Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 29, No. 6 ( 2011-02-20), p. 674-681
    Abstract: Chemotherapy in AL (primary or light chain) amyloidosis is associated with improved survival, but its effect on renal outcome has not been examined systematically. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on clinical outcome among patients with renal AL amyloidosis. Patients and Methods We evaluated factors influencing survival among 923 patients with renal AL amyloidosis observed during a 21-year period, including 221 patients who became dialysis dependent. Factors associated with renal outcome were analyzed, including serum free light chain (FLC) response to chemotherapy using a simple subtraction formula applicable to all stages of chronic kidney disease. Patient survival and graft survival were analyzed in 21 renal transplantation recipients. Results Median survival from diagnosis for the whole cohort was 35.2 months. Magnitude of FLC response with chemotherapy was strongly and independently associated with overall survival (P 〈 .001) and renal outcome. Evaluable patients achieving more than 90% FLC response had a significantly higher rate of renal responses and lower rate of renal progression compared with patients achieving a 50% to 90% response, whose renal outcomes were, in turn, better than patients achieving less than 50% FLC response (P 〈 .001). Median survival from dialysis dependence was 39.0 months, and median survival from renal transplantation was 89.0 months. Conclusion Renal outcome and overall outcome in AL amyloidosis are strongly associated with FLC response to chemotherapy and are best among patients achieving more than 90% suppression of the amyloidogenic monoclonal component. Survival on dialysis was substantially superior to that previously reported, and renal transplantation should be considered in selected patients with AL amyloidosis with end-stage renal disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 745-745
    Abstract: Abstract 745 The treatment of AL amyloidosis has evolved rapidly over the last few years. The role of autologous stem cell transplantation is controversial and oral combination chemotherapy is often the treatment of first choice. The optimal induction regime is not uniformly agreed upon although some consider oral Mel-Dex as the current “standard of care”. We report our large experience with both Mel-Dex and CTD as upfront treatment for AL amyloidosis in a comparative retrospective study and compare these findings with those of our smaller prospective randomized trial (UKATT), also to be presented as this meeting, using the same treatment regimens (Gillmore et al). Patients treated with Mel-Dex and CTD as first-line treatment between 2002–2009 were identified from the database of the UK National Amyloidosis Centre, London. Organ involvement and responses were assessed according to international consensus criteria (Gertz et al, 2005). The results are summarised below. Our CTD experience has previously been reported at this Congress (Gibbs et al, 2008). A total of 58 patients received Mel-Dex and 122 patients received CTD as upfront therapy. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different in terms of median number of organs involved (by both consensus criteria and 123I labelled serum amyloid P component (SAP) scintigraphy), cardiac involvement, creatinine clearances (CrCl) 〈 30ml/min, and NT-ProBNP levels. The Mel-Dex group was an older population, and there was a trend that their CrCl was lower at diagnosis. The median number of cycles administered for both treatments was 5 (range 1–15). More patients presenting with neurological involvement were treated with Mel-Dex. The clonal response rates between the two regimens were not significantly different. The median time to best serum free light chain response (FLC) response for CTD was 2 months (range 1–5 months) versus 3 months for Mel-Dex (range 1–7). At 12 months, organ responses were observed in 44/113 (39%) patients treated with CTD compared to 12/56 (21%) patients treated with Mel-Dex (p = 0.03). Most Mel-Dex responses were renal. The median follow-up is 19 months and the median time to clonal progression was not reached in either group. There was no significant difference in the estimated overall survival at 3 years. Toxicity of any grade was reported by 76% of Mel-Dex patients and 84% of CTD patients (p=0.30). The commonest severe toxicity in both groups was fluid retention. In conclusion, this is the largest comparative series of oral Mel-Dex and CTD in AL amyloidosis. Both regimes are not significantly different in terms of complete (CR) and overall response (OR) rates, toxicity, time to clonal progression or overall survival. There is a suggestion that time to best FLC responses with Mel-Dex is slower than CTD (3 vs 2 months). These results concur with the results of our prospective UKATT trial. Mel-Dex has the disadvantages of being a stem cell toxic regimen, requiring dose adjustment in renal failure. CTD is a reasonable alternative to Mel-Dex in the treatment of AL amyloidosis and a large international randomized prospective trial should be considered. Patient Characteristics at DiagnosisMel-DexCTDp-valueNumber of patients58122Median age (years)7264 〈 0.0001 Males (%)7146Lambda FLC excess (%)7175Abnormal SAP scintigraphy (%)9185Median number organs involved22Median NT Pro-BNP (pmol/L)1241740.84 Median Creatinine (umol/L)9392Median CrCl (ml/min)59730.07 CrCl 〈 30ml/min1415Organs Involved (% patients)Kidney8677Cardiac4748Nervous System3316Liver1018Gastrointestinal107Soft Tissue3119Treatment ResponsesFLC CR, n (%)14/45 (31%)36/96 (38%)FLC PR, n (%)20/45 (44%)40/96 (42%)Overall CR10/56 (18%)28/117 (24%)0.48 Overall PR28/56 (50%)46/117 (39%)Overall Response38/56 (68%)74/117 (63%)0.67 Organ responses12/56 (21%)44/113 (39%)0.03 Renal organ responses11/50 (22%)35/96 (36%)0.11 Median time to FLC PR (months)21Median time to best FLC response (months)32Toxicity, any grade44/58 (76%)102/122 (84%)0.30 Overall survival at 3 years44/57 (77%)90/122 (74%)NS Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off-label use of thalidomide.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2013
    In:  European Journal of Clinical Investigation Vol. 43, No. 12 ( 2013-12), p. 1372-1372
    In: European Journal of Clinical Investigation, Wiley, Vol. 43, No. 12 ( 2013-12), p. 1372-1372
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0014-2972 , 1365-2362
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004971-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: American Heart Journal, Elsevier BV, Vol. 164, No. 1 ( 2012-7), p. 72-79
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-8703
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003210-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: The American Journal of Pathology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 179, No. 4 ( 2011-10), p. 1978-1987
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-9440
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1480207-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2009
    In:  Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology Vol. 6, No. 10 ( 2009-10), p. 608-617
    In: Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 6, No. 10 ( 2009-10), p. 608-617
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1759-5045 , 1759-5053
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2493729-0
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 1733-1733
    Abstract: Risk-adapted oral regimen of cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) was previously reported by our group to be highly effective in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. However, the numbers were small with limited long-term follow-up. We now report the use of this regimen in a much larger series of 202 patients with prolonged follow-up. All patients treated with CTD between 2002 – 2008 were identified from the database of the UK National Amyloidosis Centre, London. Organ involvement and response was assessed according to international consensus criteria (Gertz et al, 2005). The course of amyloid deposits was quantified by serial I123 labelled serum amyloid P component (SAP) scintigraphy and has been reported separately. Survival was assessed by the method of Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analysis was by Cox regression. Males accounted for 58% of patients, and the light chain excess was predominately lambda (72%). Renal involvement was seen in 150 patients (75%), cardiac in 95 (47%), hepatic in 36 (15%), peripheral and/or autonomic nerve involvement in 30 (15%), pulmonary in 4 (2%), gastrointestinal tract in 15 (7%), and soft tissue in 56 (28%). Abnormalities in SAP scintigraphy were seen in 170 patients (84%). Median number of organs involved was 2. Full dose CTD was administered to 139 (69%) patients while 63 (31%) received the dose attenuated regimen. 123 (61%) patients received this chemotherapy as first line treatment. The median number of cycles delivered was 5 (range 1–15). A hematologic response occurred in 120 (62%) of 193 evaluable patients. Complete responses (CR) were seen in 49 patients (25%), near complete response (nCR) in 5 (3%) and partial responses (PR) in 66 (34%) cases. 67% of newly diagnosed and 54% of relapsed cases responded. There was no significant difference in the CR rates between newly diagnosed and relapsed cases (29 vs. 27%). Organ responses were observed in 50/120 (42%) patients - renal in 40/87 patients (46%), hepatic in 6/21 (29%), nerve in 2/16 (13%), cardiac in 4/53 (8%), gastrointestinal in 2/8 (25%), and soft tissue involvement in 7/37 (19%). Improvements on SAP scintigraphy were noted in 42 patients (21%) post-treatment. The median follow-up was 20 months (range 1 – 69 months). Median estimated overall survival (OS) from commencement of treatment and from diagnosis was 42 months and 83 months respectively. At 60 months, the median survival has not been reached for patients achieving a CR, 50 months for PR and 33 months for non-responders. There was no significant difference in OS from commencement of treatment if the patient was previously treated or not (41 vs 45 months respectively, p = 0.75). Among 120 responders, 51 patients (43%) relapsed. Median estimated time to clonal relapse (PFS) was 32 months. The PFS was 33 months for patients without prior treatment and 25 months for those treated for relapsed disease (p = 0.69). Toxicity of any grade was reported by 171 (85%) patients and was ≥ grade 3 in 21%. The commonest severe toxicity was fluid retention. Treatment-related mortality was 3%. In conclusion, this large study confirms that risk adapted CTD has comparable efficacy with other reported oral regimes, namely melphalan-dexamethasone, for the treatment of AL amyloidosis. High rates and durable clonal responses were frequently accompanied by organ responses. Treatment related mortality was low. CTD in an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis and those whose clonal dyscrasias have relapsed. It has the advantages of being stem cell sparing and not requiring dose adjustment in cases of advanced renal failure. Figure Figure
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 1863-1863
    Abstract: Abstract 1863 Poster Board I-888 The role of thalidomide maintenance has been the subject of much debate in the setting of multiple myeloma, however its use in AL amyloidosis has not been previously reported. We report our experience with thalidomide maintenance in patients who had previously received risk adapted cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone chemotherapy (CTD) for the treatment of AL amyloidosis, specifically examining its relationship to clonal response, time to clonal progression, overall survival and toxicity. All patients who achieved either a partial (PR) or complete response (CR) to CTD between 2002 – 2008 were identified from the database of the UK National Amyloidosis Centre, London and included in this study. Clonal and organ involvement and responses were assessed according to international consensus criteria for AL amyloidosis (Gertz et al, 2005). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by the method of Kaplan-Meier (KM) both for patients who did and did not receive thalidomide maintenance after a clonal response to CTD. PFS was defined as time to clonal progression after commencement of CTD. Thalidomide maintenance was defined as ongoing treatment with single agent thalidomide after CTD. The total number of patients achieving a clonal response to CTD was 108. Thalidomide maintenance was administered to 25 patients (23%), including 6 patients (24%) with symptomatic myeloma. Of these 25 patients, males accounted for 40%. The median age was 60 years (range 42–77). Median number of organs with AL amyloidosis involved was 2. Before thalidomide maintenance, 11 patients had achieved a CR with CTD (44%) and 14 had achieved a PR (56%). The median number of cycles of CTD administered before thalidomide maintenance was 4.5 (range 1 – 7). The median dose of thalidomide administered as maintenance treatment was 50mg daily (range 50mg alternate days to 200mg daily). The median length of maintenance was 10 months (range 1–70 months). Toxicity was the most common reason for cessation of maintenance treatment. After thalidomide maintenance, only 2/14 patients had an improvement in clonal response (14%). One patient had converted a near complete remission (nCR) to CR and another had converted a serum free light chain (FLC) PR to an FLC CR, but without a whole paraprotein response. Clonal progression was seen in 3/25 (12%) patients during thalidomide maintenance treatment, with another 7 patients relapsing after thalidomide was ceased (10 patients (40%) in total). Organ responses were seen in 3 patients - 2 cardiac and one liver - however these patients were already in a clonal CR after CTD treatment before thalidomide maintenance. 19 patients had stable organ involvement with AL amyloidosis. Organ disease progression was seen in 3 patients. Grade 2 or greater toxicity was reported in 18/25 patients (72%) with neuropathy the most common symptom, reported in 10/25 (40%) patients. All but one patient experienced new onset neuropathy after 10 months of thalidomide maintenance. The median follow-up of the thalidomide maintenance patients was 27 months (range 8–71 months). The median KM estimated OS was not reached for patients who either received CTD alone or with thalidomide maintenance. The median PFS was 33 months for patients treated with CTD alone, whereas this had not yet been reached for those treated with thalidomide maintenance (log rank p = 0.55). In conclusion, thalidomide maintenance after CTD in AL amyloidosis is associated with a high rate of additional toxicity (72%) with only minor improvements in clonal responses (14%) and no improvement in overall survival. There is a suggestion that thalidomide maintenance may delay clonal progression however. The optimal dose for thalidomide maintenance is unknown. While this study is small, we suggest that thalidomide should not be routinely used as maintenance therapy in AL amyloidosis. In selected patients who achieve a good clonal response to CTD and tolerate this chemotherapy well, there may be an argument for thalidomide maintenance if a prolongation in PFS is desired. Agents with less toxicity such as lenalidomide might be preferable and need to be further examined in the maintenance setting. Patients with CTD only Patients with CTD and thalidomide maintenance Number patients 83 25 Males 63% 40% CR at end of CTD 41% 44% Median PFS 33 months Not yet reached Further clonal response with thal maintenance NA 14% Grade 2 + toxicity with thal maintenance NA 72% Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off-label use of thalidomide.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 2869-2869
    Abstract: Abstract 2869 Poster Board II-845 Introduction: Risk adapted CTD, oral MD and high dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) (in selected cases) have emerged as important frontline treatments in AL amyloidosis. We report the interim results of a randomised prospective pilot study designed to estimate response rates and test feasibility of two randomisations using these treatments for patients with newly-diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis. The final analysis is due in October 2009 and final full study results will be presented at the meeting. Patients and methods: The trial recruited for 14 months from January 2008 in the UK. Twenty four patients each were planned to enter a high intensity (SCT versus CTD) or a low intensity randomization (MD versus CTD) respectively, depending on suitability for SCT. Eligibility for the high-intensity arm was deliberately stringent in order to minimize risk of transplant-related mortality. Primary endpoints were haematologic response by free light chain assay (measured at each cycle with landmark assessments at 3 and 7 months), safety and recruitment rate. A myeloma quality of life (QOL) questionnaire was piloted in the absence of a disease-specific questionnaire for AL amyloidosis at baseline and 7 months post randomisation. Results: The high intensity arm was closed early due to lack of recruitment, mostly from clinical ineligibility and no further results from this arm are reported. The low intensity arm successfully recruited the required 24 patients (12 in each group). Median (range) age at randomization was 66 (42-85) years and stratification was by ECOG performance status which ranged from 0 to 3 (21%, 33%, 33% and 13% of patients respectively). 24 (100%) and 16 (67%) patients have response assessments (or are not evaluable) at 3 months and 7 months respectively at the time of submission. One patient in each arm died and one patient in the MD arm withdrew prior to the 3 month assessment. Overall haematological response rate at 3 months (at least a PR) was similar between the two arms; 9 (75.0% (95% Confidence Interval 43% to 95%)) in the CTD arm versus 8 (66.7% (95% CI 35% to 90%)) in the MD arm. At 3 months, CR was achieved in 7 (58.3% (95% CI 28% to 85%)) CTD and 3 (25.0% (95% CI 6% to 57%)) MD patients. Final response data at 7 months will be presented at the meeting. Median (range) time to achieve at least a PR from commencement of chemotherapy was 88 (34-218) and 95 (74-133) days in the CTD and MD groups respectively. To date, 17 of the 24 patients have reached their maximal clonal response (10 CTD, 7 MD patients), two patients died before achieving maximal response and one patient is not evaluable as they withdrew prior to the first response assessment. 4 patients could still achieve maximal response once 7 month follow up is completed. Of those currently evaluable for a maximal response, 8 (80%) CTD patients had CR versus 3 (43%) MD patients and 1 (1%) CTD patient had PR compared with 4 (57%) MD patients. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. Seventeen of 24 (71%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicities during chemotherapy (10 CTD patients (83%) versus 7 MD patients (58%)) though only 9 were classified as trial medication related SAEs (serious adverse events) which appeared to be similar in each arm - 5 CTD versus 4 MD. Lethargy (n=6), worsening congestive heart failure/fluid overload (n=5), infections (n=7) and pain (n=4) were the most common grade 3/4 toxicities, again with no noticeable differences between the treatment groups. The EORTC QLQ-MY20 myeloma QOL questionnaire appeared valid for use in AL amyloidosis patients and showed comparable QOL among both groups. Conclusions: Randomisation to SCT versus combination chemotherapy is not feasible using the current criteria in the UK. These interim results suggest that CTD may compare favourably with MD with possible higher early CR rates with CTD. There is a general perception that CTD has greater toxicity than MD but in this study there was no evidence of increased SAEs in either group and the QOL was comparable. Further comparison of CTD and MD is warranted in a large phase III randomized trial, but in order to be feasible would require international collaboration. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off label use of thalidomide.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 1791-1791
    Abstract: Abstract 1791 Poster Board I-817 N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT Pro-BNP) is a cardiac biomarker that is used as a prognostic marker at diagnosis in AL amyloidosis and has been reported to change serially following treatment, in line with clonal responses. With our Italian colleagues, we recently reported that changes in NT Pro-BNP post chemotherapy have marked prognostic significance – patients who do not achieve a 30% decrease having worse outcomes. We now report a transient post chemotherapy rise in NT Pro-BNP as a new phenomenon and assess its significance, relating it to renal and cardiac function and to assess whether this phenomenon impacts on the rate of relapse or outcome. Patients with systemic AL amyloidosis who received upfront treatment with either oral cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD) or oral melphalan-dexamethasone (Mel-Dex), with a creatinine clearance of 〉 30 ml/min and who achieved a complete serum free light chain response were identified from the database of the UK National Amyloidosis Centre. NT pro-BNP levels alongside renal and cardiac function were analysed at the 0, 6 and 12 months after commencement of chemotherapy. A total of 51 such patients identified. CTD was administered to 42 of these patients, Mel-Dex to the remaining 9 patients. A rise in NT Pro-BNP from baseline was seen in 36 (71%) patients at 6 months. The median NT pro-BNP increased from a baseline of 106pmol/L at 0 months to 194pmol/L at 6 months (median increase of 163pmol/L; p = 0.0001). A subsequent fall in their NT Pro-BNP levels was seen at 12 months in 33 (92%) of these patients to a median NT Pro-BNP value of 92pmol/L (median fall 157pmol/L; p = 〈 0.0001). In 21 (64%) patients, the fall was to below diagnostic levels. There was no significant rise in the creatinine at six months (p=0.439), suggesting that the rise in NT Pro-BNP was not due to a change in the renal function. None of the patients showed a significant change in the left ventricular wall thickness, systolic or diastolic function on echocardiography at 6 months. There was no difference in the rate of NT Pro-BNP rise when comparing the treatments received: 6/9 (67%) of Mel-Dex treated patients and 30/42 (71%) CTD treated patients experienced this NT Pro-BNP rise at six months. At a median follow-up of 29 months, there was no difference in the overall survival and the rate of clonal relapse was identical (44%) for patients who did and did not have an NT Pro-BNP rise at 6 months. In conclusion, this series clearly shows that NT Pro-BNP values can rise transiently in the immediate post chemotherapy period in nearly three-quarters of patients with a complete FLC response. The exact mechanism for this is unclear. This rise is not associated with decline in cardiac function on echocardiography nor is it related to worsening renal function. It does not impact the rate of clonal relapse or overall survival. Given that fluid retention is a known side effect of thalidomide in amyloidosis, one could speculate that thalidomide could cause this transient rise in NT Pro-BNP. However, there was no difference in the percentage number of patients with a rise in NT Pro-BNP between the CTD and Mel-Dex groups (although numbers were very small in the latter group). Further data is needed for non-thalidomide based regimes to assess if this effect is seen to the same extent. This important but transient phenomenon can confound interpretation of treatment response. Immediate post treatment values should be reviewed carefully prior to being used for assessment of organ function or to be used as basis of treatment decisions. Disclosures Off Label Use: Off-label use of thalidomide.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages