In:
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Wiley, Vol. 155, No. 2 ( 2016-08), p. 274-280
Abstract:
Screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) among family members has been advocated in endemic populations in view of significantly increased risks. We aimed to compare the role of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) DNA load and EBV IgA serology as tools for screening patients with a first‐degree family history of NPC. Study Design Case‐control study. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods Serum samples were compared from 293 newly diagnosed NPC patients and 475 individuals with a first‐degree family history of NPC. EBV DNA load was measured by real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, while EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgA and EBV early antigen (EA) IgA titers were measured by immunofluorescence assays. Results NPC patients had a significantly higher median EBV DNA load as compared with unaffected family members (835.4 vs 18.8 copies/mL; P 〈 . 001). At 100 copies/mL, EBV DNA load demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 85.6%. A positive EBV‐EA IgA titer (≥1:10) gave a sensitivity of 85.0% and a specificity of 96.4%. There was good correlation between EBV DNA load and EBV serology titers (Spearman’s ρ =. 536 and. 594 for EBV‐VCA IgA and EBV‐EA IgA, respectively; P 〈 . 001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that EBV‐VCA IgA and EBV‐EA IgA were better classifiers than EBV DNA load (areas under the curve: 0.942, 0.926, and 0.880, respectively) in distinguishing NPC patients and unaffected family members. Conclusion EBV DNA load and EBV IgA serology demonstrate good sensitivity and specificity as screening tools. EBV‐EA IgA gave the best sensitivity and specificity profile as a screening tool for NPC among high‐risk family members.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0194-5998
,
1097-6817
DOI:
10.1177/0194599816641038
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2016
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2008453-5
Bookmarklink