Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13564-e13564
    Abstract: e13564 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have shown impressive results in treating oncology patients. However, some patients exhibit immune-related adverse events (irAE-s), one significant irAE is autoimmune hepatitis. Oncologists routinely screen for hepatic toxicity with a complete metabolic panel prior to each ICI administration. Predictive modeling of irAE-s based on patient factors has the potential to help guide treatment selection and monitoring protocols. We have developed a widely usable model based on patient history and routinely collected standard blood panels that can predict whether a patient will experience hepatitis with ICI administration. Methods: We defined irAE hepatitis as any single value of AST, ALT, or alkaline phosphatase three-times the upper limit of normal (ULN) as following ICI treatment. The goal was to determine whether the level of the biomarkers exceed this threshold within certain, pre-defined time-windows, as determined by medical experts. We used feature engineering to compress the time-series of lab panels into single meaningful statistical descriptors, such as mean or maximum of these vectors. The dataset was highly unbalanced with many more negative cases (out of the 3231 patients, depending on the window length used for feature generation, 100-400 positives were found), which warranted the application of synthetic resampling methods. Finally, we trained various ensemble models ( e.g., random forest, gradient boosting), on both the resampled and original dataset, to obtain the final, predictive model for the likelihood of irAE hepatitis. Models were tuned to favor high recall and lower precision (identification of patients for increased monitoring) or moderate recall and moderate precision (maximizing F1-score). Results: We explored several modelling methods, such as KNN, Logistic Regression, Random Forests (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and stacking. GB without resampling produced the best model with the moderate recall and precision. To achieve high recall with low precision, we needed to resample the dataset with random majority class under sampling and then use RF (see table below for exact results). Conclusions: In this study, we show contemporary machine learning methods can be used as a screening tool for patients at risk for irAE hepatitis. This method could be used to identify patients who would benefit from additional laboratory monitoring between ICI administrations or guide clinical decisions about therapy cessation in advance of toxicity. Additionally, these methods may be further developed and adapted to improve clinical trial exclusion criteria for patients most likely to develop irAE hepatitis.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13565-e13565
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13565-e13565
    Abstract: e13565 Background: Hepatitis toxicity is one of the most important adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, occurring in approximately 10% of patients. However, when identified early, it can be managed clinically, potentially allowing continuation of ICI treatment. The goal of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical usefulness of an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict the risk of developing hepatitis toxicity during the course of ICI treatment from routine bloodwork values. Methods: Our model uses a clinical dataset of 2438 patients who received ICI treatment at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center prior to the end of 2020. Hepatitis toxicity was defined as one or more of ALT, AST, ALKPHOS, BILIRUBIN values exceeding 2.5-times the upper limit of normal value. The available feature set was limited to the routinely available blood test values. All features were normalized to the upper limit of normal and transformed to a discretized symbolic representation, a modified version of Symbolic Aggregate ApproXimation. Motifs were extracted as n-grams from the symbol series, and the counts were used as input features for the predictive model. The study uses standard data science model training and evaluation concepts: train, validation, and test splits were created randomly on the patient level; the reported evaluation metrics are median AUC, TPR, TNR, PPV, NPV over 10 sampling runs. The final, best-performing model architecture is a boosted decision tree model (XGBoost) trained on the last four blood tests to predict hepatitis at the next blood sampling timepoint (i.e., at the time of the next ICI treatment appointment). Results: The best model uses the following eight blood values as features: ALT, AST, ALKPHOS, BILIRUBIN, ALBUMIN, CO2, CALCIUM, and BUN, and achieves an AUC of 0.82 (std. 0.01), with TPR = 0.32 (0.03), TNR = 0.97 (0.005), PPV = 0.18 (0.03), and NPV = 0.99 (0.002). It finds 32% of the timepoints where the patient is going to develop hepatitis toxicity prior to their next treatment, and about 1 in 5 positive predictions are correct. It is important to note that only about 1% of all ‘sequences’ of four consecutive blood tests are followed by hepatitis at the next test. That is, while a relatively large proportion of patients are going to develop hepatitis toxicity during their ICI treatment, the timepoint at which this happens is very uncertain. Conclusions: We demonstrate that an AI model built using only already available patient laboratory data could provide clinically useful input for clinicians to support their ICI treatment decisions to reduce the occurrence of hepatitis toxicity. The dynamic nature and below-patient-level granularity of the model would allow a clinician / clinical trial investigator to make adjustments to the therapy based on individual patient reaction over time.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e21133-e21133
    Abstract: e21133 Background: Hospitalization is the second largest contributor of cancer care spending, and over 50% of lung cancer patients are admitted to the hospital while receiving treatment. Patients who avoid hospital admission have reduced health care costs with a higher quality of life. This is the first study that characterizes the risk factors and outcomes for avoidable hospital admissions of lung cancer patients. It is the first to examine the extent to which hospitalizations from immunotherapy and targeted therapy could be avoided. Methods: A retrospective chart review of lung cancer patients admitted January 2018 through December 2018 was conducted. Demographics, disease and treatment history, admission characteristics, outcomes, and end-of-life care utilization were recorded. Following a multidisciplinary consensus review, hospitalizations were determined “avoidable” or “unavoidable.” Generalized estimating equation logistic regression models analyzed risks and outcomes associated with avoidable admissions. Kaplan-Meier estimators examined the median overall survival (mOS) between patients with and without avoidable admissions. Results: We evaluated 319 admissions from 188 patients with a median age of 66 and 16%/84% SCLC/NSCLC. Cancer-related symptoms accounted for 66% of hospitalizations; pneumonia and other infections comprised 34%, and 32% were due to cancer-related pain, vomiting, or failure to thrive (FTT). Common causes of unavoidable hospitalizations were unexpected disease progression causing symptoms, COPD exacerbation, and infection. Of the 47 hospitalizations identified as avoidable (15%), the mOS was 1.6 months; the mOS of unavoidable hospitalizations was 9.7 months (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.34-3.19; p 〈 0.001). Significant reasons for avoidable admissions included cancer-related pain (p = 0.021), hypervolemia (p = 0.033), patient desire to initiate hospice services (p = 0.011), and errors in medication reconciliation or distribution (p 〈 0.001). Errors in medication management caused 26% of the avoidable hospitalizations. Of admissions in patients on immunotherapy (n = 102) or targeted therapy (n = 44), 9% were due to adverse effects of treatment. Patients on immunotherapy and targeted therapy were not more likely to have avoidable hospitalizations compared to patients not on the treatments (p = 0.323 and 0.133, respectively). Patients with avoidable admissions were 3.02 times more likely to enroll in hospice within 30 days of hospitalization compared to unavoidable admissions (95% CI 1.54-5.92; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Patients on immunotherapy or targeted therapy were only rarely admitted due to side effects of treatment. Hospitalizations may be avoided with more aggressive outpatient symptom management, earlier hospice discussion with at-risk patients, and outpatient pharmacist review of medications following hospital discharge.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 1524-1524
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 1524-1524
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13566-e13566
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13566-e13566
    Abstract: e13566 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes in tumor types allowing subgroups of patients to have longer, higher quality lives. However, potential life-threatening immunotoxicities can arise in susceptible patients, including pneumonitis. Identifying patients at high risk of immunotoxicity can help patients understand potential adverse events, improve clinical trial cohort selection, and inform therapy selection in clinical settings. Here, we use electronic health record (EHR) data to build a binary classification model that predicts the probability of developing pneumonitis after the first ICI administration. Methods: We utilized real-world EHR-derived structured and unstructured data from 〉 2,700 patients from Vanderbilt University Medical Center obtained prior to December 31, 2018. Unstructured data were transformed into structured variables by expert curators, including labels for pneumonitis episodes following ICI initiation. Feature engineering involved aggregating lab measurements over a 60-day time window before the first ICI; other features (conditions, smoking status, etc.) used a 1-year window. To build a small, easily deployable model and assess its performance robustly, we utilized a sequential process. In each step, we decided between two versions of a random forest model, one with the original feature set (M1) and one extended with a candidate feature (M2). We identified candidate features using 90% of the data. We performed nested cross-validation on this partition and compared the inner loop results. If M2 was significantly better, we tested whether it performed better on the 10% partition. If it did, we chose M2 and assessed its performance on the outer loop. This procedure was created as our dataset was rather small and noisy, which is typical for EHR-derived data. Results: All-cause pneumonitis incidence following ICI initiation was 8.4%. Our final model includes only six features: frequency of lung-related ICD-10 codes, frequency of C34 code, frequency of C78 code, smoking status, interaction between smoking and C34/C78 indicators, and median of blood oxygen saturation. This model achieved a mean AUC of 0.66 (SD: 0.07). Our analysis on the outer loop predictions showed that selecting 50% of patients with the lowest predicted probabilities reduced the occurrence of pneumonitis in the cohort to 5%, compared to 8.4%, when we select patients randomly. The model achieved a mean positive predictive value of 0.3 and negative predictive value of 0.96. Conclusions: We utilized a real-world EHR dataset to identify patterns in patient medical history that could predict the development of pneumonitis. We demonstrated that a small number of easily obtainable clinical covariates can result in meaningful predictions. This model illustrates potential future use for identifying the patients with the highest and lowest risks for pneumonitis during treatment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13568-e13568
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13568-e13568
    Abstract: e13568 Background: Crowdsourcing as a means of codifying the knowledge of many individuals can be an effective way to build models where data do not exist to inform these models. Risk for health complications during cancer survivorship is one area where there are limited large datasets that track detailed outcomes. While many survivorship care expert groups such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Survivorship Guidelines Panels recognize the need for a stratified system of assigning survivorship care, criteria for assigning risk to individuals at the end of active cancer treatment are not well agreed upon. To build a model for risk of health complications during survivorship care, we created an online crowdsourcing platform called Follow-up Interactive Long-Term Expert Ranking (FILTER). With FILTER we invite oncologists from a range of backgrounds to determine which case, among two cases, is higher risk. This process is repeated many times by many oncologists to achieve a consensus rating for risk for each case. The purpose of this preliminary study was to understand the characteristics of oncologists who were willing to participate in pilot testing FILTER and the number of cases they were able to adjudicate. Methods: We released the FILTER application in November 2021 to members of the NCCN Survivorship Guidelines Panel, COG Survivorship Guidelines Panel, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center oncologists. Through the registration process, we collected institution and specialty information about each expert to determine whether a diverse range of experts were contributing their experience to the risk model. Results: Out of over 100 oncologists who were invited to participate in pilot testing of FILTER, 29 users have signed up for an account and adjudicated at least one matchup. These experts came from 13 institutions and have adjudicated a total of 1665 matchups generating risk scores for 78 synthetic cases. The median number of matchups adjudicated per expert was 45. There were 15 medical oncologists, 3 radiation oncologists, a surgical oncologist, and 10 pediatric oncologists who participated in pilot testing. Conclusions: We succeeded in recruiting a limited number of experts to date from a diverse range of oncology specialties, institutions, and backgrounds to pilot test FILTER. However, recruitment has been inadequate to meet the needs of the project. We therefore will seek to recruit more oncologists to refine these scores and will use meetings of oncology groups such as ASCO to achieve this goal. With enough adjudications by oncologists, a reliable ranking of cases by risk score will allow us to create a model to inform a survivorship risk calculator. This calculator, which will be made publicly available once finalized and validated, will provide another resource to help triage cancer survivors to appropriate survivorship care needs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 28_suppl ( 2021-10-01), p. 113-113
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 28_suppl ( 2021-10-01), p. 113-113
    Abstract: 113 Background: Over the past decade, genomic testing has become standard of care for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These tests qualify patients for additional anti-cancer therapies and should be performed in all patients. Small scale studies at the institutional level have revealed that there may be disparities in genomic testing in NSCLC and not all patients may have similar access to care. In this study, we use the IBM Explorys Electronic Health Record (EHR) database to conduct a nationwide retrospective, observational study to understand how gender, race, insurance type, and spoken language impacts the rate of genomic testing in metastatic NSCLC patients. Methods: From Jan 1st, 2015 to Dec 31st, 2020, the IBM Explorys EHR database comprised 128,119 lung cancer patients using the SNOMED-CT concept of Primary Malignant Neoplasm of the Lung (CID 93880001). As structured staging information was not available, metastatic NSCLC patients were imputed by removing patients who received thoracic surgeries (presumably stage I or II) and those who received radiation therapy (presumably stage III). Following imputation, 120,470 patients with metastatic NSCLC were queried for testing for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and/or RET. Odds ratios and chi-squared tests were computed for gender, race, insurance type, and spoken language comparing patients that received genomics testing to those who did not. Results: Genomic testing was taken significantly more by male patients (OR: 1.35, p 〈 0.0001), and by Caucasian patients (OR: 1.39, p 〈 0.0001). Compared to the public insurance plans, the genomic testing was significantly more in patients with private insurance plans (OR: 2.48, p 〈 0.0001) and self-pay patients (OR: 2.84, p 〈 0.0001). Patients speaking English as their first language significantly less likely took genomic testing (OR: 0.81, p 〈 0.05). Conclusions: This study aims to identify gaps in health disparities in gender, race/ethnicity, and insurance type for genomic testing that should be standard practice. Future investigation and attention to this issue appears necessary to begin moving from documenting disparities, to understanding them, and ultimately to reducing them.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 2060-2060
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 2060-2060
    Abstract: 2060 Background: The FDA has issued hundreds of cancer drug indications, with many new drugs, expanded indications, and biosimilars approved in recent years. While the gold standard for regulatory approval is the randomized controlled trial (RCT), RCT design including selection of control arms can differ considerably. We sought to investigate trends and patterns in RCT trial design used to support FDA approvals in oncology. Methods: We reviewed the available FDA package inserts of oncology drugs (N=258) for RCTs cited to support initial and expanded indication approvals as of January 2020; biosimilars were excluded. RCTs were linked to the HemOnc ontology, which contains trial-level metadata including publication year, endpoints, and trial design. Log-linear regression was performed to evaluate trends in approvals over time by endpoint. Study drugs were categorized as cytotoxic therapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy. RCTs were categorized by four designs: escalation (adding a drug or increasing the drug dose in an established regimen), in-class comparison (comparing two drugs in the same therapeutic class), out-of-class switch (comparing drugs in distinct therapeutic classes), and de-escalation (removing a drug or reducing the drug dose in an established regimen). Results: We identified 556 registration trials, 372 (67%) of which were RCTs. Approvals have been increasing exponentially over time (R 2 0.9, p 〈 0.001), both for RCTs reporting overall survival (OS) endpoints (R 2 0.77, p 〈 0.001), and non-OS endpoints (R 2 0.67, p 〈 0.001). Of the three most common trial designs (Table), in-class comparisons were least likely to report OS (28%; escalations 47%; out-of-class switches 43%, p=0.01 by Chi-squared). Class switches were common in immunotherapy trials compared to targeted or cytotoxic therapy. Conclusions: Despite growth in FDA approvals, a minority of registration trials report paradigmatic shifts in therapeutic approach (out-of-class switches), with the relative exception of immunotherapy trials. Escalation is the most common route to FDA approval, even though this design inevitably increases cost and toxicity. This suggests that new oncology drug approvals are not alone a useful metric of practice-changing innovation. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13581-e13581
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e13581-e13581
    Abstract: e13581 Background: In the past decade, immunotherapies have revolutionized oncology practice by prolonging patient survival in previously rapidly fatal cancers. However, severe immune toxicities present a challenge, affecting ̃20% and up to 50% of patients on immune monotherapies and combination immunotherapies, respectively. Oncologists must balance toxicity risk with potential efficacy, and pharmaceutical companies have a vested interest in selecting patients with the highest benefit–risk ratio during trial enrollment. Predictive toxicity–efficacy modeling has the potential to guide trial subject selection and clinical care, yet there remains a need for predictive models that can be practically implemented in these settings. Methods: A common academic–industry contract data–transfer framework—wherein academic medical institutions and industry counterparts act in isolation—creates barriers to development of high-quality algorithms with practical applications. In this framework, 1) academic medical institutions provide patient data as a “data dump;” these data are static and cannot be refined—reducing opportunities for quality control; 2) predictive model outcomes may include artifacts that are not identified; 3) manual curation of patient data is required to accurately replicate the model in real-world settings; and 4) lack of clinician participation reduces the potential clinical applications of models and reciprocal benefit to the academic institution. We outline a more contemporary, engaged approach to unite strengths of both partners to achieve a common goal. Results: In 2019, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and GE Healthcare partnered with the goal of enabling safer and more precise immunotherapy use. As part of this work, we formulated a recipe for academic–industry partnerships that offers unique advantages over a static contract framework. In our iterative, interactive approach, 1) clinical and curation experts meet with industry modelers to dynamically refine deidentified data sets by resolving discrepancies in data from different sources (e.g., manually curated vs. structured data); 2) clinical experts iteratively review outputs of predictive models to identify potential artifacts and refine final models; 3) expert curators iterate with in-house machine-learning experts to create algorithms to automate curation of natural language elements from the identified EHR data; and 4) clinical and industry stakeholders participate in regular meetings with modelers to ensure clinical and trial utility of the modeling approach. Conclusions: Compared to data transfer-only relationships, this partnership framework offers an opportunity to develop more informed, higher quality immunotherapy models with clinical and industry applications.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e18586-e18586
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e18586-e18586
    Abstract: e18586 Background: Recommendations for clinical trial consideration are ubiquitous across all cancers. However, it is challenging to identify patients from underrepresented communities and offer them opportunities to enroll in clinical trials due to a multitude of reasons including social determinants of care, distance from clinical resources, lack of resources, etc. As part of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) Influential Medicine Providing Access to Clinical Trials (IMPACT) study, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (Nashville, TN) partnered with Baptist Cancer Center (BCC, Memphis, TN) to improve accrual of trials for patients with Hodgkins lymphoma. BCC has an active NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) grant with 12 affiliated sites spread across Arkansas, Tennessee, and Mississippi and provides care for underrepresented minority, and underserved communities. Methods: We chose the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), as a conceptual model to guide assessment of the existing process and inherent opportunities. We created a secure REDCap survey to identify timepoints in the existing clinician workflow and research sites that provide the best opportunities to discuss clinical trials with the patient. Retrospective data was collected for 67 patients diagnosed with Hodgkins lymphoma, who received care at six sites affiliated with BCC. A manual chart review was performed to extract data from the electronic medical record. Results: We observed that 73% of the patients from 2 sites already had an established diagnosis of Hodgkins lymphoma at the time of referral to the medical oncologist. By contrast, only 33% of patients from the remaining 4 sites had an established diagnosis at the time of referral. In these cases, the diagnosis was established after pathological testing ordered by the oncologist was performed. Conclusions: Using our analysis, we identified 2 sites from a large healthcare network that would benefit greatest from implementing pre-screening for clinical trials before the first visit with a medical oncologist. Further, we determined that efforts/resources for trial screening at the remaining 4 sites would be best served after pathological evidence of disease was established. Clinical trial enrolment is a multi-step process and needs substantial human and financial resources. Implementation science interventions can help to guide judicious use of resources while improving patient care in rural and underserved communities.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages