Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Nephrology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 36, No. 7 ( 2023-08-22), p. 2037-2046
    Abstract: The mental health of dialysis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been modulated by dialysis modality. Studies comparing mental health of in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients during the first 2 years of the pandemic are lacking. Methods We conducted repeated cross-sectional and multivariable regression analyses to compare the mental health of in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients from March 2019 until August 2021 using data from the Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis Study To Improve Clinical Outcomes. The study period was divided into one pre-pandemic and six 3-month pandemic periods (period 1–period 6). Mental health was assessed with the Mental Component Summary score of the 12-item Short Form health survey and mental symptoms of the Dialysis Symptom Index. Results We included 1274 patients (968 on in-center hemodialysis and 306 on peritoneal dialysis). Mental Component Summary scores did not differ between in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. In contrast, in-center hemodialysis patients more often reported nervousness during period 3 (27% vs 15%, P  = 0.04), irritability and anxiety during period 3 (31% vs 18%, P  = 0.03, 26% vs. 9%, P  = 0.002, respectively) and period 4 (34% vs 22%, P  = 0.04, 22% vs 11%, P  = 0.03, respectively), and sadness in period 4 (38% vs 26%, P  = 0.04) and period 5 (37% vs 22%, P  = 0.009). Dialysis modality was independently associated with mental symptoms. Conclusions In-center hemodialysis patients more often experienced mental symptoms compared to peritoneal dialysis patients from September 2020 to June 2021, which corresponds to the second lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental health-related quality-of-life did not differ between in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Trial registration number Netherlands Trial Register NL6519, date of registration: 22 August, 2017. Graphical abstract
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1724-6059
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475007-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 38, No. Supplement_1 ( 2023-06-14)
    Abstract: Results from previous studies suggest that mental health of dialysis patients was unaffected during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the location of dialysis treatment might have had a different impact on patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, especially at time of restrictions. Studies comparing the mental health of ICHD and PD patients during the pandemic are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether dialysis modality differently affected the mental health of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method This study used data of patients participating in the Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis Study To Improve Clinical Outcomes (DOMESTICO). We conducted repeated cross-sectional analyses between ICHD and PD patients from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 until August 2021. For this, we divided the study period into six periods of three months. The year before the pandemic was used as reference period. Mental health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed using the mental component summary (MCS) score of the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) health survey. The presence of mental symptoms was determined using the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI). Both questionnaires were provided at start of dialysis, at 3 months, 6 months and each 6 months thereafter. Patients were included for analysis if a questionnaire was available in at least one period. MCS scores and the prevalence of mental symptoms between ICHD and PD patients were compared with Student's t-test and Chi-square test, respectively. Moreover, we performed multivariable regression analyses to adjust for possible confounders. Results For this analysis, 1274 patients (968 ICHD and 306 PD) were included. Mean age was 65±14 and 64±14 years, respectively. Most patients were male (ICHD: 68%, PD: 61%). Before the pandemic ICHD patients reported similar MCS scores, yet more often reported feeling nervous (32% vs. 22%, P = .03) and sad (40% vs. 29%, P = .03). During the pandemic, mean MCS scores also did not differ between ICHD and PD patients. In contrast, ICHD patients more often reported feeling nervous during period 3 (27% vs 15%, P = .04), feeling irritable and anxious during period 3 (31% vs 18%, P = .03, 26% vs. 9%, P = .002, resp.) and period 4 (34% vs 22%, P = .04, 22% vs 11%, P = .03, resp.), and feeling sad in period 4 (38% vs 26%, P = .04) and period 5 (37% vs 22%, P = .009). In a multivariable regression analysis, these differences persisted after correction for several confounders. Conclusion ICHD patients experienced more mental symptoms compared to PD patients in the period September 2020 to June 2021, which corresponds with the second lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic. This higher prevalence of specific mental symptoms in ICHD patients was not reflected by a decrease in mental HRQoL.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0931-0509 , 1460-2385
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1465709-0
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages