Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 146, No. 9 ( 2022-08-30), p. 657-672
    Abstract: Apolipoprotein B (apoB) provides an integrated measure of atherogenic risk. Whether apoB levels and apoB lowering hold incremental predictive information on residual risk after acute coronary syndrome beyond that provided by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is uncertain. Methods: The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab) compared the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab with placebo in 18 924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome and elevated atherogenic lipoproteins despite optimized statin therapy. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal/nonfatal ischemic stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina). Associations between baseline apoB or apoB at 4 months and MACE were assessed in adjusted Cox proportional hazards and propensity score–matched models. Results: Median follow-up was 2.8 years. In proportional hazards analysis in the placebo group, MACE incidence increased across increasing baseline apoB strata (3.2 [95% CI, 2.9–3.6], 4.0 [95% CI, 3.6–4.5] , and 5.5 [95% CI, 5.0–6.1] events per 100 patient-years in strata 〈 75, 75– 〈 90, ≥90 mg/dL, respectively; P trend 〈 0.0001) and after adjustment for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( P trend =0.035). Higher baseline apoB stratum was associated with greater relative ( P trend 〈 0.0001) and absolute reduction in MACE with alirocumab versus placebo. In the alirocumab group, the incidence of MACE after month 4 decreased monotonically across decreasing achieved apoB strata (4.26 [95% CI, 3.78–4.79], 3.09 [95% CI, 2.69–3.54] , and 2.41 [95% CI, 2.11–2.76] events per 100 patient-years in strata ≥50, 〉 35– 〈 50, and ≤35 mg/dL, respectively). Compared with propensity score–matched patients from the placebo group, treatment hazard ratios for alirocumab also decreased monotonically across achieved apoB strata. Achieved apoB was predictive of MACE after adjustment for achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol but not vice versa. Conclusions: In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome and elevated atherogenic lipoproteins, MACE increased across baseline apoB strata. Alirocumab reduced MACE across all strata of baseline apoB, with larger absolute reductions in patients with higher baseline levels. Lower achieved apoB was associated with lower risk of MACE, even after accounting for achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, indicating that apoB provides incremental information. Achievement of apoB levels as low as ≤35 mg/dL may reduce lipoprotein-attributable residual risk after acute coronary syndrome. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01663402.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 9547-9547
    Abstract: 9547 Background: Immunosuppressed and/or immunocompromised patients are at increased risk for solid tumors and cutaneous malignancies. Limited data exist on the safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in these patients because they are frequently excluded from clinical trials. Here, we describe the safety and effectiveness results from the initial cohort of immunosuppressed and/or immunocompromised patients with advanced CSCC enrolled in the C.A.S.E. study (NCT03836105). Methods: C.A.S.E. is a prospective, real-world, multi-center, longitudinal study evaluating the effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and survivorship in patients with advanced CSCC treated with cemiplimab. Patients received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks per routine standard of care. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, immunosuppression, and relevant medical history were collected. Immunosuppressive regimens varied amongst patients. Investigator assessment of objective response rate (ORR), safety, and tolerability was conducted. Data from 26 immunosuppressed and/or immunocompromised patients with advanced CSCC treated with cemiplimab are presented. Recruitment is ongoing. Results: As of November 17, 2020, 121 patients were enrolled in the C.A.S.E. study, of which 26 patients (median age: 74 years [IQR: 71-84]; 85% male; 89% Caucasian) were designated as immunocompromised or immunosuppressed due to a history of solid organ transplant (n = 6), autoimmune disorder (n = 11), or hematologic malignancy (n = 9). Median duration of cemiplimab exposure was 14 months (IQR: 9.1–42, range: 0, 67). Among 19 immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients who enrolled in C.A.S.E. prior to their third dose of cemiplimab, ORR per investigator assessment was 47% (95% CI: 24–71); 1 (5%) patient had complete response; 8 (42%) had partial response. One patient had a treatment-related serious adverse reaction of organ transplant rejection. One (3.8%) patient discontinued treatment due to increased alanine aminotransferase (not treatment-related). Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 23% of patients. No treatment-related AEs led to death. Conclusions: The safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of cemiplimab in this initial cohort of immunosuppressed and/or immunocompromised patients with advanced CSCC appear to be consistent with those observed in clinical trials that excluded these patients. Further follow-up and additional data would add to our general understanding of safety and effectiveness of anti-PD1 therapy in immunocompromised and/or immunosuppressed patient populations overall. Clinical trial information: NCT03836105.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 9085-9085
    Abstract: 9085 Background: In the Phase 3, EMPOWER-Lung 1 study, cemiplimab monotherapy provided significant survival benefit and an acceptable safety profile vs chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥50%. EMPOWER-Lung 1 included patients with brain metastases at baseline who are typically underrepresented in clinical trials. Other published exploratory analyses in single-cohort studies suggest benefit from immunotherapy in this patient population. Here, we present subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis from EMPOWER-Lung 1. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg IV every 3 weeks or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (NCT03088540). Patients with treated, clinically stable brain metastases (radiological stability not required) were eligible to enroll and are the focus of this subgroup analysis from the PD-L1 ≥50% population (n=563) of the EMPOWER-Lung 1 study. Results: A total of 68 of 563 (12.1%) cases had treated stable brain metastases at time of randomization. Patients were evenly distributed between cemiplimab (n=34) and chemotherapy (n=34), with similar median duration of follow-up (Table). Baseline characteristics were generally similar; median (range) age: 60.0 (45–76 ) vs 62.0 (48–77); male: 97.1% vs 85.3%; and non-squamous histology: 85.3% vs 76.5%; between cemiplimab vs chemotherapy, respectively. Per independent review committee, median overall survival (OS, 18.7 vs 11.7 months), median progression-free survival (PFS, 10.4 vs 5.3 months), and objective response rate (ORR, 41.2% vs 8.8%) were superior with cemiplimab vs chemotherapy (Table). After baseline, central nervous system (CNS) disease progression occurred in 2 (5.9%) patients with cemiplimab vs 4 (11.8%) patients with chemotherapy; extra-CNS disease progression occurred in 9 (26.5%) patients with cemiplimab vs 15 (44.1%) patients with chemotherapy. Conclusions: 1L cemiplimab monotherapy improved OS, PFS, and ORR vs chemotherapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%, and clinically stable brain metastases at baseline. Cemiplimab monotherapy represents a suitable option for this subgroup of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03088540. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 144, No. Suppl_1 ( 2021-11-16)
    Abstract: Background: Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is the consequence of elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGRLs) containing apolipoprotein B (apoB), such as VLDL and chylomicrons. Epidemiological and genetic studies indicate that triglycerides (TGs) and the cholesterol within TGRLs causally contribute to coronary heart disease risk (CHD). Evinacumab (EVIN), an angiopoietin-like 3 inhibitor, lowers TGs by derepressing lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and endothelial lipase activity. In a Phase 2 trial in patients (pts) with severe HTG (sHTG, fasting TGs ≥500 mg/dL), EVIN was previously shown to reduce TGs in patients (pts) without familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) and to be generally well tolerated (NCT03452228). This post-hoc analysis reports further details on the efficacy of EVIN in reducing atherogenic lipids/lipoproteins. Methods: Pts (N=51) were treated and assigned to cohorts based on genotype: Cohort 1 (n=17), FCS pts with bi-allelic loss-of-function (LOF) LPL pathway mutations; Cohort 2 (n=15), multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS) pts with heterozygous LOF LPL pathway mutations; Cohort 3 (n=19), MCS pts without LPL pathway mutations. Pts were randomized (2:1) to IV EVIN 15 mg/kg or placebo every 4 weeks over a 12-week double-blind treatment (tx) period (DBTP), followed by a 12-week single-blind tx period where all pts received EVIN. Results: Of 51 pts with sHTG treated in the DBTP, 70.6% were categorized as high cardiovascular risk, and 21.6% had a history of CHD. In non-FCS pts (Cohorts 2 and 3), in addition to reducing TGs, EVIN reduced atherogenic lipids and apolipoproteins at Week (W) 12 compared with baseline (Table), including non-HDL-C, remnant cholesterol, and apoB (including apoB100 and apoB48). Overall, reductions observed at W12 were maintained through W24. Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis, EVIN reduced atherogenic lipids and apoB, indicating it may have the potential to reduce CHD risk in pts with sHTG without genetic FCS.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 29, No. 14 ( 2022-10-20), p. 1842-1851
    Abstract: European guidelines set low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals & lt;1.4 mmol/L after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and & lt;1.0 mmol/L for patients with recurrent cardiovascular events ≤2 years. Many ACS patients do not achieve these goals on statin alone. We examined actual goal achievement with alirocumab and projected achievement with ezetimibe, either added to optimized statin therapy. Methods and results The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (NCT01663402) compared alirocumab with placebo in 18 924 patients with recent ACS and hyperlipidaemia despite high-intensity or maximum-tolerated statin therapy. This subanalysis comprised 17 589 patients with LDL-C ≥1.4 mmol/L at baseline who did not receive ezetimibe treatment. High-intensity statin treatment was used in 88.8%. Median (interquartile range) baseline LDL-C was 2.3 (1.9−2.7) mmol/L. With alirocumab, 94.6% of patients achieved LDL-C & lt;1.4 mmol/L at ≥1 post-baseline measurement vs. 17.3% with placebo. Among 2236 patients with a previous cardiovascular event within 2 years (before the qualifying ACS), 85.2% vs. 3.5%, respectively, achieved LDL-C & lt;1.0 mmol/L. Among patients not treated with ezetimibe, we projected that its use would have achieved LDL-C & lt;1.4 and & lt;1.0 mmol/L in 10.6 and 0%, respectively, at baseline (assuming 18 ± 3% reduction of LDL-C). Conclusion Among patients with recent ACS and LDL-C ≥1.4 mmol/L despite optimized statin therapy, the addition of alirocumab allowed 94.6% to achieve the 2019 European guideline LDL-C goal & lt;1.4 mmol/L, and 85.2% of those with recurrent cardiovascular events to achieve & lt;1.0 mmol/L. In contrast, the addition of ezetimibe to optimized statin therapy was projected to achieve LDL-C & lt;1.4 mmol/L in only 10.6% of patients at baseline.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2047-4873 , 2047-4881
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2646239-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Nature Medicine, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 29, No. 3 ( 2023-03), p. 729-737
    Abstract: Severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG) is an established risk factor for acute pancreatitis. Current therapeutic approaches for sHTG are often insufficient to reduce triglycerides and prevent acute pancreatitis. This phase 2 trial ( NCT03452228 ) evaluated evinacumab (angiopoietin-like 3 inhibitor) in three cohorts of patients with sHTG: cohort 1, familial chylomicronemia syndrome with bi-allelic loss-of-function lipoprotein lipase (LPL) pathway mutations ( n  = 17); cohort 2, multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome with heterozygous loss-of-function LPL pathway mutations ( n  = 15); and cohort 3, multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome without LPL pathway mutations ( n  = 19). Fifty-one patients (males, n  = 27; females, n  = 24) with a history of hospitalization for acute pancreatitis were randomized 2:1 to intravenous evinacumab 15 mg kg −1 or placebo every 4 weeks over a 12-week double-blind treatment period, followed by a 12-week single-blind treatment period. The primary end point was the mean percent reduction in triglycerides from baseline after 12 weeks of evinacumab exposure in cohort 3. Evinacumab reduced triglycerides in cohort 3 by a mean (s.e.m.) of −27.1% (37.4) (95% confidence interval −71.2 to 84.6), but the prespecified primary end point was not met. No notable differences in adverse events between evinacumab and placebo treatment groups were seen during the double-blind treatment period. Although the primary end point of a reduction in triglycerides did not meet the prespecified significance level, the observed safety and changes in lipid and lipoprotein levels support the further evaluation of evinacumab in larger trials of patients with sHTG. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03452228 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-8956 , 1546-170X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1484517-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of the Endocrine Society, The Endocrine Society, Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2023-10-05)
    Abstract: Disclosure: D. Gonzalez Trotter: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. J. McGinniss: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. A.N. Economides: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. K. Mohammadi: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. A.J. Rankin: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. B. Musser: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. S. Mellis: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. E. Forleo-Neto: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. G. Herman: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Background: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare disorder caused by mutations in the activin-A receptor type 1 (ACVR1) gene that render it responsive to activin-A, a ligand that normally antagonizes signaling from ACVR1. FOP is characterized by the deposition of bone in soft tissues known as heterotopic ossification (HO) and episodic painful flare-ups. Garetosmab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against activin-A, is being investigated for the prevention of new HO lesions in patients with FOP. This post hoc analysis compared the change from baseline in the number and volume of new HO lesions identified by 18F-labeled sodium fluoride (a bone-seeking tracer that measures bone deposition and turnover) positron emission tomography (PET/CT) and X-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging (which measures bone volume). Methods: Baseline and 28-week PET/CT and CT-only scans acquired during the initial double-blind placebo-controlled period of the LUMINA-1 (NCT03188666) phase 2 study were independently read by two sets of blinded readers and an adjudicator for the presence and volume of new lesions. Number and volume of new lesions were compared between the two imaging modalities. Results: The number of patients with new lesions as detected by PET/CT and CT only was 14/44 (31.8%) and 12/44 (27.3%), respectively. The mean number (standard deviation) of new lesions per patient by PET/CT through Week 28 was 0.68 (1.57) vs 0.86 (1.95) as detected by CT only. In patients with new lesions, the mean number of new lesions per patient was 2.14 (2.18) vs 3.17 (2.62) as detected by PET/CT vs CT only, respectively. The mean volume (cm3) of new lesions per patient detected by PET/CT was 6.05 (14.88) vs 5.94 (21.13) by CT only, through Week 28. In the subset of patients with new lesions, the mean volume of new lesions per patient detected by PET/CT was 19.02 (21.60) vs 21.79 (36.98) by CT only. Moderate agreement between PET/CT and CT-only detection was observed when identifying patients with new lesions, with a kappa coefficient of 0.46 (standard error: 0.146; 95% confidence interval: 0.17, 0.74). Placebo vs garetosmab groups, respectively, showed aggregate new lesion number/volume (cm3) of 27/245.0 vs 3/21.3 by PET/CT, and 37/261.5 vs 1/0.05 by CT only. Conclusions: CT imaging showed similar performance to PET/CT in the detection and characterization of new HO lesions and provides a viable option for the assessment of therapies that may inhibit the formation of new HO lesions in patients with FOP. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2472-1972
    Language: English
    Publisher: The Endocrine Society
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2881023-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2017
    In:  Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 69, No. 11 ( 2017-03), p. 1656-
    In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 69, No. 11 ( 2017-03), p. 1656-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0735-1097
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468327-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 75, No. 11 ( 2020-03), p. 75-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0735-1097
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468327-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Diabetes, American Diabetes Association, Vol. 71, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-06-01)
    Abstract: Background: Subcutaneous (SC) administration of the monoclonal antibody combination casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) decreased the risk of COVID-in a phase 3 trial of uninfected adolescents/adults who shared a household with a SARS-CoV-2–infected individual (NCT04452318) . Here, we present a subgroup analysis of this study, assessing the efficacy and safety of CAS+IMD in preventing symptomatic COVID-in individuals with diabetes and other risk factors for progression to severe disease. Methods: Healthy individuals aged ≥12 years, identified within 96 hours of collection of a positive test from a household contact, were randomized 1:1 to receive SC CAS+IMD 1200 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who developed symptomatic COVID-during the 28-day efficacy assessment period among those who were SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR negative at baseline. Post hoc analyses assessed efficacy and safety by diabetes history, body mass index (BMI) , and the presence/absence of ≥1 high-risk factor for severe COVID-19. Results: The efficacy analysis included 2067 participants who were enrolled from July 13, 2020–January 28, 2021 and were RT-qPCR negative at baseline. In participants with diabetes (n=139) , the relative risk reduction (RRR) of developing symptomatic COVID-with CAS+IMD vs. placebo was 76.3%. Similar results were observed in participants with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (n=728; RRR=74.9%) and in those with ≥1 high-risk factor for severe COVID-at baseline (n=620; RRR=77.5%) . Across subgroups, injection-site reaction was more common with CAS+IMD versus placebo whereas asymptomatic COVID-19, COVID-19, and headache were more common with placebo versus CAS+IMD. Conclusions: In study participants with diabetes and those with other risk factors for severe COVID-19, treatment with SC CAS+IMD decreased the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19, consistent with results in the overall population. Disclosure M.O'brien: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. R.V.Barnabas: Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. M.S.Cohen: Other Relationship; COVPN, Fogarty, HPTN, McGill, National Institutes of Health, Prime Global Options, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. A.Mahmood: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. G.A.Herman: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. G.D.Yancopoulos: Employee; Regenacy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. D.M.Weinreich: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. The covid-phase 3 prevention trial team: n/a. E.Forleo-neto: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. E.Oviedo orta: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. J.Mcginniss: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. P.Hou: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. F.Isa: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. K.Chan: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. N.Sarkar: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. B.J.Musser: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Funding Supported by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. This trial was conducted jointly with the COVID-Prevention Network, which was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) , National Institutes of Health (NIH) .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0012-1797
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Diabetes Association
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1501252-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages