In:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Wiley, Vol. 35, No. 8 ( 2024-08), p. 1706-1709
Abstract:
Leadless pacemakers are associated with a low risk of infection, so indications for their removal are rare. One can expect that the dwell time of the device correlates with a more difficult removal, but it has not been proved so far. Methods and Results We present a case of a patient in whom MICRA transcatheter pacing system was successfully removed with nondedicated commercially available tools, 70 months after implantation. Conclusion A successful removal of the MICRA leadless pacemaker is possible, and may be safe even many years after the device implantation, despite a lack of dedicated tools. Due to the potential risk of complications, the benefits and risks of the procedure should be weighted before making a final decision.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1045-3873
,
1540-8167
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2024
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2037519-0
Bookmarklink