Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 140, No. 11 ( 2014-11), p. 1947-1956

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0171-5216 , 1432-1335

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1737-9

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1459285-X

In: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 141, No. 11 ( 2015-11), p. 2013-2022

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0171-5216 , 1432-1335

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-1984-4

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1459285-X

In: Annals of Hematology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 102, No. 3 ( 2023-03), p. 547-561

Abstract: A randomized inter-group trial comparing more intensive treatment strategies to a common standard arm 3 + 7 (CSA) was conducted in patients with non-M3 AML. Untreated patients ≥ 60 years were allocated to the CSA ( n  = 132) or to the study group arms ( n  = 1154) of the AMLCG (TAD/HAM versus HAM/HAM ± G-CSF followed by TAD and maintenance) and the OSHO (intermediate-dose ara-C/mitoxantrone followed by ara-C/mitoxantrone). Median age of the 1147 eligible patients was 69 (range 60–87) years. CR/CRi status at 90 days was not significantly different between the CSA (54% (95%CI: 45–64)) and the study group arms (53% (95%CI: 47–60) and 59% (95%CI: 58–63)). The five-year event-free survival (EFS) probability (primary endpoint) was 6.2% (95%CI: 2.7–14.0) in the CSA, 7.6% (95%CI: 4.5–12.8) in study group A and 11.1% (95%CI: 9.0–13.7) in B. The 5-year OS was 17.2% (95%CI: 11.0–26.9), 17.0% (95%CI: 2.0–23.9), and 19.5% (95%CI: 16.7–22.8) in CSA, study group A and B, respectively. Neither study group differed significantly from the CSA regarding EFS, OS, or relapse-free survival. In multivariate analyses, allocation to the treatment strategy was not significantly associated with the time-to-event endpoints. The evaluation of more intensive treatment strategies did not show clinically relevant outcome differences when compared to CSA.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0939-5555 , 1432-0584

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05087-8

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1458429-3

In: Annals of Hematology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 100, No. 9 ( 2021-09), p. 2387-2398

Abstract: Relapse of acute leukemia is a frequent complication with uncertain outcome and poorly defined risk factors. From 1621 patients entered into two prospective clinical trials (AML02; n = 740 and AML04; n = 881), 74.2% reached complete remission (CR) 1 after induction(s) and 59 patients after additional induction ± hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Of the non-refractory patients, 48.4% with a median age of 63 (range 17–85) years relapsed. Relapses occurred within 6 months after CR in 46.5%, between 7 and 18 months in 38.7%, and after 18 months in 14.8% of patients. Relapse treatment resulted in CR2 in 39% of patients depending upon age (54.5% of ≤ 60 and 28.6% of  〉  60 years), duration of CR1, and treatment of relapse. Overall survival (OS) was 10.9 (7.4–16.2) %, but OS after HCT ± intensive chemotherapy (ICT) was 39.3% (31.8–48.6) at 5 years and not different in younger and older patients. Donor lymphocyte infusion ± chemotherapy and ICT alone resulted only in OS of 15.4% and of 5%, respectively. Independent favorable factors for OS were long CR1 duration, and HCT, while non-monosomal disease was beneficial for OS in elderly patients. Leukemia-free survival [LFS; 24.9 (19.5–31.7) % at 10 years] was affected by similar risk factors. In a competing risk model, the relapse incidence at 5 years was 53.5 ± 3.5% and the non-relapse mortality rate 21.7 ± 2.9%. Lower relapse incidence was observed in patents with HCT, long CR1 duration, and female gender. Risk factors for non-relapse mortality were HCT in younger and type of AML in elderly patients. In conclusion, allogeneic HCT ± IC improved the results in relapsed AML in younger and elderly patients. Increasing CR2 rates and HCT frequency will be the challenge for the next years. Relapse of the disease remains the major problem.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0939-5555 , 1432-0584

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04565-1

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1458429-3

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 3666-3666

Abstract: Purpose: To define prognostic factors for overall survival in adult patients (pts) with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Introduction: Prognostic factors for overall survival after AML relapse are poorly defined. Here, we investigate patient and disease related factors in terms of their impact on prognosis after AML relapse in a cohort of 495 adult AML relapse patients treated in two prospective AML trials of the East German Society of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). Patients and methods: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive relapsed AML pts treated in two OSHO trials (OSHO #61 (pts 〈 60 years) and OSHO #69 (pts 〉 60 years)). Age, cytogenetic risk at initial diagnosis, FLT3/NPM1 mutational status, type of AML (de novo versus secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasia (MDS/MPN) versus therapy related), time interval from first complete remission (CR1) to relapse and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) as consolidation in CR1 were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Between March 2002 and July 2014, a total of 862 and 968 patients (pts) were enrolled in the OSHO #61 and #69 trial, respectively. Five hundred and thirty two of 690 (77%) documented pts achieved first complete remission in the #61 and 501 of 813 (62%) pts in the #69 trial. Of these, 495 pts (252 male, 243 female) experienced AML relapse, 207(39%) pts in #61 and 288(57%) pts in #69. Median age at relapse was 63 years (range 18 to 86 years). Initial diagnoses were de novo AML, secondary AML to MDS/MPN and therapy related AML in 332(67%) pts, 129 (25.9%) pts and 30 (6%) pts, respectively. Time from CR1 to relapse was 〈 = 6 months in 198 (40%) pts, 7 to 18 months in 226 (45.7%) pts and 〉 18 months in 71 (14.3%) pts. Initial karyotpe was available for 449 pts (90.7 %). It was favorable, intermediate and poor in 20 (4.5%) pts, 301(67%) pts and 128(28.5%) pts, respectively. Sixty two (13.9%) relapsed pts had a monosomal karyotype at initial diagnosis. NPM1/FLT3 mutational status at initial diagnosis was available in 354 (78.8%) pts, 378 (71%) pts in #61 and 370 (74%) pts in #69. One hundred and three (20.8%) had allogeneic stem cell transplantation as consolidation in CR1 (56 pts) in #61 and (47 pts) in #69. Relapse therapy was documented in 450 (91%) pts. Six pts that had immunosuppression withdrawn as the only therapy and nine pts that had received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor as monotherapy were excluded from further analysis due to small numbers. All other treatments were as follows: intensive chemotherapy (INT) n=225, alloSCT with or without prior INT n=50, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLi) with or without prior chemotherapy n=22, palliative mild cytoreductive chemotherapy (mCT) n=66, azacitidine (Aza) n=52, best supportive care (BSC) n=20. With these, CR was achieved in 78 (36%), 34 (68%), 8 (36%), 6 (9%), 1 (2%), 0 (0%), respectively. Median overall survival probability (OS) for all 495 relapsed patients was 6 months. It was 11.3 months, 5.7 months, 4.5 months and 4.6 months for patients aged 18 to 50 years, 51 to 60 years, 61 to 70 years and 71 to 86 years, respectively (p 〈 0.0005). Initial cytogenetics also influenced OS, it was 10.4 months, 7.5 months and 3.8 months for patients with a favorable, intermediate and poor karyotype, respectively (p 〈 0.0005). Having a monosomal karyotype at initial diagnosis was associated with a median OS of only 2.3 months (p 〈 0.001). Initial FLT3/NPM1 mutational status had no impact on OS after relapse. OS was 4 months, 7.1 months and 16.9 months for pts with a time interval from CR1 to relapse of 〈 = 6 months, 7 to 18 months and 〉 18 months, respectively (p 〈 0.0005). In univariate analysis age (p 〈 0.0005), initial cytogenetic risk (p 〈 0.0005), type of AML (p=0.01), interval from CR1 to relapse (p 〈 0.0005), alloSCT in CR1 (p=0.03) and type of relapse therapy (p 〈 0.0005) had a significant impact on OS. In multivariate analysis favorable prognostic factors for OS were lower age (p 〈 0.0005), favorable initial cytogenetics (p=0.01), longer interval from CR1 to relapse (p 〈 0.0005) and not having undergone alloSCT in CR1. Conclusions: Our study shows that outcome of relapsed AML pts is poor. Younger age, favorable cytogenetics at initial diagnosis, a longer interval from CR1 to relapse and not having undergone alloSCT as consolidation in CR1 are positive prognostic factors, whereas type of AML and FLT3/NPM1 mutational status have no significant impact on survival after relapse. Disclosures Off Label Use: Azacitidine is licensed in Germany for the treatment of adult patients with the following conditions, who are not eligible for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: intermediate-2 and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) with 10-29% marrow blasts without myeloproliferative disorder, acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with 20-30% blasts and multi-lineage dysplasia,according to World Health Organisation (WHO) classification.. Wolf:Bayer: Honoraria; Geo Pharma: Honoraria. Sayer:Takeda: Other; Medac: Other. Al-Ali:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.3666.3666

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 1066-1066

Abstract: Despite recent advances, treatment of elderly patients with AML remains a challenge because of adverse disease biology, comorbidities and therapy related toxicities. The balance between effectivity and toxicity of treatment strategies play a key role. Since comparative studies are lacking, a prospective randomized trial was designed among German AML study groups with different treatment strategies to compare outcome. Patients ≥60 years with all AML subtypes except M3 were randomized up-front to a common standard arm (CSA) (10%) and to study specific arms (90%) of the AMLCG or the OSHO. The CSA consisted of one or two inductions of araC 100 mg/m2/d continuous IV (CI) d 1-7 d and daunorubicin (dauno) 60 mg/m2/d IV d 3, 4, 5 and two courses of araC 1 g/m2/d BID IV d 1, 3 and 5 as consolidation (Mayer RJ et al, NEJM 1994). The AMLCG study arm randomized TAD (araC 100 mg/m2/d CI d1-2 followed by BID d 3-8, dauno 60 mg/m2/d IV d 3-5 and 6-thioguanine 100 mg/m2/d po BID d 3-9) and HAM [araC 1 mg/m2/d IV BID d 1-3 and mitoxantrone (mito) 10 mg/m2/d IV d 3-5] versus two courses of HAM with any 2nd course only given if blasts persisted ± G-CSF. Two courses of TAD were given as consolidation followed by maintenance chemotherapy over three years. The OSHO study arm included araC 1 g/m²/d BID IV d 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 and mito 10 mg/m2/d IV d 1 - 3 for one or two induction courses and ara-C 500 mg/m² BID 1h IV d 1 + 3 + 5 in combination with mito10 mg/m2/d IV d 1 + 2 as consolidation. Pegfilgrastim 6 mg s.c. was applied on day 10 of induction and on d 8 of consolidation. The study was approved by the IRB and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01497002 and NCT00266136). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to randomization. Between April 1st, 2005 and May 26th, 2015 1286 patients were assigned randomly to the CSA (n=132) or to the study groups arm (n=1154). After excluding 139 patients (10.8%), 1147 patients were eligible for analysis, 1120 with follow-up for overall survival (OS) and 1079 for complete remission (CR) analysis. Baseline characteristics of all eligible patients showed median ages of 68 (60-82) years for the CSA and 69 (60-87) and 70 (60-85) years in the study arms A and B, respectively (p=0.05). Proportions of patients with secondary AML differed significantly between study arms (A: 42%, B: 30%, CSA: 36%; p=0.003). The CSA had less flt3 wildtype/npm1 wildtype patients (31%) vs. arm A (51% p=0.040) and arm B (58%, p=0.0455). No differences were observed with respect to cytogenetic risk groups, white blood cell counts, LDH, and npm1 mutant/ flt3-wildtype or mutant. The primary endpoint event free survival (EFS) did not differ between the CSA and study group strategies. Three-year EFS was 12.4% (95% CI: 6.7 - 19.9%) in the CSA, 15.6% (95% CI: 13.1 - 18.3%) in group A and 11.4% (95% CI, 7.4% to 16.4%) in group B (n.s.;Fig.1). With a median follow-up of 67 months, OS did not differ significantly between CSA and study group regimens. The 3-year survival probability was 22.3% (95% CI: 14.7-30.9%) in the CSA, 24.7% (95% CI: 21.6-27.9%) in group A and 22.4% (95% CI, 16.7% - 18.3%) in group B (Fig.2). CR status after 90 days of therapy was evaluated as secondary endpoint. The proportion of patients in CR in the CSA [51% (95% CI: 42-61%)] was comparable to the 50% (95% CI: 47-54%) and 48% (95% CI: 41-55%) of the study group arms (p=n.s.). Persistent leukemia was seen in 16% (95% CI: 10-24%) in the CSA vs 17% (95% CI: 14-19%) and 12% (95% CI: 8-17%) in groups A and B, respectively (both p= n.s.). A total of 226 patients died within 90 days of treatment, 24% (95% CI: 17-33%) in CSA, 19% in group A (95% CI: 16-22%) and 27% (95% CI: 21-33%) in group B; CSA vs A p=0.1859, CSA vs B p=0.5902). Death without AML was 3% in CSA, 2% in group A and 3% in group B, death with AML was 9% in CSA, 6% in group A and 5% in group B and death from indeterminate cause was 12% in CSA, 11% in group A and 20% in group B. Three-year relapse free survival (RFS) was 21.3% (95% CI: 12.2 - 31.0) in the CSA, 28.9% (95% CI: 24.9 -33.0%) in group A and 24.0% (95% CI: 16.8 - 31.9) in group B (both p=n.s.; Fig.3). In multivariate analysis independent variables for EFS and OS were age, type of disease, cytogenetic group and WBC count, but not the allocation to one of the treatment arms. Age and cytogenetic group were determinants for RFS. Conclusion A strictly prospective comparison of different treatment strategies in patients with AML did not show clinically relevant outcome differences when compared to a common standard arm. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Niederwieser: Novartis Oncology Europe: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Hoffmann:Novartis Oncology Europe: Research Funding. Al-Ali:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hegenbart:Pfizer: Other: Travel grant; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant. Sayer:Riemser Pharma: Consultancy. Hochhaus:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fischer:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dreger:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Hiddemann:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Other: Grants; Roche: Other: Grants.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.1066.1066

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Annals of Hematology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 100, No. 11 ( 2021-11), p. 2877-2878

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0939-5555 , 1432-0584

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04638-1

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1458429-3

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 280-280

Abstract: Treatment of elderly patients with AML remains challenging. While increasing doses of induction and consolidation chemotherapy have failed to improve outcome, efforts to decrease relapse rates using the graft-versus-leukemia effect have shown promising results in phase II studies. In the present analysis of the prospective OSHO 2004 study we evaluated the effect of post-induction hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in comparison to conventional consolidation chemotherapy (CT) on outcome in elderly patients with AML. The OSHO 2004 study is part of the German intergroup study. Upon achieving complete remission (CR) after induction, patients were assigned to CT or HCT depending on the availability of a matched related or unrelated donor. Unrelated, single antigen mismatched donors were accepted in high risk situations. By April 2014 from 817 eligible patients, 505 entered CR (62%) after one or two induction therapies. From the 452 patients who received consolidation in CR 1, 31 patients (7%) relapsed and 10 (2%) died of complications during consolidation. No further therapy for medical reasons was given to 73 patients, 206 patients received second consolidation with cytarabine (0.5 g/m2 i.v. bid d1, 3, 5) plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m² d1-2) and 132 patients underwent HCT. Most frequent conditioning regimens for HCT were low dose TBI (83%) and treosulfan/fludarabine (12%). Most of the patients received HCT from unrelated (80%) donors and the majority received grafts from HLA-identical (78%) donors. Our analysis was restricted to the 315 patients 〈 75 years receiving either CT or HCT. Probabilities for overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and differences tested by the log-rank test. Relapse incidence (RI) and non relapse mortality (NRM) were described by estimating the cumulative incidence and testing the differences using the Gray's test. Multivariate Cox regression models and competing risks regression models were used to identify independent prognostic variables for outcomes. The median age was 67 (60-74) and 65 (60-74) years in the CT and the HCT groups (p 〈 0.0005), respectively. There were no differences between CT and HCT regarding gender, AML type (de novo, secondary or therapy related) and FLT3 mutation status. However more patients with mutated NPM1 were observed in the CT as compared to the HCT group (39% vs 28%; p=0.07) and more patients entered into remission after one induction in the CT as compared to the HCT group (89% vs. 81%; p=0.05). Low risk cytogenetics and normal karyotype were present more frequently in the CT than in the HCT arm (p 〈 0.0005). The interval from CR to CT was 50 days and from CR to HCT 72 days (p 〈 0.0005). Patients receiving related or unrelated matched/mismatched HCT had superior LFS than those receiving CT (32±5% vs. 13±4% at 8 years, respectively; p 〈 0.0005). The difference was more distinct when only those patients with matched related or unrelated donors were compared to those receiving CT (36±6% vs. 13±4% at 8 years; p 〈 0.0005). Similar figures were obtained for overall survival [OS, 35±5% matched/mismatched HCT vs. 24±4% for CT (p=0.18) and 41±6% for matched HCT patients vs. 24±4% for CT (p=0.09)]. RI was lower after HCT (40±5%) than after CT (79±5%; p 〈 0.0001). In contrast, NRM was higher in HCT patients (28±7%) than in CT patients (9±11%; p 〈 0.0001). Subpopulation analyses identified no difference in LFS and OS between matched related versus unrelated HCT. The difference in LFS between HCT and CT was highest in patients with normal karyotype, high risk cytogenetics and patients with non-monosomal karyotyp. Prognostic factors for LFS, OS, RI and NRM were analyzed in a multivariate analysis. Significant prognostic factors for LFS were cytogenetic risk (p=0.04), HCT (p=0.01) and FLT3 mutation status (p=0.07). OS was determined by cytogenetics p 〈 0.01) with a trend for lower age (p=0.07) and HCT (p=0.14). Prognostic factors for RI were cytogenetics (p 〈 0.0006), FLT3 mutation status (p 〈 0.03) and HCT (p 〈 0.0005). NRM was influenced by HCT (p=0.002). Conclusions: HCT from related or unrelated donors improved LFS and OS in patients with AML over the age of 60 years and in particular in those with high risk cytogenetics or normal karyotype disease. The LFS of over 30% after 8 years achieved by HCT represents a marked improvement in the prognosis of patients with AML aged 60-75 years in CR1. Disclosures Al-Ali: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wolf:Bayer: Honoraria; Geo Pharma: Honoraria. Hochhaus:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Maschmeyer:Celgene: Consultancy.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.280.280

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7