Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Translational Medicine, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 6, No. 1 ( 2008-12)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1479-5876
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2118570-0
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Informa UK Limited ; 2009
    In:  Expert Review of Hematology Vol. 2, No. 5 ( 2009-10), p. 563-575
    In: Expert Review of Hematology, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 2, No. 5 ( 2009-10), p. 563-575
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1747-4086 , 1747-4094
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2009
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: European Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 97, No. 1 ( 2016-07), p. 33-38
    Abstract: The efficacy of erythropoietic‐stimulating agents ( ESA ) in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia ( CMML ) is unknown. Our objective was to analyze erythroid response ( ER ) and overall survival ( OS ) in a series of 94 patients with CMML treated with ESA . Methods We analyzed a series of 94 patients with CMML treated with ESA included in the Spanish and Düsseldorf‐ MDS registries. Findings ER was observed in 64% of patients and red blood cell ( RBC ) transfusion independence in 31%. The median duration of ER was 7 months (range, 0–88). CPSS and EPO level were significantly associated with ER in multivariate analysis ( P = 0.003). Considering only patients with CPSS low‐ or intermediate‐1‐risk group, the absence of RBC transfusion dependence and erythropoietin ( EPO ) level predicted ER ( P = 0.003 and P = 0.008, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only the EPO level retained its prognostic value ( P = 0.029). Achievement of ER correlated with a better survival since ER evaluation ( P = 0.016). Interpretation The CPSS and EPO levels are adequate tools to select CMML patients with symptomatic anemia who may benefit from treatment with ESA . A significant ER to ESA is expected in anemic patients with low/intermediate‐1 CMML risk by the CPSS and a low endogenous serum EPO level.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0902-4441 , 1600-0609
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2027114-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 3460-3460
    Abstract: Introduction: High-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous peripheral blood (PB) stem cell transplantation (SCT) is currently standard of care in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who are younger than 65 years. In patients older than 65 years, HDT compared to thalidomide-containing chemotherapy had no advantage in one phase III trial and up to date no further phase III trials comparing HDT with other novel agents in elderly patients have been published. As a transplant center we believe that HDT is still benefitting elderly patients, despite an increasing number of new alternative drugs for the treatment of patients with MM. As we treated elderly patients with HDT and autologous SCT since 2000 on a regular basis, we wanted to analyze the impact of this treatment strategy on outcome in elderly patients over the time. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 437 patients who received first-line HDT and autologous PBSCT at our institution between Feb 2000 and Feb 2014 in order to compare the outcome of patients according to age. Eligibility for HDT in our center was not based on chronological age but on general biological fitness as reflected by comorbidities. Results: Median age was 54 years (range: 30-65) in 345 patients categorized as "young", and 68 years (range: 66-75) in 92 "elderly" patients. In young vs elderly patients, the prevalence of ISS stage 3 was 17% and 26%, respectively (p=0.02), and the frequency of high-risk FISH cytogenetics was 40% and 38%, respectively (p=0.5). Treatment consisted of conventional (62% vs 47%) or bortezomib-containing (38% vs 53%) induction therapy, 1-2 cycles of cyclophosphamide-containing stem cell mobilization, and HDT with melphalan 200 in young and tandem melphalan 100 in elderly patients, followed by autologous SCT. In both groups, 8.5% of patients received single melphalan 140 due to renal insufficiency or other toxicity concerns. Maintenance treatment with lenalidomide was given in 32% of the young and 44% of elderly patients, respectively (91 and 34 patients). There was no significant difference between young and elderly patients of treatment-related mortality (3.0% vs 2.2%, p=0.5) or response rates at 100 days after HDT (16% vs 20% CR, p=0.8). After a median follow-up of 50 months, there was no difference in median PFS (38 vs 44 months, p=0.4) and median OS (95 vs 85 months, p=0.8). The same was true for subgroup analysis of patients with either good or poor prognostic markers, like ISS stage or FISH. Interestingly, looking at the time periods 2000-2007 and 2008-2014, we found a more pronounced improvement of median PFS over time in elderly (28 vs 58 months, p 〈 0.0001) than in young patients (34 vs 41 months, p=0.04). Of note, the difference in PFS between elderly and younger patients was significant before the year 2007 (p=0.004) and became undetectable with increasing use of novel agents in combination with HDT (p=0.2). There was a trend for an improvement of median OS before and after 2007 from 70 to 84 months for the elderly group (p=0.3), and from 83 to 116 months for the younger patients (p=0.2). Looking at defined treatment protocols instead of time periods, we could observe that patients treated with HDT preceded by bortezomib-containing induction therapy and followed by lenalidomide maintenance were no longer subject to an influence of age on treatment outcome. The 4-year-PFS was 70% and 77% (p=0.7) and the 4-year-OS was 87% and 90% (p=0.9) in young and elderly patients, respectively. Conclusion: In our single center experience, we could demonstrate a significant improvement of PFS and a trend for OS especially in elderly patients aged 66-75 years treated with first-line tandem melphalan 100 HDT and autologous SCT from 2000 to 2014. Two factors did not change over time, namely selection of appropriate candidates for HDT, based on comorbidities and performance score, and toxicity of HDT in terms of TRM. In our view our results are based on the addition of novel agents to HDT regimen such as bortezomib for induction therapy and lenalidomide as maintenance treatment. The combination of novel agents and HDT had an equalizing effect with regard to the prognostic impact of age. Further, treatment outcomes with a HDT regimen including bortezomib and lenalidomide seems to be superior to other standard therapies for elderly patients such as VMP or Ld. We conclude that, despite the availability of several new drugs, HDT is still a useful treatment option for selected patients beyond the age of 65. Disclosures Neukirchen: Celgene: Other: Travel support. Gattermann:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kobbe:Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Fenk:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel support.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 2813-2813
    Abstract: There is scarce information about the efficacy of ESA in CMML although their use is common in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to analyze the response and OS in a series of 99 pts with CMML treated with ESA and to evaluate the feasibility of the predictive model of response to ESA used in MDS (Hellström-Lindberg, et al. Br J Haematol. 1997; 99: 344-51). Method Between January 1997 and March 2013 99 pts with CMML from the Spanish Registry of MDS and the Düsseldorf-MDS registry were studied. Clinical characteristics, response and OS were analyzed. Predictive model of response to ESA (0 good, 1 intermediate, and 2 poor) based on erythropoetin (EPO) level ( 〈 or ≥ 500 U/L) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion need ( 〈 2 or ≥ 2 RBC/month) was applied. Results 66 (67%) pts were males. Median age (range) was 75 (52-93) years. CMML subtype: myelodysplastic 58 (59%), myeloproliferative 41 (41%), CMML-I 84/98 (86%), CMML-II 14/98 (14%). CPSS score: Low/Int-1 65/90 (72%), Int-2/High 25/90 (28%). Transfusion dependence on initiation of ESA 24/86 (28%). Score based on predicted model of response to ESA: 0 43/62 (69%), 1 15/62 (24%), 2 4/62 (7%). ESA type: EPO alfa 22/94 (24%), EPO beta 16/94 (17%), EPO theta 3/94 (3%) darbepoetin 53/94 (56%). Concomitant medication: hydroxyurea 19 (39%), iron 18 (37%), steroids 4 (8%), azacitidine 3 (6%), etoposide 2 (4%), G-CSF 1 (2%), romiplostim 1 (2%) and oral chelation 1 (2%). Four pts were excluded for response analysis because they received azacitidine (3) and oral chelation (1). Response: Erythroid response (ER) 55/86 (64%), transfusion independence 5/22 (23%). ER according to CPSS (Low/Int-1 vs. Int-2/High): 71% vs. 43%, p=0,032. Median (min,max) time of ER was 4 months (0,88). Pts with 0 score according to predictive model of response to ESA presented significantly higher ER than pts with 1-2 score (77% vs. 24%, p 〈 0.001) (Table 1). Median (range) follow-up was 2.1 years (0.1-10.5) years and median OS was 3.3 years (95%CI 2.7-4). OS of pts of Low/Int-1 risk group with ER (n= 40) was significantly higher than that of non-responding pts (n=16) (median in years (4.4, 95%CI (0.4-8.3) vs. 2.3, 95%CI (1.5-3), p 〈 0.001). Conclusions A high frequency of ER was observed in this series of pts with CMML, the majority belonging to Low-risk CPSS. Predictive model of response to ESA from MDS was feasible, with a similar ER than that of MDS pts. Pts with low-risk CPSS with ER to ESA had a better OS than non-ER patients Supported by RD12/0036/0029 from RTICC-Instituto Carlos III, Spain Disclosures: Germing: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jansen-Cilag: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 1428-1428
    Abstract: Introduction: Hyperleukocytosis, defined as a white blood cell count (WBC) of 〉 50 × 109/L or 〉 100 × 109/L, is seen in newly diagnosed AML and often results in leukostasis, increased risk of complications, and potentially early death. Those pts often require urgent evaluation and therapy. Leukapheresis is also sometimes used despite limited evidence supporting its use. There is limited data regarding the impact of time (day/night) and day (weekday/weekend) of admission and time to initiation of IC on outcomes in pts with hyperleukocytosis. Methods: Data were collected from 12 centers in USA and Europe (EU). Eligible pts had newly diagnosed AML, presented with a WBC 〉 50 × 109/L, and received IC. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models stratified by centers (EU vs. USA) estimated odds ratios for death during induction (30-day mortality) and achievement of composite complete response (CRc) defined as CR+CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models stratified by centers (EU vs. USA) estimated hazards ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS). We evaluated the impact of leukapheresis, day of presentation (weekend vs. weekday), time of presentation (nighttime = 6pm-6am vs. daytime=6am-6pm), and time to initiation of IC. Studied covariates included age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), cytogenetics and molecular abnormalities, WBC, hemoglobin, platelet count, bone marrow and blood blast percentage, and presence of clinical leukostasis, tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) at presentation. Results: Among 1050 pts with AML and hyperleukocytosis whose data were collected, 787 were reported to have received IC and were included in this analysis. Of 787 pts receiving IC, 16.6% (95%CI, 13.9-19.3%) died during the first 30 days of IC. Leukapheresis was used in 117 pts (15%) in 8 of the 12 centers. In univariate analyses, neither weekend nor nighttime presentation nor use of leukapheresis impacted odds of death in the first 30 days. In multivariate analysis, higher odds of death during first 30 days were associated with age ³ 55 years (OR 3.2, p=0.015), ECOG PS ³ 2 (OR 4.4, 0.004), WBC 〉 100 × 109/L (OR 6.0, p=0.01) and presence of leukostasis (OR 4.5, p=0.005) and TLS (HR, 3.2, p=0.049). However, neither initiation of IC beyond 48 hours of presentation (vs. less than 48 hours) or use of leukapheresis significantly affected the odds of death in first 30 days (Figure 1A). Median OS of the entire cohort was 12.6 months (95%CI, 11.5-14.9) (Figure 2A). In multivariate analyses, age ³ 55 years (HR 2.6, p 〈 0.001), ECOG PS ³ 2 (HR 1.5, p=0.02), poor cytogenetic risk group (vs. intermediate/good, HR 1.6, p=0.02) and clinical presence of leukostasis (HR 1.4, p=0.03) all predicted inferior OS. The use of leukapheresis showed a trend towards improved OS with borderline statistical significance in univariate analysis (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.6-1.0, p=0.052) (Figure 2B) but this was not statistically significant in multivariate analysis (Figure 1B). Initiation of IC beyond 48 hours of presentation (vs. less than 48 hours) did not significantly impact OS. CR was achieved in 51% (95%CI, 46.9%-54.1%) of pts and 14% (95%CI, 11.4%- 16.4%) had a CRi. In multivariate analysis, age ³ 55 years (OR 0.3, p 〈 0.001), ECOG PS ³ 2 (OR 0.5, p=0.012), adverse cytogenetic risk group (OR 0.4, p=0.007), and presence of leukostasis (OR 0.5, p=0.04) were associated with decreased odds of achieving CRc. However, initiation of IC beyond 48 hours of presentation (vs. less than 48 hours), and use of leukapheresis did not significantly impact odds of achieving CRc (Figure 1C). Day and time of presentation were not significantly associated with OS, 30-day mortality or CR/CRi rare in univariate analysis. Impact of leukapheresis in pts with clinical leukostasis and sensitivity analyses including propensity score matching are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In this very large international cohort of newly diagnosed AML pts who presented with hyperleukocytosis and treated with IC, neither day (weekend vs weekday) nor time (day vs night) nor the use of leukapheresis had significant impact on odds of death during the first 30 days or on OS. Our data further highlight the limited evidence behind use of leukapheresis and support the urgent need to conduct randomized clinical trials to study any of its benefits. Disclosures Montesinos: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bhatt:Pfizer: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fathi:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Khan:Teva: Speakers Bureau. Roboz:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Cluzeau:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Menarini: Consultancy; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Germing:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mukherjee:LEK Consulting: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Projects in Knowledge: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squib: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BioPharm Communications: Consultancy; Aplastic Anemia & MDS International Foundation in Joint Partnership with Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute: Honoraria. Brunner:Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ritchie:NS Pharma: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Podoltsev:Daiichi Snakyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zeidan:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: European Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 83, No. 5 ( 2009-11), p. 477-482
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0902-4441 , 1600-0609
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2027114-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Leukemia Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 36, No. 8 ( 2012-08), p. 1067-1070
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0145-2126
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008028-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2014
    In:  Leukemia Research Vol. 38, No. 2 ( 2014-02), p. 145-146
    In: Leukemia Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 38, No. 2 ( 2014-02), p. 145-146
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0145-2126
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008028-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Leukemia Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 77 ( 2019-02), p. 8-13
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0145-2126
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008028-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages