Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: JAMA Oncology, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 9, No. 1 ( 2023-01-01), p. 128-

Abstract: Cytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation. Objective To determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings. Exposures Immunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm. Results The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] , 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2374-2437

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5357

Language: English

Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)

Publication Date: 2023

In: JAMA Oncology, American Medical Association (AMA)

Abstract: Systematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking. Objective To assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022. Exposure Treatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs] , immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up. Results Of 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] , 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19–related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2374-2437

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2934

Language: English

Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)

Publication Date: 2023

In: JAMA Network Open, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 4, No. 11 ( 2021-11-12), p. e2134330-

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2574-3805

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34330

Language: English

Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2931249-8

In: JAMA Oncology, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 7, No. 8 ( 2021-08-01), p. 1167-

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2374-2437

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1799

Language: English

Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)

Publication Date: 2021

In: Blood Cancer Discovery, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 3, No. 3 ( 2022-05-05), p. 181-193

Abstract: Patients with B-lymphoid malignancies have been consistently identified as a population at high risk of severe COVID-19. Whether this is exclusively due to cancer-related deficits in humoral and cellular immunity, or whether risk of severe COVID-19 is increased by anticancer therapy, is uncertain. Using data derived from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19), we show that patients treated for B-lymphoid malignancies have an increased risk of severe COVID-19 compared with control populations of patients with non–B-lymphoid malignancies. Among patients with B-lymphoid malignancies, those who received anticancer therapy within 12 months of COVID-19 diagnosis experienced increased COVID-19 severity compared with patients with non–recently treated B-lymphoid malignancies, after adjustment for cancer status and several other prognostic factors. Our findings suggest that patients recently treated for a B-lymphoid malignancy are at uniquely high risk for severe COVID-19. Significance: Our study suggests that recent therapy for a B-lymphoid malignancy is an independent risk factor for COVID-19 severity. These findings provide rationale to develop mitigation strategies targeted at the uniquely high-risk population of patients with recently treated B-lymphoid malignancies. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 171

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2643-3230 , 2643-3249

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-22-0013

Language: English

Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Publication Date: 2022

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 2022-2022

Abstract: Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a curative therapy for a significant proportion of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We previously developed a conditioning regimen for R/R cHL patients undergoing ASCT incorporating gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GN-BVC), which enabled a reduction in the BCNU dose and toxicity without compromising efficacy (BBMT 2010;16:1145-54). Since this publication, several novel agents have been approved for treatment of R/R cHL including brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which may be changing outcomes and toxicities following ASCT. We sought to determine whether post-ASCT outcomes have improved for R/R cHL in the era of novel agents, and to evaluate how BV and the ICIs have impacted toxicities after ASCT in a large cohort of patients treated with the same conditioning regimen. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of outcomes for a large cohort of patients with R/R cHL who underwent ASCT using GN-BVC conditioning at Stanford University from 2001-2017 (n=268). We divided the cohort into two treatment eras: Era A: 2001-2009 (n=137) and Era B (increasing use of novel agents): 2010-2017 (n=131). We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox models to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) between treatment eras. We also compared outcomes between patients who underwent ASCT in complete remission (CR, n=126) or with a partial response (PR, n=142). For patients treated in era B, we compared outcomes and toxicity profiles for patients treated with standard platinum-based salvage regimens (n=102) to those who received BV-based salvage regimens prior to ASCT (n=29). Results: Patients who underwent ASCT in era B had improved OS compared to those transplanted in era A (4-year OS: 87.8% vs 77.9%, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.91, p=0.022), but PFS did not differ significantly between treatment eras (4-year PFS: 70.2% vs 62.7%, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.52-1.2, p=0.24, Figure 1). For patients who relapsed after ASCT, PPS was significantly higher for those transplanted in era B compared to era A (84.7% vs 62.8% at 2 years, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.98, p=0.045). Overall, patients who underwent ASCT in CR compared to those with a PR had significantly improved OS (88.3% vs 78.3% at 4 years, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.88, p=0.016) and PFS (78.4% vs 55.1% at 4 years, HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.67, p=0.00016). Among patients who relapsed, those in era B who received novel agents (BV and/or an ICI) at any point in treatment exhibited higher OS compared to historical controls in era A (4-year OS: 72.2% vs 53.1%) but were statistically different only at the p=0.083 level which is above the p=0.05 significance threshold. Of the patients who underwent ASCT in era B (n=131), 102 (78%) received standard platinum-based salvage regimens (e.g. ICE or DHAP) and 29 (22%) received BV-based salvage regimens prior to ASCT, including 11 patients (8%) who received both BV and an ICI pre-ASCT. Outcomes were excellent for patients who received BV-based salvage regimens pre-ASCT (4-year OS 97% and PFS 76%) but were not statistically different compared to patients who received platinum-based regimens (4-year OS 86% and PFS 69%; p=0.56 and p=0.76, respectively). Pneumonitis requiring corticosteroids occurred in 8% of patients treated in era B, including 10% of patients receiving BV-based salvage regimens pre-ASCT and 7% of patients receiving standard platinum-based regimens. One patient who received BV and nivolumab pre-ASCT died from grade 5 pneumonitis. Conclusions: In this cohort of R/R cHL patients who underwent ASCT using the same conditioning regimen, OS was significantly higher for patients transplanted within the past decade. A potential survival benefit was observed among patients who relapsed post-ASCT, likely reflecting the more widespread use of BV and ICIs in the post-ASCT setting. Patients who received BV-based salvage regimens pre-ASCT had excellent outcomes without an apparent increase in toxicity, but the small number of patients limits comparisons to standard platinum-based regimens. Further studies are needed to better define the optimal sequencing of novel agents and ASCT in the treatment of R/R cHL in the modern era. Figure 1 Disclosures Sica: Physician's Education Resources (PER): Honoraria. Advani:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cell Medica, Ltd: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Developments, Inc.: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; Celmed: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stanford University: Employment, Equity Ownership; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agensys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Infinity Pharma: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc./Kite Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Miklos:AlloGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Precision Bioscience: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Becton Dickinson: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite-Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly:Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy. Rezvani:Kaleido: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: one-time compensation from advisory boards; Nohla Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: one-time compensation from advisory boards; AbbVie: Other: Principal investigator ; U.S. Department of Justice: Other: Expert medical witness; Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Other: Brother is employed. Shizuru:Forty Seven Inc: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-131532

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, ( 2023-03-01)

Abstract: The treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory (R/R) classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has evolved significantly over the past decade following the approval of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. We evaluated how outcomes and practice patterns have changed for R/R cHL patients who underwent autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) at our institution from 2011-2020 (N=183) compared to 2001-2010 (N=159) and evaluated prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in both eras. OS was superior in the modern era (4-year estimates 89.1% vs 79.0%, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.85, p=0.011) with a trend towards lower non-relapse mortality beyond 2 years post-transplant. Among patients who progressed after AHCT, 4-year post-progression survival increased from 43.3% to 71.4% in the modern era, reflecting increasing use of BV and the PD-1 inhibitors. In multivariable analysis for patients transplanted in the modern era, age ³45 years, primary refractory disease, and lack of complete remission pre-AHCT were associated with inferior PFS, while receipt of a PD-1 inhibitor-based regimen pre-AHCT was associated with superior PFS (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.80, p=0.030). Extranodal disease at relapse was associated with inferior OS (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.25-7.77, p=0.014). Our study demonstrates improved survival for R/R cHL after AHCT in the modern era attributed to more effective salvage regimens allowing for better disease control pre-AHCT and improved outcomes for patients who progressed after AHCT. Excellent outcomes were observed with PD-1 inhibitor-based salvage regimens pre-AHCT and support a randomized trial evaluating immunotherapy in the second line setting.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022018827

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 3, No. 22 ( 2019-11-26), p. 3602-3612

Abstract: Infectious diseases are the second most common cause of death in HCT recipients, but some are first identified only by autopsy. Autopsy is underutilized and should be performed regularly to help improve infection-related morbidity and mortality.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000634

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2876449-3

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 3840-3840

Abstract: Introduction: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-Cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory large B cell lymphoma when conventional treatments failed. Cardiovascular side effects of CAR-T therapy that have been noticed so far include hypotension, left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure and cardiogenic shock in settings of CRS. We aimed to assess the cardiovascular side effects in a racially/ ethnically diverse patient population who underwent CAR-T cell therapy. Methods: This study included thirty-four consecutive adult patients who underwent treatment with CAR-T cell product Axi-Cel at an academic health system between 2018-2021. We performed detailed chart reviews and collected information related to the age, gender, hematological malignancy diagnosis, other medical comorbidities, therapeutic regimens, pretreatment cardiac risk factors, development of CRS with grading , pre and post treatment electrocardiograms ( EKG), transthoracic echocardiograms( TTE) , death, cause of death, and duration between administration of CAR-T products and death of the patients . We collected data pertaining to development of hypotension, EKG changes, arrhythmias, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure (HF), acute cardiac syndrome (ACS), troponin elevation, echocardiographic changes post CAR-T cell therapy, and follow up visits after 60 days to get information pertaining to development of hypotension, tachycardia or SOB, need for further cardiac work up, and cardiology referral. Results: Mean age of our study participants was 65 years ranging between ages of 30 and 84 years with 38 % (13/34) female and 62% (21/34) male study participants. Study population was predominantly Hispanic, white and African American with percentages of 35% (12/34), 32% (11/34), 26 %(9/34) respectively followed by categories Asian 2.9% (1/34) and other at 2.9 %( 1/34). Sixty seven percent (22/37) patients had primary diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 32% (11/34) had different primary malignancy with transformation into DLBCL. Thirty eight percent individuals had received autologous stem cell transplant. Sixty one percent (21/34) of our study participants developed cytokine release syndrome, with CRS grades 1-3 in 57% (12/29), 25% (08/21) and 4.7% (1/21) respectively. Thirty four percent (09/34) study participants died after cellular therapy. Septic shock and disease progression each were primary cause of death in 55 % (5/9) of patients, followed by respiratory failure in 22% (2/9) and ventricular fibrillation leading to cardiac arrest in 11% (1/9) of the patients. Mean duration of time between administration of therapy and death was 70 days. The cardiovascular effects noted immediately post CAR-T treatment and observations from follow up oncology visits are listed in Table 1. Troponin elevation was noticed in two study participants in settings of CRS, but one participant exhibited troponin elevation in absence of CRS. Seventeen percent of patients (6/34) developed left ventricular dysfunction after Axi-Cel. Most of them had concurrent CRS but one case of fatal heart failure occurred in absence of CRS. Three patients developed fatal arrhythmias post CAR-T therapy (1- Non sustained ventricular tachycardia in settings of CRS, 2- supraventricular tachycardia in settings of CRS, and 3- ventricular tachycardia needing defibrillation without CRS). Only one patient developed ACS in settings of CRS which lead to patient's demise. Conclusions: In a real world, minority rich cohort, we observed that a significant number of our patients had preexisting cardiovascular findings including abnormal EKG (30% excluding sinus tachycardia) or abnormal echocardiographic findings (46%). Hypotension (68%) and sinus tachycardia (59%) were the most commonly observed cardiovascular toxicities. Although Axi-Cel was in general safe and well tolerated, we observed cardiovascular side effects associated with and independent of CRS. Notably, six patients (17%) developed left ventricular dysfunction including one fatality which was independent of CRS. There was only one fatal coronary syndrome and two cases of troponin elevation in our series. Our study stresses the importance of a thorough cardio-oncology evaluation before proceeding with cellular therapies as well as involved follow up during and after hospitalization. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gritsman: iOnctura: Research Funding. Shastri: Kymera Therapeutics: Research Funding; Onclive: Honoraria; Guidepoint: Consultancy; GLC: Consultancy. Verma: BMS: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Medpacto: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Stelexis: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novartis: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Stelexis: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Throws Exception: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-154004

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 29-30

Abstract: Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is an aggressive T-cell malignancy with a dismal prognosis, caused by HTLV-1. Although our previous study, mainly using whole-exome sequencing and SNP array karyotyping, discovered many driver mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs), the whole-genome landscape of ATL still remains elusive. To this end, we have performed high-depth whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 155 ATL cases with a median sequencing depth of 96-fold for tumors. Among them, 75 cases were also analyzed by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). In total, we detected 1,952,490 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 159,141 insertion-deletions (4.0 SNVs and 0.3 indels/Mb/case), 10,279 SVs (66.3 SVs/case), and 3,975 CN altered segments (25.7 segments/case). Using several driver discovery algorithms (dNdScv, MutSig2CV, and DriverPower), we identified 47 significantly mutated genes, 19 of which were mutated in more than 10% of cases. These included several novel mutations, such as those affecting XPO1 (7.1%), ZNF292 (6.5%), and ITGB1 (5.2%). Using GISTIC2.0, we identified 13 significant CNAs, such as IRF4 amplifications and CDKN2A deletions, consistent with previous SNP array data. To detect significantly recurrent SVs, we calculated SV breakpoint frequency and identified 13 genes affected by SVs, including the previously identified genes (such as CARD11, CD274, and TP73). In addition, we investigated recurrent mutations in non-coding elements by DriverPower and LARVA and discovered 12 recurrently mutated elements. Among them, the most frequent were splice site mutations, including those of HLA-A and HLA-B, most of which caused loss of function as revealed by RNA-seq. By contrast, we found recurrent mutations in TP73 splice site, which induced skipping of exons 2 and 3, generating a dominant-negative variant similar to their SVs. In addition, recurrent non-coding elements contained several novel regions, such as 3´-untranslated region (UTR) of NFKBIZ and 5´- UTR of TMSB4X. Altogether, a total of 56 genes were recurrently altered. The median number of driver alterations was eight per case, and at least one driver alteration was found in 149 cases (96.1%). Among 56 driver genes, 40 (71.4%) genes were affected by more than one alteration class. Some drivers, such as CDKN2A, IKZF2, and CD274, were affected almost exclusively by CNAs and/or SVs, while showing quite high alteration frequencies (11.6-29.0%). These observations suggest that WGS presented a substantially different overview of driver alterations from our previous study. The overall numbers of mutations and SVs were linked to these driver alterations, suggesting their etiology. In particular, inactivation of EP300 and immune-related molecules, such as HLA-A, HLA-B, and CD58, were associated with an increased number of mutations and SVs, especially deletions and tandem duplications. By contrast, cases with TP53-altered cases harbored more inversions and translocations. These results emphasize a pivotal role of immune evasion for acquiring genetic alterations to drive ATL progression. To define molecular subgroups in ATL, we integrated the 56 identified genetic drivers using non-negative matrix factorization clustering and identified two robust subgroups with discrete clinical and genetic characteristics. Group 1 was enriched with alterations affecting distal components of T-cell receptor (TCR)/NF-κB signaling (such as CARD11, PRKCB, and IRF4) and immune-related molecules (HLA-A, HLA-B, and CD58), whereas proximal regulators of TCR/NF-κB signaling (PLCG1, VAV1, and CD28) and a JAK/STAT signaling molecule (STAT3) were more frequently altered in group 2. In addition, group 1 cases had a larger number of mutations, SVs, and CNAs than group 2 cases. Clinically, most cases with lymphoma subtype were classified into group 1, whereas group 2 mainly consisted of cases with leukemic subtypes. Moreover, group1 cases showed a worse overall survival than group 2, independently of clinical subtype. These results suggest the biological and clinical relevance of the molecular classification of ATL. In summary, our WGS analysis not only identifies novel somatic alterations but also extends the overview of ATL genome. We also propose a new molecular classification of ATL, with its clinical relevance, which can lead to the future improvement of patient management. Disclosures Kogure: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.: Honoraria. Nosaka:Kyowa Kirin Co.Ltd: Honoraria; Chugai pharmaceutical Co. Ltd: Honoraria; Novartis international AG: Honoraria; Celgene K.K: Honoraria; Eisai Co., Ltd: Honoraria; Merck Sharp & Dohme K.K.: Honoraria; Bristol-Myer Squibb: Honoraria. Imaizumi:Kyowa Kirin Co. Ltd.: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria. Utsunomiya:Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Shah:Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Physicians Education Resource: Honoraria. Janakiram:Takeda, Fate, Nektar: Research Funding. Ramos:NIH: Research Funding. Takaori-Kondo:Astellas Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Thyas Co. Ltd.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; CHUGAI: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; OHARA Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Miyazaki:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; NIPPON SHINYAKU CO.,LTD.: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma KK: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Honoraria. Matsuoka:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin Co. Ltd.: Research Funding. Ishitsuka:Takeda: Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; mundiharma: Other: Personal fees; Taiho Pharmaceuticals: Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Other: Personal fees; Novartis: Other: Personal fees; Pfizer: Other: Personal fees; Astellas Pharma: Other, Research Funding; Genzyme: Other; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Other, Research Funding; Eisai: Other, Research Funding; Mochida: Other, Research Funding; Shire: Other; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Other; Ono Pharmaceutical: Other, Research Funding; Teijin Pharma: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Asahi kasei: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other; Huya Japan: Other; Celgene: Other: Personal Fees; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; BMS: Other: Personal fees; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Other: Personal fees, Research Funding. Ogawa:Asahi Genomics Co., Ltd.: Current equity holder in private company; Chordia Therapeutics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KAN Research Institute, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Shimoda:Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Shire plc: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Perseus Proteomics: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia Japan: Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Merck & Co.: Research Funding; CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Asahi Kasei Medical: Research Funding; Japanese Society of Hematology: Research Funding; The Shinnihon Foundation of Advanced Medical Treatment Research: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kataoka:CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Asahi Genomics: Current equity holder in private company.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-134360

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7