feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 1491-1491
    Abstract: Development of cytogenetic methods has contributed to the understanding that ALL is not a homogenous disease. Detection of structural and numerical alterations in the chromosomes of lymphoblasts has identified several different ALL subgroups. G-banding reveals about 60–70% of these changes. The development of FISH and PCR methods has decreased the proportion of apparently normal karyotype to less than 20%. Still a part of ALL patients have no chromosomal aberrations detected with conventional cytogenetics. It seems likely, however, that ALL with a normal karyotype reflects rather our inadequate capability to detect all possible aberrations than a true normality of the lymphoblast genome. Microarray methods offer an effective tool to define novel cytogenetic changes in ALL. In our study characterizing and evaluating ALL in adolescents and young adults aged 10–25 years in Finland, we analyzed patients diagnosed during 1990–2007 (n=231). Eighty-nine patients had normal (n=80) or failed (n=9) karyotype at diagnosis. DNA from initial samples was available for 27 of these 89 patients. 26 patients had normal karyotypes, for one patient the karyotype analysis failed by G-banding at diagnosis. The key clinical characteristics of the 27 patients did not differ from the rest of the patients with normal or failed karyotype. Genomic DNA was extracted from diagnostic bone marrow samples. Digestion, labeling and hybridization of DNA was performed according to the Agilent protocol version 2.0 for 44K arrays. Labeled samples were hybridized against gender matched reference DNAs to Human Genome CGH 44B oligo microarray slides (Agilent Technologies Santa Clara, CA, USA). For data-analysis Agilent’s CGH Analytics software version 3.5 was used. The starting and ending points of the aberrations were confirmed by the ADM-2 algorithm with 10.0 threshold. The immunophenotype of the patients was as follows: T-cell ALL 8/27 patients, precursor B ALL 13/27, mixed lineage 5/27 (according to the European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias), not known 1/27. Seventeen patients had normal karyotype and no other marker for MRD follow-up, while 9 patients had either immunoglobulin and/or T-cell receptor gene rearrangement (n=8) or over-expression of Willms Tumor gene 1 (WT1) (n=1). In total 58 aberrations were detected in the 27 patient samples (1–7 aberrations per sample, mean 2.1) (Figure 1). Four samples (15%) did not show any aberration (two with immunoglobulin and/or T-cell receptor gene rearrangements). Losses were detected in 20/27 cases and gains in 10/27 cases. Cases with losses only were more frequent (n=13, 48%) than those with gains only (n=3, 11%). Losses were more numerous than gains (44/20 vs. 14/10). Single aberrations were seen in seven patients. Five of these were deletions affecting 9p21.3, two were gains in 21q. In the 27 cases, the most commonly detected aberrations were deletions involving 9p21.3 (n=10), 5/10 (50%) being T-ALL. In all the 10 cases the CDKN2A gene was affected. Other aberrations seen more than once were deletion of 6q (n=4), amplification of the terminal part of 21q (n=3), amplification of 1q (n=2), deletion of 12p (n=2), deletion in 12q23-q24 (n=2), deletion in 16q22 (n=2), deletion in 17q11 (n=2) and deletion in 22q11 (n=2). Nineteen relatively small aberrations (about 2 Mb or less in size) were detected in 15 cases and such deletion was found to be the only aberration in 4/15 cases. Our data indicate that a subgroup of ALL with fully normal cytogenetics may not exist. Microarray CGH shows a clear benefit in more detailed examination of the blast cell DNA. In 85% (23/27) of the patients with initially normal karyotypes we determined single or multiple aberrations with array CGH. Losses were more frequent than gains. Seven patients (26%) had only a single aberration, three of these being submicroscopic ( & lt;200 kb).We conclude that microarray CGH enables to detect molecular-genetic changes also in ALL cases having a “normal” karyotype using conventional cytogenetics. We are getting closer to the point where normal molecular-genetic findings do not exist in leukemic lymphoblasts. Figure 1. DNA copy number alterations detected with array CGH in 27 adolescent ALL patients with initially normal or failed karyotype. Vertical lines to the left and right of each chromosome represents copy number losses and gains, respectively. Figure 1. DNA copy number alterations detected with array CGH in 27 adolescent ALL patients with initially normal or failed karyotype. Vertical lines to the left and right of each chromosome represents copy number losses and gains, respectively.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Hematology ; 2006
    In:  Blood Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 1885-1885
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 1885-1885
    Abstract: Background: Long-term survival in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia has dramatically improved during the past three decades through intensification of therapy. Progress has also been made regarding therapy of adult ALL. Recent reports in the literature suggest better outcome on pediatric protocols, as compared with adult ones. In pediatric ALL, age over 10 years is a high-risk factor in many protocols. The arbitrary age limit of 16 years may not truly reflect the biologic differences in ALL between adolescents vs. young adults. The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the outcome of adolescents with ALL in Finland, treated on pediatric vs. adult ALL protocols. Materials and methods: All patients aged 10–25 years diagnosed with ALL during 1990–2005 in Finland were included. There were 120 patients (aged 10–16 yrs) treated on pediatric common Nordic (NOPHO) protocols with a total duration of 2 yrs, and 100 patients (aged 17–25 yrs) treated on Finnish National ALL adult protocols with a total duration of 3.5 yrs. In total 15 underwent allo-SCT in first remission. Data had been collected to the pediatric Nordic NOPHO database, as well as to the Finnish Leukemia Group ALL database. Events were defined as death, relapse, or second malignancy. Results: The 5-year EFS was 68 % for children (n=62) and 55% for adults (n=72) (p=0.04), and the 5-year OS was 75 % for children and 68 % for adults (p=0.075), respectively. When only patients treated with conventional chemotherapy were included (stem cell transplant recipients in 1CR excluded), the 5-year EFS was 65 % for children (n=53) and 55 % for adults (n=66) (p=0.09), and the 5-year OS was 80 % for children and 65 % for adults (p=0.09), respectively. Regardless of protocol, EFS in the age group of 10–15 years was 74 % and in the group 15–25 years 57 % (p=0,06). Conclusions: EFS regarding all patients was better on pediatric than on adult protocols. All the other comparisons reached statistically only a trend level. The difference in outcome between pediatric and adult protocols in Finland is less clear than reported elsewhere. Age seems to be a prognostic factor also in the adolescent age groups. The non-transplanted patients seemed to have a better outcome, suggesting that those with higher risk probably ended up with transplant. Although therapy is an important risk factor, our further analysis of cytogenetic features including CGH array may reveal other risk factors that may turn out to be even more powerful. EFS, pediatric vs. adult treatment group EFS, pediatric vs. adult treatment group
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 932-932
    Abstract: Abstract 932 The Nordic Lymphoma Group has since 1996 conducted three consecutive phase II trials for front-line treatment of MCL patients ≤ 65 years of age. The first protocol (MCL1) 1996-2000 introduced high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (unpurged or ex vivo purged) as consolidation after 4 cycles of intensified CHOP (maxi-CHOP). The results were disappointing, as the majority of patients relapsed. 1 Being in CR pre-transplant was the most important factor for outcome. Hence, in the second trial (MCL2) 2000-2006 induction therapy was intensified by adding high-dose Ara-C and rituximab to the regimen. Compared to MCL1 this led to significant improvement of event-free and overall survival, and the rate of PCR negative stem cell grafts and bone marrow samples.2 Again, responders in less than CR pre-transplant had a significantly poorer outcome. We therefore made a further intensification for the MCL3 study (2006-2009) by adding 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) to the high-dose BEAC/BEAM to responders not in CR. Methods: As in the MCL1 and 2 studies newly diagnosed stage II-IV MCL patients ≤ 65 years were included. Induction treatment was identical to that of the MCL2 study with alternating cycles of maxi-CHOP-rituximab (3 cycles) and Ara-C-rituximab (3 cycles). Response evaluation was done after cycle 5. PET/CT was recommended, but could not influence the response evaluation, which was done according to the International Workshop criteria. Responders underwent in vivo purged harvest of stem cells after cycle 6 (Ara-C + 2 doses of rituximab). Patients in CRu or PR received a standard dose 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan (0.4 mCi/kg) one week prior to the BEAM/BEAC, CR patients received BEAM/BEAC alone. Patients are followed by CT-scans, bone marrow and blood samples, including PCR for minimal residual disease or molecular relapse. For molecular relapse preemptive treatment with 4 standard doses of rituximab, as in the MCL2 study3, is given. Results: The planned accrual of 160 patients was reached in June 2009. The patient characteristics are similar to those of the MCL2 trial with a median age of 57 years (28-65), the majority male (80%) and in stage IV (89%) with bone marrow involvement (74%). The response rates pre-transplant so far compare favorably with data from MCL2 with 50% in CR, 18% in CRu, and 28% in PR. Only 4 out of 128 evaluable patients did not respond (3%) and there was one case (1%) of treatment-related mortality during induction therapy. While it is still too early to assess the impact of the 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan on the progression-free survival, the side effects were similar to those of the MCL2 study including a treatment related mortality of 4%. Fifty-five patients in CRu or PR have so far been treated with 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan, with no indication of any added toxicity. Only 12 out of 133 patients (10%) have not undergone transplant, 5 due to stem cell harvest failure, 3 due to toxicity and 4 due to non response to induction treatment. PET-scan prior to transplant was positive in 2% of CR patients, 20% of CRu patients and 54% of PR patients. Patients with a positive PET-scan pre-transplant had a 36% chance of achieving a molecular remission post-transplant, compared to 92% of cases with a negative PET-scan (p 〈 0.001) Conclusion: The high response rates after induction treatment achieved in the MCL2 study are confirmed in the present study. Adding 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan to high-dose chemotherapy for responding patients not in CR prior to transplant is feasible and does not increase toxicity. A negative PET-scan prior to transplant predicts for a molecular remission after the transplant. References: Andersen et al, Eur J Cancer, 2002, 38: 401-408 Geisler et al, Blood, 2008, 112: 2687-2693 Andersen et al J Clin Oncol 2009 epub ahead of press Disclosures: Kolstad: Bayer Schering Pharma: Research Funding. Geisler:Bayer Schering Pharma: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 747-747
    Abstract: Abstract 747 The outcome of mantle cell lympoma (MCL) has improved in recent years. The Nordic Lymphoma Group has since 1996 completed three consecutive phase II trials for front-line treatment of MCL patients 〈 66 years of age. The first trial (MCL1) showed that quality of response prior to transplant was the most important factor for outcome. Hence, in the second trial (MCL2) induction therapy was intensified by adding cycles of high-dose Ara-C and rituximab to the regimen. Despite significant improvement in overall and progression-free survival, patients who did not achieve CR pretransplant had a shorter time to progression. Therefore, the main objective of the MCL3 study was to improve the time to progression in patients who achieved only CRu or PR pretransplant by adding Zevalin to the high-dose regimen as a late intensification. Results of the – otherwise largely identical - MCL2 trial serve as the historic control. Methods: Newly diagnosed stage II-IV MCL patients 〈 66 years received induction immunochemotherapy with alternating cycles of R- (rituximab) maxi-CHOP and R-Ara-C to a total of 6 cycles. Evaluation of pretransplant response with CT scans and bone marrow was performed after 5 cycles. PET/CT pretransplant was recommended, but would not influence treatment. Responding patients by NCI criteria underwent in-vivo purged stem cell harvest after the 6th cycle (Ara-C + 2 doses of rituximab). Patients in CRu or PR received a standard dose Zevalin (0.4 mCi/kg) one week prior to high-dose therapy with BEAM or BEAC while CR patients received the high-dose chemotherapy without Zevalin. Follow-up included CT-scans, bone marrow and blood sampling for at least 5 years, including PCR for minimal residual disease or molecular relapse. Patients in solely molecular relapse received preemptive therapy with 4 weekly doses of rituximab, as in the MCL2 study. Results: 161 consecutive patients were included from 2005–2009, with characteristics similar to that of the MCL2 trial with a median age of 57 years (28–65), a male predominance and the majority in stage IV with bone marrow involvement. Only 12 out of 161 patients (7 %) did not receive a transplant, 6 due to stem cell harvest failure, 2 due to toxicity and 4 due to no response to induction treatment. Before transplant 50% were in CR, 17% in CRu, and 30% in PR. Only four out of 161 patients (2 %) did not respond to induction treatment. After a median follow-up of 3.2 years the projected 5-year overall and event free survival, and time to progression were 71, 55 and 65% respectively and the MCL2 and MCL3 curves were superimposable. Of the 69 candidates to Zevalin in CRu/PR according to protocol, 65 (94%) actually received this treatment. There was no significant difference in time to progression for patients in CRu and PR pretransplant between MCL2 and MCL3, indicating no effect of late intensification with Zevalin in MCL3 in this patient group. Interestingly, a positive pretransplant PET scan proved to be a strong negative predictor for outcome. Lack of benefit from addition of Zevalin to the high-dose regimen was shown for both PET-positive and PET-negative patients. In a multivariate analysis of the impact of clinical response, PET positivity and zevalin treatment, only PET positivity pretransplant had independent significance (p=0.0003 HR=3.412 (95% confidence limits 1.744 – 6.673). The treatment-related mortality was 3 %. Side-effects were similar to that previously reported for MCL2, and we did not find that Zevalin added any toxicity. Of the 3 patients who developed secondary MDS/AML posttransplant, two had received Zevalin and one had not. Conclusion: The MCL3 data confirm the good results and tolerability of the Nordic regimen. However, the late intensification with Zevalin, albeit non-toxic, did not prolong the time to progression for patients in only CRu or PR pretransplant. A positive PET prior to transplant was shown to be a strong negative predictor for outcome. The concept of late intensification may be too late in poor responders. In consequence, up-front intensification with increasing use of high-dose AraC for MIPI high-risk patients is used in the subsequent, now ongoing Nordic-British MCL5 study. Disclosures: Arne: Bayer Schering Pharma: Research Funding. Geisler:Roche, Schering: Consultancy, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 1001-1001
    Abstract: Background: The Nordic Lymphoma Group has shown that adding cytarabine (AraC) and rituximab (R) to high dose CHOP and autologous stem cell transplantation increases response rate, event free survival (EFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with MCL & lt; 65 years (Geisler et al, Blood 2008). About 50% of pts with MCL are older than 65 years. Most of them are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy or transplantations and no satisfactory standard treatment is known for them. In this prospective pilot trial for elderly pts we explored the feasibility and efficacy of a prolonged standard dose induction treatment (10 cycles) with potentially synergistic combinations followed by R maintenance. Methods: Eligible were pts with histologically confirmed MCL (WHO criteria), CD5+, CD19/20+, cyclinD1+, age & gt; 65 years, with adequate organ functions and performance status & lt; 4. Induction: standard dose R-CHOP (cycles 1, 3, 5), R-AraC (R 375mg/m2 x 1, AraC 1g/m2 4 doses with 12 hrs intervals, cycles 2, 4), R-AraC with fludarabine (F) (2 doses of F 25 mg/m2, cycles 6 – 8), CHOP (cycles 9–10). Maintenance for pts with CR/PR: R 375 mg/m2 bimonthly x 12. Diagnostic workup included physical examination, CT scan, histological lymph node biopsy, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, and immunohistology or flow cytometry of the diagnostic material. Endoscopies were performed for symptomatic patients. Responses were evaluated according to revised criteria (Cheson et al JCO 2007) after 5th, 8th, 10th cycles and after that every 6 months. Results: Thirty four pts were recruited. Age median 74 years (67–79 years). Performance status 0 n=12, 1 n=16, 2 n=3, 3 n=3. Stage IIA n=1, IVA n=20, IVB n=13. International prognostic index IPI 2 n=10, 3 n=13, 4 n=9, 5 n=2. Response to induction: CR 23, CRu 6, PR 3, PD 1, not evaluable 1. The response of 7 pts improved with cycles 6 to 8 (R-AraC with F). At diagnosis 32 pts had bone marrow involvement. At best response 24/25 pts with bone marrow involvement studied and CR (n=17), CRu (n=6) or PR (CTscan positive, n=1) were negative in flow cytometry (sensitivity 10−3–10−4). One patient with PR had residual MCL in flow cytometry. Median follow-up time of living patients is 26 months, range 6–43 months. There have been 8 events: progression or relapse 4, secondary AML 1, sudden cardiac death in CR 1, and 2 responding patients withdrew their concents. At 30 months EFS is 72%, PFS 77%, time to progression 85%, and OS 80%. Three pts have discontinued induction after 6,7 or 8 cycles due to toxicity but remain in CR. Infections grade 3 occurred in 8 pts and grade 4 in 1 patient. Eight pts have had transient neutropenia & lt; 0.5 x 109/l during maintenance treatment. Conclusions: Elderly patients with MCL and with good performance status could be treated relatively intensively with moderate toxicity when supported with G-CSF. In historical comparison to CHOP, R, AraC and F increase response rate and prolong PFS, TTP and OS. Flow cytometry is a powerful tool to study bone marrow involvement at diagnosis and minimal residual disease. A longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the maintenance treatment but several patients have developed transient grade 4 neutropenia during maintenance treatment after this induction schedule.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 2700-2700
    Abstract: Abstract 2700 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma is a disease of the elderly, with a median age of 70 years. Younger patients may be treated with potentially curative treatment including high dose chemotherapy. For elderly patients, however, no standard therapy has been defined. In a randomized comparison between R-CHOP and R-bendamustine (R-B) by the German StiL Group, R-B was associated with less toxicity and improved outcomes, making R-B a preferable first-line treatment option. Lenalidomide (LEN) is another active agent in MCL, with a response rate of 53% as a single agent in relapsed/refractory MCL. In the current trial, we investigate if the addition of lenalidomide to R-B may enhance efficacy, with manageable toxicity, for the older population of MCL patients. Methods: In phase I, the MTD of LEN was to be determined, starting with 5 mg/day increasing up to 25 mg/day in a sequential dose escalation using a 3+3 design. LEN, bendamustine and rituximab are given in 6 cycles/28 days. LEN D1-21, B 90 mg/m2 D1-2 and R 375 mg/m2 D1. The maintenance phase consists of LEN 25 mg/day, D1-21, for 7 cycles. Eligibility criteria are age 〉 65 years or ≤ 65 years, unable to tolerate high dose chemotherapy, with stage II-IV untreated mantle cell lymphoma. Results: The trial was commenced in October 2009.The phase I portion initially recruited 12 pts according to the original protocol design in 3 cohorts with LEN dose from 5–15 mg d 1–21. Median age was 72.5 years, range 66–85. MIPI high risk n=8, intermediate risk n=4. Response after 6 cycles: CR/CRu n=9/10, PR n=1/10 (ORR 100%). Molecular remission in BM: 5/9 pts. Toxicity was more profound than expected, mostly during cycle 1 (SAE n=9, AE Grade III/IV n=14). Notable was a high incidence of cutaneous and allergic AE. No patients could receive more than 10 cycles, median 6.5. A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was noted at the dose of 15 mg. This led to a modification of the phase I protocol: Cohort A: No LEN in cycle 1, cycles 2–6: 10 mg LEN days 1–14. During maintenance, cycles 7–8: LEN 10 mg days 1–21, cycles 9–13: LEN 15 mg days 1–21. Cohort B: Same as Cohort A, but reducing B to 70 mg/m2 in cycles 2–6. Cohort C: as Cohort B, but reducing LEN to 5 mg days 1–14 cycles 2–6. In Cohort A, 2 of 6 patients experienced a DLT. Evaluation of Cohort B (6 pts) is ongoing. Conclusions: The addition of LEN to the R-B regimen leads to increased toxicity in elderly patients with MCL. Early data indicate a high response rate. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages