group and 23,9 in the control group), Sokal risk groups. Median time of busulfan pretreatment was 3,9 mos (1–62 mos). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 17. Results. In the whole group of patients frequency of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was 60% (51/85), estimated overall survival (OS) by 5 years from IM start was 87% (death rate 7% - 6/85). In the study group CCyR rate was significantly lower, than in the control group: 34,8% (8/23) and 69,35% (43/62), respectively, p=0,038. Estimated OS by 5 years was 72% (death rate 17% - 4/23) for busulfan-pretreated pts and 95% (death rate 3% - 2/62) for the control group, p 〈 0,01. Interestingly, that in the group of shortly busulfan-pretreated pts (the duration of pretreatment ≤6 mos), the lower CCyR rate has also been observed – 31% (4/13), although all other parameters were seemed equal to the control group (median time before IM start 28,3 mos). Conclusion. The pretreatment with busulfan impaired negatively the efficacy of imatinib treatment in CML late CP patients. Even short pretreatment (less than 6 mos) had adverse effect on CCyR. The mechanism is unclear. Busulfan pretreatment before imatinib therapy should not be used. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 4432-4432
    Abstract: Abstract 4432 Background: The incidence of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), reported from some population based registries, varies significantly. CML is known as age-dependent disease, so population age structure may strongly influent on the data. For international comparisons several systems for age-standardization are using in epidemiological studies. We conducted our retrospective study to reveal differences in CML incidence rates on the basis of calculation – crude or age-adjusted according to different population standards in St. Petersburg and Leningrad region. Methods: In 2005 the database of Ph- and/or bcr-abl- positive CML patients (pts) was conducted in St. Petersburg and Leningrad region. Since then the data from all newly diagnosed CML patients were included prospectively on population basis. The database was updated at least bi-annually. The data were obtained from hematologists, as general practitioners and private physicians are not licensed to treat oncohematological disorders. The data were double checked from the list of Imatinib distribution (the only drug reimbursed for first line treatment). To calculate crude CML incidence rate we use the data of the general census of the population in Russia in 2010 (the whole population of our region is 6596434 with population in age 15 and above 5821133). For age-adjusted CML incidence rate we use three of currently existing standards: The Segi (“World”), The Scandinavian (“European”) and the WHO standard (based on world average population between 2000–2025). Results: There are 258 (242 in chronic, 9 in accelerated and 7 in blastic phases) CML adult (15 years and above) pts, registered during 2006–2011. The median age is 53 years (48,5 and 55,5 years for men and women respectively). Sokal score was evaluable in 209 pts. It is low in 37%, intermediate in 35% and high in 28% pts. The crude CML incidence rate is slightly higher in men than in women with ratio 1,2:1. Mean annual crude CML incidence rate was 0,65 per 100 000 whole population of Saint Petersburg and Leningrad region, but it was 0,74 in adult population (15 years old and above). Mean annual CML incidence rates in the same age groups were slightly higher in all three standardized systems: 0,94 in Segi, 0,84 in Scandinavian and 0,88 in WHO standard populations. CML incidence rates in all age groups are presented in the table 1. CML incidence rate was lowest in young pts. It was unexpectedly very low in senior pts. CML incidence rates nearly for all age groups were slightly higher in St. Petersburg than in the Leningrad region. The majority of pts (98%) were treated with Imatinib (93% first or second line) or other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (5% first line-in international clinical trials, 18% after Imatinib failure or intolerance). Stem cell transplantation was performed only in 8/258 (3%) pts. Only 25235 (7,5%) evaluable pts progressed from chronic to advanced phases. Only 29/258 (11%) pts dead mostly due to CML (21 CML related deaths were reported). Estimated 5 years overall survival is 91,5%. Mean annual overall CML pts death rate was 1,9% (mean annual death rate between 2006–2010 in whole population of our region was 1,6%). Mean pts accumulated very fast - annual CML prevalence increasing rate between 2005–2011 was more than 14% (Picture 1). Conclusions: CML incidence both crude and age-adjusted in our population based registry is nearly the same in young and middle age, but much lower in senior (65 years and above) pts groups in comparison with published data from other registries which probably represents peculiarities of health system rather than real incidence. In the tyrosine kinase inhibitors era CML patients death rate is very low (nearly the same as in whole population) and CML pts is accumulated very fast in our region. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 4278-4278
    Abstract: Abstract 4278 Imatinib(IM) has become the “gold standard” for the treatment of CML CP. In clinical trials the majority of pts obtain complete hematologic (CHR) and complete cytogenetic (CCyR) responses. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of treatment by IM in CML CP pts in general practice (outside clinical trials). Patients and methods There are 335 pts with CML in databases in Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region. Most of them (283/335-84,5%) are ever treated with IM. Disease phases at the time of the start of IM therapy by ELN (from 268/283 evaluable pts) and MDACC (from 256/283 evaluable pts) criteria were: CP – 232 and 215, AP – 28 and 33, BP - 8 and 8 respectively. All 232 pts in CML CP (by ELN criteria) treated since 2001 by IM were included in the study. Before IM 91/232(39%), 114/232(49%) and 17/232 (7,3%) pts were pretreated by hydroxyurea, interferon-alfa with or without hydroxyurea and busulfan. 12/335(4%) pts were undergone alloSCT(6 alive, 6 dead due to progression or TRM) There were 134/232(58%) pts in early (duration before Im ≤ 12 mos) and 98/232(42%) pts in late CP ( 〉 12 mos). In early and late CP, there were 49/123 and 50/89, 40/123 and 23/89, 34/123 and 16/89 evaluable pts with low, intermediate and high Socal score respectively. The predominance of low Sokal score in late CP pts could to be related to survival benefit before imatinib.. The median time before Im for the whole group, for early and late CP pts were 7,4 mos(from 7 days to 132 mons), 1,8 mons (form 7 days to 12 mons) and 39 mons (from 12,1 mos to 132 mos) respectively. Median time of Im therapy was 33 mos (1 - 75 mos) in whole group, 24mons (1 - 73mos) in early and 34mos(2 - 75mos) in late CP pts respectivel Results Estimated overall survival by 6 years was 94,2% in whole group, 97% and 87% in early and late CP pts resp. Only 14/228(6,1%) of evaluable patients died due to CML: 4/130(3%) in early and 10/98(10,2%) in late CP group. 4 pts, resistant to IM, were transplanted: 1 in early CP and 3 in BP. Deathes were due to TRM or disease progression. CHR was achieved by 3 mons in most cases: 82/110(74,5%) and 36/64(56%) pt, in early and late CP, resp. Patients (39 in hole group, 12 in early and 27 in late CP) with CHR before IM were excluded from these analyses. The probability of CCyR by 6 years was 98% in early CP and 82% in late CP (p=0.002). The rate of CCyR was 75% 80/107) vs 31% (14/75) in patients with or without CHR by 3 mons (p=0.00). The same differences were found in early and late CP. CCyR in patients with CHR before IM was the same as in patients with newly obtained CHR by 3 mons on IM. Thereafter we have divided group of pts with late CP according to its duration before IM (very early - 〈 6mons, early late - 6-60 mons and very late ≥60 mons) and compared CCyR in early CP with different subgroups of late CP. Achievement of CCyR was higher in pts in very early(69.1%) and early –late(68.2%) than in very late group(34.6%)(p=0.09) Further subdivisions of the period of 6-60 mos did not reveal any differences. Moreover, when we deleted the patients pretreated with busulfan, the differences were found only between early and early-late phases. We have separately analyzed very late group, it appeared that pretreatment with busulfan severely decreases CCyR (22% vs 81% in with (12 pts) or without (7 pts) busulfan pretreatment, p=0,002. Probably, patients in very late CP is a specific group of patients with preformed very good prognosis. Clonal evolution before treatment (8 pts in early CP and 7 in late CP) did not influence CCyR achievement. The probability of progression to AP/BP was slightly higher in late (6%) than in early CP (3%) (p=0.05). The appearance of clonal evolution was higher in late than in early CP (p=0,0002). Progression to AP/BP was 1% vs 11% in pts with or without CHR by 3 mos resp. (p=0.003). Conclusions Imatinib is efficacious drug in general hematological practice with very high probability of overall survival, CCyR and low risk of progression to AP/BP. CHR is an early and very important predictor for further successful treatment. Achievement of CCyR strongly depends on CHR by 3 mons. Patients with CHR before imatinib have similar CCyR in patients with CHR by 3 mons on imatinib. Pretreatment period predispose patients to clonal evolution on imatinib treatment. Busulfan pretreatment severely decreases probability of CCyR. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 4288-4288
    Abstract: Abstract 4288 Resistance to imatinib could be overcome by new generations of TKIs. Data about the efficacy of second line TKI treatment may help to create a system for prognosing the duration of 2nd line TKI treatment and time of switching from second line TKI treatment to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of 2nd line TKI treatment in patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Patients and methods 44 resistant and 3 intolerant to imatinib pts were included. Cytogenetics with G-banding and PCR with sequencing were performed for evaluation the response and mutations. There were 39, 7 and 1 pts in CP, AP and BP respectively, Patients were treated by three different ATP-pocket inhibitors. The follow-up on 2nd line TKIs was 0.9-48mons (Median - 15.9 mons), median follow-up from diagnosis was 73,9 mons. In prognosis analysis (CHR, cytogenetics, Sokal) intolerant patients were not included. Results Probability of overall survival from diagnosis by 10 years was 85%. Probability of survival from the start of TKI2 by 4 y -90%. There were no differences in survival in pts with primary and secondary resistance, in CP and AP. Patients with low and intermediate Sokal risk did better than patients with high risk (p=0.014, Fig. 1.). 8 pts had T315I mutation when studied on second line TKI therapy. Achievement of CCyR was 50% (58% when T3151 patients were excluded), it was higher in low+intermediate in comparison with high risk pts (60% vs 30%, p=0.091), in CP than in AP (56% vs 20%,p=0.07), in patients with CHR at switching than in those without CHR (72% vs 18%, p=0.014). We failed to find any differences in CCyR achievement in pts with different best cytogenetic response on imatinib (complete, major, minor, minimal responses, absence of cytogenetic response). MCyR depended on the type of resistance - it was higher in secondary, than in primary resistant pts (80% vs 45%,p=0.06, Fig2). Probability of MCCyR loss was 20%, all of them appear during the first year of treatment. It was higher in AP than in CP (40% vs 12%,P=0.04). Probability of 4 years PFS was high - 75%, also without differences in primary vs secondary resistance and even in AP vs CP. Conclusion Second line TKI treatment is very efficacious in imatinib resistant pts. The effect depended on the type of resistance and phase of the disease, CHR at the moment of switching to 2nd line treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 4780-4780
    Abstract: There are few data on different biological significance of b2a2 and b3a2 transcripts. The main one is thrombocytosis in b3a2 CML patients (R.A.Perego e.a.,2000), probably associated with coexpression of m-bcr-abl (T.Liu e.a.,2006). Noteworthy that the level of transcripts in primary CML patients did not differ(Rodrigues J. e.a.,2005). That was the reason for evaluating Glivec efficacy in CP CML patients with bcr-abl trabscripts- b2a2 and b3a2. Patients and Methods. 97 Ph+, CP CML patients were studied. They received Glivec either as front line therapy or after resistance to preceeding therapy. Analysis of b3a2 and b2a2 transcripts was performed in 27 of them. Cytogenetics was performed routine technology with G-banding. Statitics: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model were used. Results. The median time to CCyR in whole cohort of patients was 320 days. Of 27 bcr-abl studied patients, 9 had b2a2 and 18 b3a3 transcripts. They did not differ in age, duration of the disease and Sokal Score. Median time to CCyR in b2a2 patients was 172 days and 362 in b3a2 patients(p=.0001). Time to CCyR was shorter in b2a2 patients(p=.003) and insignificantly longer in b3a2 patients when compared to the whole cohort of studied patients. Cox analysis revealed that type of transcripts is independant prognostic factor, including platelet level and spleen size. Difference was more pronounced in patients with front line Glivec therapy. Conclusion. b2a2 transcript is independent prognostic marker for early achievement of CCyR on Glivec therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages