Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Informa UK Limited ; 2016
    In:  Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery Vol. 11, No. 11 ( 2016-11), p. 1029-1032
    In: Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 11, No. 11 ( 2016-11), p. 1029-1032
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1746-0441 , 1746-045X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2272966-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Informa UK Limited ; 2015
    In:  Expert Review of Hematology Vol. 8, No. 2 ( 2015-03-04), p. 225-235
    In: Expert Review of Hematology, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 8, No. 2 ( 2015-03-04), p. 225-235
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1747-4086 , 1747-4094
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2015
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 25, No. 1 ( 2007-01-01), p. 10-15
    Abstract: Troxacitabine is a non-natural nucleoside analog with unique structural and metabolic features. Bolus intravenous (IV) troxacitabine regimens have shown significant activity in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and preclinical data suggest that administration via continuous infusion may result in enhanced antitumor activity. Patients and Methods Patients with refractory AML initially received troxacitabine 10.1 mg/m 2 by continuous IV infusion (CIVI) for 48 hours. Infusion duration and daily dose were increased in subsequent patient cohorts. Results Forty-eight patients, median age 58 years (range, 21 to 81 years), were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities were mucositis and hand-foot syndrome, and 12.0 mg/m 2 /d for 5 days was established as the maximum-tolerated dose. Seven patients (15%) achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), with a median survival among responders of 12 months. Steady-state concentrations of troxacitabine were found to be linearly and inversely proportionally related to calculated creatinine clearance at doses of 10.1 and 12.0 mg/m 2 /d. All patients responding to troxacitabine had steady-state serum drug concentration of more than approximately 80 ng/mL. In 27 patients achieving target troxacitabine plasma concentrations (ie, approximately 80 ng/mL) the CR + CRp rate was 26%. Conclusion Troxacitabine administered as a CIVI allows a significant increase in dose-intensity in comparison to IV bolus regimens, has antileukemic activity, and warrants additional investigation in patients with refractory AML. The recommended phase II study dose is 12.0 mg/m 2 daily CIVI for 5 days.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 190, No. 6 ( 2020-09), p. 891-900
    Abstract: Leukaemic stem cells (LSC) have been experimentally defined as the leukaemia‐propagating population and are thought to be the cellular reservoir of relapse in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Therefore, LSC measurements are warranted to facilitate accurate risk stratification. Previously, we published the composition of a one‐tube flow cytometric assay, characterised by the presence of 13 important membrane markers for LSC detection. Here we present the validation experiments of the assay in several large AML research centres, both in Europe and the United States. Variability within instruments and sample processing showed high correlations between different instruments ( R pearson   〉  0·91, P   〈  0·001). Multi‐centre testing introduced variation in reported LSC percentages but was found to be below the clinical relevant threshold. Clear gating protocols resulted in all laboratories being able to perform LSC assessment of the validation set. Participating centres were nearly unanimously able to distinguish LSC high ( 〉 0·03% LSC) from LSC low ( 〈 0·03% LSC) despite inter‐laboratory variation in reported LSC percentages. This study proves that the LSC assay is highly reproducible. These results together with the high prognostic impact of LSC load at diagnosis in AML patients render the one‐tube LSC assessment a good marker for future risk classification.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Leukemia & Lymphoma, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 54, No. 4 ( 2013-04), p. 799-806
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1042-8194 , 1029-2403
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030637-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 3336-3337
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 120-120
    Abstract: Background: Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) die from relapsed disease, including those who attain complete remission (CR). Post-remission treatment designed to kill chemoresistant leukemia stem cells (LSC) and eradicate minimal residual disease (MRD) could delay or prevent relapse. The Interleukin-3 Receptor alpha chain (IL3Rα/CD123) is overexpressed on LSC and AML blasts compared to normal hematopoietic cells. CSL362 is a fully humanized anti-CD123 monoclonal antibody, engineered for greater antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) by high affinity for NK cell CD16. CSL362 has potent activity against AML cells in vitro and in mouse xenograft models. In this Phase 1 study we evaluated the safety, PK and immunogenicity of repeat doses of CSL362 as post-remission treatment for AML patients. Exploratory endpoints include effects on CD123+ normal blood cells (basophils and pDC), NK cells, levels of serum cytokines, CSL362 binding to CD123 on monocytes, and MRD. Methods: Eligibility criteria include CD123+ AML in 1st or 2nd CR /CRp, adverse risk factors (disease history, cytogenetics, molecular mutations or MRD), and no plan for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Intravenous CSL362 is given over 3 hours every 14 days x 6 doses. Final evaluation for safety is at week 16 and for remission status is at week 24. Sequential cohorts of 3 - 6 pts have been treated at 5 dose levels, from 0.3 to 9.0 mg/kg. Serum is assayed centrally for cytokines, PK and immunogenicity. Standardized whole blood biomarker assays are performed at each site by flow cytometry, and analyzed centrally. Bone marrow is sampled at baseline, weeks 5 and 12. Results: To date, 25 pts (16M, 9F) median age 66 yr (range 32-83 yr) have received 118 infusions of CSL362; 15 pts received all 6 doses, 6 pts relapsed on study, 1 pt was withdrawn for an SAE (infusion reaction); 3 pts are ongoing. Adverse events related to CSL362 in ≥ 10% of pts (CTCAE V4 grades) were infusion reactions (12 pts; 15 grade 1-2, 2 grade 3 events), increased C-reactive protein (3 pts; 4 grade 2 events), hypertension (3 pts; 6 grade 1-2, 2 grade 3 events), and hypotension (3 pts; 2 grade 2, 1 grade 3 events). There have been 3 dose limiting toxicities (1 hypertension, 2 infusion reactions), and 3 related SAEs (2 infusion reactions, 1 transient delirium). Infusion reactions have been manageable with supportive care. A protocol amendment to allow hydrocortisone premedication has been effective to prevent or reduce the severity of reactions. At follow-up ≥ 6 months from first dose, 10 of 20 evaluable pts maintained CR. Median duration of CR from start of CR and ongoing at last follow-up was 34+ weeks [range 26 – 52+ weeks]. Of 6 evaluable pts who were MRD positive at baseline, 3 converted to negative on study. Biomarker assays show rapid, complete in vivo depletion of basophils and pDC (cells that have high expression of CD123) at all dose levels, ≤ 6 hours post-dose. Depletion is sustained for ≥ 15 days at doses ≥ 3.0 mg/kg. NK cells (which do not express CD123) in blood fall transiently then recover from day 3 post-dose to ≥ baseline by day 8. CSL362 saturation of CD123 on monocytes (cells that have low CD123 expression) in vivo occurs rapidly post-dose at all dose levels and is sustained ≥ 15 days at dose levels ≥ 3.0 mg/kg. Serum CSL362 concentration demonstrated a nonlinear PK profile with slower clearance and longer half-lives at higher doses. PK profiles at doses above 3 mg/kg seem to be dose proportional. The half-life for the two higher dose levels is 4-5 days. Cytokine assays showed increased levels of GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, IL-15 and IL-1RA after the 1st dose, returning to baseline by day 8. Levels after dose 6 were lower than after the dose 1. Low level anti-CSL362 antibody titers were detected coincident with trough concentrations of CSL362 in 6 of 18 pts tested thus far, with no effects on PK or association with adverse events. Conclusion: CSL362 is safe and well tolerated in AML pts with CR/CRp and high risk of relapse. Potent, targeted ADCC of normal cells (basophils and pDC) that highly express CD123 is evident at all dose levels tested, with durable depletion at ≥ 3.0 mg/kg. At dose levels ≥ 3.0 mg/kg, saturation of CD123 on marker monocytes is durable for the inter-dose interval. These data indicate it is likely that dose levels ≥ 3.0 mg/kg are required to maximize ADCC against residual AML. A phase 2 study of CSL362 is planned. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Roboz: Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Teva Oncology: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy. Busfield:CSL Limited: Employment. Barnden:CSL Limited: Employment. Sedgmen:CSL Limited: Employment. Ghosh:CSL Limited: Employment. Hosback:CSL Limited: Employment. Davis:CSL Limited: Employment. Dyson:CSL Limited: Employment. Dasen:CSL Behring: Employment. DeWitte:CSL Behring: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bensen-Kennedy:CSL Behring: Employment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 2066-2066
    Abstract: Abstract 2066 Poster Board II-43 From 1999 to 2009, 298 adults, age 60 yrs and above, received initial induction therapy for untreated AML at Weill-Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian Hospital. Based on physician/patient preference and/or protocol eligibility, patients received either a traditional cytosine arabinoside/anthracycline-based induction regimen (n= 103) or an alternative, low-intensity regimen(n=195); either low-dose ara-C +/- arsenic trioxide (n=88) or tipifarnib +/- oral etoposide (n=107). Overall the median age was 72 yrs (range 60-89), 47% had an antecedent hematological disorder (AHD) and 42% had an unfavorable karyotype. Patients treated with low-intensity regimens were significantly older compared to those given standard induction (median age 75 vs 67 yrs) and had a higher percentage of unfavorable karyotypes (46% vs 33%). Complete remissions (CR) were achieved in 23% of patients receiving low-intensity regimens and 53% of patients treated with standard therapy. Thirty and 60 day mortality rates were 9.7% and 20.5% versus 14.5% and 25% for low-intensity and standard regimens respectively (p=0.29). Seventy two of the initial 195 patients (37%) treated with a low-intensity regimen received a second induction regimen for primary resistance or relapse; either a standard ara-C-anthracycline regimen (n=38) or a second non-intensive regimen (decitabine +/- gemtuzumab ozogamicin, low-dose ara-c, SGN-33,) (n=34). Overall 25/72 (35%) achieved a CR with salvage therapy; 16/38 CR's (42%) with standard induction and 9/34 CR's (26%) with a second low-intensity regimen. Median overall survival for all 298 patients was 6.7 months. By univariate analysis, no significant difference in survival was seen for patients initially treated with a low-intensity regimen compared to those receiving standard induction (median 6.2 vs 7.7 months; p=0.82 by log-rank test). By multivariate analysis, age over 75, prior AHD, unfavorable karyotype, ECOG performance status 〉 2, and male gender all predicted for shorter survival, whereas intensity of initial treatment did not. These results suggest that older patients with AML may receive initial therapy with a non-traditional, low-intensity induction regimen and have similar survival outcomes compared to patients given standard induction. A comparison of the quality of life of patients, as manifested by the percentage of days spent in hospital, frequency of transfusion support, and number of outpatient visits, will be presented. Death due to resistant disease remains the major problem for older patients with AML Disclosures: Off Label Use: arsenic trioxide to be used to enhance the effects of low-dose ara-C as part of a clinical trial.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 2805-2805
    Abstract: There is no adequate therapy for advanced MDS and elderly AML and treatment outcomes are generally poor. LDAC in elderly AML patients using a variety of dosing schedules results in a CR rate of approximately 20% and possibly improved morbidity and mortality compared to conventional chemotherapy or supportive care. In MDS patients, the CR rates with LDAC are lower, 10–20%, with short duration and no clear benefit over supportive care. On the basis of preclinical data suggesting a possible anti-angiogenic effect of ATO, as well as clinical data showing activity of ATO in MDS, a phase I/II trial of ATO in combination with LDAC was initiated in IPSS-2 MDS and newly-diagnosed, poor-prognosis AML patients. ATO was given at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg for days 1–5 and 8–12. LDAC was dose-escalated from 5 mg/m2 SC BID to the target phase II dose of 10 mg/m2 SC BID for days 1–14 (one treatment cycle). Patients who achieved CR after one treatment cycle were given a second, identical cycle, followed by maintenance treatment of 5 days of LDAC and 2 days of ATO every 28 days. Patients who did not achieve CR after one cycle were given a second cycle beginning between days 21–28, with the addition of ascorbic acid 1g IV within 30 minutes of the ATO infusion. Fifty-seven patients have been enrolled to date, 34 with AML and 23 with MDS. A total of 28 AML and 16 MDS patients are evaluable for response, 38 of whom were treated with the target dose of LDAC. There were no responses in patients treated with less than the target dose. Clinical characteristics of the 28 AML patients include: mean age 75 yrs (range 55–85 yrs; one patient & lt; 60 yrs with AML and multiple medical comorbidities was included); 18 (64%) abnormal cytogenetics; 18 (64%) antecedent hematologic disorder; 4 (14%) secondary disease. CR was achieved in 11 patients (39%), with follow-up 1–8+ mos. Six patients (55%) required 2 treatment cycles to achieve CR. Of the total 34 AML patients, 4 (12%) died of progressive disease prior to day 30 and 1 (3%) died of neutropenic sepsis. Clinical characteristics of the 16 evaluable IPSS-2 MDS patients include: mean age 70 yrs (range 56–84 yrs); 11 (69%) abnormal cytogenetics; 2 (1%) prior therapy with 5-azacytidine. CR was achieved in 4 (25%) patients, follow-up 1–11+ mos. One patient required 2 treatment cycles to achieve CR; there were no therapy related deaths. The regimen was generally well-tolerated, with minimal grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity and no significant nausea, emesis, diarrhea or mucositis. Alopecia was not seen. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was, as predicted, observed in all patients. Fluid retention occurred in 21/34 (62%) of patients. There were no clinically significant drug-related arrhythmias. For AML patients, the combination of ATO and LDAC resulted in a CR rate comparable to conventional chemotherapy, with improved tolerability and induction mortality. Further investigation of this regimen is warranted in both MDS and AML.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 6-7
    Abstract: Introduction: RARA-positive (RARA+) AML patients represent a subset of non-APL AML characterized by high RARA expression levels, which can be identified by a novel blood-based biomarker test that predicts sensitivity to SY-1425, an oral selective RARα agonist (McKeown, Cancer Discovery 2017; Vigil, ESH 2017). Approximately 30% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients are RARA+, similar to the prevalence in newly diagnosed (ND) unfit AML (Vigil, ESH 2017). Evidence of synergistic activity of SY-1425 with azacitidine (aza) in preclinical models supported clinical development of the combination (McKeown, Haematologica 2018), which is currently being evaluated in RARA+ R/R AML and ND unfit AML (NCT02807558). Early data of SY-1425 in combination with aza demonstrated a high CR rate and a rapid onset of response in RARA+ ND unfit AML (Cook, ASH 2018; de Botton, ESH 2019), supporting evaluation of the combination in a RARA+ R/R cohort. Initial data for the RARA+ R/R AML cohort are presented here. Methods: RARA+ R/R AML patients enrolled on the trial received aza at 75 mg/m2 IV/SC daily on days 1-7 followed by SY-1425 at 6 mg/m2/day PO in divided doses twice daily on days 8-28 of each 28-day cycle. Objectives included characterization of activity by overall response rate (ORR) per IWG criteria, characterization of composite complete response rate, time to response, overall survival (OS), and evaluation of safety. Results: A total of 28 patients were treated, with data available through 27 May 2020 reported here. Baseline characteristics included 13 (46%) male, median age 74 (30-87), and 12 (43%) with marrow blasts & gt; 30%. Patients were heavily pretreated with 12 (43%) having received 3 or more prior regimens, including 19 (68%) with prior HMA and/or venetoclax treatment; 17 (61%) with prior HMA; and 9 (32%) with prior venetoclax in combination with HMA or LDAC. Nine (32%) patients were reported as both HMA and venetoclax naïve. Two (7%) had received prior allogenic stem cell transplant. Time on treatment was up to 6.5 months. 17 (61%) patients had discontinued treatment, most commonly due to progressive/resistant disease (29%). Among the 20 response-evaluable patients, the ORR was 20% with 4 pts having an IWG response; 3 (15%) attaining a CRi, all at the first response assessment at Cycle 2 Day 1, and 1 (5%) achieving MLFS at Cycle 3 Day 1. Two patients discontinued treatment approximately 1 month after initial response and the other 2 responders (1 CRi and 1 MLFS) continued treatment. Of those who did not achieve an IWG response, 7 (35%) achieved reductions in bone marrow blasts ≥25% not meeting criteria for IWG response, 8 (40%) had stable disease, and 1 (5%) had disease progression. Median OS for all treated patients (n=28) was 5.9 months (95% CI: 3.8, NE). The AE profile of the combination is consistent with that previously reported for single-agent SY-1425 or aza in AML. Most common AEs (all grades/causality) included nausea (39%), constipation (29%), pyrexia (29%), and fatigue, hypertriglyceridemia, diarrhea and vomiting (25% each). Hematologic AEs ≥ grade 3 included thrombocytopenia (18%), anemia (18%), febrile neutropenia (14%) and neutropenia (7%). The majority of non-hematologic AEs were low grade. The most frequent SAEs included febrile neutropenia, pyrexia and sepsis (11% each). Conclusions: SY-1425 in combination with aza was generally well-tolerated with clinical responses observed in this heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory AML population. The early OS estimate is encouraging, especially given the prevalence of HMA +/- venetoclax prior treatment in the study population. SY-1425 in combination with aza shows potential as a novel regimen for the treatment of RARA+ R/R AML. Disclosures Stein: Celgene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Biotheryx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cluzeau:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Consultancy; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liesveld:Onconova: Other: data safety monitoring board; Abbvie: Honoraria. Rousselot:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rizzieri:Mustang: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acrobiotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Braun:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Servier: Research Funding. Bixby:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Roboz:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy. Kelly:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Volkert:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhou:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Incyte: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Kang-Fortner:Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Roth:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages