Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: JNCI Monographs, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 2014, No. 49 ( 2014-11), p. 236-243
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1745-6614 , 1052-6773
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2044141-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2018
    In:  Journal of the National Medical Association Vol. 110, No. 1 ( 2018-02), p. 53-57
    In: Journal of the National Medical Association, Elsevier BV, Vol. 110, No. 1 ( 2018-02), p. 53-57
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-9684
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2202777-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2014
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 23, No. 11_Supplement ( 2014-11-01), p. C07-C07
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 23, No. 11_Supplement ( 2014-11-01), p. C07-C07
    Abstract: Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the US and is the leading cause of death. The accurate profiling of lung cancer (i.e. depiction of the magnitude of this disease among the different population subgroups at the state and local levels) is necessary to inform the development of effective cancer control programs in the areas most impacted, and subsequently, reduce the cancer burden. One of the prerequisites for accurate profiling of cancer is a high quality cancer data. Unfortunately, researchers often rely on a combination of data sources that may differ in data quality, completeness and other important attributes. The State Cancer Profiles website is perhaps the most comprehensive, and high quality resource that provides national, state and local level cancer data collected from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. Lung cancer data from State Cancer Profiles can be utilized to assess the burden and the risks, identify trends, examine sociodemographic data, expose economic, geographic and racial disparities, identify research opportunities and make important informed decisions. In this particular project, we demonstrate how State Cancer Profiles can be used effectively to profile lung cancer and identify health disparities, using the State of Indiana as an example. Method: We utilized rate/trend comparison, mortality rates, historical trends as well as screening and risk factors data to profile lung cancer mortality. A series of maps and tables were generated to communicate the geographic differences in lung cancer mortality at the local and state levels. Results: Results show how the state of Indiana compares to other states and the within state variation in cancer and risk factors. Indiana is the 7th highest state in lung cancer mortality rates. The death rate in Indiana is above the US average nonetheless, the trend is stable for females and falling for males. Orange, Wayne and White counties have the highest death rates which are above the Indiana and US averages and show rising trends. Marion County, also show death rates above the state and US averages. However, the trend is falling. In Marion County, African Americans (a predominant population in the county) have higher death rates compared to whites, 75.8 vs. 66.3. Similarly, in Allen County, African Americans have high rates compare to whites, 68.5 vs. 48.7. As far as risk factors, Indiana is the 6th highest state in the percentage of current smokers. It is noteworthy, that indoor smoking is legislated by only 30% of the state. Demographic data show that 83% of Indiana's population under the age of 65 is insured. Of the families in Indiana, 10% are below poverty. Marion County shows poverty rate at 14.2. Conclusion: The information offered by State Cancer Profiles is useful for developing a profile of cancer; for identifying the areas where cancer burden is the greatest and subgroups of populations that are most impacted. It reveals that racial disparities in lung cancer exist at both the state and county levels, despite the fact that the overall mortality rates are dropping. Furthermore, it shows the demographic characteristics and risk factors that are relevant for understanding cancer burden. In conclusion, State Cancer Profiles is an excellent tool for communicating health disparities, depicting cancer burden and informing cancer control planning. Citation Format: Antoinette Percy-Laurry, Zaria Tatalovich. Utilizing state cancer profiles for communicating lung cancer disparities. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AACR Conference: The Science of Cancer Health Disparities; Dec 6–9, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C07. doi:10.1158/1538-7755.DISP13-C07
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Implementation Science Communications, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2023-07-12)
    Abstract: As the focus has grown in recent years on both engaged research and dissemination and implementation (D & I) research, so too has federal funding to support these areas. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an overall perspective about the range of practices and approaches being used to engage partners in D & I research, with special attention to disparities-relevant research, and to identify gaps and opportunities in research funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) in this space. Methods This analysis examined a portfolio of active D & I research grants funded in fiscal years 2020 and 2021 across the NIH. Grant applications were deductively coded and summary statistics were calculated. Cross-tabulations were used to identify trends by engagement and disparities foci. Results There were 103 grants included in the portfolio, of which 87% contained some form of community or partner engagement, and 50% of engaged grants were relevant to health disparities. Engagement was planned across the research continuum with each study engaging on average 2.5 different partner types. Consultation was the most common level of engagement (56%) while partnership was the least common (3%). On average, each study used 2.2 engagement strategies. Only 16% of grants indicated formally measuring engagement. Compared to non-disparities studies, disparities-relevant studies were about twice as likely to engage partners at the higher levels of partnership or collaboration (19% vs. 11%) and were also more likely to be conducted in community settings (26% vs. 5%). Conclusions Based on this portfolio analysis, D & I research appears to regularly integrate engagement approaches and strategies, though opportunities to deepen engagement and diversify who is engaged remain. This manuscript outlines several gaps in the portfolio and describes opportunities for increasing engagement to improve the quality of D & I research and application to advancing health equity. In addition, opportunities for leveraging the consistent and systematic application of engagement approaches and strategies to advance the science of engagement are discussed.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2662-2211
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3038166-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Public Health Association ; 2014
    In:  American Journal of Public Health Vol. 104, No. 9 ( 2014-09), p. 1589-1591
    In: American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, Vol. 104, No. 9 ( 2014-09), p. 1589-1591
    Abstract: Historically, researchers and policy planners have selected a single indicator to measure trends in social inequalities. A more rigorous approach is to review the literature and data, select appropriate inequality measures to address the research question, compute results from various indices, and graphically compare resulting trends. The Health Disparities Calculator (HD*Calc, version 1.2.4; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) computes results from different indices and graphically displays them, making an arduous task easier, more transparent, and more accessible.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0090-0036 , 1541-0048
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Public Health Association
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2054583-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Public Health Management and Practice Vol. 27, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. E1-E8
    In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 27, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. E1-E8
    Abstract: The Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. (P.L.A.N.E.T.) Web portal was designed to ease access to data and evidence-based resources for cancer control practitioners and researchers focused on developing, implementing, and evaluating cancer control programs. Objectives: To determine usability, applicability, and opportunities to improve the P.L.A.N.E.T. Web portal after significant changes to the portal over time. Design: The National Cancer Institute surveyed and interviewed cancer control professionals to assess factors influencing utilization of P.L.A.N.E.T. Data were collected from May 2017 to June 2018 via partner agencies, electronic publications, and online links. Outcome Measures: Descriptive statistics with χ 2 test were used to analyze the quantitative data and examine the relationship among variables. Qualitative interviews further informed the quantitative analysis. Results: Of the 724 participants surveyed, 51% were users of P.L.A.N.E.T., with the majority accessing P.L.A.N.E.T. within the last 6 months. Most users felt that P.L.A.N.E.T. effectively met their needs for accessing specific cancer data, identifying evidenced-based programs, and ascertaining details on various cancer topics. There were statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics between users and nonusers of P.L.A.N.E.T., where users were more likely to have more experience in the cancer field, were older in age, and located in southern states. Conclusion: Results indicate that P.L.A.N.E.T. is seen as a viable and credible source for cancer control program planning and delivery. A reassessment of P.L.A.N.E.T.'s goals is warranted, which may support reaching out to new audiences, amplifying or removing underutilized resources, and adding additional resources and topics. Consideration for training and tutorials on P.L.A.N.E.T. would benefit partner agencies and build capacity for evidence-based program development.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-4659
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2093165-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2017
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 26, No. 2_Supplement ( 2017-02-01), p. B02-B02
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 2_Supplement ( 2017-02-01), p. B02-B02
    Abstract: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the US and accounts for the second highest cancer deaths among men and women. Scientific evidence shows colorectal cancer as one of the most preventable cancers, if detected and treated early. National efforts are underway to accelerate the uptake of colorectal cancer screening to 80% of eligible adults being screened by 2018. The Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. (Plan, Link, Act, Network with Evidence-based Tool) is a comprehensive web portal that can be used to inform the development of effective cancer control programs, providing an accurate profile of cancer and evidence-based interventions among the different population subgroups at the state and local levels. The P.L.A.N.E.T. web portal was used to demonstrate how to develop a cancer control plan to improve colorectal cancer screening rates and reduce disparities at the local level. State Cancer Profiles, Research to Reality, Research Synthesis and Research-tested Intervention Programs were four resources utilized from P.L.A.N.E.T. to profile colorectal cancer and develop a cancer control plan for St Landry Parish, Louisiana, a large culturally diverse and historic area. A series of maps and tables were generated to communicate the geographic, SES and racial differences in colorectal cancer at the local and state levels. The State Cancer Profiles resource provided rate/trend comparisons, mortality rates, historical trends as well as screening and risk factors data to profile colorectal cancer. Five Parishes, including St. Landry, showed higher death rates above Louisiana, but stable. High rates of obesity, smoking, poverty and lower education persist in the Parish. St. Landry also showed a colorectal screening rate of 46.7%, which is far below the new 80% goal. The Research to Reality resource provided statistical and anecdotal evidence, opportunities to collaborate and a colorectal learning community to help mobilize community resources and influence implementation of a cancer control program. The Research Synthesis resource provided national scientific recommendations and policy from systematic and evidence reviews on colorectal cancer. Thirteen research-tested colorectal intervention programs were available with 50% focused on the medically underserved that can be adopted for a specific population. The results show the utility of Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. web portal when there is a targeted approach to improving cancer outcomes. A colorectal cancer control plan for St. Landry should include a focus on obesity reduction, smoking cessation and screening. Evidence-based interventions and other resources to reduce the risk factors can be accessed on P.L.A.N.E.T. The demonstration of P.L.A.N.E.T. shows how it can be used to elicit action from cancer control planners to set priorities, allowing for the development and implementation of effective cancer control programs in the areas most impacted in order to reduce cancer burden and disparities. Citation Format: Antoinette Percy-Laurry. Utilizing Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. to develop a colorectal cancer control plan. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Ninth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2016 Sep 25-28; Fort Lauderdale, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B02.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2018
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 78, No. 13_Supplement ( 2018-07-01), p. 5289-5289
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 78, No. 13_Supplement ( 2018-07-01), p. 5289-5289
    Abstract: INTRODUCTION While a decrease in overall cancer rates is found during the period, 1999-2013, geographic disparities still persist. Understanding the relationship between rurality and access to evidence-based interventions remain significant. This review investigates cancer control interventions developed to deploy in a rural environment and their common implementation strategies and approaches. METHOD We searched the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Research-Tested Intervention Programs (RTIPs) database to identify interventions in rural settings. The interventions were reviewed for program focus, population, cultural relevance, physician influence, coordination of services, and implementation strategies. We compared the review in RTIPs to systematic reviews on breast cancer programs and obesity-related programs found in PubMed using keyword searches. RESULTS Of the 185 intervention programs provided by the RTIPs database, 36 were recommended for rural settings. Of the 36 programs, 12 were conducted in rural populations only. Cancer topics and related areas varied with most of the 12 interventions on nutrition/obesity-related (4) and breast cancer screening (3). In PubMed, we searched for systematic reviews on diet/nutrition and breast cancer screening in the US rural settings and found two systematic reviews specific to breast cancer screening interventions and one systematic review on lifestyle interventions focused on diet/nutrition and physical activity. Of the two breast cancer systematic reviews, one was focused on supportive care and the other review included only 5 interventions of a larger review of breast cancer studies. The lifestyle systematic review summarized 18 interventions, most of which were tailored to target a specific racial/ethnic group. Implementation strategies used were mainly education and building capacity in meal preparation and physical activity. The breast cancer review provided no detail on the implementation strategies and approaches of the 5 interventions since they were reviewed for differences in mammography uptake in rural vs urban. Only 5 RTIPs rural only interventions were found to target the underserved and an additional 2 interventions focused on minority women population. DISCUSSION More studies and interventions are needed on rural populations to contribute to the understanding and reduction of the high rates of cancer. Early detection is vital in advancing cancer efforts and NCI's RTIPs would benefit from having new interventions focused on messaging and physician guidance and knowledge to allow for effective comprehensive cancer control programs. The reviews also show there is a need for research on strategies and approaches used in rural settings. Furthermore, there needs to be a comprehensive evaluation on the effectiveness of breast cancer intervention programs and diet/nutrition-related programs in rural communities. Citation Format: Antoinette Percy-Laurry, David A. Chambers. Implementing cancer intervention programs in rural settings: A review [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5289.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 29, No. 12_Supplement ( 2020-12-01), p. PO-262-PO-262
    Abstract: Background: Evidence-based guidelines for preventive services are developed by expert groups such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to help Americans stay healthy. Despite the proven value of evidence-based preventive services (e.g., screenings, provider counseling, and preventive medications), implementation by providers and uptake by patients vary, contributing to disparities in disease burden and life expectancy. The NIH convened a workshop with multidisciplinary and multisector participants in June 2019 to assess the available scientific evidence on achieving health equity in the use of clinical preventive services for three leading causes of death: diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Methods: The workshop was framed around five key questions (KQ) and included a systematic evidence review, speaker presentations, and public discussion. KQ 1-2 considered the effects of barriers on the part of providers and patients to adopting and implementing evidence-based preventive services, and how they contribute to health disparities. KQ 3-5 addressed the effectiveness of health information technology and health care organization interventions to reduce disparities in preventive services use. An unbiased, independent panel of experts considered the scientific evidence in addition to speaker and audience perspectives to develop a report of findings and recommendations for addressing disparities in the use of ten clinical preventive services recommended by the USPSTF. Results: Overall, the need for more research on the effects of barriers was identified. However, compared with heart disease and diabetes, the barriers to adopting preventive services for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening have received greater attention. While patient navigation was shown to be effective in increasing cancer screening rates, strategies for bundling preventive services and implementing health information technologies require more study. The importance of addressing unmet basic needs related to health and enhancing community resources to reduce disparities were recurring themes throughout the workshop. Lastly, there were implications for more research in cancer dissemination and implementation. Conclusion: Chronic diseases, including heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, are responsible for seven of every ten deaths in the U.S. each year. Greater use of proven clinical preventive services could avert the loss of millions of life-years. Achieving health equity in preventive services is feasible, but requires efforts at the patient, provider, healthcare organization, and community levels, and greater attention to addressing social determinants of health. Citation Format: Antoinette Percy-Laurry, Richard Berzon, Jennifer Croswell, Carrie Klabunde, Melissa Green Parker, LeShawndra Price, Pamela Thornton, Kate Winseck, Xinzhi Zhang. Achieving health equity in cancer preventive services: NIH Workshop insights on barriers and the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions and strategies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-262.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Implementation Science, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 12, No. S1 ( 2017-4)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1748-5908
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2225822-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages