Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 4880-4880

Abstract: Background: Imatinib has become standard front-line therapy for CML. In ~3% of patients treated with imatinib, abnormalities including trisomy 8 and/or monosomy 7 occur in Ph’ negative subclones and dysplasia occasionally is present, but transformation to AML is rare. We describe the first known case of AML with an MLL translocation during an imatinib-induced molecular remission of CML. Methods: The Ph’ and the t(11;19)(q23;p13.1) were detected and monitored in sequential marrows using cytogenetic and FISH analyses. The BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript was traced by RT-PCR. The MLL translocation was identified and characterized in the AML blasts by Southern blot analysis, panhandle PCR-based methods and conventional PCR. Clinical History and Results: The patient presented with chronic phase CML at age 53 and was treated with hydroxyurea for 6 weeks, IFN-α for 20 months and imatinib for 32 months. Complete cytogenetic response was achieved at 10 months. Molecular remission, as indicated by absence of the BCR-ABL1 transcript, occurred after 15 months of imatinib (37 months from CML diagnosis). Mild dysgranulopoiesis was noted 6 months after imatinib was started and increased on subsequent studies. After 28 months of imatinib (50 months from CML diagnosis), there was marked trilineage dysplasia and the karyotype showed t(11;19)(q23;p13.1) in cells that were Ph’ negative and negative for the BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript. FAB M5b AML was diagnosed four months later. The patient succumbed to AML despite aggressive management with chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Southern blot analysis of the AML revealed two MLL bcr rearrangements. The reciprocal breakpoint junctions on the der (11) and der (19) chromosomes indicated a translocation of intron 8 of MLL and intron 1 of the known MLL partner gene ELL, which encodes a transcription elongation factor. The involved region of MLL was more 5′ than the secondary leukemia translocation breakpoint hotspot. The der (11) fusion transcripts joined MLL exon 7 to ELL exon 2, which is consistent with alternative splicing, and the der (19) fusion transcript joined ELL exon 1 to MLL exon 9. Conclusions: Secondary leukemias with MLL translocations have been associated with topoisomerase II poisons, but not with the agents administered to this patient. The entity that we describe is distinct from blast crisis, in which Ph’ positive subclones evolve to acquire additional alterations. This case establishes that persistent clonal abnormalities and/or dysplasia in Ph’ negative cells following imatinib therapy may not be benign and may herald AML transformation. With effective and selective molecular eradication of the Ph’ positive clone, the emergence of leukemia with independent abnormalities may become more common. This is a highly concerning clinical complication to consider with BCR-ABL targeted agents.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V106.11.4880.4880

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2005

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 1069-1069

Abstract: Background: Gilteritinib (ASP2215) is a novel, highly selective, potent oral FLT3/AXL inhibitor with preclinical activity against FLT3-ITD activating and FLT3-D835 resistance mutations. The objectives of this phase 1/2 study were to assess gilteritinib safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles after single- and multiple-day dosing, and antileukemic effects in patients with R/R AML. Methods: This open-label study (NCT02014558) enrolled patients (≥18 yr) into 1 of 7 dose-escalation cohorts (20-450 mg once daily [QD]) or concomitant dose-expansion cohorts. While confirmed FLT3 mutation was not an inclusion criterion, each expanded dose level enrolled ≥10 patients with FLT3 mutations (FLT3mut+); 120 and 200 mg dose levels were further expanded with ≥40 FLT3mut+ patients. The choice to expand these dose cohorts was based upon FLT3 inhibition in correlative assays and clinical activity seen during dose escalation. Safety and tolerability were primary endpoints; blood samples were drawn from patients in the dose-escalation cohorts to evaluate gilteritinib PK parameters and PD effects. Antileukemic response rates (eg, complete remission [CR] , CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp], CR with incomplete hematological recovery [CRi] , overall response rate [ORR]) were secondary endpoints. Results: Patients (N=252; 129M:123F, median age 62 yr [range: 21-90]) enrolled between October 2013 and August 2015 received ≥1 dose of gilteritinib. The study population was heavily pretreated: 70% (n=177) had ≥2 prior AML therapies, 29% (n=73) had a prior stem cell transplant, and 25% (n=63) had prior TKI treatment with sorafenib most commonly used. Across the study, 194 patients had a locally confirmed FLT3 mutation (ITD, n=159; D835, n=13; ITD-D835, n=16; other, n=6). For all enrolled patients, progressive disease (n=75), lack of efficacy (n=44), adverse events (n=34), and death (n=29) were the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation. Seven deaths were considered possibly/probably related to treatment: pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure, hemoptysis, intracranial bleed, ventricular fibrillation, septic shock, and neutropenia (all n=1). Maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 300 mg when 2 of 3 patients in the 450 mg cohort experienced diarrhea and/or hepatic transaminase elevation as dose-limiting toxicities. Diarrhea (16%) and fatigue (15%) were the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events of any grade. Less than 5% of patients (11/252) had a maximum post-baseline QTcF interval 〉 500 msec. Gilteritinib concentrations were generally dose proportional and showed both a long-elimination half-life (45-159 h) and substantial accumulation (3.2-10 fold) by day 15. An exposure-related increase in the inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation with increasing doses of gilteritinib was also observed. Gilteritinib showed strong antileukemic activity in FLT3mut+ patients (ORR=49%); response was observed less frequently in patients with wild-type FLT3 (ORR=12%). While CR, CRi, and CRp occurred at all doses, responses were enriched among FLT3mut+ patients with gilteritinib steady-state trough concentrations ≥100 ng/mL, which correlated with potent FLT3 inhibition in PD assays and corresponded to doses ≥80 mg. The ORR in 169 FLT3mut+ patients receiving ≥80 mg was 52% (Table); median overall survival in this patient population was ~31 wk (range: 1.7-61; Figure) and median duration of response was 20 wk (range: 1.1-55). Clinical responses occurred in FLT3mut+ patients with -ITD, -D835, and both mutations (ORR: 55%, 17%, and 62%, respectively) as well as in FLT3mut+ patients with or without prior TKI treatment (ORR: 42% vs 56%, respectively). Conclusions: This PD-driven, first-in-human study shows that gilteritinib was well tolerated and generated frequent, prolonged, clinically important responses in FLT3mut+ patients with R/R AML. Antileukemic responses were enriched in FLT3mut+ patients treated at doses that consistently and potently inhibited FLT3 phosphorylation. The survival of these patients appears better than expected for this patient population when treated with standard therapy. Our data suggest that FLT3 inhibition may improve survival in patients with FLT3mut+R/R AML; as such, phase 3 testing of oral gilteritinib 120 mg QD in patients with FLT3mut+R/R AML after first-line therapy is underway (NCT02421939). Disclosures Perl: Astellas US Pharma Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Asana Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman:Janssen: Other: advisory board; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Other: advisory board; Ariad: Other: advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: advisory board; Syros: Other: advisory board. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Smith:Astellas: Research Funding. Erba:Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, DSMB, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Gill:Astellas: Employment. Goldberg:Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; COTA Inc: Employment; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neostem: Equity Ownership. Jurcic:Astellas: Research Funding. Larson:Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Liu:Astellas: Employment. Ritchie:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding. Schiller:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Strickland:Celator: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutica: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Wang:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Research Funding. Stuart:Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Martinelli:Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bahceci:Astellas: Employment. Levis:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.1069.1069

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 321-321

Abstract: Introduction: ASP2215 is a highly selective inhibitor of AXL and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) receptors. ASP2215 is active against both FLT3 internal tandem duplication [ITD] and D835 mutations. Prior analyses of an open-label, dose-escalation/dose-expansion study in subjects with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) show ASP2215 was well tolerated from 20-300 mg and associated with antileukemic activity in FLT3 mutation-positive (FLT3+) patients at ≥80 mg with minimal activity observed in wild-type FLT3 subjects. Here we describe the tolerability and potent activity of ASP2215 in a large cohort of FLT3+ patients. Methods: Patients (≥18 years) with R/R AML were assigned to treatment in dose-escalation cohorts or were randomized to an open dose level in the dose-expansion cohorts. Although FLT3 mutation was not an inclusion criterion, each expanded dose level enrolled ≥10 FLT3+ subjects; 120 mg and 200 mg dose levels were further expanded with ≥40 FLT3+ subjects. Tolerability was assessed by adverse event (AE) monitoring. Response assessment was based on modified Cheson criteria and duration of response and overall survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: As of June 19, 2015,215 patients with a median age of 61 yr (range: 21-90) had received ≥1 dose of ASP2215 (safety population). Across the safety population, 65% of subjects received ≥2 prior lines of AML therapy, 29% had a hematopoietic stem cell transplant prior to ASP2215 treatment, and 23% had prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Approximately 73% of patients were FLT3+, of which 137 had FLT3-ITD mutation, 7 were FLT3-D835+, and 9 had both FLT3-ITD and D835. Treatment-related AEs of all Grades, reported in ≥10% of the safety population were diarrhea (16%), fatigue (13%), and increased AST (11%); 〈 2% of subjects reported a Grade ≥3 QTc prolongation. Activity was assessed in the 133 FLT3+ patients treated with ASP2215 ≥80 mg. Overall response rate (ORR; composite complete [CRc] plus partial remission [PR] ) for all FLT3+ subjects was 55% (Table). Median overall survival for FLT3+ patients receiving ASP2215 ≥80 mg was ~29 weeks (95% CI: 22-32) and was similar for patients who achieved CRc or PR (Figure). Treatment with ≥80 mg ASP2215 was associated with an ORR of 60% in FLT3-ITD subjects; ORR for the other FLT3 populations was 29% (Table). No difference was observed in median ORR of ASP2215 (≥80 mg) in TKI-naïve patients (55%) and patients with prior TKI treatment (55%). Conclusions: ASP2215, a novel AXL/FLT3 TKI, was well tolerated in subjects with R/R AML and demonstrated a strong antileukemic activity in FLT3+ subjects. Importantly, the ASP2215 response rate in these FLT3+ patients was independent of prior TKI treatment. Even in this heavily pretreated population, the survival of R/R FLT3+ AML patients who received ≥80 mg ASP2215 was longer than prior reports of cytotoxic chemotherapy or other FLT3 inhibitors. Table. ASP2215 Response Assessment 80 mg 120 mg 200 mg 300 mg 450 mg Total All FLT3+ Subjects Population, n 12 52 57 10 2 133 CRc, n (%) 5 (42) 25 (48) 28 (49) 3 (30) 0 61 (46) PR, n (%) 3 (25) 3 (6) 3 (5) 3 (30) 0 12 (9) ORR, n (%) 8 (67) 28 (54) 31 (54) 6 (60) 0 73 (55) Subjects with FLT3-ITD Only Population, n 10 46 50 8 0 114 CRc, n (%) 4 (40) 23 (50) 26 (52) 3 (38) 0 56 (49) PR, n (%) 3 (30) 3 (7) 3 (6) 3 (38) 0 12 (11) ORR, n (%) 7 (70) 26 (57) 29 (58) 6 (75) 0 68 (60) Subjects with FLT3-D835 and Subjects with FLT3-ITD and FLT3-D835 Population, n 2 5 5 1 1 14 CRc, n (%) 1 (50) 1 (20) 2 (40) 0 0 4 (29) PR, n (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ORR, n (%) 1 (50) 1 (20) 2 (40) 0 0 4 (29) CRc, composite complete remission (complete remission + complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery + complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery); ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response. NR, no response. Subjects with non-evaluable data (N=8) were not included in this curve. Figure 1. Overall Survival by Best Overall Response Achieved with ASP2215 ≥80 mg Across All FLT3+ Subjects Figure 1. Overall Survival by Best Overall Response Achieved with ASP2215 ≥80 mg Across All FLT3+ Subjects Disclosures Altman: BMS: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Spectrum: Other: Advisory board; Ariad: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Astellas: Other: Participation in an advisory board December 2013. Off Label Use: ASP2215 is currently under investigation for the treatment of AML and is not yet approved.. Perl:Arog Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Asana Biosciences: Consultancy; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ambit/Daichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas US Pharma Inc.: Consultancy. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy. Levis:Arog: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy. Smith:Plexxikon: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Claxton:NCI: Research Funding; Medimmune, Inc: Research Funding; Ambit Biosciences Corp: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Erba:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GlycoMimetics: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committees ; Jannsen (J & J): Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committees ; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Celator: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; GlycoMimetics: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committees ; Jannsen (J & J): Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committees ; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Gill:Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Employment. Goldberg:Cyclacel: Research Funding; Celetor: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Jurcic:Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Larson:Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lui:Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Employment. Ritchie:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Sargent:Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Employment. Schiller:Sunesis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Strickland:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Steering Committee and Advisory Board Participation; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Other: Advisory Board Particpation. Wang:Immunogen: Research Funding. Stuart:Sunesis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma, Inc: Research Funding. Baldus:Novartis: Research Funding. Martinelli:MSD: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy. Bahceci:Astellas Pharma Global Development: Employment.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.321.321

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 737-737

Abstract: Background: Quizartinib, a once-daily, oral, highly potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, demonstrated a significant improvement in survival vs SC in FLT3-ITD-positive R/R AML in the global, randomized, phase 3 QuANTUM-R study (Cortes et al. Lancet Oncol, 2019; NCT02039726). Patients with R/R FLT3-ITD-positive AML were randomized 2:1 to receive single agent quizartinib or investigator's choice of pre-selected SC. We investigated the effects of baseline co-mutations and FLT3-ITD VAF on overall survival (OS) and response (composite complete remission [CRc]) to quizartinib and SC in QuANTUM-R. Methods: We analyzed 37 recurrently mutated genes in AML in baseline bone marrow samples from 304 patients (82.8% of ITT population [N = 367; quizartinib, n = 245; SC, n = 122]) with R/R FLT3-ITD-positive AML using next-generation sequencing and a customized Archer® Core Myeloid panel. Positive mutation status was defined as ≥ 1 mutation detected in the gene region using a VAF cutoff of 2.7%. FLT3-ITD VAF was measured separately by the Navigate BioPharma FLT3 Mutation Assay (polymerase chain reaction-based, VAF cutoff of 3%). Low and high FLT3-ITD VAF were defined as ≤25% and & gt;25%, respectively. Results: In addition to FLT3-ITD, 5 key co-mutations were detected: DNMT3Amut (n = 182/304 [59.9%]), NPM1mut (n = 168/304 [55.3%] ), TET2mut (n = 98/304 [32.2%]), IDH1/2mut (n = 49/304 [16.1%] ) and CEBPAmut (n = 46/304 [15.1%]). Median OS was numerically longer with quizartinib vs SC in patients with DNMT3Amut, TET2mut, IDH1/2mut and NPM1mut, but not CEBPAmut (Table). CRc rates were numerically higher with quizartinib vs SC for each of the 5 key baseline co-mutations. For single gene mutations, the longest median OS was seen in patients with CEBPAmut treated with quizartinib or SC (37 and 37.6 weeks, respectively). As the majority of NPM1mut patients were also DNMT3Amut (138/168, 82%), we examined various permutations of these two mutations. Patients with NPM1wt/DNMT3Amut had significantly longer median OS with quizartinib vs SC (39.3 vs 19.6 weeks, respectively; HR, 0.239; P = 0.003 [Table] ) while NPM1mut/DNMT3Amut patients had lower and similar median OS between the 2 arms (23.6 vs 23.4 weeks, respectively). Quizartinib treatment showed significantly longer median OS vs SC in patients with high FLT3-ITD VAF (23.9 vs 17 weeks respectively; HR, 0.689, P = 0.0148), while the median OS in patients with low FLT3-ITD VAF was similar (34.1 vs 26.6 weeks, respectively; HR, 0.857, P = 0.535). Conclusions: This is the first evaluation of the effect of baseline co-mutations on clinical outcomes in a large trial of R/R AML patients with FLT3-ITD mutations treated with quizartinib. Key co-mutations identified in this analysis were found to potentially impact treatment response and OS with quizartinib, relative to SC. Despite relatively low CRc rates in patients with IDH1/2mut, this group-as well as those with NPM1wt-derived the greatest OS benefit from quizartinib compared with SC on QuANTUM-R. CEBPA mutations were associated with high CRc rates and relatively long median OS, regardless of treatment arm. Patients with NPM1mut had a higher CRc rate with quizartinib vs SC, but this did not translate into longer survival on either arm compared with NPM1wt. A high allelic burden of FLT3-ITD at the time of salvage therapy was associated with relatively poorer median OS; quizartinib significantly improved survival of patients with high FLT3-ITD VAF relative to SC. Although these results require confirmation in an independent dataset, the modulatory effects of baseline co-mutations on treatment response and OS with quizartinib appear to differ from other FLT3 inhibitors. Our results indicate that a subset of R/R AML patients may particularly derive clinical benefit from quizartinib. Table Disclosures Perl: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Arog: Consultancy, Other: Non-financial support included travel costs for advisory board meetings.; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support included travel costs for advisory board meetings.; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Clinical Advisory Board member, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Non-financial support included travel costs for advisory board meetings.; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support included travel costs for advisory board meetings.; NewLink Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support included travel costs for advisory board meetings.; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support included travel costs for advisory board meetings.; Bayer: Research Funding; BioMed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Non-financial support included travel costs for advisory board meetings as well as a medical writing company that assisted with manuscript preparation/submission and slide deck assembly for academic meeting presentations of the data., Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support included travel costs for advisory board meetings as well as a medical writing company that assisted with manuscript preparation/submission and slide deck assembly for academic meeting presentations of trial data., Research Funding. Cortes:Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ganguly:Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding. Khaled:Omeros: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Travel support. Krämer:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: trial grant; Roche: Consultancy, Other: trial grant; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: trial grant; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: trial grant; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: trial grant; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: trial grant; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: trial grant; Ariad: Consultancy, Other: trial grant; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: trial grant; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria. Russell:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; DSI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Chang:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Mires:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Kato:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment; Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Korkhov:Precision for Medicine, Inc.: Employment; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Wang:Precision for Medicine, Inc.: Employment; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Günnel:Precision for Medicine, Inc.: Employment; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Sumi:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment. Isoyama:Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd: Employment. Lesegretain:Daiichi-Sankyo Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berisha:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Dos Santos:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Levis:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; FUJIFILM: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-121880

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 7003-7003

Abstract: 7003 Background: Gilteritinib, a highly selective FLT3/AXL inhibitor, has displayed antileukemic activity in FLT3 mutation-positive (FLT3 mut+ ) relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML in the CHRYSALIS Phase I/II study (NCT02014558), specifically at doses ≥80 mg/d. This exploratory analysis assessed molecular response to gilteritinib in a CHRYSALIS subpopulation. Methods: Molecular response was assessed from bone marrow aspirates obtained at baseline and at ≥1 additional time point from FLT3 mut+ patients (≥18 y) treated with 120 or 200 mg/d gilteritinib. These doses were identified due to their ability to induce consistent, potent FLT3 inhibition and high clinical response rates. FLT3-ITD and total FLT3 were quantified by NGS to assess molecular response. A Cox regression model of overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier estimation established a FLT3-ITD:total FLT3 ratio (ITD signal ratio) of 10 −2 as the threshold for improved survival. Results: Of 147 FLT3-ITD mut+ patients who received gilteritinib 120 or 200 mg/d, 80 were included in this analysis. Composite response rate for these 80 patients was 55%. During response, 20 patients (25%) had an ITD signal ratio of ≤10 −2 . Of these 20 patients, 18 had a ratio of ≤10 −3 (major molecular response [MMR]) and 13 had a ratio of ≤10 −4 (minimal residual disease [MRD] negative). Median time to achieve minimum signal ratio was 54 days. Elimination of morphologic leukemia was observed in 80% of patients with ITD signal ratios 〈 10 −2 . Patients who had a signal ratio ≤10 −2 , MMR, or were MRD negative had significantly longer median OS than those who did not (Table). Conclusions: Molecular responses to gilteritinib in FLT3-ITD mut+ R/R AML correlated with clinical response and improved OS. This is the first demonstration of molecular response to a FLT3 inhibitor in AML. These data suggest ITD signal ratio may predict durable clinical benefit of gilteritinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02014558. [Table: see text]

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.7003

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2017

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Nature, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 485, No. 7397 ( 2012-5), p. 260-263

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0028-0836 , 1476-4687

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1038/nature11016

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2012

detail.hit.zdb_id: 120714-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1413423-8

SSG: 11

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 1458-1458

Abstract: Background: Gilteritinib, a highly selective fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)/AXL inhibitor, demonstrated strong antileukemic activity at doses ≥80 mg/day in patients with R/R AML with FLT3 mutations (FLT3mut+) enrolled in the CHRYSALIS phase 1/2 study (NCT02014558). We analyzed the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) and achievement of complete remission/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh) on overall survival (OS) in patients with FLT3mut+ R/R AML from the CHRYSALIS study. Methods: Minimal residual disease was assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using an Illumina® sequencing platform that quantified FLT3-ITD and total FLT3 alleles in a subgroup of FLT3mut+ patients with internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations across all gilteritinib doses who had bone marrow samples available at baseline and at ≥1 post-baseline time point. The ITD variant allele frequency (VAF) was the FLT3-ITD to total FLT3 ratio. An ITD VAF ≤10−4 defined MRD-negative status. For FLT3 VAF, a capture-based NGS assay that included all exons of FLT3 was used. Sample DNA was used to generate whole genome libraries which were hybridized with a custom probe to capture target fragments that were sequenced on an Illumina® MiSeq platform. Treatment response was evaluated according to the CR/CRh rate. Complete remission was assessed according to the 2003 modified International Working Group criteria and CRh was defined as absolute neutrophil count 〉 0.5 × 109/L and platelet count 〉 50 × 109/L. The rate of CR/CRh has been used as an approval endpoint for R/R AML. Results: The demographic and baseline characteristics of patients who were assessed for MRD and CR/CRh were representative of the entire CHRYSALIS R/R AML population. A total of 108 FLT3-ITDmut+ patients were analyzed for MRD; 95 of these patients had received ≥80 mg/day gilteritinib, which was shown to induce maximum FLT3 inhibition and antileukemic response. Eighty-two of the 95 patients were MRD-positive and 13 achieved MRD-negative status at any post-baseline time point. Of these 95 patients, 49 had a best overall response of composite complete remission (CRc; ie, CR plus CR with incomplete hematologic plus CR with incomplete platelet recovery) and 11 were MRD-negative. None of the patients who received 〈 80 mg/day gilteritinib achieved MRD-negative status. Of the 46 patients who did not achieve CRc, two were MRD-negative. As seen in Figure 1, patients who had achieved CRc and were MRD-negative (n=11) had longer median OS (168.7 weeks; 95% CI: 41.7, not reached) than those who had achieved CRc and were MRD-positive (n=38; 36.1 weeks; 95% CI: 27.1, 51.7; P=.004). Excluding patients with an OS duration less than the median time to reach MRD-negative status, MRD-negative patients (n=12) had a median OS of 131.4 weeks (95% CI: 35.1, not reached) compared with MRD-positive patients (n=38) who had a median OS of 47.3 weeks (95% CI: 42.7, 61.1). Of the 95 patients who received ≥80 mg/day gilteritinib in the MRD analysis, 24 had a best overall response of CR/CRh. Of the 24 patients with CR/CRh, 10 (41.67%) were MRD-negative. Of the 71 patients without CR/CRh, three (4.2%) were MRD-negative. Patients who received 120 mg/day gilteritinib were previously shown to have longer survival than patients in other dose cohorts. Of the 56 patients who received 120 mg/day gilteritinib, 13 achieved a best overall response of CR/CRh. As shown in Figure 2, patients who achieved CR/CRh had a median OS of 70.6 weeks (95% CI: 27.1, not reached) and a 52-week survival probability of 66.7% (95% CI: 33.7, 86.0) compared with patients who did not achieve CR/CRh who had a median OS of 32.4 weeks (95% CI: 16.0, 40.9) and a 52-week survival probability of 20.2% (95% CI: 9.5, 33.6). Conclusions: Single-agent therapy with gilteritinib induced deep molecular responses, including MRD negativity, in heavily pretreatedpatients with FLT3-ITDmut+ R/R AML. Our results suggest a potential association between MRD-negative status and longer survival in patients withFLT3-ITDmut+ R/R AML. Additionally, patients who achieved CR/CRh appear to have both a higher rate of MRD negativity and longer OS than patients who did not achieve CR/CRh. Disclosures Perl: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; NewLink Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman:Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; FujiFilm: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Pfizer: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Cyclacel: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Incyte: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Genetech: Other: Payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Ariad: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Bayer: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Celator: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Agios: Other: Payment to the institution to conduct the trial ; Astellas Pharma: Other; Immune Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boeringer Ingelheim: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding. Smith:Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Jurcic:Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ritchie:Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau. Strickland:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hill:Ligacept, LLC: Other: Shareholder. Rosales:Astellas Pharma: Employment. Bahceci:Astellas Pharma: Employment.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-110971

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 14_Supplement ( 2016-07-15), p. LB-073-LB-073

Abstract: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a predominantly fatal hematopoietic malignancy with high inter-patient and intra-patient genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity. The prognosis of relapsed AML remains dismal, yet the epigenetic basis of relapse is still unclear. Here we investigated whether and how the epigenome evolution impacts AML progression with biological and clinical relevance. Methods: We obtained clinical annotation and AML specimens from 138 patients with paired diagnosis and relapsed samples. We used normal bone marrow (NBM) as epigenetic/transcriptomic controls and patients’ matched germline DNA as genetic controls. We then performed DNA methylation sequencing (ERRBS), RNA-seq, and Exome-seq. For one patient with 5 serial time points, we performed whole genome sequencing (WGS), ERRBS, and single cell RNA-seq. We measured the epigenetic allele burden using a compositional entropy-based approach (Methclone) and methylation heterogeneity using epipolymorphism. Results: We found that diagnosis stage epigenetic allele burden (ΔS & lt; -90) was linked to an inferior clinical outcome (p = 0.0064, log-rank test of relapse-free survival). The higher significance in promoter regions implies the functional impact of epigenetic dynamics. Promoter epiallele shift was associated with more differential expression events (p = 3.8 × 10−6, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and promoter epiallele diversity is significantly associated with single cell resolution transcriptional heterogeneity (p & lt; 2.2 × 10−16, ANOVA test). The global methylation heterogeneity is decreased from diagnosis to relapse, indicating a selective impact of chemotherapy on epigenetic variability (p = 0.0056, paired Wilcoxon test). We investigated epigenetic allele burden progression from diagnosis to relapse by classifying patients into three clusters using K-means clustering: those with 1) decreased, 2) stable, or 3) increased abundance of epiallele burden. No association was seen between epigenetic clusters and patterns of genetic evolution, and the genetic abundance is higher in Cluster 3 than Cluster 1 (p = 0.048, Wilcoxon test), indicating divergent paths of genetic and epigenetic evolution. We next examined differential expression in the epigenetic cluster samples at diagnosis compared to NBM. Cluster 1 specific genes were enriched for cell cycle processes, while Cluster 3 genes were enriched for immune responses (p & lt; 0.001, gene ontology hypergeometric tests). Integrating WGS and ERRBS data showed that epiallele burden is more dynamic than somatic mutations; a significant increase in epiallele burden preceded a major increase of somatic mutational abundance. Summary: Our results indicate that epigenetic dynamics may provide leukemia cells greater evolutionary fitness via transcriptional adaptation and is associated with clinical outcome. This provides an alternative mechanism of AML resilience during progression and a potential predictor of relapse. Citation Format: Sheng Li, Francine E. Garrett-Bakelman, Stephen S. Chung, Todd Hricik, Franck Rapaport, Jay Patel, Richard Dillon, Priyanka Vijay, Anna L. Brown, Alexander E. Perl, Joy Connon, Mathijs A. Sanders, Peter J.M. Valk, Lars Bullinger, Selina Luger, Michael W. Becker, Ian D. Lewis, Luen Bik To, Richard J. D’Andrea, David Grimwade, Ruud Delwel, Bob Löwenberg, Hartmut Döhner, Konstanze Döhner, Monica L. Guzman, Duane C. Hassane, Gail J. Roboz, Martin Carroll, Christopher Y. Park, Donna S. Neuberg, Ross L. Levine, Ari M. Melnick, Christopher E. Mason. Epigenome evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-073.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2016-LB-073

Language: English

Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1

detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3

In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 18, No. 8 ( 2017-08), p. 1061-1075

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1470-2045

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30416-3

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2017

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1

In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 14, No. 17 ( 2008-09-01), p. 5619-5625

Abstract: Purpose: Bexarotene is a retinoic X receptor agonist that has been shown in vitro to inhibit growth and induce differentiation of myeloid leukemic cell lines. We therefore conducted a phase I dose escalation study to assess the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and activity of bexarotene in patients with non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Experimental Design: We enrolled patients with active non-M3 AML who had either relapsed or refractory disease or were not eligible for standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Cohorts of three to six patients received escalating doses of daily oral bexarotene ranging from 100 to 400 mg/m2 until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable adverse events occurred. Results: Twenty-seven patients, with median age of 69 years (range, 51-82 years), were treated. Twenty-four (89%) patients had undergone prior chemotherapy. At the highest dose level tested (400 mg/m2), three of six patients had to reduce their dose of bexarotene due to grade 3 adverse events. The maximum tolerable dose of bexarotene was determined to be 300 mg/m2. Clinical activity was manifested by 4 (15%) patients with reduction in bone marrow blasts to ≤5%, 11 (41%) patients with improved platelet counts, and 7 (26%) patients with improved neutrophil counts. Three patients with relapsed AML survived & gt;1 year while taking bexarotene. Leukemic blast differentiation was suggested by the presence of the leukemic cytogenetic abnormality in mature circulating granulocytes and the occurrence of differentiation syndrome. Conclusions: The recommended dose of bexarotene for future studies is 300 mg/m2/d. Bexarotene is well tolerated in patients with non-M3 AML and has evidence of antileukemic activity.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5185

Language: English

Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Publication Date: 2008

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9