Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. TPS3172-TPS3172
    Abstract: TPS3172 Background: Ulixertinib (BVD-523) is a small molecule inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) in development as a novel anti-cancer drug. Early clinical data demonstrated anti-tumor activity, especially for patients with tumors harboring atypical BRAF or MEK1/2 alterations (Sullivan et al., Cancer Discov. 2018;8(2):184-195). Atypical BRAF (non-V600) alterations can be categorized according to characteristics of molecular signaling (Class II or III), are seen in approximately 3% of all human cancers, and there are currently no approved therapies for this indication. Similar to atypical BRAF alterations, the incidence of MEK1/2 alterations are rare in human tumors ( 〈 1 %). Preclinical data have demonstrated activity of ulixertinib in MEK mutant models. Ulixertinib has FDA fast-track designation for patients with solid tumors, other than CRC, with specific BRAF mutations (G469A, L485W, or L597Q). Designed with intent to register, the BVD-523-ABC clinical trial will continue evaluation of ulixertinib in patients with tumors harboring any atypical BRAF or MEK1/2 alteration (NCT04488003). Methods: This multi-center, phase II study, will be conducted in two parts and assess the clinical benefit, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ulixertinib in patients with advanced malignancies. Ulixertinib will be administered at the RP2D of 600 mg BID for 28-day treatment cycles. Eligible patients will have locally advanced or metastatic cancer which progressed following standard systemic therapies, or for which the patient is not a candidate or refused systemic therapy. Planned correlative analyses include reverse phase protein array and transcriptomics of tumor tissue. Part A is open-label and tumor agnostic, except for group 4 and 6 (CRC patients only). Patients will enroll into one of six groups based on BRAF (groups 1-4) or MEK1/2 (groups 5-6) tumor alteration (38 patients per group). Overall response rate (ORR) is the primary endpoint for Part A, with secondary endpoints including duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Part B is tumor histology specific. Patients will be randomized to receive either ulixertinib or physician's choice of treatment in a 2:1 ratio. Up to three specified tumor histologies will be defined, guided by available Part A data (n = 80-100 per histology). The primary endpoint of Part B is PFS, and secondary endpoints include OS, ORR, and DOR. This study has enrolled 43 patients of the planned 228 in Part A at the time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04488003.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 2651-2651
    Abstract: 2651 Background: Etigilimab (etig), a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, blocks TIGIT interaction with PVR (poliovirus receptor) and inhibits downstream signalling with target cell killing. Etig +/- nivolumab (nivo) showed acceptable safety and preliminary activity in a FIH Phase 1a/b study in solid tumors. ACTIVATE, an open-label Phase 1b/2 basket study is evaluating further efficacy, safety, tolerability and PK/PD of etig+nivo. This is a preliminary efficacy and safety analysis from ACTIVATE. Methods: Subjects with advanced/metastatic solid tumors without curative/standard of care therapies are given IV etig+nivo Q2W until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Six open cohorts are enrolling in parallel: endometrial cancer (post-front-line platinum), endometrial cancer (2-3 prior lines), PD-L1+ checkpoint-inhibitor-naïve (CPI-n) cervical cancer, rare cancers (germ cell tumor (GCT), sarcoma, uveal melanoma), ovarian cancer (post-front-line platinum) and TMB-h/MSS, (TMB 〉 10mut/mb) tumors. Tumor assessments are done every 8 weeks following baseline scan. Primary endpoint is investigator-assessed ORR by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include duration of response and safety. Results: Of 27 efficacy-evaluable subjects enrolled in the 6 open cohorts with minimum 1 staging scan or radiological/clinical progression at data cut-off of 02/10/22, 12 had clinical benefit with 1 complete response (CR), 2 partial responses (PRs) and 9 stable diseases (SDs) and 15 had radiological/clinical progressive disease (PD), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 11% and disease control rate (DCR) of 44%. Conclusions: Etig+nivo is safe and well tolerated with no new safety signals. Early efficacy was noted in cervical cancer (1CR, 1PR and 1SD) and uveal melanoma (3 SDs 〉 20 weeks). Encouraging activity was also noted in ovarian cancer and post-CPI treated TMB-H/MSS NSCLC. These early data support continued evaluation of the combination of etig+nivo. Clinical activity was notable as below. Clinical trial information: NCT04761198. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. TPS3152-TPS3152
    Abstract: TPS3152 Background: BRAF inhibitors have transformed treatment (Tx) for patients (pts) with BRAF V600-mutant cancers, but long-term efficacy is limited by disease progression in the brain, due to poor brain penetration. PF-07284890 is a potent, selective, highly brain-penetrant, small-molecule inhibitor of BRAF V600 mutations. This first in human study will assess the PK, safety, and preliminary clinical activity of PF-07284890, as monotherapy and in combination with binimetinib (MEK inhibitor), in pts with BRAF V600-mutated advanced solid tumors with/without brain metastases. Methods: Phase 1a/1b open-label, multicenter, dose-finding study (NCT04543188). Pts will be ≥18 y with a histologically confirmed advanced/metastatic solid tumor including primary brain tumor (PBT), confirmed BRAF V600 mutation, and presence/absence of brain involvement. Pts will have disease progression despite prior Tx without alternative Tx options. Pts with brain metastasis/PBT 〉 4 cm and/or symptomatic brain disease will be excluded initially, but allowed based on emerging PK. Phase 1a is a dose escalation study of PF-07284890 (monotherapy and combination). ̃35 pts will be enrolled to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of PF-07284890 (monotherapy and combination). Cohorts of 2-4 pts will be treated at each dose level of PF-07284890 until MTD/RDE determination (PF-07284890 starting dose: 50 mg QD; binimetinib 45 mg BID). Bayesian Logistic Regression Model will be used to inform dose level decisions. At least 6 pts each for monotherapy and combination will be treated at MTD/RDE. Phase 1a primary endpoints: Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities; MTD/RDE; AEs; lab abnormalities; and dose interruptions, modifications and discontinuations due to AEs. Secondary endpoints include PK parameters and overall response (RECIST; overall and intracranial; RANO for PBT). Phase 1b is a dose expansion and drug-drug interaction study to further evaluate PF-07284890 + binimetinib. Cohorts 1-4 (̃40 pts each) will enroll pts based on tumor type, brain involvement (asymptomatic/symptomatic), and prior Tx. Cohort 5 (̃20 pts) will include pts with any solid tumor including leptomeningeal metastases. Cohort 6 (̃10 pts) will assess the effect of PF-07284890 + binimetinib on CYP3A activity using midazolam as a substrate. Phase 1b primary endpoint: overall response (RECIST; overall and intracranial; RANO for PBT). Secondary endpoints: duration of response; progression-free survival; disease control rate; time to response; overall survival; AEs; lab abnormalities; and dose interruptions, modifications and discontinuations due to AEs; and PK parameters. For both Phase 1a and 1b, Tx will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. Study began enrolling pts in January 2021 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04543188.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 28_suppl ( 2022-10-01), p. 96-96
    Abstract: 96 Background: Despite the availability of molecularly-targeted agents for the treatment of many cancer types, gaps remain in integrating comprehensive precision oncology decision support tools and services into routine clinical practice. Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) have been shown to improve accurate incorporation of precision oncology and oncologic clinical trial enrolment into clinical practice. However, the traditional MTB model is a didactic meeting occurring at regular pre-scheduled cadences which may not align with treatment decisions or schedules of community-based general medical oncologists and advanced practice providers (APPs) without protected time away from clinic. Herein, we report on the utilization of an on-demand virtual MTB (vMTB) implemented at Tennessee Oncology (TO) powered by the Personalized Medicine (PM) team at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI). Methods: “MolecularHelp” (MH) decision support services were implemented in September 2021 for oncology providers at TO – a network of over 100 oncologists and 86 APPs practicing across 34 clinics in Tennessee. The MH services request was a structured order that could be placed directly within the electronic health record (EHR) or through patient-protected email within the practice. MH orders initiated a virtual, on-demand interpretation of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) reports by a centralized vMTB run by SCRI's PM team and supported by Genospace, SCRI's precision medicine software platform. The PM team – comprised of pharmacologists, cell biologists, human geneticists, and molecular biologists – analyze CGP results and provide expert advice on both standard-of-care (SOC) and clinical research therapeutic options. Both SOC and clinical research targeted therapy options were relayed back to the treating physician and embedded within the EHR. Herein, we report key metrics including MH order frequency, average turnaround time, and subsequent clinical trial enrolment between September 2021 and March 2022. Results: CGP reports from 120 unique patients were reviewed by the vMTB during the collection period. MH orders were initiated by 30 TO providers from 14 different clinic locations across Middle and East Tennessee. The average turnaround time from referral to vMTB interpretation was less than 10 hours. Of the 120 patients reviewed, actionable mutations were identified by the MTB in 103 patients, of whom 27 subsequently enrolled onto clinical trials (15 phase 1 and 12 phase 2/3). Conclusions: An on-demand vMTB is feasible within an engaged community oncology practice with investments in bioinformatics, decision support software tools, and a team of precision oncology experts supported by a robust clinical trial menu. On-demand vMTBs can be widely adopted to enhance clinical trial enrolment. Future directions include studying the impact of vMTBs on patient outcomes over time.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 6_suppl ( 2023-02-20), p. 498-498
    Abstract: 498 Background: BT8009 is a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate (BTC), a novel class of chemically synthesized molecules comprising a small (~2 kDa) bicyclic peptide targeting Nectin-4 tumor antigen linked to cytotoxin MMAE via a valine-citrulline cleavable linker. BTCs represent a unique therapeutic class, distinct from ADCs and with pharmacokinetic properties analogous to small molecules. Presented are the monotherapy dose escalation results of the ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial of BT8009 (NCT04561362). Methods: In the Part A 3+3 dose escalation portion of the study, BT8009 monotherapy was administered weekly (2.5, 5, 7.5 mg/m 2 ) or every other week (7.5, 10 mg/m 2 ) of a 28-day cycle, or on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (7.5 mg/m 2 ). Primary objectives were to assess safety of the monotherapy and define maximum tolerated and recommended Phase II dose(s) (RP2D). Key secondary objectives were antitumor activity per RECIST v1.1 and PK parameters. Results: At time of the 20 Sept 2022 data cut-off, 49 pts had received BT8009 (24 pts with UC): weekly (7 pts at 2.5 mg/m 2 , 20 pts at 5 mg/m 2 , 5 pts at 7.5 mg/m 2 ); biweekly (5 pts at 7.5 mg/m 2 , 7 pts at 10 mg/m 2 ); and days 1+8 of a 21-day cycle (5 pts at 7.5 mg/m 2 ). Two RP2Ds have been determined: 5 mg/m 2 given weekly on a 28-day cycle and 7.5 mg/m 2 given on days 1+8 of a 21-day cycle. Median age was 66 y, 59% pts were male, and median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 1-15). Most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade experienced by ≥15% of pts were nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, decreased appetite, alopecia, asthenia, pyrexia, and neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia; majority were mild to moderate in severity. One DLT (G3 asthenia) was reported at the 7.5 mg/m 2 weekly dose level and 1 DLT (G4 sepsis) at the 10 mg/m 2 biweekly dose level. Treatment-related SAEs occurred in 5 pts. No pt discontinued treatment due to an AE. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Of 8 efficacy evaluable pts with UC treated with a RP2D of 5 mg/m 2 , there was 1 complete response, 3 partial responses (PR), and 3 stable diseases (SD), for an ORR of 50% and clinical benefit rate of 75% (CR+PR+SD≥16 wks). Median duration of response has not yet been reached, but as of 20 Sept 2022 was at least 11 months. Both plasma BT8009 and MMAE exhibited linear pharmacokinetics, with short half-life for BT8009 ( 〈 1 h) and longer half-life for MMAE (37-46 h). Conclusions: BT8009 was well tolerated and demonstrated promising preliminary antitumor activity. Evaluation of BT8009 as monotherapy at RP2D(s) and in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor will be explored during the expansion phase of this trial; cohorts will include pts with renal impairment to support further development in cis-ineligible pts, pts with previously untreated cis-ineligible metastatic UC, pts with refractory UC, and tumor-specific cohorts outside of bladder cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04561362 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e14627-e14627
    Abstract: e14627 Background: MPNST is a rare and aggressive soft tissue malignancy accounting for 10% of all soft tissue sarcomas. This disease is characterized by high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis, and there is no current effective standard of care treatment option for patients with MPNST, with the only curative option of complete resection. Therefore, further treatment options are warranted. Investigational mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibitor alrizomadlin restores TP53 function, activating p53-mediated apoptosis in tumor cells. Alrizomadlin also functions as a host immunomodulator and may restore antitumor activity in patients with MPNST that progressed on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: This US/Australian multicenter trial evaluated alrizomadlin combined with PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with MPNST that progressed on available therapy or in those for whom therapy was unavailable. ECOG performance status was between 0-2 for eligible patients. Alrizomadlin 150 mg was administered orally every other day for 2 consecutive weeks, with 1 week off, and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously for 30 minutes on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Results: As of December 12, 2022, preliminary clinical results are reported for 24 patients with MPNST, of whom 16 were male, with a median (range) age of 35 (14-73) years. Treatment (alrizomadlin or pembrolizumab)-related adverse events of any grade ( 〉 10%) were reported in 18 patients. They included nausea (41.7%), vomiting and anemia (37.5% each), fatigue and diarrhea (33.3% each), thrombocytopenia (25.0%), and decreased leukocyte and lymphocyte counts (12.5% each). A total of 12.5% of patients reported treatment-related serious adverse events, including colitis, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and pericardial effusion. Among17 efficacy evaluable patients, the clinical benefit rate, as defined by the combination of overall response rate and stable disease for ≥ 4 cycles, was 53% per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1) and iRECIST. The median (range) treatment duration was 10 (4-20) cycles. Conclusions: Alrizomadlin combined with pembrolizumab is well tolerated and demonstrates meaningful clinical benefit in patients with MPNST for whom standard of care therapy is unavailable. Internal study identifiers: APG-115-US-002. Clinical trial information: NCT03611868 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 9024-9024
    Abstract: 9024 Background: PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors have transformed clinical care of NSCLC patients. However, many patients may develop primary or secondary resistant to PD-(L)1 inhibitors. The marketed anti-CTLA-4 mAbs are ineffective as monotherapy for NSCLC. ONC-392 is a novel target-preserving anti-CTLA-4 antibodies that confers immunotherapeutic effect by selective depletion of regulatory T cells (Treg) in the tumor microenvironment. Preclinical studies show that ONC-392 is more effective and less toxic for immunotherapy than other clinically used anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. In first-in-human study in patients with advanced solid cancer, the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for ONC-392 monotherapy was established as 10 mg/kg. In this study, we tested safety and clinical activities of ONC-392 in NSCLC patients who progressed on PD(L)1-targeted therapy. Methods: Anti-PD-(L)1 resistant NSCLC patients were enrolled as parts of PRESERVE-001 studies (NCT04140526) expansion cohort Part C Arm I and treated with 2 cycles of 10 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg, q3w, ONC-392 by IV infusion. Safety was evaluated based on treatment emergent and treatment-related adverse events, while efficacy was evaluated by investigators using RECIST1.1 criteria. Results: As of December 18, 2022, 33 NSCLC patients have received at least one dose of ONC-392 at 10 mg/kg. The median age is 66 yrs (range 43 - 89 yr), 61% male. 61% were non-squamous cell carcinoma and 39% were squamous cell carcinoma. 27% are ECOG score 0 and 73% were ECOG score 1. The median prior treatment was 2 cycles (range 1 to 4). The average ONC-392 treatment period was 3.5 cycles (range 1 to 13 cycles). Overall, the patients with TRAE in grade 3 or above is 33% (11/33), including diarrhea/colitis (3, 9%), AST/ALT increase or hepatitis (3, 9%), muscular weakness (2, 6%), nephritis (1, 3%), adrenal insufficiency (1, 3%). Due to pace of enrollment, efficacy data are available in 22 patients. 6 of 22 evaluable patients have partial response and 12 patients have stable disease per RECIST 1.1, resulting in a response rate of 27% and disease control rate of 82% among evaluable patients. The median follow-up period for all patients is 5.8 months and 8.6 months for 20 alive patients (range 2.9 to 14.1 months). The estimated 6- and 12-month overall survival (OS) rates were 65% and 55%. Median OS has not reached. Conclusions: Overall, ONC-392 monotherapy with 10 mg/kg is safe and tolerable. Onc-392 monotherapy has showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in IO-resistant NSCLC when compared with historical data. Based on these encouraging data, we have initiated a Phase 3 study testing ONC-392 monotherapy among NSCLC who progressed on PD(L)1-targeting immunotherapy (NCT05671510). Clinical trial information: NCT04140526 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 9532-9532
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, BMJ, Vol. 9, No. Suppl 2 ( 2021-11), p. A511-A511
    Abstract: THOR-707 (SAR444245) is a recombinant human IL-2 molecule irreversibly bound to a PEG chain to block alpha-binding while retaining near-native affinity for beta/gamma IL-2 receptor subunits. We report updated results from the ongoing HAMMER phase 1/2 trial. Methods SAR444245 was given via IV infusion as monotherapy Q2W [A] or Q3W [B] , with pembrolizumab 200mg IV Q3W [C], or Q3W with cetuximab 400mg/m2 IV on D1 then 250mg/m2 IV QW [D] after pre-medication and peri-infusion hydration. A 3+3 design was used to identify the MTD/RP2D in pts with advanced solid tumors. Key objectives included assessments of safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Results 68 pts, median age 61.5 (37–78) yrs with median 3 (1–10) prior therapies enrolled. Most common tumors: melanoma (n=10), colorectal (n=11). Doses tested by cohort: [A]: 8–16 µg/kg (n=9); [B] : 8–40 µg/kg (n=29); [C]: 8–32 µg/kg (n=20); [D] : 16–24 µg/kg (n=10). The most common ( 〉 30%) AEs included pyrexia (52.5%), nausea (50.0%), flu-like symptoms (44.1%), vomiting (36.8%), chills (32.4%), fatigue (32.4%), AST elevation (30.9%). AEs generally resolved promptly with supportive care. Grade(G) 3/4 ( 〉 5%) related AEs included ALT/AST elevation (5.9%), and decreased lymphocyte count (26.5% within first 24 hrs, recovering by 48–72 hrs, this lymphocyte migration is mechanistically consistent with immune cell margination). G3/4 CRS was observed in 2 pts. Two DLTs occurred: G3 infusion reaction (32 µg/kg [B]) and G3 AST/ALT/G2 bilirubin elevation with G2 CRS (24 µg/kg [C] ). No vascular leak syndrome, QTc prolongation, cardiac, or end organ toxicity was observed. Half-life was ~10 h. Sustained increases in CD8 T and NK cells were observed (fold relative to baseline): monotherapy (1–9.4x and 2–43.3x); with pembrolizumab (0.5–5.78x and 1.5–26.9x); with cetuximab (1.3–7.57x and 3.6–45.4x). Max CD4 and eosinophils increased to 136 cell/µL and 1078 cell/µL. No IL-5 elevation or ADAs were observed. Transient IL-6 increases in 4 pts (500, 627, 1000, 1100 pg/mL) were not associated with AEs. Four pts had confirmed PRs (1 PD1-treated SCC, unknown primary [B]; 2 PD1-naïve BCC and 1 PD1-treated HNSCC [C] ); 3 pts had minor responses -- prostate (-24%) and PD1-treated melanoma (-17%) [B]; PD1-treated NSCLC (¬-2 9%) [C] -- after ≥2 scans. 23 pts completed ≥5 cycles. Conclusions SAR444245 was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients, including prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Clinical safety, efficacy and PD suggest a wide therapeutic window. Combination with pembrolizumab and cetuximab leveraged SAR44245’s effects on CD8 T and NK cells. Trial Registration NCT04009681 Ethics Approval The clinical trial was approved by each institutions ethics’ and review board prior to beginning study enrollment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2051-1426
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2719863-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 2609-2609
    Abstract: Background: PRMT5 is overexpressed in certain myeloid malignancies and catalyzes symmetric arginine dimethylation of protein substrates that regulate expression of genes associated with disease pathogenesis (Pastore et al. Cancer Discov. 2020). PRT543 is a potent, selective, oral PRMT5 inhibitor with preclinical antitumor activity in acute myeloid leukemia and myeloproliferative neoplasm models (Bhagwat AACR 2020). An open-label phase 1 study of PRT543 in unselected patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors and hematologic malignancies (NCT03886831) is ongoing. Dose escalation results from pts with myeloid malignancies are presented herein. Materials and Methods: This study assesses the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy per International Working Group (IWG) response criteria for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasm of PRT543 administered at varying schedules beginning with twice weekly (BIW) and increasing to once daily (QD) with doses ranging from 5 to 40 mg in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation followed a modified 3+3 design, allowing for accelerated titration at lower doses. Serum symmetric dimethylarginine (sDMA) and intron retention, a marker of PRMT5-mediated mRNA splicing fidelity, were assessed as measures of PRMT5 target engagement and function, respectively. Results: As of 16 July 2021, 23 unselected pts (12 with myelofibrosis [MF] and 11 with MDS) with disease refractory to established therapies had enrolled (5 pts were dosed BIW, 6 pts 3 times per week [TIW] , 5 pts 5 times per week, and 7 pts QD). The median number of prior lines of systemic therapies was 2 (range, 0 to 6). Ten of 12 MF pts had prior exposure to ruxolitinib. Median platelet counts at baseline were 176,500/µL for MF pts and 52,000/µL for MDS pts. Three of 23 pts (13%) experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of thrombocytopenia, with a single occurrence at each of 3 different doses/schedules (40 mg TIW, 35 mg 5 times per week, and 20 mg QD). No other DLTs were reported. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), any grade, in all regimens were nausea (n=5, 22%), thrombocytopenia (n=5, 22%), anemia (n=4, 17%), diarrhea (n=4, 17%), and fatigue (n=3, 13%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs in all regimens were limited to anemia (n=4, 17%) and thrombocytopenia (n=4, 17%). Cytopenias were reversible and managed with dose modifications. Eighteen pts discontinued treatment, primarily due to disease progression or investigator decision. One pt was discontinued due to an AE (performance status decreased/weakness). PRT543 demonstrated dose-dependent increases of C max (nM) and AUC (nM.hr). At the expansion dose (35 mg 5 times per week), half-life (T ½) was 14 hrs, and plasma drug exposures (C max, 1988 nM; AUC, 19813 nM.hr) exceeded those required for preclinical efficacy. Serum sDMA decreased in a dose-dependent manner reaching 58% reduction with the expansion dose. Increased intron retention in select transcripts was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells at the expansion dose. Reductions in inflammatory serum markers, including C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A and cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 were observed. Improvement in individual symptoms such as night sweats, fever and pruritis were noted. Of the 5 MF patients with spliceosome mutations, 1 MF pt (SF3B1) with anemia and transfusion history (8 units over the 121 days prior to baseline) experienced a substantial improvement in anemia (hemoglobin increase from 6.0 to ≥11.1 g/dL). This pt has been transfusion-free for over 300 days and remains on study. Three pts with MF exhibited stable disease per IWG for at least 1 year, with 1 MF pt demonstrating improvement in bone marrow reticulin fibrosis (+2-3 to +1-2). Conclusions: PRT543 was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile. Dose-dependent inhibition of target engagement and functional activity of PRMT5 were observed. PRT543 treatment demonstrated reduction in inflammatory markers and improvement in symptoms and anemia in select patients. Prolonged stable disease per IWG was observed in several pts with refractory MF. PRT543 is currently being evaluated as monotherapy in pts with at least one spliceosome mutation (MF and MDS pts with anemia and pts with high-risk myeloid malignancies) and in combination with ruxolitinib in MF patients demonstrating a suboptimal response to ruxolitinib. Disclosures Patel: Vigeo: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; TopAlliance: Research Funding; Tesaro: Research Funding; Vedanta: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Ciclomed: Research Funding; Klus Pharma: Research Funding; Kymab: Research Funding; Lycera: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bicycle Therapeutics: Research Funding; Hutchinson MediPharma: Research Funding; Ignyta: Research Funding; Taiho: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jounce Therapeutics: Research Funding; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Revolution Medicines: Research Funding; Hengrui: Research Funding; Cyteir Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ribon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jacobio: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Evelo Biosciences: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Artios Pharma: Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Phoenix Molecular Designs: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Mabspace: Research Funding; Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Other: Study investigator; Seven and Eight Biopharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Synthorx: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agenus: Research Funding; Checkpoint Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xencor: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Florida Cancer Specialists: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Research Funding; ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioNTech: Research Funding; ModernaTX: Research Funding; Mirati Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Exelixis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LSK Biopartners: Research Funding; Placon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Effector Therapeutics: Research Funding; Clovis: Research Funding. Monga: Gunderson Foundation: Other; Rising Tide Foundation: Other; Amgen: Research Funding; Orbus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McKean: Ascentage Pharma Group: Research Funding; Bicycle Therapeutics: Research Funding; Dragonfly Therapeutics: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding; Exelixis: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; IDEAYA Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ikena Oncology: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jacobio Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Moderna: Research Funding; NBE Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncorus: Research Funding; Plexxikon: Research Funding; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sapience Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Tizona Therapeutics: Research Funding; TMUNITY Therapeutics: Research Funding; TopAlliance Biosciences: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BicycleTX Limited: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Castle Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MedPage Today: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mauro: Prelude Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Viscusi: Prelude Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Scherle: Prelude Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bhagwat: Prelude Therapeutics: Current Employment. Moore: Prelude Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun: Prelude Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chiaverelli: Prelude Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mintah: Prelude Therapeutics: Current Employment. Nath: Actinium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stein: PinotBio: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Foghorn Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Palmisiano: Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Foundation One: Consultancy. Verstovsek: Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages