In:
Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 4_suppl ( 2022-02-01), p. 382-382
Abstract:
382 Background: Capecitabine is usually used for patients with curatively resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) in EU and US, but no clear survival benefit has been shown in phase III trials. S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, has shown promising efficacy, with a mild toxicity profile, in patients with advanced BTC. The aim of this trial was to confirm whether adjuvant S-1 therapy might improve the overall survival (OS) in patients with curatively resected BTC. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial was conducted in 38 Japanese hospitals. Eligible patients were aged 20 to 80 years old, had undergone R0/R1 resection for histologically confirmed adeno(squamous) carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder or ampulla of Vater (T2-4, N0, M0 or T1-4, N1, M0) or the intrahepatic bile duct (T1-4, N0-1, M0) (7th UICC classification), and had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1.The calculated sample size was 440 to detect hazard ratio for OS of 0.74 with one-sided alpha of 5% and a power of 80%. Patients in surgery-alone arm received no further anti-cancer treatment, while those in adjuvant S-1 arm received 4 cycles of oral S-1 chemotherapy at the dose of 40 mg/m 2 twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest. Primary endpoint was OS, and secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS), incidence of adverse events, and proportion of treatment completion. Results: A total of 440 patients (surgery-alone, n = 222; adjuvant S-1, n = 218) were enrolled from September 2013 to June 2018. The data cutoff date was June 23, 2021, and the median follow-up duration was 45.4 months. Of all randomized patients, OS was significantly longer with adjuvant S-1 than surgery-alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.694, 95%CI, 0.514-0.935; one-sided p = 0.008; the 3-year OS, 67.6% [surgery-alone; 95%CI, 61.0-73.3%] and 77.1% [adjuvant S-1; 95%CI, 70.9-82.1%]). Adjuvant S-1 was also better for RFS (HR 0.797 [95%CI, 0.613-1.035] , 3-year RFS, 50.9% [surgery-alone; 95%CI, 44.1-57.2%] and 62.4% [adjuvant S-1; 95%CI, 55.6-68.4%] ). All preplanned subgroup analyses (PS, age, cancer type, cancer stage, R factor, and serum CA19-9) revealed favorable OS and RFS for adjuvant S-1 arm. The main grade 3-4 adverse events in adjuvant S-1 arm were biliary tract infection (7.2%), diarrhea (2.9%), appetite loss (2.9%), fatigue (2.9%), and the treatment was well-tolerated. Conclusions: Adjuvant S-1 therapy led to significantly longer survival than surgery alone and becomes the standard of care for resected BTC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000011688.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0732-183X
,
1527-7755
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2022.40.4_suppl.382
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2005181-5
Bookmarklink