Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Language
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 71, No. 7 ( 2020-10-23), p. e159-e169
    Abstract: The burden and timeline of posttransplant infections are not comprehensively documented in the current era of immunosuppression and prophylaxis. Methods In this prospective study nested within the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS), all clinically relevant infections were identified by transplant–infectious diseases physicians in persons receiving solid organ transplant (SOT) between May 2008 and December 2014 with ≥12 months of follow-up. Results Among 3541 SOT recipients, 2761 (1612 kidney, 577 liver, 286 lung, 213 heart, and 73 kidney-pancreas) had ≥12 months of follow-up; 1520 patients (55%) suffered 3520 infections during the first year posttransplantation. Burden and timelines of clinically relevant infections differed between transplantations. Bacteria were responsible for 2202 infections (63%) prevailing throughout the year, with a predominance of Enterobacteriaceae (54%) as urinary pathogens in heart, lung, and kidney transplant recipients, and as digestive tract pathogens in liver transplant recipients. Enterococcus spp (20%) occurred as urinary tract pathogens in kidney transplant recipients and as digestive tract pathogens in liver transplant recipients, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9%) in lung transplant recipients. Among 1039 viral infections, herpesviruses predominated (51%) in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Among 263 fungal infections, Candida spp (60%) prevailed as digestive tract pathogens in liver transplant recipients. Opportunistic pathogens, including Aspergillus fumigatus (1.4%) and cytomegalovirus (6%), were rare, scattering over 12 months across all SOT recipients. Conclusions In the current era of immunosuppression and prophylaxis, SOT recipients experience a high burden of infections throughout the first year posttransplantation, with rare opportunistic pathogens and a predominance of bacteria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-4838 , 1537-6591
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002229-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 7, No. 1 ( 2023-03-07)
    Abstract: Many potential prognostic factors for predicting kidney transplantation outcomes have been identified. However, in Switzerland, no widely accepted prognostic model or risk score for transplantation outcomes is being routinely used in clinical practice yet. We aim to develop three prediction models for the prognosis of graft survival, quality of life, and graft function following transplantation in Switzerland. Methods The clinical kidney prediction models (KIDMO) are developed with data from a national multi-center cohort study (Swiss Transplant Cohort Study; STCS) and the Swiss Organ Allocation System (SOAS). The primary outcome is the kidney graft survival (with death of recipient as competing risk); the secondary outcomes are the quality of life (patient-reported health status) at 12 months and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope. Organ donor, transplantation, and recipient-related clinical information will be used as predictors at the time of organ allocation. We will use a Fine & Gray subdistribution model and linear mixed-effects models for the primary and the two secondary outcomes, respectively. Model optimism, calibration, discrimination, and heterogeneity between transplant centres will be assessed using bootstrapping, internal-external cross-validation, and methods from meta-analysis. Discussion Thorough evaluation of the existing risk scores for the kidney graft survival or patient-reported outcomes has been lacking in the Swiss transplant setting. In order to be useful in clinical practice, a prognostic score needs to be valid, reliable, clinically relevant, and preferably integrated into the decision-making process to improve long-term patient outcomes and support informed decisions for clinicians and their patients. The state-of-the-art methodology by taking into account competing risks and variable selection using expert knowledge is applied to data from a nationwide prospective multi-center cohort study. Ideally, healthcare providers together with patients can predetermine the risk they are willing to accept from a deceased-donor kidney, with graft survival, quality of life, and graft function estimates available for their consideration. Study registration Open Science Framework ID: z6mvj
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2397-7523
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2886634-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 2034-2034
    Abstract: Fetomaternal and maternofetal cell transfer have been described. Their clinical relevance is unknown. We hypothesized that firstborn siblings could tolerize their siblings born thereafter through sequential fetomaternal-maternofetal cell transfer. Hence, stem cell transplants within a family from a firstborn sibling (group A) should result more graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and worse overall survival than transplants to a firstborn donor (group B). Results of a retrospective single center cohort analysis of 321 HLA-identical sibling donor hemopoietic stem cell transplants showed a survival of 48.3% (+/−10.9%) at 10 years in the group with firstborn donors (group A, 110 patients) as compared to 63.2 (+/−10.6%) in the group with firstborn recipients (group B, 105 patients; p 〈 0.02) and a RR of death after adjustment for other risk factors of 2.6 (CI 1.45–4.66; p 〈 0.001) for the group with firstborn donors. These results support the concept of a clinically relevant tolerizing effect of birth order, possibly mediated by fetomaternal cell transfer in man. Patients characteristics and outcomes Birth Order Donor First Sibling Recipient First Sibling n 110 105 Donor Age median (range) 30.1 (4.9–68) 25.4 (0.4–59.1) p=0.005 Recipient Age median (range) 25.4(3.2–62.1) 30.8 (2.2–63.0) Number of Siblings 2 67 69 n.s. 3 26 22 〉 3 17 14 Diagnosis n.s. Acute myeloid leukemia n 33 26 Acute lymphoblastic leukemia n 24 24 Chronic myeloid leukemia n 23 23 Lymphoproliferative disorders n 14 13 Severe aplastic anemia n 11 12 Myelodysplastic syndromes n 5 7 Stem Cell Source n.s. Bone Marrow n 71 73 PBSCT n 39 32 Conditioning n.s. With totoal body irradiation n 18 22 Without total body irradiation n 92 83 Outcomes Survival at 10 yrs % 48.3 63.2 p 〈 0.02 Relapse at 3 yrs. % 26 20 n.s. Acute GvHD p=0.017 〈 Grade II n 46 61 〉 = Grade II n 64 44 Chronic GvHD n.s. none n 28 30 n.a. n 29 17 Limited n 32 30 Extensive n 21 23 Figure 1: Kaplan Meyer estimate of cumulative survival of groups A(firstborn donor: gray line) and B (firstborn recipient: black line). + indicates censored patient. Figure 1:. Kaplan Meyer estimate of cumulative survival of groups A(firstborn donor: gray line) and B (firstborn recipient: black line). + indicates censored patient.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 2408-2408
    Abstract: Abstract 2408 Background Previously, horse antithymocyte globulin (hATG) with ciclosporin (CSA) was the standard immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for patients with aplastic anemia (AA) ineligible for HSCT, with response rates of 60–75% within 3–4 months. Rabbit ATG (rATG, Thymoglobuline, Genzyme) was reserved for non-response or relapse after a course of hATG. Following the withdrawal of hATG (Lymphoglobuline) from the market, the use of rATG as first line IST has been evaluated prospectively with hATG (ATGAM, Pfizer) in a randomised study from NIH (Scheinberg et al, NEJM, 2011), reporting significantly lower response rate and worse outcome after rATG. We report here the results of a multicenter, EBMT, phase II pilot study of 35 patients with AA enrolled between August 2008 and August 2010 at 10 centres (EUdraCT number 2007–000902–55). Patients enrolled were ineligible for matched sibling HSCT, had not received prior ATG or CSA and included both severe AA (SAA) and transfusion dependent non-severe AA (NSAA). The median age was 36 years (range 17–75). Six (17%) patients had very severe AA, 20 (57%) SAA and 9 (26%) had NSAA. Primary endpoint was response at 6 months. Dose of rATG was 3.75mg/kg daily for 5 days. CSA dose was 5mg/kg daily from day +1. For prevention of serum sickness, prednisolone was given at 1–2mg/kg daily from day 1–5, then the dose halved every 5 days. Results were compared in a 3: 1 ratio with 105 historical patients from the EBMT registry, matched for categorised age and disease severity, and who had been treated with hATG (Lymphoglobuline, Genzyme) and CSA. The study was designed to demonstrate a 25% difference in total response to rATG, with 80% power at a 5% level of significance. The median follow up for all patients treated with rATG is 285 days (6–781). Results At 3 months, no patients had achieved a complete response (CR). Partial response (PR) occurred in 11 (34%). Two patients died, on day +6 and +9, and one was lost to follow up. At 6 months, CR rate was 7% (n=2) and PR rate 32% (n=11). One patient relapsed at 59 days. Five patients underwent unrelated donor HSCT for non-response to rATG, at day +153, 168, 321, 322 and 460 post rATG. Infections occurred in 22 (63%), elevated liver function in 10 (29%), rash in 8 (23%), haemorrhage in 7 (20%), hypertension in 6 (17%), abnormal renal function in 6 (17%), arthralgia in 5 (14%), avascular bone necrosis in one. There were 10 deaths after rATG (28.5%) and one following subsequent HSCT. Infections were the main cause of death in 9/10 patients. For rATG, overall survival at 2 yr was 56%, compared to 78% for hATG, p=0.001. Overall survival after censoring HSCT patients was 39% for rATG and 72% for hATG, p=0.0005. On multivariate analysis, rATG (RR = 3.4, p=0.003) and age 〉 37 years (RR = 3.8, p=0.002), were independent adverse risk factors for survival. Disease severity and time from diagnosis to treatment were not significant risk factors. CR at a given time was 11% for rATG and 44% for hATG, and PR for rATG was 43% and 23% for hATG. There were 19/105 (18%) deaths after hATG. Changes in CD4+ T-cells were analysed in a subset of 5 patients from a single center, prior to rATG (n=5) and post rATG (n=8). The relevant (preliminary) findings are:pre-ATG therapy, number of Tregs was significantly lower in AA compared to healthy age-matched controls (p=0.009), while Th17 (p=0.014), Th1 cells (p=0.014) and Th2/Tregs ratio (p=0.025) were higher in AA patients. Following treatment with ATG, the frequency of Th1 (p=0.002) and B-cells (p=0.007) was reduced but there was no significant change in the frequency of Tregs, Th17/Tregs or T-helpers/Tregs ratios. However, the frequency of cytokine secreting non-Tregs (CD4+ CD25high CD45 RA− Foxp3low) studied in 5 patients was significantly increased in post treatment samples (p=0.02) and there was a trend for a higher frequency in non-responders compared to responders. Conclusions We report significantly inferior response and survival with rATG (Thymoglobuline) compared to hATG (Lymphoglobuline), and a high incidence of serious infections with rATG, in association with significant changes in CD4+ T-cell subsets. These results have major implications for future treatment algorithms for AA and improve further our understanding of the mechanism of action of rATG in AA. Disclosures: Marsh: Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ATG used in treatment of aplastic anemia. Schrezenmeier:Genzyme: Research Funding. Risitano:Genzyme: Honoraria. Dufour:Pfizer: Research Funding. Elebute:Alexion: Honoraria. Mufti:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Bacigalupo:Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 707-707
    Abstract: Unrelated donor (UD) transplants for patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) have been known to yield inferior results when compared to transplants from HLA identical siblings (SIB). With the significant improvement of UD transplants over the past decade, on may ask whether this is still true. Aim of the study To compare the outcome of UD with SIB transplants in recent cohort of patients reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Aplastic Anemia Registry. Patients We have analyzed 1500 patients with acquired aplastic anemia (SAA), who received a first bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB),. HLA matched transplant between 2005 and 2009, from identical siblings (n=975) or unrelated donors (n=525). Excluded were cord blood grafts. Clinical characteristics of the two groups were different: although SIB vs UD grafts had comparable age (20 vs 21 years median age , p=0.1), SIB grafts were performed earlier (152 vs 607 median days from diagnosis, p 〈 0.00001), had less frequently anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in the conditioning regimen (50% vs 61%, p 〈 0.0001), had less frequently radiation based conditioning (5% vs 31%, p 〈 0.00001), and more frequently received marrow as a stem cell source (61% vs 53%, p=0.002). Results The cumulative incidence (CI) of engraftment was 91% for both SIB and UD transplants; and the CI of acute GvHD grade II-IV was11% in SIB and 25% in UD grafts (p 〈 0.0001). Infection was the leading cause of death (10% UD, 8% SIB), followed by GvHD (6% UD vs 3% SIB) and rejection (1,7% and 1,4% respectively). In multivariate COX analysis the strongest negative predictors of survival was the use of PB as a stem cell source (RR 2, p 〈 0.00001), followed by patient age 〉 20 years (RR 2.0, p 〈 0.0001), an interval diagnosis-transplant (Dx-Tx) 〉 180 days (RR 1.3, p=0.006) and no anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in the conditioning (RR 1.6, p=0.002). The use of an UD as compared to a SIB was not statistically significant (RR 1.2, p=0.4). When stratified for negative predictors, the actuarial 5 year survival of SIB and UD transplants was 91% vs 81% in low risk patients (n=541, 0-1 negative predictors, p=0.052), 74% vs 72% for the largest group of intermediate risk patients (n=829, 2-3 negative predictors, p=0.4) and 53% vs 50% for a small group of high risk patients (n=130, 4 negative predictors, p=0.8). Conclusions This study suggests that the outcome of UD and SIB transplant for SAA is currently comparable, if one corrects for confounding variables, and especially time to transplant. This information warrants the activation of an unrelated donor search for all patients lacking an HLA matched sibling, up to the age of 60, and this may be relevant for treatment strategies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 2092-2092
    Abstract: The only curative treatment approach for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but disease relapse after transplantation is a major concern. Predictors for disease outcome after HSCT are limited. However, unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities have been shown to serve as predictors for MDS-relapse after transplantation. Similar to the data available in MDS-patients not undergoing HSCT (Schanz et al. J Clin Oncol 2012), there is evidence that the novel 5-group cytogenetic classification has a better predictive value for outcome after HSCT than standard IPSS cytogenetics (Deeg et al. Blood 2012). The aim of this large multicentric, international study was to retrospectively determine the impact of the new 5-group cytogenetic MDS classification on outcome after HSCT. Patients and Methods Patients were selected from the EBMT database who had received HSCT for the treatment of MDS between 1982 and 2010 and for whom sufficient cytogenetic information was available. In total, 903 patients were included into the study. At time of HSCT, 97 (10.7%) patients had untreated MDS, 218 (24.1%) patients had advanced MDS or AML evolving from MDS in complete remission, and 227 (25.1%) patients were not in remission after treatment (in 12.3% information on stage of the disease was not available). Median time between diagnosis and transplant was 6.6 months (range 0.2-359.3). Matched related donor HSCT was performed in 574 patients (63.6%), and matched unrelated donor HSCT in 329 patients (36.4%). Bone marrow (35.4%) or peripheral blood (64.6%) served as stem cell graft. Myeloablative preparative regimens were used in 582 patients (64.5%), and a non-myeloablative regimen was given to 320 patients (35.4%). Impact of cytogenetic classification was analyzed in uni- and multivariate models regarding overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS) after HSCT. Predictive performance of the 2 classifications was compared by means of the cross-validated log partial likelihood. Results Estimated 5-year RFS and OS were 32% and 36% respectively. According to the 5-group cytogenetic classification 19 (2.1%) patients had very good risk cytogenetics, 204 (22.6%) normal risk cytogenetics, 438 (48.5%) intermediate risk cytogenetics, 178 (19.7%) poor risk cytogenetics, and 64 (7.1%) very poor risk cytogenetics. Good, intermediate, and poor risk cytogenetics according to IPSS were found in 192 (38.0%), 500 (40.2%), and 211 (23.7%) patients, respectively. In univariate analysis 5-group cytogenetic information was found to be strongly associated with OS and RFS (OS: log-rank test P 〈 .01, RFS: P 〈 .01) (Figure 1). Further clinicopathologic factors showed a significant impact on impaired OS and RFS: Disease status at HSCT (RA/RARS no pretreatment; RAEB(t)/sAML in CR; RAEB(t)/sAML not in CR, RAEB(t)/sAML untreated) (OS: P 〈 .01, RFS: P 〈 .01) and IPSS cytogenetics (good; intermediate; poor) (OS: P 〈 .01, RFS: P 〈 .01). Patient age showed an impact for RFS (P=.05), but not for OS (P=.09). In multivariate analysis, statistically significant predictors for RFS and OS at HSCT were 5-group cytogenetics, IPSS-cytogenetics, disease status and patient's age. Using 5-group cytogenetics classification, patients with poor risk [(RFS: P=.001, HR=1.40 (95% CI: 1.15-1.71); OS: P=.003, HR=1.38 (95% CI: 1.12-1.70)] or very poor risk cytogenetics [(RFS: P 〈 .001, HR=2.14 (95% CI: 1.6-2.9); OS: P 〈 .001, HR=2.14 (95% CI: 1.59-2.87)] had worse RFS and OS than patients in the other 3 risk groups. Patients with very poor risk cytogenetics had worse RFS and OS compared to patients with poor risk cytogenetics [(RFS: P 〈 .01, HR=1.53 (95-% CI: 1.11-2.11), OS: P 〈 .01, HR=1.55 (95-% CI: 1.11-2.15)]. When comparing the predictive performance of a series of 3 models both for OS and for RFS – (1) with only classical risk factors, (2) these extended with IPSS cytogenetics, (3) extended with 5-group classification instead-, the model with 5-group cytogenetics performed best. Conclusion In this international, multicentric analysis we confirm that MDS patients with poor and very poor risk cytogenetics had significantly worse RFS and OS after HSCT than patients in the other risk groups of the 5-group cytogenetic classifier. New therapeutic strategies to prevent relapse after HSCT in patients with poor or very poor cytogenetics are urgently needed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 7 ( 2011-08-18), p. 1838-1844
    Abstract: The bone marrow (BM) is an organ extremely efficient in mediating long-term survival of plasma cells (PCs), ensuring an immune humoral memory. This implies that the BM must provide continuously key PC survival factors. Our results show that the BM is an organ constitutively rich in a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily implicated in PC survival. APRIL production is induced during hematopoiesis in myeloid cells by non–lineage-committing factors such as stem cell factor, thrombopoietin, IL-3, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand. Notably, APRIL production, both in the human and mouse systems, peaks in myeloid precursor cells, before dropping in fully mature granulocytes. Myeloid cells secrete APRIL that circulates freely in BM plasma to act on PCs, usually at distance from APRIL production sites. Selective APRIL in vivo antagonism and in vitro coculture experiments further demonstrated that myeloid precursor cells mediates PC survival in an APRIL-dependent manner Thus, APRIL production by myeloid precursor cells shows that the 2 main BM functions, hematopoiesis and long-term PC survival, are linked. Such constitutive and high APRIL production may explain why BM mediates long-term PC survival.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 9 ( 2011-09-01), p. 2618-2621
    Abstract: Outcome after unrelated donor bone marrow (BM) transplantation for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) has improved, with survival rates now approximately 75%. Increasing use of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) instead of BM as a graft source prompted us to compare outcomes of PBPC and BM transplantation for SAA. We studied 296 patients receiving either BM (n = 225) or PBPC (n = 71) from unrelated donors matched at human leukocyte antigen-A, -B, -C, -DRB1. Hematopoietic recovery was similar after PBPC and BM transplantation. Grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease risks were higher after transplantation of PBPC compared with BM (hazard ratio = 1.68, P = .02; 48% vs 31%). Chronic graft-versus-host disease risks were not significantly different after adjusting for age at transplantation (hazard ratio = 1.39, P = .14). Mortality risks, independent of age, were higher after PBPC compared with BM transplantation (hazard ratio = 1.62, P = .04; 76% vs 61%). These data indicate that BM is the preferred graft source for unrelated donor transplantation in SAA.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 119, No. 23 ( 2012-06-07), p. 5367-5373
    Abstract: The clinical value of chemotherapy sensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with G-CSF priming has remained controversial. Cytarabine is a key constituent of remission induction chemotherapy. The effect of G-CSF priming has not been investigated in relationship with variable dose levels of cytarabine. We randomized 917 AML patients to receive G-CSF (456 patients) or no G-CSF (461 patients) at the days of chemotherapy. In the initial part of the study, 406 patients were also randomized between 2 cytarabine regimens comparing conventional-dose (199 patients) versus escalated-dose (207 patients) cytarabine in cycles 1 and 2. We found that patients after induction chemotherapy plus G-CSF had similar overall survival (43% vs 40%, P = .88), event-free survival (37% vs 31%, P = .29), and relapse rates (34% vs 36%, P = .77) at 5 years as those not receiving G-CSF. However, patients treated with the escalated-dose cytarabine regimen benefited from G-CSF priming, with improved event-free survival (P = .01) and overall survival (P = .003), compared with patients without G-CSF undergoing escalated-dose cytarabine treatment. A significant survival advantage of sensitizing AML for chemotherapy with G-CSF was not apparent in the entire study group, but it was seen in patients treated with escalated-dose cytarabine during remission induction. The HOVON-42 study is registered under The Netherlands Trial Registry (www.trialregister.nl) as #NTR230.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 3202-3202
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: Allogeneic HCT (alloHCT) with myeloablative conditioning is considered a standard of care for adult patients with high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, with improving results of conventional-dose chemotherapy and the introduction of novel agents the indications for alloHCT require re-evaluation, taking into account patient- and procedure-related factors. The aim of this study was to analyze most recent results of alloHCT for adult patients with ALL and to identify factors associated with outcome. PATIENTS: 562 patients aged 18-55 years (median 35 y) treated with alloHCT from either HLA-matched sibling (n=252) or unrelated (URD, n=310) donors in first complete remission (CR1) during the period 2008-2012 were included in the analysis. The diagnosis was B-ALL (n=430) or T-ALL (n=132). Ph-positive status was present in 225 (40%) cases. RESULTS: The probability of the overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 69%, leukemia-free survival (LFS) - 60%, relapse incidence - 22%, while, non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 17%. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was 39% and 45%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of treatment failure (either relapse or NRM) was increased for patients with high initial tumor burden (WBC 〉 30 x109/L for B-ALL and 〉 100 x109/L for T-ALL, HR=1.45, p=0.01) while, it was reduced for transplantations with conditioning based on total body irradiation (TBI, HR=0.63, p=0.02). The risk of relapse was increased in case of high initial WBC (HR=1.89, p=0.001) and Ph-positive ALL (HR=1.61, p=0.02) while, reduced for TBI-based conditioning (HR=0.48, p=0.004). Finally, the risk of NRM was increased for URD-HCT (HR=2.11, p=0.002) and in case of female donor to male recipient gender combination (HR=1.85, p=0.02). In the URD-HCT setting, a univariate analysis did not reveal significant effects of the level of HLA disparity on outcome. Similarly, other factors, including recipient age, ALL subtype (B vs T), donor/recipient CMV serological status, interval from diagnosis to HCT or the source of stem cells did not affect transplantation outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our registry based study indicates that myeloablative alloHCT performed between 2008-2012 for adult patients with ALL in CR1 result in impressive 2y OS and LFS of 69% and 60%, respectively. Among disease-related risk factors, high initial tumor burden is the strongest predictor of treatment failure. As for procedure-related factors, the choice of conditioning appears most important. Based on our current results, TBI - based regimens should still be strongly recommended. Disclosures Rambaldi: Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages