In:
Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e18021-e18021
Abstract:
e18021 Background: Gefitinib was approved in Italy for treatment of pts with advanced NSCLC carrying mutant EGFR in May 2010. Methods: The EGFR FASTnet program was designed to facilitate the exchange of biological material, clinico-pathological data and reports between medical oncologists, primary pathologists and referral laboratories. EGFR mutational analysis was carried by Sanger sequencing, Real Time PCR, Pyrosequencing, Fragment Analysis and High resolution melting. The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and the Italian Society of Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology (SIAPEC-IAP) have full access to the anonymous EGFR FASTnet database. Results: As of December 31, 2011, 503 oncologists, 135 pathologists and 38 referral laboratories joined the EGFR FASTnet program. The enrolled cohort of 3819 pts with advanced NSCLC was significantly enriched for adenocarcinoma histology (3172 [83%]), female sex (1361 [36%] ) and smoking history (never smoker 911 [24%], former smoker 〉 15 yrs 880 [23%], light smoker 194 [5%] ). Mutational analysis was feasible in 3567 pts (93%). At registration, 72% of the pts had not received yet treatment for advanced disease. Mutational analysis was carried by Sanger sequencing in 2021 cases (57%), Real Time PCR in 174 (5%), Pyrosequencing in 636 (18%) and other techniques in 736 (21%). EGFR mutations were found in 520 cases (14.6%): 334 in exon 19 (9.4%), 163 in exon 21 (4.6%), 7 in exon 18 (0.2%) and 16 in exon 20 (0.4%). Proportion of mutated cases was slightly higher with Real time PCR compared to other techniques: Sanger 14.8%, Real time PCR 21.3%, Pyrosequencing 13.5%, other 13.3% (p = 0.049). A higher mutation rate was found in never smokers (32.0%), light smokers (18.7%) and former smokers 〉 15 yrs (12.4%), as well as in adenocarcinoma (15.7%) and females (25.2%). Conclusions: The pts for EGFR mutational screening are spontaneously selected by medical oncologists according to known predictive factors. The results of the mutational analysis from clinical practice in Italy are consistent with data from literature.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0732-183X
,
1527-7755
DOI:
10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e18021
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publication Date:
2012
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2005181-5
Bookmarklink