In:
Anesthesiology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 91, No. 1 ( 1999-07-01), p. 156-166
Abstract:
It is common clinical practice to administer reduced doses of opioid to patients suffering from hemorrhagic shock to minimize adverse hemodynamic consequences and to prevent prolonged opioid effect However, the scientific foundation supporting this practice is not well established. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that hemorrhagic shock alters both the distribution and clearance of opioids using fentanyl in a porcine isobaric hemorrhage model. Methods Eighteen pigs were randomized to shock or control groups. The animals in the shock group were subjected to hemorrhage using an isobaric method. Pigs in both groups received fentanyl (50 microg/kg) intravenously over 5 min. Frequent arterial blood samples were obtained for radioimmunoassay. Each animal's pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by fitting a three-compartment model to the concentration versus time data Nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic models examining the influence of mean arterial pressure and cardiac index were also constructed. Clinical simulations using the final population model were performed. Results The shock cohort reached substantially higher fentanyl concentrations. The shock group's central clearance and central- and second-compartment distribution volumes were significantly reduced. The most useful population model scaled all pharmacokinetic parameters to mean arterial pressure. The simulations illustrated that hemorrhagic shock results in higher fentanyl concentrations for any given dosage scheme. Conclusion The essential finding of the study is that fentanyl pharmacokinetics are substantially altered by hemorrhagic shock. The reduced opioid requirement commonly observed during hemorrhagic shock is at least partially attributable to pharmacokinetic mechanisms.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0003-3022
DOI:
10.1097/00000542-199907000-00024
Language:
English
Publisher:
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Date:
1999
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2016092-6
Bookmarklink