Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 8 ( 2014-08-21), p. 1312-1319
    Abstract: GO before transplant improves outcome of CBF-AML patients in first relapse.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Haematologica, Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica), Vol. 103, No. 10 ( 2018-10), p. e455-e457
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0390-6078 , 1592-8721
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2186022-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030158-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2805244-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 698-698
    Abstract: Background: Olutasidenib, a potent, selective, oral, small molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1), has been previously shown, as a single agent, to be well tolerated and induce durable complete remissions in a subset of patients (pts) with high-risk relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 46% and a CR/CRh rate of 33% (de Botton et al., ASCO/EHA 2021). Azacitidine (AZA) has shown synergistic effects with mIDH1 inhibitors on releasing differentiation block in mIDH leukemia models in vitro. Here, we present results of an ongoing phase 2 trial (NCT02719574) in pts receiving olutasidenib (150 mg twice daily) in combination with AZA (75 mg/m 2) (Olu-AZA). Methods: Pts were enrolled into 1 of 4 Olu-AZA cohorts: (1) pts with R/R AML/MDS who were naïve to prior hypomethylating agent [HMA] and IDH1 inhibitor therapy, (2) pts with R/R AML/MDS who had inadequately responded to or had progressed on prior HMA, (3) pts with R/R AML/MDS who were previously treated with an IDH1 inhibitor as their last therapy prior to enrollment (including pts who received single-agent olutasidenib), and (4) treatment naïve [TN] mIDH1 AML pts who were candidates for AZA first line treatment. The primary endpoint was CR/CRh (complete remission [CR] according to modified IWG 2003 criteria plus CR with partial hematologic recovery [CRh] ) response rate. CRh was defined as bone marrow blasts & lt; 5%, absolute neutrophil count & gt; 0.5×10 9/L, and platelet count & gt; 50×10 9/L. ORR, a secondary endpoint, comprised CR+CRh+CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) + morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) + partial remission (PR). Duration of treatment (DOT) time to response, and duration of response were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Due to the low number of MDS pts, response parameters are presented for AML pts only. Results: As of 16-June-2021, a total of 72 pts with AML/MDS (n=63/9) received Olu-AZA (R/R w/o prior HMA/IDH1 therapy, n=20; R/R with prior HMA therapy, n=21; R/R with prior IDH1 therapy, n=20; TN AML, n=11) with a median DOT of 4.7 mo (95% CI: 3.6, 5.7). The median age was 72 y (range: 28‒84) with a median number of prior therapies for R/R pts of 2 (1‒5). At the cut-off, 11 (15%) pts remained on treatment and 61 (85%) had discontinued, most commonly (≥10%) due to: disease progression (32%), transplant (11%), and AEs (10%). For pts with AML, the ORR across Olu-AZA cohorts was 40-68% with a median duration of ORR of 3.7-8.5 mo (not reached [NR] for TN AML) and a median time to first response (PR or better) of 1.6-2.8 mo (Table 1). Notably, the CR/CRh rate ranged from 30-47% including 23-45% of pts in CR, with a median duration of CR/CRh of 4.7-16.0 mo (NR for TN AML) and a median time to CR/CRh of 2.8-4.0 mo. For pts who were transfusion-dependent at baseline, 56-day transfusion independence was achieved by 40-100% of pts for platelets and 25-57% of pts for red blood cells (Table 1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥25% of pts were nausea (49%), constipation (40%), vomiting (35%), thrombocytopenia (32%), diarrhea (28%), and neutropenia (26%). Grade 3/4 all-causality TEAEs in & gt;10% of pts were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (25%), anemia (19%), and febrile neutropenia (14%). TEAEs of QTc prolongation (all grades) were reported in 5 (7%) pts with grade 3 events in 2 (3%) pts. All pts were receiving concomitant medications associated with QTc prolongation. No events led to olutasidenib dose reduction or discontinuation. Hepatobiliary TEAEs associated with liver enzyme abnormalities (all grades) were reported in 15 (21%) pts, with grade ≥3 events in 6 (8%) pts. Most pts (n=11) required no dose modification or were successfully rechallenged, 3 pts with grade ≥3 events discontinued treatment, two after recurrence of abnormalities with rechallenge, and one pt died with liver function tests abnormal in the setting of AML progression and sepsis. There were no cases of Hy's law. Investigator-assessed IDH1 differentiation syndrome (any grade) was observed in 6 (8%) pts; most cases resolved with treatment interruption, dexamethasone, and/or supportive treatment; 2 pts had concomitant leukocytosis. Conclusions: Olutasidenib in combination with AZA was well tolerated and induced durable CR/CRh in a subset of high-risk pts with mIDH1 AML. Transfusion independence was achieved in a subset of pts in all cohorts. Additional analyses of safety and efficacy will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cortes: Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, BioPath Holdings, Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Esteve: Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Bajel: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria. Yee: Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TaiHo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Paladin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onconova: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Braun: Servier: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. De Botton: Celgene, Agios, Forma Therapeutics, Astella, Daiichi Sankyo, Syros, Abbvie, Bayer, Seattle Genetics, Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene, Agios, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Syros, Abbvie, Bayer, Janssen, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Agios, Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding. Recher: Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MaatPharma: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Watts: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutices: Research Funding. Curti: Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grove: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jonas: 47, AbbVie, Accelerated Medical Diagnostics, Amgen, AROG, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Forma, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlycoMimetics, Hanmi, Immune-Onc, Incyte, Jazz, Loxo Oncology, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sigma Tau, Treadwell: Research Funding; AbbVie, BMS, Genentech, GlycoMimetics, Jazz, Pfizer, Takeda, Treadwell: Consultancy; AbbVie: Other: Travel reimbursement. Montesinos: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Patel: BMS-Celgene, Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Peerview: Honoraria. Prebet: BMS: Research Funding; BMS, Curios, Daichi: Consultancy. Wang: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, steering committee, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data safety monitoring committee; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Genentech: Consultancy; MacroGenics: Consultancy. Polyanskaya: Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Brevard: Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Sweeney: Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fenaux: Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Wei: Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 3696-3696
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) including invasive candidiasis(IC), pulmonary invasive aspergillosis (IA) and other fungal species as mucor mycosis (IM), remain a major clinical problem in neutropenic patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) due to their high morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: We performed a prospective observational study on antifungal (AF) prophylaxis used in a prospective clinical trial of intensive chemotherapy within the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA 0702 study, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00932412). A total of 677 AML patients from 34 different centers were included, 45% were males, and median age was 46 years (18-60). Prognosis according to cytogenetics was favorable in 23% of patients, intermediate in 53% and unfavorable in 18%. All patients received daunorubicine and aracytine intensive induction chemotherapy. The trial protocol recommended posaconazole suspension as AF prophylaxis at the dose of 200 mg three times a day from day 4 after induction chemotherapy and until neutrophils recovery. Patients were considered evaluable for this study if they received posaconazole for a minimum duration of 7 days and not later than 10 days after the beginning of the induction chemotherapy. IFI were classified by the local investigators and were reviewed later by an independent expert according to the EORTC classification (possible, probable and proven), scanner images were requested for further investigations when needed. The objective of this study was to describe the IFI prophylaxis strategies used in the different centers, to calculate the cumulative incidence of IFI according to different strategies, and to evaluate the overall survival and IFI related mortality. RESULTS: Among the 677 patients, 383 (57%) received posaconazole as AF prophylaxis for a median duration of 25 days (7-253). Posaconazole was introduced after a median time of 3 days after the beginning of the chemotherapy. We distinguished 4 groups, Group 1: patients without any prophylaxis (n = 203, 30%), Group 2: posaconazole alone (n=241, 36%), Group 3: posaconazole plus other prophylaxis (n=142, 21%), and Group 4: patients receiving other prophylaxis (n= 91, 13%). Overall, there were 72 IA [34 (47%) possible, 38 (53%) probable/proven], 17 IC (all probable/proven) and 7 IM [1 possible, 6 probable/proven] . The median delay between posaconazole prophylaxis and IFI occurrence was 22 days (7-50) for IA, 18 days (15-60) for IC and 26 days (13-28) for IM compared to 10 days (3-180), 8 days (3-32) and 21 days (10-32) in case of other prophylaxis. The cumulative incidence of IFI was 2.4% at 10 days (IA: 2.4%, IC : 0%, IM : 0%), 11,2% at 30 days (IA: 8.4%, IC: 2%, IM: 0.7%), 14.2% at 60 days ( IA: 10.6%, IC : 2.5%, IM : 1%), and 14.2% at 100 days (IA:10.6%, IC : 2.5%, IM : 1%). When considering the prophylaxis groups, the cumulative incidence of probable/proven IA at day 60 was 8.37% for Group 1; 4.7% for Groups 2 and 3 combined and 3.3% for Group 4 (Figure 1). After a median follow-up of 27.5 months (0.4- 73.4), 418 patients are alive and 259 (38.3%) died with 5.4% from IFI. Concerning the overall survival, the results were analyzed according to the presence or absence of IFI and AF prophylaxis (Figure 2) we observed a better survival without any IFI whatever the AF prophylaxis was and in case of AF prophylaxis there was an improvement of 2-years survival after chemotherapy induction. Concerning the global mortality and the IFI related mortality, the results were analyzed according to the prophylactic groups and the timing of prophylaxis, the multivariate analysis showed the negative impact of 2 factors on the mortality at day 100: Unfavorable cytogenetics: HR= 3.34 (1-11.20) p=0.05 and presence of IFI: HR = 5.63 (2.62-12.08) p 〈 0.001. CONCLUSION: This study gives 3 important messages: 1) despite the trial protocol recommendations, this study shows that the ECIL recommendations are followed only in 57% of patients with in addition, an early switch in 37% of cases, 2) AF prophylaxis has a significant impact on IFI incidence and when we consider posaconazole alone and IA, this effect is only significant in case of probable/proven IA, 3) a better survival was obtained in patients without IFI whatever the AF prophylaxis was and in case of IFI an improvement of 2 year-survival was observed on AF prophylaxis with an IFI related mortality rate of 5.4%. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 4288-4288
    Abstract: Different transfusion care strategies are considered for the treatment of acute thrombopenia due to low or absence of production of platelets in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients with controversies about both threshold of platelets to consider prior to transfusion and the quality of the product to transfuse. In addition, despite two recent studies (Wandt et al, Lancet. 2012 Oct 13;380:1309; Stanworth and al. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 9;368:1771), the choice between preventive (based upon the number of platelets) and curative (based on clinical symptoms) care, as discussed in 2004 by Slichter and al. (Transfus Med Rev. 2004 Jul;18(3):153), still remains a concern although preventive care is commonly used. In this study, we compared the treatment of AML patients at the Institut Paoli-Calmettes (Marseille, France, that elicited curative transfusion care strategy) herein called IPC, and Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud (Pierre Benite, France, that elicited preventive transfusion care strategy) herein called CHLS, between January 2001 and December 2010, considering the use of transfusion product during induction, and death due to hemorrhage. At the time of study, the curative transfusion care strategy at the IPC relied on the analysis of three complete blood counts a week, clinical examination of the patients (Pt) at least twice a day, and platelet transfusion in case of mucosal hemorrhage syndrome, headaches, fever, and high blood pressure. At the CHLS, the preventive transfusion care strategy relied on blood count, daily clinical examination of the Pt, and platelet transfusion when platelet number was found below 20 G/L. Both IPC and CHLS used Platelet Concentrate (PC) obtained from apheresis from single donor (CPA) or multiple donors (MCPS) and a threshold of 80 g/l Hb was considered for red blood cell transfusion. AML patients were treated by cytarabine combined with anthracycline (induction regimen), with subtle differences between CHLS and IPC and according to recommendation at the time of treatment. Our analysis covered a 45 day induction time, and the 6 first months (185 days) of treatment. Between January 2001 and December 2010, 884 patients (median age 59 with 80% 〈 70) and 524 patients (median age 52 with 94% 〈 70) were treated at the IPC and at the CHLS, respectively. 74% vs 82% of the patients underwent complete remission (CR) following one or two induction regimens, and 39% vs 40% are still alive. During induction, patients at the IPC and the CHLS received 5,1 ± 3,9 (mean ± Standard Deviation) and 10,2 ± 7 PC, with 4,4 and 9,8 CPA and 1,3 and 1,3 MCPS, respectively. During this period, the number of packed red blood cell unit used was 5.7 ± 4,6 and 10.6 ± 5,8, respectively, and 21 Pts deceased from hemorrhage at the IPC versus 2 at the CHLS, with 9 Pts refractory to platelet transfusion versus 1. When not considering Pts refractory to transfusion and Pts with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), 7 Pts died at the IPC (at a median of 12 days after diagnosis) versus 1 patient at the CHLS at day 16 after diagnosis. Of note, ≥ grade 3 sepsis supported in intensive care unit was observed in 5 over 7 patients at the IPC. This retrospective study confirms the results suggested in the TOPPS and German studies that have compared preventive and curative platelet transfusion strategies for leukemia patients. Two fold less platelet products are used in a curative strategy, but more patients deceased from hemorrhage, most of them earlier during the treatment and with high grade sepsis. Unexpectedly, two fold more packed red blood cell units are used in the preventive strategy. This study also suggests that increase of the number of platelet concentrate infused without regard to ABO typing could decrease the therapeutical impact of red blood cell transfusion. At the IPC, high number of patients deceased from hemorrhage in context of DIC or refractoriness to transfusion may be relied to the platelet and plasma transfusion strategy elicited in these particular situations. Altogether, these results suggest that risk factors like sepsis, have to be considered to elicit a preventive versus curative platelet transfusion strategy in the treatment of AML Patient. Six months results and further statistical analyses are in progress and will be presented. Disclosures Prebet: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Vey:BMS: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 3251-3251
    Abstract: Introduction: Anemia, a hallmark of MDS, is challenging to treat, particularly after failure of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Sotatercept (ACE-011) is a novel and first-in-class activin type IIA receptor fusion protein that acts on late-stage erythropoiesis to increase mature erythrocyte release into the circulation (Carrancio et al. Br J Haematol 2014;165:870-82). Treatment with sotatercept stimulated erythropoiesis and significantly increased hemoglobin (Hb) levels in healthy volunteers (Sherman et al. J Clin Pharmacol 2013;53:1121-30), supporting its clinical development for the treatment of anemia in patients (pts) with lower-risk MDS. Methods: The primary objective of this phase 2, open-label, dose-finding study is to determine a safe, tolerable, and effective dose of sotatercept resulting in erythroid hematological improvement (HI-E; modified IWG 2006 criteria) in pts with anemia and IPSS-defined Low or Int-1-risk MDS or non-proliferative CMML (white blood cells 〈 13,000/µL). Secondary objectives include rate of RBC-transfusion independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 weeks. Eligible pts had anemia (≥ 2 RBC units transfusion requirement in the 12 weeks prior to enrollment for Hb ≤ 9.0 g/dL) with no response, loss of response, or low chance of response to ESAs (serum erythropoietin [EPO] 〉 500 mIU/mL). Pts received subcutaneous sotatercept at dose levels of 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01736683. Results: As of May 22, 2014, a total of 54 MDS pts were enrolled: 7, 6, 21, and 20 in the sotatercept 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Median age was 71 years (range 56–86) and median time from diagnosis was 4 years (range 0–31); most pts were male (70%). Pts received a median of 6 RBC units (range 0–18) in the 8 weeks prior to treatment start. Forty-five pts (83%) received ≥ 4 RBC units in the 8 weeks prior to treatment start (high transfusion burden; HTB), and 9 pts (17%) received 〈 4 units in the 8 weeks prior to treatment start (low transfusion burden; LTB). Nineteen pts (35%) had IPSS Low and 34 pts (63%) had IPSS Int-1-risk MDS; IPSS risk data were missing for 1 pt. Fifty-one pts (94%) had prior treatment with ESAs, 30 (56%) with hypomethylating agents, 26 (48%) with lenalidomide, and 26 (48%) with other MDS treatments; 15 pts (28%) had serum EPO 〉 500 mIU/mL. Of the 53 pts evaluable for efficacy, HI-E was observed in 21 pts (40%) overall: 0, 4 (67%), 8 (40%), and 9 pts (45%) in the sotatercept 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Nineteen of 44 HTB pts responded with a ≥ 4 RBC units/8 weeks transfusion burden reduction; duration of transfusion response appeared to be dose-dependent. Five HTB pts achieved RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks, with RBC-TI duration ranging from 59–345+ days. Eight of 9 LTB pts showed Hb increases, not influenced by transfusion, ranging from 1.3–3.8 g/dL. Of these, 2 pts had a Hb increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL sustained for ≥ 8 weeks. Pts with Hb 〉 11.0 g/dL were subject to dose delay per protocol, which may have impacted Hb increase sustainability. RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks was achieved in 6 LTB pts. Increases in platelet and neutrophil levels were seen in pts with baseline thrombocytopenia and pts with baseline neutropenia, respectively. Sotatercept was generally well tolerated. Twenty pts (37%) reported ≥ 1 suspected treatment-related adverse event (AE); fatigue (11%), headache (9.3%), decreased appetite (7.4%), and nausea (7.4%) were the most common. Of 35 pts (65%) who discontinued treatment, 28 discontinued due to lack of therapeutic effect and 4 due to AEs. Of those AEs leading to discontinuation, 3 were suspected to be treatment-related: 1 pt with grade 2 hemolytic anemia, 1 pt with grade 3 hypertension, and 1 pt with grade 2 muscular weakness in the sotatercept 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Other reasons for discontinuation were withdrawal of consent (n = 2; 4%) and pt decision (n = 1; 2%). Conclusions: Sotatercept was well tolerated in lower-risk MDS pts at the dose levels tested, with promising evidence of clinical activity in this largely HTB cohort of ESA-refractory, anemic, lower-risk MDS pts. Further exploration of higher sotatercept dose levels and longer-term treatment is planned. PF and AFL contributed equally to this abstract as senior co-authors. Disclosures Komrokji: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Sotatercept (ACE-011) is an investigational agent that is being assessed for efficacy and safety in myelodysplastic syndromes.. Garcia-Manero:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Ades:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Laadem:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vo:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Prebet:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Boyd:US Oncology: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Beyne-Rauzy:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Zou:Celgene: Employment. Attie:Acceleron Pharma: Employment. Sherman:Acceleron Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. List:Celgene: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Oncotarget, Impact Journals, LLC, Vol. 8, No. 23 ( 2017-06-06), p. 37866-37874
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1949-2553
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Impact Journals, LLC
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2560162-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: The Lancet Haematology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 5, No. 2 ( 2018-02), p. e63-e72
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2352-3026
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2018
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Harborside Press, LLC, Vol. 17, No. 6 ( 2019-06), p. 721-749
    Abstract: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults and accounts for the largest number of annual deaths due to leukemias in the United States. Recent advances have resulted in an expansion of treatment options for AML, especially concerning targeted therapies and low-intensity regimens. This portion of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for AML focuses on the management of AML and provides recommendations on the workup, diagnostic evaluation and treatment options for younger (age 〈 60 years) and older (age ≥60 years) adult patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1540-1405 , 1540-1413
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Harborside Press, LLC
    Publication Date: 2019
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 2, No. 8 ( 2018-04-24), p. 923-932
    Abstract: In the largest study of HMAs in RR-AML to date, 16% of patients achieved CR/CRi and experienced a median OS of 21 months. Low proliferative disease (peripheral blood blasts 〈 5%) was associated with improved response and OS.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2876449-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages