Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 6611-6611
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 6611-6611
    Abstract: 6611 Background: To address the paucity of data on costs of cancer recurrence, this study estimated medical care costs of patients diagnosed with recurrent breast, colorectal or lung cancer, and compared costs to patients diagnosed with de novo stage IV disease. Methods: Data from patients enrolled in three health plans who were diagnosed with de novo stage IV or recurrent breast (n stage IV = 352; n recurrent = 765), colorectal (n stage IV = 1072 and n recurrent = 542) and lung (n stage IV = 4042 and n recurrent = 339) cancers between 2000-2012 were used to estimate total medical care costs in the 12 months preceding (pre-index), month of index, and 12 months following (post-index) diagnosis/recurrence date. Cancer patients were identified using tumor registry data. Recurrent cancers were validated by medical record abstraction and the RECUR algorithms –innovative tools to detect recurrence using claims and electronic health record data. We used generalized linear repeated measures regression models controlling for demographic and comorbidity variables to estimate costs (2012 US$), stratified by age at diagnosis (ages 〈 65, ≥65). Results: Medical care cost differences in the pre-index period indicate higher costs for recurrent cancer patients than for stage IV breast (Age 〈 65:+$2550; Age ≥65: +$1254), colorectal (Age 〈 65:+$3295; Age ≥65: +$1653), and lung cancer patients (Age 〈 65:+$3232; Age ≥65: +$2340). Conversely, in the index and post-index periods, costs for stage IV cancers were higher than recurrent cancer costs. Specifically, post-index period cost differences indicate higher costs for stage IV patients than for recurrent breast (Age 〈 65:+$683; Age ≥65: +$1172), colorectal (Age 〈 65:+$3104; Age ≥65: +$1557), and lung cancer patients (Age 〈 65:+$1136; Age ≥65: +$1103). Conclusions: Our study provides medical care cost estimates of recurrent and de novo stage IV cancers. Cost differences between recurrent and stage IV cancers reveal heterogeneity in care patterns that merits further investigation. The reported study costs, measured in capitated care systems using standardized fee-for-service reimbursement coefficients, may serve as a benchmark for stage-specific phase-of-care oncology episode payment models.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 4543-4543
    Abstract: 4543 Background: Annually over 10,000 people with bladder cancer in the US have cystectomy surgery with urinary diversion (UD). While ileal conduit (IC) is most common, neobladder (NB) and continent pouch (CP) are options to retain urinary continence. Few studies in community settings have examined patient and clinician factors associated with UD choice. Methods: Eligible patients were age ≥21 with a cystectomy and UD for bladder cancer from 1/2010 to 6/2015 in 3 West coast Kaiser Permanente regions. Data were obtained from the EHR and chart review.We useda mixed effects logistic regression model with surgeon as a random effect, and region as a fixed effect, to identify patient factors associated with UD choice (IC vs NB/CP). We also examined whether surgeon factors were associated with UD choice above and beyond patient factors. Results: Among 1063 patients, 80% had an IC. IC patients were older (mean age 72 vs. 62), more likely female (24% vs. 16%), more likely diagnosed with AJCC stage III/IV (41% vs. 28%), and had higher Charlson comorbidity score (median 4 vs. 3) than NB/CP patients. Surgeons accounted for a sizable portion of the variability in UD choice (ICC = .26). The model with patient factors showed good fit (AUC = .93, Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = .22). Including surgeon factors (annual cystectomy volume, specialty training, clinical tenure) did not improve model fit (p = .32). Female sex, eGFR 〈 45, 4+ comorbidities, and stage III/IV tumors were associated with higher odds of receiving an IC vs. NB/CP (Table). Conclusions: Patient factors predict much of the variability in UD choice. The high ICC indicates that surgeons also contribute to this process, but surgeon factors we examined were not uniquely associated with IC. Future studies should explore more nuanced surgeon factors, such as how UD choice is shaped by personal beliefs about UD and likely outcomes. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 3_suppl ( 2016-01-20), p. 90-90
    Abstract: 90 Background: Bladder cancer patients who are treated with cystectomy (bladder removal) and urinary diversion (bladder replacement) experience high rates of complications and hospital readmissions, and have substantial supportive care needs. Patient-reported priorities for improving early-phase survivorship care are lacking. Methods: On the basis of focus groups and in-depth interviews with 32 bladder cancer survivors about post-operative challenges, we developed a structured question listing 16 early survivorship challenges. We asked respondents to indicate which challenges had been difficult to manage at home. The item was part of a survey mailed to members of three Kaiser Permanente regions who had undergone cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer approximately 6 months previously (N = 197). Eligible patients were identified through health plan databases and chart review. Results: The response rate to the survey was 65%. Respondents reported an average of 3 challenges. The most commonly reported challenges pertained to coordination of medical care (69%), such as confusion about follow-up care, problems obtaining medical and ostomy supplies, knowing what complications to look for and who to notify if they occur, receiving home health care, or obtaining prompt medical advice. Other problems were caring for the urinary diversion (53%); dealing with urine leaks and incontinence (49%); problems with balance, vision, and dexterity (32%); difficulty managing emotions (23%); and management of lymphedema (11%) or incisional or parastomal hernias (7%). Conclusions: More than two thirds of bladder cancer survivors who had recently undergone cystectomy and urinary diversion struggled with medical care coordination. Managing self-care, complications, and emotional well-being after this major surgery can be difficult for patients, who must also navigate a variety of supportive services, such as medical follow-up with multiple departments and providers, home health services, and wound or ostomy care. A more formal approach to discharge and better communication among patients and providers will help improve early survivorship care for this group.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 6018-6018
    Abstract: 6018 Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) is often used for the staging of head and neck cancer (HNC). The purpose of this study is to explore the association between the increased utilization of PET and stage/survival in the managed care environment. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with HNC (n=958) between 2000-2008, at 4 integrated health systems (Group Health Cooperative, Seattle; Health Alliance Plan/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit; Kaiser Permanente Colorado and Northwest, Portland) were identified via tumor registries linked to claims data. We compared AJCC stage distribution, patient/treatment characteristics, and survival between pre-PET era (2000-2004) vs. PET era (2005-2008), and those with PET vs. those without, during the PET era. AJCC stage was grouped into stage I/II (localized), stage III/IVa/IVb (locally advanced), and stage IVc (metastatic). Ordered logistic regression estimated the effects of PET utilization on upstaging. Kaplan-Meier estimates described overall survival (OS) differences between PET users and nonusers in the PET era. Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the effect of PET use on survival. Results: There was a non-significant increase in stage III/IVa/IVb (40% to 44%) with a decrease in stage I/II (58% to 52%) between pre-PET era and PET era (p=0.11). During the PET era, patients with PET were more likely stage III/IVa/IVb and less likely stage I/II compared to patients without PET (III/IVa/IVb: 62% vs. 29%, I/II: 35% vs. 68%). On multivariate analysis those who were staged with PET were twice as likely to have locally advanced disease (OR 2.091; p=0.006). There was no difference in stage IVc. Patients with PET scans were more likely to receive chemotherapy with radiation and less likely to receive no treatment. 3-year actuarial OS for patients (all stages) with and without PET was 81% vs. 77% (p=0.261). 3-year actuarial OS for patients staged III/IVa/IVb with and without PET was 58% vs. 41% (p= 0.001). Conclusions: HNC patients were more likely to be upstaged with the use of PET. There was an improvement in survival in stage III/IVa/IVb patients, but no difference in survival across all stages. This likely reflects selection bias and stage migration rather than improved outcomes among individual patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e18576-e18576
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e18576-e18576
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 6621-6621
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 6621-6621
    Abstract: 6621 Background: A substantial proportion of cancer spending is directed towards patients with metastatic disease. Past efforts to characterize spending for metastatic cancer have been limited, because they have not included patients with recurrent disease or analyzed spending across the entire episode of care. Spending for stage IV and recurrent metastatic cancer patients may differ. Methods: Using SEER-Medicare data from 2008-13, we identified breast (BC), colorectal (CRC), and lung (LC) cancer patients who were continuously enrolled in parts A, B and D, and had either stage IV or recurrent disease (i.e., return of cancer after resection of stage I-III disease). Mean total Medicare spending/patient per month and per year (2012$US) were estimated from 12 months prior to 12 months after diagnosis, and described for relevant patient sub-groups. Results: In a cohort of 27,847 patients, total spending for stage IV vs. recurrent cancer was 61-73% lower in the year before diagnosis ($11,339 vs. $28,796 for BC; $13,359 and $49,804 for CRC; $15,118 and $49,555 for LC), and 28-88% higher in the year after diagnosis ($68,787 and $42,091 for BC; $111,304 and $58,657 for CRC; $92,181 and $72,354 for LC). When considering the 2 year-period spanning the diagnosis, spending was similar (≤14%) between groups. The primary drivers of spending differences between patients with stage IV and recurrent disease were cancer type and time from diagnosis (Table). Younger age, higher comorbidity, and SEER region were also drivers of higher spending, especially after diagnosis. Conclusions: Spending patterns differ for patients with stage IV vs. recurrent cancer, suggesting different patterns of care that warrant further investigation. Spending differences after diagnosis were driven largely by part B spending, which was due in part to differential chemotherapy use. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages