Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Elsevier BV, Vol. 115, No. 1 ( 2023-01), p. 93-102
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0360-3016
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500486-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 502-502
    Abstract: 502 Background: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) has been the mainstay for DCIS treatment. Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) has often been recommended based on multiple randomized clinical trials (RCT). However, these studies have failed to identify subsets of patients who did or did not benefit from adjuvant RT/ET therapy after BCS. We evaluated the association of a 7-gene predictive DCIS biosignature (PreludeDx, Laguna Hills, CA) to assess the impact of ET on 10-yr ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk after BCS alone or with RT. Methods: DCISionRT with integrated Residual Risk subtype (RRt) reported a decision score (DS) and three risk groups, a) Low Risk (DS≤2.8), b) Elevated Risk (DS 〉 2.8 without RRt) and c) Residual Risk (DS 〉 2.8 with RRt). DCISionRT/RRt was evaluated in 926 patients from 4 cohorts who were treated with BCS alone or with RT/ET. The three risk groups were assessed for 10-yr total (invasive and in situ) IBR risk by Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival analysis. Results: DCISionRT/RRt classified 338 (37%) women as Low Risk, 399 (43%) as Elevated Risk, and 189 (20%) as Residual Risk. Overall, patients treated with ET had a significantly lower 10-yr IBR risk in multivariable analysis independent of RT (HR = 0.55, p = 0.033). In the Low Risk group treated with BCS without RT, the average 10-yr IBR risk was 5.6% (95% CI 2.5-12.1%, n = 124) and was not significantly different with vs without ET (p = 0.33). The 10-yr IBR risk after BCS alone was 22.6% in the Elevated Risk group and 50.3% in the Residual Risk group. Compared to BCS alone, the 10-year IBR risk tended to be lower in patients prescribed ET without RT in the Elevated (11.6%, 95% CI 3.9-32%) and Residual (15.4%, 95% CI 4.1-49%) Risk groups. 10-yr IBR risk was not significantly reduced by RT within the Low Risk group (p = 0.7) but was significantly reduced to 6.3% (95% CI 3.4-12%) by RT within the Elevated Risk (HR = 0.2, p 〈 0.001) and to 12.5% (95% CI 6.4-23%) within the Residual Risk (HR = 0.2, p 〈 0.001) groups. 10-yr IBR risk was significantly higher after RT in the Residual (HR = 2.5, p = 0.013) vs. Elevated Risk groups. After BCS and RT, there was no significant reduction in 10-yr IBR risk for those treated with vs without ET in the Elevated (p = 0.22) and Residual (p = 0.87) risk groups. Conclusions: The DCISionRT/RRt biosignature demonstrated prognostic and predictive RT response in Elevated and Residual Risk patients. Consistent with prior RCT data, ET was associated with lower 10-yr IBR risk overall, and within the DCISionRT Elevated and Residual Risk groups without RT. However, neither ET nor RT were asssociated with significant risk reduction in the Low Risk group. There was no added benefit of ET in the Elevated and Residual Risk groups after BCS+RT; the Residual Risk group patients still had a high IBR risk after RT.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 83, No. 5_Supplement ( 2023-03-01), p. P1-04-06-P1-04-06
    Abstract: Background: HER2-positive versus HER2-negative ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been associated with an increased risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT). In recognition of this, the NASBP-B43 trial was designed to determine if two doses of trastuzumab would improve local control with BCS plus RT in HER2-positive DCIS. The trial demonstrated a non-statistically significant advantage with the addition of trastuzumab in reducing ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR). The predictive 7-gene DCIS biosignature, DCISionRT with Residual Risk Subtype (PreludeDxTM, Laguna Hills, CA) has been shown to classify DCIS patients into two distinct groups of patients with substantially different rates of IBR following BCS plus RT. Based upon these differences in outcome, we assessed the IBR rate in patients with HER2(+) DCIS treated with BCS and RT who were or were not in the Residual Risk Subtype group defined using DCISionRT, while accounting for the varying clinicopathologic profile of the patients. Materials & Methods: DCISionRT was evaluated in a subset of 178 women with HER2(+) DCIS treated with BCS and RT as part of a multinational cohort of 926 patients from the United States, Sweden, and Australia, who were used in the validation studies for DCISionRT. Central pathology review and biosignature testing were performed at a CLIA-certified lab (Laguna Hills, CA). HER2(+) DCIS was defined as patients with a HER2(3+) immunohistochemistry & gt;10% per ASCO/CAP guidelines. The IBR rate was calculated for the overall group of HER2(+) patients and those in the Residual Risk group. Individual patient outcome and biosignature results were analyzed using Kaplan Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard analyses. Results: The biosignature classified 113 of the 178 (63%) HER2(+) women into the Residual Risk group (DS & gt;2.8 with RRt). Patients in the Residual Risk group had a significantly greater IBR (HR=8.3; 95%CI: 1.1,50, p=.012) over 10-years, with a corresponding 10-year total IBR rate of 16.2% (95%CI: 9.7%, 26.5%) versus 1.6% (95%CI: 0.2%, 10.9%) for all other HER2(+) patients. In univariate analysis, younger patients tended to have higher IBR rate after BCS plus RT, but only Residual Risk was significantly associated with IBR rate after BCS plus RT. Moreover, multivariable analysis demonstrated that the Residual Risk group was eight times more likely to recur after BCS and RT, while clinicopathologic factors (age, grade, tumor size) were not associated with higher IBR rates. Conclusion: The DCISionRT Residual Risk group was predictive for 10-year IBR risk after BCS plus RT in women with HER2(+) DCIS. Approximately 40% of patients with HER2(+) DCIS would be expected to achieve low rates of recurrence with BCS and RT, while about 60% of these women (classified in the Residual Risk group) would have higher recurrence rates and may benefit from further therapy, such as HER2-directed therapies. These findings suggest that if the results of the B43 trial were re-analyzed using the predictive 7-gene biosignature (DCISionRT with Residual Risk Subtype), better clarity could be gained on the true impact of trastuzumab on IBR rates in patients with HER2(+) DCIS and the patients most likely to benefit from this additional therapy. Table 1. Univariate and Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Analyses. Citation Format: Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Rachel Rabinovitch, Pat Whitworth, Julie A. Margenthaler, Brian J. Czerniecki, DAVID J. DABBS, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Wärnberg, jess Savala, Steven C. Shivers, Karuna Mittal, Troy Bremer. Characterization of recurrence risk after lumpectomy and radiotherapy in HER2-positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, using 7-gene predictive biosignature: Implications for the NSABP-B43 trial results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-06.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 1986
    In:  Seminars in Nuclear Medicine Vol. 16, No. 4 ( 1986-10), p. 306-336
    In: Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 16, No. 4 ( 1986-10), p. 306-336
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0001-2998
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 1986
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2133379-8
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Walter de Gruyter GmbH ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Perinatal Medicine Vol. 48, No. 9 ( 2020-11-26), p. 1013-1016
    In: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Vol. 48, No. 9 ( 2020-11-26), p. 1013-1016
    Abstract: COVID-19 pandemic is changing profoundly the obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) academic clinical learning environment in many different ways. Rapid developments affecting our learners, patients, faculty and staff require unprecedented collaboration and quick, deeply consequential readjustments, almost on a daily basis. We summarized here our experiences, opportunities, challenges and lessons learned and outline how to move forward. The COVID-19 pandemic taught us there is a clear need for collaboration in implementing the most current evidence-based medicine, rapidly assess and improve the everchanging healthcare environment by problem solving and “how to” instead of “should we” approach. In addition, as a community with very limited resources we have to rely heavily on internal expertise, ingenuity and innovation. The key points to succeed are efficient and timely communication, transparency in decision making and reengagement. As time continues to pass, it is certain that more lessons will emerge.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1619-3997 , 0300-5577
    Language: English
    Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467968-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 133, No. 3 ( 2019-03), p. 484-491
    Abstract: To estimate whether routine use of intravenous oxytocin decreases the frequency of interventions to control excess blood loss during dilation and evacuation (D & E). METHODS: In this multisite, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, women undergoing D & E at 18–24 weeks of gestation received 30 units of oxytocin in 500 mL of intravenous fluid or 500 mL of intravenous fluid alone initiated on speculum placement. The primary outcome was the frequency of interventions to control excess bleeding. A sample size of 75 patients per group was needed to detect a 15% decrease in intervention from 20% to 5% with 80% power and two-sided alpha 0.05. Secondary outcomes included measured blood loss, complications, procedure duration, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: From November 2014 to February 2018, we screened 337 women and randomized 160 to receive prophylactic oxytocin (n=82) or placebo (n=78). Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. The frequency of interventions for bleeding, our primary outcome, was 7.3% in the oxytocin group vs 16.7% in the placebo group, difference of 9.4% (95% CI −21.0% to 1.9%). Interventions primarily included uterine massage and uterotonic administration. Among our secondary outcomes, median measured blood loss was lower in the oxytocin group at 152 (interquartile range 98–235) mL vs 317 (interquartile range 168–464) mL (95% CI 71.6–181.5). Frequency of hemorrhage, defined as blood loss of 500 mL or more and 1,000 mL or more, was lower in the oxytocin group at 3.7% vs 21.8%, difference of 18% (95% CI −29 to −6.9%) and 1.2% vs 10.3%, difference of 9.0% (95% CI −17 to −0.7%), respectively. Procedures were shorter in the oxytocin group at a median of 11.0 (interquartile range 8.0–14.0) vs 13.5 (interquartile range 10.0–19.0) minutes in the placebo group (95% CI 1.0–4.0). We found no differences in the frequency of nonhemorrhage complications, pain scores, or satisfaction scores between groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic use of oxytocin during D & E at 18–24 weeks of gestation did not decrease the frequency of interventions to control bleeding. However, oxytocin did decrease blood loss and frequency of hemorrhage. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02083809.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0029-7844
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2012791-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 83, No. 5_Supplement ( 2023-03-01), p. PD15-07-PD15-07
    Abstract: Background: Prognostic and predictive tools are needed to optimize treatment for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). While radiotherapy (RT) is standard of care for DCIS after breast conserving surgery (BCS), those at low-risk for ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk may be treated without RT. Low-risk has been defined as the absence of high risk clinicopathologic (CP) factors, including larger ( & gt;2 cm), palpable, or high nuclear grade (NG) tumors, and younger age ( & lt; 50 yrs). However, prospective trials have failed to identify low risk patients (pts) who do not clinically benefit from RT after BCS (RTOG 9804). DCISionRT® (PreludeDxTM, CA) is a 7-gene predictive biosignature providing a validated score (DS) to assess the 10-yr IBR risk and RT benefit, using individual tumor biology and CP factors. This study assessed total 10-yr IBR rates, RT benefit, and number needed to treat (NNT) for risk groups defined by biosignature and CP criteria. Methods: DCIS patients (n=926) from four international cohorts (median follow up 8.5 yrs, 1-3rd quartile 5.8 – 10.2 yrs) treated with BCS (negative margins), with (n=641) and without RT (n=335), had formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues analyzed at a CLIA lab (PreludeDx, Laguna Hills, CA) for DCISionRT with a Residual Risk subtype (RRt). A biosignature Low Risk group (DS≤2.8 without RRt) was contrasted to a High Risk group comprising Elevated Risk (DS & gt;2.8 without RRt) and Residual Risk (DS & gt;2.8 with RRt) groups. Low-risk CP groups were RTOG 9804-like (NG1-2, non-palpable, negative margins, screening detected) or (age & gt;50 and NG 1-2). Total 10-yr IBR rates were evaluated using Cox Proportional Hazards and Kaplan Meier analysis by treatment, biosignature and CP risk groups. NNT was determined with 10-yr IBR rate differences with RT. Results: The biosignature classified 37% (n=338) of women as Low Risk and 63% (n=588) as High Risk. Among women who did not receive RT, biosignature Low Risk pts had lower IBR than biosignature High Risk pts (5.6% vs. 25.7%, p & lt;.001). About half of pts defined as CP low-risk by 9804-like (51%) or favorable Age/NG (58%) criteria were reclassified by the biosignature to High Risk. These pts had significant RT benefit: 9804-like group - HR 0.3, p=.007, absolute 10-yr IBR reduction of 12.7%, and for favorable Age/NG group - HR .34, p=0.012, absolute 10-yr IBR reduction of 11.2%. The corresponding NNTs were ~8-9. Overall, RT significantly reduced IBR for biosignature High Risk patients (p & lt;.001, n=588), with an absolute 17.7% reduction and a NNT of ~6. For patients in CP high risk groups, 23% of not-9804-like and 31% of (age & lt; 50 or NG 3) pts were reclassified as biosignature Low Risk. RT did not significantly reduce IBR in any Low Risk Biosignature group, including those in CP high-risk groups. IBR for not-9804-like group was 5.9% vs 3.0% without and with RT, p=.52, and for (age & lt; 50 or NG 3) pts was 4.4% vs 3% without and with RT, p=.70. For CP low-risk and biosignature Low Risk groups, RT reduced IBR by 0%. Overall, RT did not significantly reduce IBR rate for biosignature Low Risk patients (p=.71, n=338), with a 0.8% absolute 10-yr IBR rate difference and a NNT of ~100. Conclusion: In a large multicenter population, DCISionRT was a better predictor of 10-yr prognosis and RT benefit than CP criteria alone. Pts with biosignature Low Risk disease, comprising about 1/3 of CP high-risk pts, had no significant RT benefit. Whereas pts with biosignature High Risk disease, comprising about 1/2 of CP low-risk pts, significantly benefited from RT, highlighting the lack of accuracy of these CP factors in assessing RT benefit. Table 1. Ten-Year Risk of Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence (IBR) Citation Format: Rachel Rabinovitch, Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Julie A. Margenthaler, Brian J. Czerniecki, Pat Whitworth, DAVID J. DABBS, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Wärnberg, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, Jess Savala, Steven C. Shivers, Karuna Mittal, Troy Bremer. PD15-07 7-gene predictive biosignature improves risk stratification for breast ductal carcinoma in situ patients compared to clinicopathologic criteria, identifying a low risk group not clinically benefiting from adjuvant radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD15-07.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2020
    In:  Medical Science Educator Vol. 30, No. 1 ( 2020-03), p. 187-195
    In: Medical Science Educator, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 30, No. 1 ( 2020-03), p. 187-195
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2156-8650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2806660-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 1983
    In:  Clinical Nuclear Medicine Vol. 8, No. Supplement ( 1983-09), p. P38-
    In: Clinical Nuclear Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 8, No. Supplement ( 1983-09), p. P38-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0363-9762
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 1983
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2045053-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 1983
    In:  Clinical Nuclear Medicine Vol. 8 ( 1983-09), p. P38-
    In: Clinical Nuclear Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 8 ( 1983-09), p. P38-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0363-9762
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 1983
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2045053-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages