Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 4045-4045

Abstract: Introduction Recently, progress has been made in the treatment of patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Nevertheless, patients failing hypomethylating agents (HMA) have a dismal prognosis and very limited treatment options. Targeting CD123 on leukemic stem cells (LSC) is one promising approach in MDS and AML. Talacotuzumab (TAL, JNJ-56022473) is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD123 preferentially via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) mediated by natural killer cells (NKs). Aim The SAMBA trial, a phase II study of the German and French MDS study groups within the EMSCO network assessed the overall hematological response rate after 3 months of single agent TAL treatment in AML or HR MDS patients failing hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Methods TAL was given IV at a dose of 9 mg/kg once every two weeks for a total of 6 infusions, responders received up to 20 additional infusions. After the first 3 months, overall hematological response rate (either CR, PR, marrow-CR, HI, SD) was evaluated by bone marrow biopsy. The study was accompanied by an immune monitoring via flow cytometric analysis to investigate the distribution of T- and NK cells in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) at the time of screening and during therapy in comparison with healthy, age-matched controls. Results 24 patients (19 AML and 5 HR MDS) with a median age of 77 (range 71-90) years, who either failed to achieve complete- (CR), partial response (PR), hematological improvement (HI) or relapsed after HMA therapy were included in the study. After TAL administration, 14 patients could be assessed for response after 4 infusions and 10 patients after 6 infusions. The overall response rate (ORR) was 20.8% including 1 complete remission (CRi), 1 patient with hematologic improvement (HI-E) and additionally 3 patients with disease stabilization. The median duration of response in these patients was 3 months (range 3-14 months). Two patients are still on treatment, one patient despite losing objective response (14 months) and one patient with disease stabilization (13 months). The median overall survival for the entire cohort of patients was 3.2 months (range 0.4-11.2 months). In 10 patients (41.6%), therapy with TAL resulted in grade 3/4 infusion related side effects (pneumonia, n=1; infusion-related reaction, n=8; septic shock, n=1). Before treatment initiation, patients had lower levels of CD56dim NK-cells in PB (82% vs. 89% of NK-cells; p=0.069) expressing significantly more inhibiting NK-cell receptors like KIR2DL2 (8.8% vs. 3.2% of NK-cells; p 〈 0.001) and less activating NK-cells receptors like NKG2D (95% vs. 99% of NK-cells; p 〈 0.01) compared to healthy controls. Moreover, expression of PD-1 on lymphocytes and monocytes as well as their matching ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 on blasts and monocytes in PB was significantly higher in patients compared to healthy controls (p 〈 0.01), another evidence for an exhausted T-cell immune status in our patients prior to treatment initiation. We could not detect any difference in NK-cell levels in responding patients compared to non-responders. Interestingly, pre-treatment expression (MFI and percentage) of CD123 on immature myeloid derived suppressor cells (iMDSC) was higher in responders than in non-responders (p 〈 0.01). Anti-CD123 targeted therapy with TAL resulted in a decreased CD123+ MFI (4239 vs. 2910; p 〈 0.01) on iMDSCs as well as lower levels of iMDSCs in PB and BM (p 〈 0.05).Responding patients displayed a 10-fold reduction of CD123 MFI after 3 months of treatment (2565 vs. 236; p=0.06), indicating that the CD123 molecule on immature MDSCs is targeted effectively by TAL. Conclusion Single agent TAL has limited efficacy in patients with advanced myeloid malignancies failing HMA. Expression of CD123 on immature MDSCs might serve as a biomarker of response for future anti-CD123 targeted approaches. Disclosures Götze: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel aid ASH 2017. Krönke:Celgene: Honoraria. Middeke:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schlenk:Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ades:JAZZ: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; silent pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-113112

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Leukemia, Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Abstract: The EUROPE phase 2 trial investigated the predictive value of biomarkers on the clinical efficacy of single agent romiplostim (ROM) treatment in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (LR-MDS) and thrombocytopenia within the ‘European Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Cooperative Group‘ (EMSCO) network. A total of 77 patients with LR-MDS and a median platelet count of 25/nl were included, all patients received ROM at a starting dose of 750 μg by SC injection weekly. Thirty-two patients (42%) achieved a hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P) with a median duration of 340 days. Neutrophil (HI-N) and erythroid (HI-E) responses were observed in three (4%) and seven (9%) patients, respectively. We could not confirm previous reports that HI-P correlated with baseline endogenous thrombopoietin levels and platelet transfusion history, but SRSF2 mutation status and hemoglobin levels at baseline were significantly linked to HI-P. Sequential analysis of variant allelic frequency of mutations like SRSF2 did not reveal an impact of ROM on clonal evolution in both responders and non-responders. In summary, our study confirms the safety and efficacy of ROM in LR-MDS patients and may allow to better define subgroups of patients with a high likelihood of response.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0887-6924 , 1476-5551

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1038/s41375-022-01669-z

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008023-2

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 37-38

Abstract: *AK, PP shared first-, UP, HM, LA shared senior authors Introduction: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML), not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, the majority of patients do not respond to these agents. Patients failing HMA therapy still have a dismal outcome with very limited treatment options available. Bemcentinib (BEM) is a selective small molecule inhibitor of AXL, a surface membrane protein kinase receptor mediating resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and decreased antitumor immune response. AXL is overexpressed on leukemic cells, especially in the stem cell compartment, and represents a potential novel target in patients with MDS and AML. Methods: The multicenter phase 2 BERGAMO trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of BEM in patients with HR-MDS or AML, refractory to or relapsing after at least six or four cycles of either azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DAC), respectively. Patients received an initial loading dose of 400mg BEM orally administered on d1-3 of cycle 1 and a maintenance dose of 200mg BEM on d4-28 of cycle 1 as well as on d1-28 in subsequent 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (CR, CRi, PR or SD) assessed after 4 treatment cycles. All patients who achieved CR, CRi, PR or SD after 4 cycles of BEM were considered as responders and allowed to continue treatment for a total of up to 9 cycles. Non-responding patients stopped treatment after 4 cycles. Secondary endpoints of the trial included a translational project evaluating the role of biomarkers and response. Results: Between 2018 and 2020, 58 patients in 10 European centers were screened (MDS=27/AML=31) with a median age of 78 years (range, 62-86 years). 45 patients (MDS=21, AML=24) received at least one cycle of BEM and were eligible for safety and efficacy analysis after the first 4 months of treatment. Thirty six (80%) out of 45 patients were considered relapsed after a response to HMA, 8 (18%) had primary resistance and 1 patient (2%) had HMA intolerance. The median number of prior AZA or DAC cycles was 13. In addition, 18 patients (40%) (MDS=9/AML=9) were red blood cell transfusion-dependent. Treatment with BEM was generally well tolerated with only low rates of grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities (n=7). Forty-seven serious adverse events (SAE) occurred in 22 patients (MDS=9/AML=13), mostly due to infectious complications (n=12), hematological toxicity (n=4) or gastrointestinal disturbance (n=6). Until the first 4 months of BEM treatment, the median number of BEM treatment cycles received was 1.5 (range, 0.5-4). During study, 9 patients (20%) died due to infection (MDS=1/AML=3), deterioration of general condition (MDS=1/AML=2) and progressive disease (MDS=0/AML=2). BEM treatment is currently ongoing in four patients (MDS=3/AML=1). The primary endpoint was met in 9 of 45 patients (20.0%). Within the MDS cohort 33.3% achieved a response (n=7/21; CR=1, CRi= 3, SD=3), while 8.3% of patients (n=2/24) with AML achieved stable disease(SD). The 4 MDS patients achieving CR/CRi had a normal karyotype and a median baseline IPSS-R score of 4 (range 3-5). Among the MDS non-responders 4 patients had a complex karyotype, median IPSS-R score was 5 (range 3-5). Median baseline bone marrow blast count was 15% vs. 13% and median pretreatment hemoglobin-, platelet- and WBC levels were 9.2 g/dl (range 7.9-11.8 g/dl), 51 G/L(range 26-120 G/L) and 1.9x109/l (range 1.18-8.9 x109/l) vs. 9.6 g/dl (range 7.9-11.3 g/dl), 35 G/L (range 0-167 G/L) and 1.45x109/l (range 0.82-6.97 x109/l) comparing MDS responders (CR/CRi) vs MDS non-responders, respectively. Preliminary data evaluating soluble AXL (sAXL) in blood plasma at baseline showed that 66.6 % (n=2/3) of MDS patients achieving CR/CRi displayed sAXL levels below a defined threshold, while this was only seen in 20% (n=2/10) of MDS non-responders. Conclusion: These results of the prospective phase II BERGAMO trial confirm, that single agent BEM is generally safe and well tolerated in this patient population with an unmet medical need. Importantly, BEM showed clinical efficacy in a subgroup of MDS patients. These encouraging clinical results are being further explored by an in depth translational research program aiming to identify additional molecular and biological prognostic factors associated with response. Disclosures Kubasch: Celgene: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Cluzeau:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Götze:Celgene: Research Funding. Teipel:janssen: Honoraria. Jentzsch:Novartis: Honoraria; JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Giagounidis:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McPherson:BerGenBio ASA: Current Employment. van de Loosdrecht:novartis: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria. Fenaux:Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Platzbecker:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Medyouf:Bergenbio: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ades:Celgene/BMS: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Bemcentinib is currently undergoing Phase II clinical trials for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), acute myeloid leukemia /myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS), melanoma and metastatic pancreatic cancer. In 2019, FDA have granted fast track designation to bemcentinib for the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) whose disease has relapsed.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-140240

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 44-45

Abstract: *UP, LA contributed equally Introduction A significant proportion of lower risk (LR)-MDS patients present with thrombocytopenia, being associated with shortened survival and higher risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment options for patients with LR-MDS and severe thrombocytopenia remain limited apart from transfusion support. Romiplostim (ROM), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) has shown safety and efficacy dependent on endogenous TPO levels as well as platelet transfusion history in a poorly defined subset of LR-MDS patients (Giagounidis et al. Cancer 2014, Sekeres et al. BJH 2014). Methods The multicenter phase 2 EUROPE trial investigated potential biomarkers of response (e.g. TPO levels, molecular markers) to single agent ROM in LR-MDS patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Patients were eligible if platelet counts were ≤30 G/L or ≤50 G/L in case of bleeding history. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P, according to IWG 2006 criteria) lasting for at least 8 weeks after 16 weeks of ROM (750µg SC qw) treatment. At the time of screening, patients were assigned into 3 different cohorts based on their previous platelet transfusion events (PTE) as well as centrally assessed TPO serum levels (A: TPO & lt;500 ng/l, PTE & lt;6 units/past year; B: TPO & lt;500 ng/l, PTE≥6 units or TPO≥500 ng/l, PTE & lt;6 units, C: TPO≥ 500 ng/l, PTE≥6 units). Bone marrows analysis were centrally reviewed. Results From 2015 to 2019, a total of 79 patients were included at 29 trial sites in Germany, France and the Czech Republic. Patients' median age was 74 years (range 42-93), median baseline platelet count was 25.5 G/L (range 3-50 G/L) and they were stratified into cohort A (n=51) or B+C (n=28), respectively. The primary endpoint was met with 34 out of 79 (43%) patients responding (HI-P), with response being markedly higher in cohort A (49%, n=25) vs. cohort B and C (32%, n=9) (p=0.145). Ten (13%) and eight (10%) patients had additional neutrophil (HI-N) and erythroid (HI-E) responses, respectively. During treatment, six patients had transient increases in peripheral blasts to more than 10% and one patient progressed to AML after one month of ROM. Although a higher number of responders was observed in group A, neither TPO level at screening (p=0.21), nor number of pretreatment PTE (p=0.12) were significantly associated with response to ROM treatment. Thus, our findings do not confirm that baseline TPO levels and number of pretreatment PTE alone allow reliable prediction of response to ROM. With the aim to identify new molecular patterns correlating with response, we performed a targeted NGS analysis for somatic variants in 54 candidate genes in 75 patients at baseline and in 44 patients after 16 weeks of ROM. Responders (R) more frequently exhibited mutations like SRSF2 (R=39%, NR=17%), RUNX1 (R=24%, NR=14%) and TET2 (R=30%, NR=29%), whereas non-responders (NR) exhibited mutations like DNMT3A (R=12%, NR=21%), U2AF1(R=9%, NR=14%) or ASXL1 (R=6%, NR 17%) more frequent. The percentages of patients with a response to ROM were similar regardless of total number of baseline somatic mutations. Comparing responders vs. non-responders, we found no significant changes of variant allelic burden of variants detected pre- and post-ROM (Fig. 1). We identified the presence of a SRSF2 mutation as a significant predictor of response to ROM treatment (p=0.031, logistic regression). Mutated SRSF2 was significantly more frequent in responders (39%) compared to non-responders (17%) (p=0.036, Fisher's exact test) (Fig. 2A,B). We used logistic regression with stepwise backward selection to assess the influence of the presence of ASXL1, DNMT3A, RUNX1, TET2 and SRSF2 mutations on response. Our final regression model excludes the non-significant ASXL1, DNMT3A, RUNX1 and TET2 mutations and includes the significant SRSF2 mutation, resulting in an overall accuracy of 64.0% for a correct ROM response prediction in this patient cohort. Conclusion: This prospective study did not confirm a significant association between response to ROM, pretreatment PTE burden and endogenous TPO levels. Instead, patients with a mutated SRSF2 displayed a significantly higher response to ROM treatment. This may allow personalized treatment approaches in patients with LR-MDS and severe thrombocytopenia. In this study, extended treatment with ROM did not lead to a significant increase in AML cases. Disclosures Kubasch: Shire: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Giagounidis:AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Götze:Celgene: Research Funding. Cony-Makhoul:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Laribi:takeda: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; amgen: Research Funding; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Park:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Travel expenses. Metzeler:Astellas: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharma: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Other: Co-owner and CEO. Schlenk:PharmaMar: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fenaux:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ades:Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Research Funding; jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Limitations of Use: Romiplostim is not indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopenia due to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or any cause of thrombocytopenia other than chronic ITP.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-139291

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 2998-2998

Abstract: Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and peripheral cytopenia. In about half of patients with lower-risk (LR) MDS, thrombocytopenia is present at the time of diagnosis and associated with shortened survival and an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) romiplostim has shown safety and marked efficacy in a still poorly-defined subset of LR-MDS patients with thrombocytopenia. Methods: The EUROPE multicenter phase 2 trial within the EMSCO network investigated the impact of biomarkers like endogenous thrombopoietin (TPO) level and platelet transfusion events (PTE) on the efficacy of romiplostim (750µg SC qw) treatment in patients with LR-MDS (IPSS low/int-1). Patients were eligible if baseline bone marrow blast count was 〈 5% as assessed by central morphology and platelet counts were ≤30 Gpt/L or ≤50 Gpt/L in case of bleeding history. According to a previously published model of response to TPO-RA (Sekeres at al. BJH 2014), patients were assigned into 3 different cohorts at the time of screening based on their previous PTE as well as centrally assessed TPO serum levels (cohort A: TPO 〈 500 ng/l, PTE 〈 6 units/past year; cohort B: TPO 〈 500 ng/l, PTE≥6 units or TPO≥500 ng/l, PTE 〈 6 units, cohort C: TPO≥500 ng/l, PTE≥6 units). Primary endpoint of the study was the rate of hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P) according to IWG 2006 criteria after 16 weeks of romiplostim treatment. We here present the analysis for the first 16 weeks of romiplostim treatment. Results: From 2015 to 2018, a total of 68 patients were included in 20 trial sites in Germany, France and Czech Republic. Patients displayed a median age of 74 years and a median platelet count of 25 G/L (range 1-50 G/L) and were stratified into cohort A (n=47), B (n=17) or C (n=4), respectively. All patients received at least one cycle of romiplostim with a median weekly dose of 750μg and a median of 15 cycles of romiplostim until week 16. Reasons for premature study discontinuation before week 16 were investigator/patient decision (n=8), adverse events (n=5), disease progression (n=4) or death (n=1). There were 9 reported severe treatment-related adverse events in seven patients including pulmonary embolism (n=1), subacute stroke (n=1), mucocutaneous hemorrhage (n=1), asthenia (n=1), suspicion of anti-romiplostim antibodies (n=1), progression to AML (n=1) and varicella zoster infection (n=1). Two patients had transient increases in peripheral blasts to more than 10% and 1 patient progressed to AML after 1 month of treatment. HI-P was observed in 26 of 68 (38%) patients, while response was ongoing in 24 of them beyond week 16. Moreover, rate of HI-P lasting for at least 8 weeks was notably higher in cohort A (45%, n=21/47) compared to patients in cohort B and C (24%, n=5/21) (p=0.11). Median peak increase of PLT count in responding patients was 199 G/L in cohort A and 83 G/L in cohort B (p=0.25) and was observed in median after 7 weeks (range 3-16). In addition, responses occurred also in 2 patients in the neutrophil (HI-N) and in 7 patients in the erythroid (HI-E) lineage according to IWG 2006 criteria (Table 1). Explorative analysis showed a correlation between pretreatment platelet transfusion requirement and endogenous TPO-levels (spearman-test, p=0.034). Median pretreatment endogenous TPO-level was lower in responders compared to non-responders (82 vs. 103 pg/ml, p=0.15). Higher response rates occurred in patients with lower TPO-levels ( 〈 500 ng/l) and lower pre-treatment transfusion needs (PTE 〈 6 units/past year), but both variables were not significantly associated with response to romiplostim (univariable logistic regression, p= 0.13 and p=0.53, respectively). Evaluation of the mutational profile in a subgroup of 49 patients demonstrated that 67% of responders exhibited spliceosome mutations including SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1 and ZRSR2 compared to 35% in non-responders (p=0.06) (Table 1). Conclusion: This prospective study confirms that romiplostim treatment is highly effective in a subgroup of LR-MDS patients, but neither baseline platelet transfusion requirements nor baseline TPO levels were significantly associated with clinical response to romiplostim. Further translational analyses are ongoing to elucidate potential biomarkers of response. Disclosures Platzbecker: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Götze:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cony-Makhoul:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Park:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Thiede:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Diaceutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ades:Helsinn Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Silence Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Romiplostim is formally not licensed for the treatment of thrombocytopenia due to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-129047

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 4251-4251

Abstract: Introduction: Flow cytometry (FCM) is considered as a co-criterion in MDS diagnostics if the main diagnostic methods are not sufficient to clearly diagnose or rule out MDS. The iMDSFlow working group of the European LeukemiaNet worked on recommendations regarding the harmonization of preanalytics, data analysis, as well as of appropriate diagnostic scores. The aims of the present study were (1) to test whether the parameters and reference ranges applied for FCM diagnostics in MDS do have an impact on prognosis; and (2) whether the incorporation of computational algorithms in data mining could further improve the prognostic information of FCM. Methods: FCM diagnostics was performed in bone marrow (BM) of 303 patients cytomorphologically classified as MDS using a Lyse-wash-method and measuring on a FACSCantoII cytometer. For FCM data evaluation, commonly used diagnostic flow-scores - FCSS (Wells et al. 2003), Ogata-score (Ogata et al. 2009), new iFS-score (Cremers et al. 2017), ELN-Red-score (Westers et al. 2017), Red-score (Mathis et al. 2013) - were applied, including the analysis of progenitor cells, granulopoiesis, monopoiesis, and nucleated erythropoiesis. Thus, 55 FCM parameters necessary to assess the mentioned flow-scores and 33 additional FCM parameters have been evaluated. Clinical variables (n=11) including IPSS-R (vLR+LR: 163 pts., Int: 81 pts., HR+vHR: 59 pts.) have also been recorded. Median follow-up time was 28 months (1.5 - 84 mo). Overall survival (OS) was assessed in uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis using log-rank likelihood test. Reference ranges for FCM parameters have been assessed before using BM of 49 healthy donors. In addition, in order to improve prognostic output, a computational approach was devised that tests every possible combination of binary, ternary, and quaternary marker strata segregation to identify the thresholds that bring about optimum separation of hazard strata in each model based on log-likelihood p-value. Finally, it was assessed whether the FCM variables correlate with IPSS-R and also have independent predictive value in MDS. Results: First, MDS flow-scores and IPSS-R have been tested for OS resulting in a significant association of higher flow-scores with shorter survival, Ogata: median OS: 51 mo vs. not reached (NR), hazard ratio (HR)=2.1, p=0.00084; FCSS: 70 mo vs. NR, HR=2.1, p=0.013; new iFS: 70 mo vs. NR, HR=1.9, p=0.02; IPSS-R: 37 vs. 55 vs. 74 mo; HR=2.4/1.4, p=0.0045. Second, we wanted to explore whether single FCM parameters inherit prognostic information using the diagnostic reference ranges. Of note, 19 of all FCM parameters were significantly associated with OS, e.g. decreased side scatter (granulopoiesis; 37 mo vs. NR, HR=2.4, p=0.000047), decreased % of B-lymphatic progenitors (lyPC; 52 mo vs. NR, HR=2.3, p=0.0013). As a third step, a computational learning algorithm was applied. In 7/19 parameters already showing significant differences in OS while using the diagnostic reference ranges, the algorithm could add information. Moreover, the algorithm optimized thresholding for 17 additional FCM parameters, resulting in clearer survival differences, e.g. decreased side scatter (myPC, 33 vs. 74 mo, HR=2.6 p=0.00002), aberrant CD5 expression (granulopoiesis; 32 vs. 74 mo, HR=2.5 p=0.000045). Next, we performed an independent multivariate Cox model with lasso penalty, considering 14 FCM parameters which in univariate analysis showed a clearer survival difference compared to IPSS-R. Of note, this identified the following as best predictors of OS: IPSS-R, decreased side scatter (granulopoiesis), CD45 MFI (ratio of CD45 MFI lymphocytes : myPC), and decreased % B-lymphatic progenitors. Conclusions: In addition to the known importance of FCM in MDS diagnostics, we provided evidence that FCM has also an important prognostic impact in relation to IPSS-R even in this heterogeneous group of MDS patients. Thus, in univariate analysis a computational learning algorithm was able to refine thresholding resulting in an improved separation of OS curves. Importantly, even in multivariate analysis FCM proved its significance for patient outcome. Further studies should evaluate, whether a flow-score including the most influential variables could add prognostic information to IPSS-R. Disclosures Kordasti: Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Boston Biomed: Consultancy; API: Consultancy. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-128042

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 33-33

Abstract: Background In a recent phase-III trial CPX-351 (Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA), a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin, has shown higher remission rates and longer overall survival (OS) in patients aged 60 to 75 years with AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) or therapy-related AML (t-AML) in comparison to conventional 7+3 regimen. Based on this CPX-351 has been approved in the USA 2017 and in Europe 2018 for adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML. Still, several issues such as age ( & lt;60 years), measurable residual disease (MRD), molecular subgroups and outcome after allo-HCT were not addressed in the phase-III trial. Aiming to investigate these open aspects and to provide more clinical experience with CPX-351, we performed a real-world analysis of patients with AML treated with CPX-351 as first-line therapy. Design/Methods: For this retrospective analysis, we collected data on baseline characteristics, treatment details including allo-HCT and outcome from patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML, who were treated with CPX-351 according to the EMA label between 2018 and 2020 in 25 German centers participating in the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL), German Cooperative Transplant Study Group and the AML Study Group (AMLSG). Results: A total of 188 patients (median age 65 years, range 26 to 80) with t-AML (29%) or AML-MRC (70%) including 46 patients (24%) & lt;60 years could be analyzed. Eigthy-six percent received one, 14% two induction cycles and 10% received consolidation with CPX-351. Following induction, CR/CRi rate was 47% including 64% of patients with available information achieving measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity ( & lt;10-3) as measured by flow cytometry at local laboratories. Additionally, 35 patients were categorized as MLFS at first remission control, which achieved CRi (n=16) or CR (n=10) in the further course without additional therapy. After median follow-up of 9.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was 21 months and 1-year OS rate was 64%. In multivariate analysis, complex karyotype predicted lower response (p=.0001), and pretreatment with hypomethylating agents (p=.02) and adverse European LeukemiaNet 2017 genetic risk (p & lt;.0001) were associated with lower OS. Allo-HCT was performed in 116 patients (62%) including 101 of these patients with CR prior transplant and resulted in 1-year OS of 73% (median survival not reached), especially in MRD negative patients (p=.048). With 69% of patients developing grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity following induction and a day 30-mortality of 8% the safety profile was consistent with previous findings. Conclusion: The results from this real-world analysis confirm CPX-351 as an efficient treatment for these high-risk AML patients bridging to facilitating allo-HCT in many patients with encouraging outcome after transplantation. Disclosures Röllig: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gaidzik: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Unglaub: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee; JazzPharma: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee. Thol: Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Haenel: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy. Vucinic: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; MSD: Honoraria. Fransecky: Novartis: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Holtick: Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Kobbe: Celgene: Research Funding. Holderried: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Therakos: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Other: Travel support; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; Eurocept Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Medac: Other: Travel support. Heuser: Astellas: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BergenBio: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tolremo: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Sauer: Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member. Goetze: Abbvie: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios and Astex: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Helsinn: Honoraria; GEMoaB: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Berlin-Chemie: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedica: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Schetelig: Roche: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees . Germing: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: advisory activity, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Schroeder: JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-153440

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 2626-2627

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-159190

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 12301-12302

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-165481

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 4561-4561

Abstract: We have previously reported on the efficacy of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in corticosteroid-refractory (SR) acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in 95 patients (pts) (Leukemia 2015;29(10):2062-8). To assess long-term follow-up results, we collected data from the same pts treated in 19 centers in Europe and the US. Pts were classified as SR-aGVHD (n=54, all grade III or IV) or SR-cGvHD (n=41, all moderate or severe). Median numbers of pre-ruxolitinib GVHD treatment lines were 3 (1-7) and 3 (1-10) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGvHD, respectively. The median follow-up was 19 and 24 months for aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively. The 1-year overall survival (OS) from was 62.4% (CI: 49.4%-75.4%) and 92.7% (CI: 84.7%-100%) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGvHD, respectively. The estimated median OS (50% death) was 18 months for aGVHD and not reached for cGVHD patients. The median duration of ruxolitinib treatment was 5 and 10 months for patients with SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively reflecting the different biology of the diseases. At follow-up, 22/54 (41%) of SR-aGVHD patients and 10/41 (24%) of SR-cGVHD patients have an ongoing response and are free of any immunosuppression. GVHD relapse or progression after achieved PR/CR was observed in 14/45 (31%) and 13/36 (36%) patients with SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. Response to re-treatment with Ruxolitinib or any immunosupressive therapy was seen in 11/14 (78%) and 11/13 (86%) patients with SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. Cytopenia (any grade) and CMV-reactivation were observed during ruxolitinib-treatment in both SR-aGVHD (30/54, 55.6% and 18/54, 33.3%) and SR-cGVHD (7/41, 17.1% and 6/41, 14.6%) patients. These findings extend our previous report by showing that patients with SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD may benefit long-term from ruxolitinib treatment with an OS that is relatively high for steroid-refractory GVHD. GVHD-relapse or GVHD-progression rates were moderate and more than 75% of the relapse/progression patients responded to re-treatment with ruxolitinib or other immunosuppression. Disclosures Meyer: Stanford University: Patents & Royalties. Marks:Pfizer: Honoraria. Lübbert:Ratiopharm: Other: Study drug valproic acid; Celgene: Other: Travel Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding. Scheid:Novartis: Other: funding outside this work; Celgene: Other: funding outside this work; Janssen: Other: funding outside this work. Kobbe:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel support. Negrin:Stanford University: Patents & Royalties. Brune:Meda Pharma: Consultancy. Mielke:JAZZ Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants; Gilead: Other: Travel grants; Celgene: Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau. Kuball:Gadeta B.V,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kröger:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Peschel:MophoSys: Honoraria. von Bubnoff:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.4561.4561

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7