Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e16158-e16158
    Abstract: e16158 Background: The prognosis of advanced bile tract cancer (BTC) is unfavorable with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of less than 10%. Durvalumab has been approved in the first line setting in combination with chemotherapy (gemcitabine with cisplatin) for advanced BTC. Monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in BTC in the second line is suboptimal with ORR reported in the 5-15% range. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of an anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) agent in combination with an anti-CTLA4 (tremelimumab) agent with and without radio frequency ablations (RFA) in advanced BTC. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced BTC who had received or refused at least one prior line of systemic therapy were treated with tremelimumab 75 mg intravenously (IV) and durvalumab 1500 mg (IV) for 4 combined doses followed by monthly durvalumab 1500 mg IV alone until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. Objective response was assessed through CT or MRI by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) every 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and managed. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (PFS). All patients underwent a pretreatment and on treatment biopsy. Results: 22 patients with advanced BTC were enrolled in this study; 10 patients were treated with durvalumab and tremelimumab (Durva/ Treme -Arm A) and 12 patients were treated with the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab and an ablative procedure (Durva/ Treme/ RFA -Arm B). A total of 18 patients were evaluable (10 in Arm A and 8 in Arm B). The best clinical response in Arm A were as follows: PR (n=8), SD (n=1), PD (n=1) and in Arm B: SD (n=3), PD (n=5). The median progression free survival (PFS) in the Durva/ Treme Arm A was 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.9-3.9) and Durva/ Treme/ RFA Arm was 2 months (95% CI: 1.3-2.5)). The median overall survival (OS) in the Durva/ Treme Arm A was 6.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-7.4) and Durva/ Treme/ RFA Arm was 5.7 months (95% CI: 2.9-7.6). The most common study hematologic related Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were lymphopenia (n=6) and anemia (n=3) and the most common non hematologic AEs included increased AST (n=9), increased alk phos (n=7) and increased total bilirubin (n=6). Conclusions: Combined ICI with Durva/ Treme with and without RFA is well tolerated; Durva/ Treme alone showed promising activity in this small early-stage study, with an ORR of 80%, in patients with advanced BTC. Clinical trial information: NCT02821754 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e16150-e16150
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e16150-e16150
    Abstract: e16150 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition has demonstrated modest activity in biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Augmentation of the immune response by ablative procedures to improve efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition has been previously demonstrated in hepatocellular carcinoma, however the outcome of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition with tremelimumab (anti-CTLA4) and durvalumab (anti-PD1) with ablation in advanced biliary tract carcinoma is unclear. The primary objective of this study was to establish the efficacy via 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) of combining tremelimumab and durvalumab in patients with advanced BTC either alone or with tumor ablation. Secondary objectives were safety and feasibility of combination treatment. An exploratory objective was overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed advanced or unresectable BTC (intra- or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer) who had progressed on, been intolerant to, or refused prior chemotherapy. Disease had to be technically amenable to cryoablation with at least two measurable lesions. Adequate organ function and an ECOG of 0 or 1 were required. Patients were treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab with or without tumor ablation. Tremelimumab and durvalumab were administered intravenously every 28 days for four cycles followed by durvalumab every 28 days until disease progression. Cryoablation was performed on day 36. Patients were imaged every 8 weeks and response was defined per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. Results: In total, 22 patients have been enrolled into the BTC cohort. Half underwent ablation and half received immunotherapy alone. The median age was 59 years (range 21-80). All patients had received prior systemic chemotherapy, locally advanced disease was present in 68% of patients. Median PFS was 2.1m and median OS was 5.6 m. DCR was 45% (SD). Median OS and PFS was similar in the group that received ablation vs immunotherapy alone with a median OS of 6.8 m vs 6.7 m and 2.0 m vs 2.7 m respectively. The most common grade 3- 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (27%), increased AST (41%), increased alkaline phosphatase (32%) and elevated bilirubin (27%). Conclusions: Combination checkpoint inhibition combined with tumor ablative procedures is a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients with advanced BTC, however the addition of ablative therapy may not enhance efficacy in this small cohort of patients. Results illustrate the poor prognosis of advanced BTC and may represent a non-chemotherapeutic approach to treatment in this patient population. Further studies are warranted to identify patient populations most likely to respond to these interventions. Clinical trial information: NCT02821754.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. TPS4655-TPS4655
    Abstract: TPS4655 Background: Operable hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers continue to pose significant challenges. Radical resections are rarely curative, and chemotherapy is able to reduce tumor recurrence for only a fraction of patients. Despite the obvious advantages of extirpation of the identifiable tumor(s), the inflammatory milieu that accompanies surgery and the obligate time off cytotoxic agents allows for activation of remote quiescent disseminated tumor cells, leading to metastatic recurrence. We are conducting a study to determine the safety and efficacy of immediate peri-operative MVT-5873, a cytotoxic monoclonal antibody targeting Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), in patients undergoing resections pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver. MVT-5873 is a human IgG1 antibody isolated from a patient following immunization with a sLe a -KLH vaccine. MVT-5873 has demonstrated cell surface binding in sLe a positive human tumor lines and has been shown to be potent in complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays and antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity assays. In patients with CA 19-9-producing cancers, MVT-5873 treatment has been shown to decrease serum CA 19-9 levels and prevent tumor progression. This trial may open the door for investigation of additional and/or synergistic agents in the immediate peri-operative period and usher in a new paradigm in the management of surgically treated cancers. Methods: This is a prospective, Phase II trial designed to determine the efficacy (increase in 1-yr DFS) and safety of peri-operative MVT-5873 for subjects with operable pancreatic, liver and bile duct cancers with elevated CA 19-9 levels. Patients may receive any standard neoadjuvant regimen prior to enrollment at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. Eligible patients will receive a pre-operative dose of MVT-5873 three days prior to the planned operation to remove all demonstrable disease. Following the operation, patients will receive a total of four doses of MVT-5873; the first two doses on postoperative days four and ten. The third dose will be administered on the normally scheduled postoperative clinic visit, followed by a final dose one month after discharge from the hospital and prior to the start of adjuvant treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03801915 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. TPS3148-TPS3148
    Abstract: TPS3148 Background: The nucleoside analog 5-aza-4’-thio-2’-deoxycytidine (Aza-TdC) inhibits DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), a methyltransferase involved in methylation-mediated silencing of tumor suppressor genes. Attenuation of DNA methylation via DNMT1 inhibitors results in reactivation of silenced tumor suppressor genes and can lead to tumor growth arrest and apoptosis. The DNMT1 inhibitors decitabine and 5-azacytdine are currently FDA-approved for use in myelodysplastic syndromes and are also used in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Relative to these compounds, Aza-TdC exhibits enhanced stability and incorporation into DNA and has shown improved preclinical antitumor activity in both leukemia and solid tumor xenograft models. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral Aza-TdC in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary study objectives include assessing objective response by RECIST 1.1, pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, and examining re-expression of tumor suppressor genes inhibited by methylation in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Methods: Patients are treated with Aza-TdC on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 21-day cycle. The study follows Simon accelerated titration design 3, with 100% dose increments and 1 patient per dose level. Accelerated titration will continue until 1 patient experiences a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or 2 patients experience drug-related grade 2 toxicity at any dose level, after which, a 3 + 3 dose escalation design will be used. Blood samples are collected for PK and CTC analyses. An MTD expansion cohort is planned, in which tumor biopsies will be collected for further pharmacodynamic assessments. Patients included in this study must be ≥18 years old and have histologically documented solid tumors that have progressed on standard therapy and for which there is no other standard therapy available. Dose level 3 has been completed without any DLTs; enrollment to dose level 4 began in February 2019. Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. Clinical trial information: NCT03366116.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e18351-e18351
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e18351-e18351
    Abstract: e18351 Background: Immunotherapy with aPD1/aPDL1 has been shown to be efficacious for a range of indications. However, cost-effectiveness has only been demonstrated for some. Our goal was to compare incremental costs and effects across Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved aPD1/aPDL1 using a standardized value framework. Methods: aPD1/aPDL1 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from the FDA's 2014-18 approval lists. Restricted mean Overall (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were extrapolated to 10 years via best-fitting (Akaike/Bayesian information criterion) parametric function (Kaplan-Meier survival curves digitized via Henley & Hoyle approach). Average wholesale price for experimental and comparator regimens from approval year’s Micromedex Red Book (IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA) were applied to either median treatment duration or mean extrapolated PFS, assuming the entire cohort was treated with no dose reductions. For multicenter RCTs with physician’s choice of the comparator, we assumed the regimen most likely used in the U.S. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were discounted at 3% per annum. Results: Undiscounted OS gains with aPD1/aPDL1 after extrapolation to 10 years ranged from 0.72 to 1.89 LYs as compared to between 0.13 and 0.27 LYs at the end of the RCT. Discounted additional costs for aPD1/aPDL1 ranged from about -$1,700 to $348,312. Crude estimates of the incremental cost per LY gained vary widely, with ICERs for PACIFIC and Impower150 beyond $150,000/LY in both analyses, and additionally Keynote 024 and Checkmate 214 in the analysis that assumed treatment to the end of PFS. Conclusions: Value for money appears to vary widely across indications and comparators, from cost-saving to low-value. Common extrapolation-based analyses of aPD1/aPDL1-based regimens can help elucidate differences in value. The presented analyses are preliminary. Further assessment of extrapolation methods, downstream costs and quality of life effects are required. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e16110-e16110
    Abstract: e16110 Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) have a dismal prognosis. Recently, standard of care changed by adding durvalumab (D) to chemotherapy after the TOPAZ-1 study demonstrated an extended and durable survival benefit (median OS: 12.8 vs 11.5 months; 24-month OS rate: 23.6% vs 11.5%). Extrapolating from IMbrave150 and HIMALAYA trials in liver cancer, we combined an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody with the STRIDE regimen (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) in advanced BTC. Methods: This is a phase II single center trial of unresectable or metastatic BTC with a safety run-in included (NCT03937830). In schedule A, the first 6 patients (pts) received single dose T 300mg with D 1,150mg flat dose + bevacizumab (B) 7.5mg/kg/dose every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In schedule B, the next 8 pts did not start B until cycle 2 (C2); all other scheduling and dosing remained the same. Paired tumor tissue and blood were collected before and on treatment for correlative studies. Primary endpoint was 6-month PFS, and secondary endpoints were safety and feasibility, OS, and best ORR according to Response Evaluation Criteria (RECIST 1.1). Results: We enrolled 14 pts as of data cutoff (1/11/23) with 8 patients alive (median follow-up 4.3 mo, 0.7-17.7). Accrual is expected to be completed by June 2023 with 20 evaluable pts; interim analysis presented early due to vital unexpected results with different dosing schedules. Updated data will be presented at ASCO along with 6-month PFS and correlative studies. We treated 6 pts with schedule A and observed ORR 17% (PR x 1, SD x 4, PD x1), mPFS 8.5 mo (96% CI: 1.8 - NE), and mOS not reached (range: 3.0 - 17.7 mo). 50% of pts experienced G3 or G4 immune-related adverse events (irAE), including overlapping myositis-myocarditis-myasthenia gravis syndrome, thyroiditis, colitis, and hepatitis; these pts received systemic steroids and were taken off treatment. irAE occurred early after initiation of treatment with most presenting within 40 days. Based on the high rate of severe irAE, we changed to schedule B and treated 8 pts. We observed ORR 0% (SD x 1, PD x 5, unevaluable x 2), mPFS 2.6 mo (96% CI: 0.9 - 3.9), and mOS 4.7 mo (95% CI: 0.9 - 4.7). There were no G3 or G4 irAE; there was 1 death from tumor-related bleed that occurred prior to restaging in C2 and may have been worsened by bevacizumab. Clinical response appears to diminish with treatment schedule change, albeit small numbers limit interpretation (Cochran-Armitage trend test, p = 0.0671). Conclusions: The combination of anti-VEGF with anti-PDL1 and anti-CTLA4 appears to induce a strong immune response in advanced BTC with more severe and earlier irAE. In contrast, historical data showed limited benefit with D+T alone in BTC. We observed that modifying dosing schedule may impact outcomes by reducing efficacy when the three drugs are not given together. Clinical trial information: NCT03937830 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. TPS4656-TPS4656
    Abstract: TPS4656 Background: Treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver dominant metastatic disease from colorectal or pancreatic cancers are limited with poor overall survival. Tadalafil has shown to increase anti-tumor immunity by decreasing myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and impair tumor growth in preclinical HCC models. Oral vancomycin affects bile acid metabolizing gut commensal bacteria leading to increased CXCL16 expression in the liver resulting in NKT mediated liver-selective anti-tumor effects. This study combines immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) treatment with nivolumab in combination with tadalafil and oral vancomycin. We aim to evaluate the synergy of the antitumor effect induced by the change in gut microbiome with oral vancomycin and the immunomodulatory effect of PDE5 inhibition combined with ICI with nivolumab in advanced liver cancer or liver metastasis. Correlative Studies: Paired liver tumor biopsies are analyzed for genomic analysis (WES, RNA-seq), immune cell infiltration, proteomics and metabolomic studies (bile acids) and chemokine expression. Stool samples are analyzed for microbiota. Blood samples are analyzed for immune monitoring, cytokine profiles and pharmacokinetics of study drugs. Serum bile acid levels are determined in blood in the 2 hour period after test meal ingestion. Methods: This is a single-arm study of nivolumab, oral vancomycin and tadalafil. Treatment is delivered in 4-week cycles (C) and continues until off treatment. Imaging is done every 8 weeks. Biopsies are done at baseline and during week 3 of C2. Nivolumab is administered on day (D)1 of each C at a dose of 480 mg IV. Tadalafil is administered orally (PO); 10 mg daily starting on D1 of C1 and continues daily until off study. Vancomycin administration starts on D1 of C1 at 125 mg PO every 6 hours for a total daily dose of 500 mg. Patients will be on vancomycin 3 weeks on, 1 week off per regimen. The study is currently enrolling without DLT. Clinical trial information: NCT03785210 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18614-e18614
    Abstract: e18614 Background: Previous studies showed that SES is a barrier to cancer clinical trial enrollment. But, few studies have investigated the impact of socioeconomic deprivation (SED) on trial participation using a granular geocoded measure. To overcome this gap, we assessed trial enrollment at the only NCI-designated cancer center in Kentucky. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients enrolled in GI and lung cancer trials from 2012 to 2021 using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated dataset that ranks census block groups based on SED and includes 17 variables. Patients with an identifiable state and national rank ADI were included and stratified in quintiles. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for analysis. Results: We included 1130 patients who enrolled in a trial; 10 patient refused enrollment 0.9%. Trial participation by gender was similar: 50.5% female and 49.5% male. Race included White 93.5%, African American 5.7% and Asian 0.71% patients. Hispanics made 0.5% of the cohort. When assessed by national ADI, 45% of clinical trial participants were in the highest ADI quintile. When assessed by ADI state ranking, there was similar distribution in trial enrollment. Enrollment at the national and state levels were significant for age (p 〈 0.001, for both) and race (p = 0.003 and 0.023, respectively). Conclusions: Prior studies have shown that low SES is a barrier trial enrollment; however, this study demonstrates that using a granular measure of SED at the state level, GI and lung cancer clinical trial enrollment has similar distribution by ADI quintiles. But, when assessed at the national level, 45% of trial participants were in the highest SED quintile. This highlight the importance of state and national-level comparisons for SED and suggest that future research is needed to identify barriers and facilitators of cancer clinical trial enrollment. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 117-117
    Abstract: 117 Background: The benefit of immune checkpoint inhibition is limited to the small percentage of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients whose tumors present mismatch repair (MMR) gene abnormalities; immunotherapy has not shown benefit in patients with MMR proficient CRC. Oncolytic immunotherapy represents a unique therapeutic platform. This phase I trial tests the safety of the combination of pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) plus durvalumab (durva) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CRC. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced proficient mixed match repair (pMMR) CRC received intravenous infusion of Pexa-Vec at dose level 3 x 10 8 plaque forming units (pfu) (DL1) or at 10 9 pfu (DL2) every 2 weeks for 4 doses and durva 1500 mg every 28 days. Response was assessed with CT every 8 weeks. Adverse events were recorded and managed. The primary endpoint included safety, tolerability and feasibility of this combination therapy. Samples of tumor and peripheral blood were collected for assessment of immune parameters. Results: Sixteen patients (6 males and 10 females) enrolled with a median age of 52.1 years (range 39-69) from Dec, 2017 to Oct, 2018. Four patients were treated with Pexa-Vec at DL1 and durva;twelve patients were treated with Pexa-Vec at DL2 and durva.The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAE) included fever 15/16 (94 %), hypotension 12/16 (75 %), chills 12/16 (75%), fatigue 8/16 (50%), sinus tachycardia 7/16 (44%) and rash 6/16 (38%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 8/16 (50%)patients; the most common were fever 7/16 (44 %), lymphopenia 2/16 (13%), neutropenia 1/16 (6%) and anemia 1/16 (6%). 14 patients were evaluable for response analysis; one patient 1/14 (7 %) achieved a confirmed partial response (lasting 7.1 months) and continues to receive treatment, while 13 patients had progressive disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.2 months (95% CI: 2.2-2.3 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (CI: 4.9-10.1 months). Conclusions: Combination therapy of Pexa-Vec with durva ICI issafe, well tolerated and demonstrates possible activity in patients with advanced pMMR CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03206073.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. TPS624-TPS624
    Abstract: TPS624 Background: The mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide, but outcome of systemic treatments in advanced HCC is suboptimal. Adoptive T-cell transfer therapy represents a promising field that exploits the ability of T-cells to recognize and eliminate their target. Targeting the tumor-associated antigen glypican- 3 (GPC3) through chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) engineered T cells is a mechanistically rational novel treatment for advanced HCC. This study aims to determine the dose and early signals of GPC3 targeted (CAR)-T cells in advanced GPC3 expressing HCC (NCT05003895). Methods: This phase I first in human dose escalation trial will study the safety and feasibility of CAR (hYP7)- T cells in advanced HCC patients expressing GPC3. Eligibility criteria includes advanced HCC, not candidates for curative interventions, progressed on first line systemic treatment, tumor GPC3 positivity of ³ 25% by IHC, Child-Pugh Class A, ³1 measurable lesion, ECOG 0 or 1, adequate organ and marrow function. ParticipantsÕ T cells collected through leukapheresis will be transduced with a lentivirus encoding the CAR construct to generate CAR expressing T cells. Patients receive a conditioning chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine prior to the infusion of the GPC3 directed CAR-T cells (Table). The trial has a 4-level modified Fibonacci dose escalation with a minimum of 3 patients at each level and a 28-day interval between the first three patients. Response will be assessed by imaging every two months during the first year. Patients undergo close monitoring with safety assessments during the first year and are followed for life. The primary objective is to determine the MTD, DLT, safety and feasibility of anti-GPC3 CAR expressing T- cells in patients with GPC3-expressing advanced HCC. Secondary objectives include best overall response and overall survival. Exploratory objectives are multiple and include studies to evaluate the persistence and peak levels of anti-GPC3 CAR-T cells after infusion. Recruitment began in December 2021 and the two patients at dose level -1 has been treated; the planned sample size is 38 patients. Table 1 Dose Level Anti-GPC3 CAR-T Cyclophosphamide (mg/m2) Fludarabine (mg/m2) Level -1 0.3x106 CAR-T per kg bw 200 30 Level 1 0.3x106 CAR-T per kg bw 300 30 Level 2 1x106 CAR-T per kg bw 300 30 Level 3 3x106 CAR-T per kg bw 300 30. Clinical trial information: NCT05003895 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages