Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 523-525

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-157126

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Mediators of Inflammation, Hindawi Limited, Vol. 2015 ( 2015), p. 1-7

Abstract: Escherichia coli O104:H4-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is characterized by Shiga toxin-induced vascular damage. As indicated by recent studies, dysregulation of the angiopoietin (Angpt)/Tie2 ligand receptor system may be crucial for endothelial dysfunction in HUS. Early Angpt-2 levels quantified in 48 adult HUS patients were predictive for a complicated clinical course, in particular for need of hemodialysis and mechanical ventilation as well as occurrence of seizures. In vitro challenge of human umbilical vein endothelial cells with patients’ sera indicated an injurious mediator role of Angpt-2 opening future perspectives for mitigating endothelial activation in HUS.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0962-9351 , 1466-1861

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1155/2015/670248

Language: English

Publisher: Hindawi Limited

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008065-7

In: Cancer Cell International, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 19, No. 1 ( 2019-12)

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1475-2867

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1186/s12935-019-0798-x

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2091573-1

In: BioMed Research International, Hindawi Limited, Vol. 2017 ( 2017), p. 1-8

Abstract: Aims . Expression of PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) has been demonstrated in various cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, PSMA expression in PDAC-associated neovasculature has so far not been systematically analyzed. Methods and Results . We analyzed PSMA expression in 81 PDAC tissue samples from 61 patients. Microvessel density (MVD) was assessed by software-based image analysis and showed a mean MVD of 63.7 microvessels/0.785 mm 2 . PSMA was practically absent in tumor tissue (5.3%) and PDAC cell lines (0/7) but could be detected in tumor-associated neovasculature in 53.2% of cases. There was no association between neovascular PSMA expression and clinicopathological tumor characteristics. Samples with PSMA+ neovasculature showed increased MVD; however, this result was not statistically significant ( p 〉 0.05 ). Presence of PSMA+ neovessels correlated with overall survival under palliative chemotherapy (894 versus 400 days; HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.87; p 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion . PSMA expression in tumor-associated neovasculature is a common feature and associated with improved overall survival under palliative chemotherapy in PDAC. Our results point towards a possible association between PSMA expression and response to therapy which might be based on enhanced intratumoral bioavailability of systemic chemotherapy.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2314-6133 , 2314-6141

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1155/2017/2847303

Language: English

Publisher: Hindawi Limited

Publication Date: 2017

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2698540-8

In: HemaSphere, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 7, No. S3 ( 2023-08), p. e72156a7-

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2572-9241

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1097/01.HS9.0000967464.72156.a7

Language: English

Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2922183-3

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 10-11

Abstract: Background: Monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients (pts) with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who achieve complete remission (CR) can predict hematological relapse. Recently published data from the first cohort of the RELAZA2-trial have shown that pre-emptive therapy with azacitidine (AZA) can prevent or substantially delay an overt relapse in MRD-positive pts with MDS or AML (Platzbecker et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018). Aims: To evaluate outcome of the entire patient cohort of the RELAZA2-trial and determine whether MRD-guided pre-emptive AZA treatment could prevent relapse in molecularly defined cohorts. Methods: Between 12/2011 and 07/2018 380 pts with advanced MDS or AML, who had achieved CR after conventional chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) were prospectively screened for MRD in monthly intervals either in bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB). A total of 94 pts (AML, n=83; MDS, n=11) became MRD positive during 24 months from baseline by either quantitative PCR (qPCR) or analysis of CD34+ donor-chimerism and entered the treatment phase. Preemptive MRD-triggered treatment consisted of AZA 75 mg/m2 per day subcutaneously on days 1-7 of a 29-day cycle for up to 24 cycles. After six cycles, MRD status was reassessed and pts with MRD negativity were eligible for treatment de-escalation. Primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) six months after start of pre-emptive treatment. For mutational analysis next generation sequencing (NGS) with a panel of 54 genes was performed (Illumina Trusight Myeloid). Results: Median age was 60 yrs (range: 22-80 yrs); 52 (55%) of the pts were female. Prior therapy consisted of chemotherapy in 42 (45%) and allo-HCT in 52 (55%) of the pts. Cytogenetics could be analyzed in 93 (99%) of the 94 pts. Risk categorization according to ELN 2017 was favorable in 30 (37%), intermediate in 31 (38%) and adverse in 21 (26%) of the AML pts, respectively. Type of MDS was advanced in all 11 pts and all were previously transplanted. Fifty-two (61%) of 85 pts with available NPM1 status were positive. NGS on 64 (68%) pts with available DNA at the time of first diagnosis revealed additional mutations in DNMT3A (n=25), TET2 (n=15), FLT3-ITD (n=12), IDH1 (n=9), FLT3-TKD (n=8), ASXL1, NRAS, TP53 (n=7, each), IDH2 (n=6), PTPN11, WT1 (n=5, each), GATA2, U2AF1 (n=4, each), CBL (n=3), CEBPA, CSFR3, CUX1, EZH2, KIT, RAD21, RUNX1, SF3B, STAG2, ZRSR2 (n=2, each), and KRAS (n=1). MRD data were correlated with outcome in 45 pts for NPM1, in 3 for RUNX1-RUNX1T1, whereas CD34-donor-chimerism was analyzed in 39 pts (missing, n=7). There was a significant faster and deeper decline of MRD in PB as compared to BM (P=0.03). The same held true with regard to the increase of donor-chimerism, which was achieved faster in PB as compared to BM (P=0.05). Secondary molecular abnormalities (MAs) had no impact on MRD response as measured by qPCR, which was also true if MAs were categorized functionally. Similarly, additional chromosomal abnormalities had no impact on MRD response in both MRD methods. However, in pts with measurement of donor-chimerism ASXL1 mutations were a negative factor for MRD response (P & lt;0.001). At hematological relapse, only 1 (2%) of 45 pts with NPM1 measurement was not congruently MRD positive. Six months after start of MRD-guided therapy, 56 (60%) of 94 pts were still in CR while a total of 38 pts (40%) developed a hematological relapse after median of 3 AZA cycles. 38 (40%) pts responded with either a decline of MRD below a predefined threshold (increasing donor-chimerism to ≥80% or PCR MRD & lt;1%), while a stabilization in the absence of relapse was achieved in 18 (19%) pts. Overall response rate was not statistically different between pts with (63%) or without (55%) antecedent allo-HCT (P=0.5). RFS rate at 6 months was 60% (56/94 pts). With a median follow-up of 9 months after start of MRD-guided pre-emptive treatment 12-months overall and progression-free survival rates were 94% and 44%, respectively. Conclusions: AZA as a pre-emptive therapy was effective in delaying hematological relapse of advanced MDS or AML pts, regardless of the underlying genetic signature. Based on these encouraging results, intensifying treatment with AZA in combination with pembrolizumab is currently investigated as MRD-guided treatment in NPM1 positive AML (PEMAZA; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03769532). Disclosures Wolf: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bug:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eurocept: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Jazz: Honoraria; Neovii: Other: Travel; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Sanofi: Other: Travel. Götze:Celgene: Research Funding. Stelljes:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Subklewe:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Haenel:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Bayer: Honoraria. Rollig:Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Müller-Tidow:Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; BiolineRx: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag GmbH: Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Other: Co-owner and CEO. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label: treatment with azacitidine to prevent or substantially delay an overt relapse in MRD-positive patients with MDS or AML

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-138427

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 29 ( 2019-10-10), p. 2632-2642

Abstract: Nucleophosmin 1 ( NPM1) mutations are associated with a favorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) when an internal tandem duplication (ITD) in the fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 gene ( FLT3) is absent ( FLT3-ITD neg ) or present with a low allelic ratio ( FLT3-ITD low ). The 2017 European LeukemiaNet guidelines assume this is true regardless of accompanying cytogenetic abnormalities. We investigated the validity of this assumption. METHODS We analyzed associations between karyotype and outcome in intensively treated patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML who were prospectively enrolled in registry databases from nine international study groups or treatment centers. RESULTS Among 2,426 patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML, 2,000 (82.4%) had a normal and 426 (17.6%) had an abnormal karyotype, including 329 patients (13.6%) with intermediate and 83 patients (3.4%) with adverse-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML, adverse cytogenetics were associated with lower complete remission rates (87.7%, 86.0%, and 66.3% for normal, aberrant intermediate, and adverse karyotype, respectively; P 〈 .001), inferior 5-year overall (52.4%, 44.8%, 19.5%, respectively; P 〈 .001) and event-free survival (40.6%, 36.0%, 18.1%, respectively; P 〈 .001), and a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (43.6%, 44.2%, 51.9%, respectively; P = .0012). These associations remained in multivariable mixed-effects regression analyses adjusted for known clinicopathologic risk factors ( P 〈 .001 for all end points). In patients with adverse-risk chromosomal aberrations, we found no significant influence of the NPM1 mutational status on outcome. CONCLUSION Karyotype abnormalities are significantly associated with outcome in NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML. When adverse-risk cytogenetics are present, patients with NPM1 mut share the same unfavorable prognosis as patients with NPM1 wild type and should be classified and treated accordingly. Thus, cytogenetic risk predominates over molecular risk in NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00416

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 13-13

Abstract: Background In newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the general recommendation is to start treatment immediately after the diagnosis has been made. This paradigm is based both on the observation that untreated acute leukemia has a poor prognosis and on retrospective analyses demonstrating a shorter survival in younger AML patients (pts) in whom treatment was delayed by more than 5 days (Sekeres et al., 2009). A more recent single-center analysis came to a different conclusion, showing no prognostic effect for the time from diagnosis to treatment (TDT; Bertoli et al., 2013). We explored the relationship between TDT and prognosis on a large set of real-world data from the AML registry of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) and compared it to the published cohorts. Methods The SAL runs a transregional AML registry in 46 treatment centers across Germany (NCT03188874). All registered patients with an intensive induction treatment, a minimum follow-up time of 12 months and no acute promyelocytic leukemia were selected (n=2,200). Treatment start was defined by the first day of cytarabine, whereas single agent hydroxyurea (HU) was labeled as pretreatment. We analyzed the influence of TDT on complete remission (CR), early death (ED) and overall survival (OS) in univariable analyses for each day of treatment delay, in groups of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and & gt;15 days of TDT, and by using the restricted cubic spline (RCS) method for data modelling. In order to adjust for the influence of established prognostic variables on the outcomes, we used multivariable regression models and propensity score weighting. The influence of HU pretreatment on outcomes was investigated by introducing an interaction term between TDT and the presence of HU pretreatment. Results The median age was 59 years (y) (IQR 50-68), the proportion of pts with favorable, intermediate and adverse genetic risk according to ELN was 27%, 53%, and 20%; & gt;95% of pts received induction treatment with standard 7+3. HU pretreatment was administered in 4% of pts. The median TDT was 3 days (IQR 2-6). Descriptive statistics after grouping of pts showed the highest median age and the lowest proportion of NPM1 mutated and favorable risk in the TDT group 11-15. Of all pts, 79% achieved a CR/CRi; unadjusted CR rates for the patient groups with TDT of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and & gt;15 days were 80%, 77%, 74% and 76%, respectively (p=0.317). In multivariable analysis accounting for the influence of ELN risk, age, WBC, LDH, de novo versus secondary AML and ECOG, the OR for each additional day of TDT was 0.99 (95%-CI, 0.97-1.00; p=0.124). Four percent of pts died within the first 30 days from treatment start. The respective rates in the four TDT categories were 4.0%, 3.8%, 5.1% and 4.1% (p=0.960). In multivariable analysis, the OR for TDT was 1.01 (95%-CI, 0.98-1.05; p=0.549). After a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-y OS of all pts was 51%. The unadjusted 2-y OS rates stratified by TDT of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, & gt;15 days were 52, 49, 46, and 51% (see Table 1 and Figure 1). The hazard ratio (HR) for each day of treatment delay was 1.00 (95%-CI; 0.99-1.01; p=0.317). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the HR for TDT as continuous variable was 1.00 (95%-CI, 0.99-1.01; p=0.689). When OS was analyzed separately stratified for age ≤60 and & gt;60 ys and for high versus lower initial WBC defined by a threshold of 50 x 109/L, no significant differences between TDT groups were observed. Multivariable models using TDT as a grouped variable or with RCS did not provide evidence for a significant influence of TDT on outcomes. Propensity score matching of pts in the four TDT groups did not reveal an influence on outcomes. The use of HU was not associated with CR, ED nor OS. Conclusion Our study on 2,200 newly diagnosed registry pts receiving consistent intensive induction with standard-dose cytarabine plus daunorubicin (7+3) suggests that TDT is not related to response or survival, neither in younger nor in older pts. Despite multivariable analyses, a bias towards longer TDT intervals in pts judged to be clinically stable by the treating physician cannot be excluded entirely. As treatment stratification in intensive first-line treatment of AML evolves, the TDT data suggests that it may be a safe and reasonable approach to wait for genetic and other laboratory test results in order to assign clinically stable pts to the best available treatment option before the start of intensive treatment. Disclosures Krämer: Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board. Jost:Daiichi: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Brümmendorf:Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen: Employment; Ariad: Consultancy. Krause:Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel; Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel. Scholl:Novartis: Other: Project funding; Pfizer: Other: Advisory boards; Gilead: Other: Project funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Advisory boards; AbbVie: Other: Advisory boards. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding. Kiani:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Middeke:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Speakers Bureau. Stoelzel:JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Neovii: Other: Travel funding; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Travel funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123717

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 4649-4649

Abstract: Introduction Despite substantial progress in the treatment of newly diagnosed AML, 20% to 40% of patients do not achieve remission with conventional induction chemotherapy. In addition, 50% to 70% of patients with CR1 are expected to relapse within 3 years. Currently, allogeneic HSCT is thought to be the most reliable curative option for patients with relapsed and/or refractory (r/r) disease. Compared to HSCT in CR1 allogeneic HSCT beyond CR1 is associated with lower survival rates. So far, different predictive factors influencing survival in r/r AML have been identified. However, pretransplantation variables delineating prognostic subgroups after allogeneic HSCT beyond CR1 are less well known and the total number of patients in trials addressing this issue has been limited. Methods We analyzed the outcome after allogeneic HSCT in non-APL-AML patients transplanted with either subsequent 2nd complete remission (CR2), r/r AML or with persisting cytopenia (PC, including patients with hematologic complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery and patients with persisting bone marrow hypoplasia) after induction or salvage therapy. Of 3989 patients who enrolled into a multicenter clinical trial (AMLCG1999; NCT00266136) of the German Acute Myeloid leukemia Cooperative Group (AMLCG) we identified 498 subjects aged 17 to 74 years who underwent allogeneic HSCT beyond first CR. Before transplantation, all patients received first line treatment either with 6-Thioguanine, cyararabine, daunorubicin (TAD) and high-dose cytarabine, mitoxantrone (HAM) or HAM/HAM. After induction failure (n=97) or relapse (n=401) patients either received salvage chemotherapy (n=299) or directly underwent allogeneic HSCT (n=199). Overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS) after allogeneic HSCT were the main endpoints for this analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate survival probabilities in subgroups. Log-rank tests were used to compare survival groups. Relative hazard rates and differences in subgroups were calculated using cox regression analysis. Results At a median follow-up of 6.5 years for surviving patients, OS and RFS rates were 32% (95% CI 28-36%) and 30% (95% CI 26-34%), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed an OS of 49% in 128 patients with allogeneic HSCT in CR2. In comparison, 73 patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT with PC after induction (n = 42) / salvage treatment (n = 31) and 297 patients with refractory disease (RD) exhibited an OS of 39% and 23%, respectively (Figure 1). The corresponding cumulative incidences (CI) at 1/6.5 years for death in remission after allogeneic HSCT were 25%/31% for patients transplanted in CR2, 29%/41% for patients transplanted with PC and 30%/46% for patients transplanted with RD, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after 6.5 years was 58% for patients transplanted with RD compared to 34% for patients transplanted in CR2 and 31% for patients with PC. Main prognostic factors for survival outcome were remission status prior to allogeneic HSCT and cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis. By contrast, patient age, donor, graft source, remission status after induction therapy and CMV status had no significant impact on survival outcome. Conclusions Long-term OS rates after allogeneic HSCT for patients with r/r AML are considered to range between 20 and 40%. Our analysis indicates that a substantial fraction of patients who received similar first line treatment within one prospective trial is able to achieve long term survival when transplanted beyond CR1. In addition, remission upon salvage therapy prior to allogeneic HSCT might be a relevant prognostic factor for patients with r/r AML. However, whether remission induction prior to HSCT can provide an overall survival benefit in patients with r/r disease is still elusive and is currently being evaluated in a prospective randomized clinical trial (ETAL3-ASAP; NCT02461537). Disclosures Beelen: Medac: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support. Scheid:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Lenz:Celgene Corp.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hiddemann:Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stelljes:MSD: Consultancy; JAZZ: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-116964

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Molecular Oncology, Wiley, Vol. 14, No. 2 ( 2020-02), p. 248-260

Abstract: Oncogenesis of Ewing sarcoma (EwS), the second most common malignant bone tumor of childhood and adolescence, is dependent on the expression of chimeric EWSR1‐ETS fusion oncogenes, most often EWSR1‐FLI1 (E/F). E/F expression leads to dysregulation of focal adhesions (FAs) enhancing the migratory capacity of EwS cells. Here, we show that, in EwS cell lines and tissue samples, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is expressed and phosphorylated at Y397 in an E/F‐dependent way involving Ezrin. Employing different EwS cell lines as in vitro models, we found that key malignant properties of E/F are mediated via substrate‐independent autophosphorylation of FAK on Y397. This phosphorylation results in enhanced FA formation, Rho‐dependent cell migration, and impaired caspase‐3‐mediated apoptosis in vitro . Conversely, treatment with the FAK inhibitor 15 (1,2,4,5‐benzenetetraamine tetrahydrochloride (Y15) enhanced caspase‐mediated apoptosis and EwS cell migration, independent from the respective EWSR1‐ETS fusion type, mimicking an anoikis‐like phenotype and paralleling the effects of FAK siRNA knockdown. Our findings were confirmed in vivo using an avian chorioallantoic membrane model and provide a first rationale for the therapeutic use of FAK inhibitors to impair metastatic dissemination of EwS.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1574-7891 , 1878-0261

URL: Issue

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1002/mol2.v14.2

DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12610

Language: English

Publisher: Wiley

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2322586-5