Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: JCO Precision Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), , No. 2 ( 2018-11), p. 1-12

Abstract: Gene rearrangements that involve NTRK1/2/3 can generate fusion oncoproteins that contain the kinase domains of TRKA/B/C, respectively. These fusions are rare in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with frequency previously estimated to be 〈 1%. Inhibition of TRK signaling has led to dramatic responses across tumor types with NTRK fusions. Despite the potential benefit of identifying these fusions, the clinicopathologic features of NTRK fusion-positive NSCLCs are not well characterized. Methods We compiled a database of patients with NSCLCs that harbor NTRK fusions. We characterized clinical, molecular, and histologic features with central review of histology. Results We identified 11 patients with NSCLCs that harbor NTRK gene fusions verified by next-generation sequencing and with available clinical and pathologic data. Fusions involved NTRK1 (n = 7) and NTRK3 (n = 4), with five and two distinct fusion partners, respectively. Fifty-five percent of cohort patients were male with a median age at diagnosis of 47.6 years (range, 25.3 to 86.0 years) and a median smoking history of 0 pack-years (range, 0 to 58 pack-years). Seventy-three percent of patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis. No concurrent alterations in KRAS, EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or other known oncogenic drivers were identified. Nine patients had adenocarcinoma, including two with invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma and one with adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features; one had squamous cell carcinoma; and one had neuroendocrine carcinoma. By collating data on 4,872 consecutively screened, unique patients with NSCLC, we estimate a frequency of NTRK fusions in NSCLC of 0.23% (95% CI, 0.11% to 0.40%). Conclusion NTRK fusions occur in NSCLCs across sexes, ages, smoking histories, and histologies. Given the potent clinical activity of TRK inhibitors, we advocate that all NSCLCs be screened for NTRK fusions by using a multiplexed next-generation sequencing–based fusion assay.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2473-4284

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/PO.18.00037

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2018

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. TPS3635-TPS3635

Abstract: TPS3635 Background: Treatment options for most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are largely limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy, with little advancement in the last decade. Encouragingly, a small subset of patients deficient in mismatch repair (dMMR/MSI-hi) benefit from checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) whereas those proficient in mismatch repair (pMMR/MSS) do not. The absence of clinical benefit in patients with pMMR/MSS mCRC may relate to a lack of neoantigen-specific T cells and immune infiltration. An individualized neoantigen vaccine that induces CD8 T cells capable of tumor lysis has the potential to expand the number of patients with mCRC who may benefit from immunotherapy. Data from a Phase 1/2 study evaluating neoantigen vaccines in combination with CPIs in patients with previously treated mCRC demonstrated a 44% molecular response (MR) rate (≥50% decrease in ctDNA relative to baseline) in 4/9 patients; this correlated with improvement in OS relative to those without a MR. To further investigate neoantigen vaccines in earlier lines of treatment, a Phase 2/3 study in the1L maintenance setting in mCRC was initiated. Methods: GO-010 is a Phase 2/3, randomized, open-label, multi-center study evaluating the efficacy and safety of 2 neoantigen-containing vectors (GRT-C901-adenoviral vector plus GRT-R902-self-amplifying mRNA vector) as prime/boost in combination with CPIs as an add-on to fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab (bev) following 1L therapy with FOLFOX/bev in patients with mCRC. During Phase 2, up to 90 patients will be randomized 1:1 to the vaccine or control arm with a primary objective of assessing efficacy by MR. During Phase 3, up to 226 patients will be randomized with a primary objective of assessing PFS per iRECIST in a blinded, independent manner. There are two stages to the study. In the vaccine production stage, while patients receive FOLFOX/bev 1L therapy, neoantigen prediction is performed using a tumor biopsy and Gritstone’s EDGE™ neoantigen prediction model. For patients in the vaccine arm the top 20 predicted neoantigens are included in the vaccine vectors. After completing oxaliplatin, patients will enter the study treatment stage. Patients in the control arm will continue with maintenance therapy whereas patients in the vaccine arm will add the vaccine regimen to maintenance therapy. The vaccine regimen consists of GRT-C901/GRT-R902 as well as SC ipilimumab (30 mg) and IV atezolizumab (1680 mg). Over the first year of treatment, 6 vaccinations will occur. Ipilimumab will be administered SC with the first doses of GRT-C901 and GRT-R902. Atezolizumab will be administered every 4 weeks for up to 2 years. Study assessments include imaging, ctDNA, safety, immunogenicity and exploratory biomarker analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT05141721.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.TPS3635

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Nature Medicine, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 2, No. 10 ( 1996-10), p. 1084-1089

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1078-8956 , 1546-170X

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1038/nm1096-1084

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 1996

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1484517-9

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 1069-1069

Abstract: Background: Gilteritinib (ASP2215) is a novel, highly selective, potent oral FLT3/AXL inhibitor with preclinical activity against FLT3-ITD activating and FLT3-D835 resistance mutations. The objectives of this phase 1/2 study were to assess gilteritinib safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles after single- and multiple-day dosing, and antileukemic effects in patients with R/R AML. Methods: This open-label study (NCT02014558) enrolled patients (≥18 yr) into 1 of 7 dose-escalation cohorts (20-450 mg once daily [QD]) or concomitant dose-expansion cohorts. While confirmed FLT3 mutation was not an inclusion criterion, each expanded dose level enrolled ≥10 patients with FLT3 mutations (FLT3mut+); 120 and 200 mg dose levels were further expanded with ≥40 FLT3mut+ patients. The choice to expand these dose cohorts was based upon FLT3 inhibition in correlative assays and clinical activity seen during dose escalation. Safety and tolerability were primary endpoints; blood samples were drawn from patients in the dose-escalation cohorts to evaluate gilteritinib PK parameters and PD effects. Antileukemic response rates (eg, complete remission [CR] , CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp], CR with incomplete hematological recovery [CRi] , overall response rate [ORR]) were secondary endpoints. Results: Patients (N=252; 129M:123F, median age 62 yr [range: 21-90]) enrolled between October 2013 and August 2015 received ≥1 dose of gilteritinib. The study population was heavily pretreated: 70% (n=177) had ≥2 prior AML therapies, 29% (n=73) had a prior stem cell transplant, and 25% (n=63) had prior TKI treatment with sorafenib most commonly used. Across the study, 194 patients had a locally confirmed FLT3 mutation (ITD, n=159; D835, n=13; ITD-D835, n=16; other, n=6). For all enrolled patients, progressive disease (n=75), lack of efficacy (n=44), adverse events (n=34), and death (n=29) were the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation. Seven deaths were considered possibly/probably related to treatment: pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure, hemoptysis, intracranial bleed, ventricular fibrillation, septic shock, and neutropenia (all n=1). Maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 300 mg when 2 of 3 patients in the 450 mg cohort experienced diarrhea and/or hepatic transaminase elevation as dose-limiting toxicities. Diarrhea (16%) and fatigue (15%) were the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events of any grade. Less than 5% of patients (11/252) had a maximum post-baseline QTcF interval 〉 500 msec. Gilteritinib concentrations were generally dose proportional and showed both a long-elimination half-life (45-159 h) and substantial accumulation (3.2-10 fold) by day 15. An exposure-related increase in the inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation with increasing doses of gilteritinib was also observed. Gilteritinib showed strong antileukemic activity in FLT3mut+ patients (ORR=49%); response was observed less frequently in patients with wild-type FLT3 (ORR=12%). While CR, CRi, and CRp occurred at all doses, responses were enriched among FLT3mut+ patients with gilteritinib steady-state trough concentrations ≥100 ng/mL, which correlated with potent FLT3 inhibition in PD assays and corresponded to doses ≥80 mg. The ORR in 169 FLT3mut+ patients receiving ≥80 mg was 52% (Table); median overall survival in this patient population was ~31 wk (range: 1.7-61; Figure) and median duration of response was 20 wk (range: 1.1-55). Clinical responses occurred in FLT3mut+ patients with -ITD, -D835, and both mutations (ORR: 55%, 17%, and 62%, respectively) as well as in FLT3mut+ patients with or without prior TKI treatment (ORR: 42% vs 56%, respectively). Conclusions: This PD-driven, first-in-human study shows that gilteritinib was well tolerated and generated frequent, prolonged, clinically important responses in FLT3mut+ patients with R/R AML. Antileukemic responses were enriched in FLT3mut+ patients treated at doses that consistently and potently inhibited FLT3 phosphorylation. The survival of these patients appears better than expected for this patient population when treated with standard therapy. Our data suggest that FLT3 inhibition may improve survival in patients with FLT3mut+R/R AML; as such, phase 3 testing of oral gilteritinib 120 mg QD in patients with FLT3mut+R/R AML after first-line therapy is underway (NCT02421939). Disclosures Perl: Astellas US Pharma Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Asana Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman:Janssen: Other: advisory board; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Other: advisory board; Ariad: Other: advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: advisory board; Syros: Other: advisory board. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Smith:Astellas: Research Funding. Erba:Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, DSMB, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Gill:Astellas: Employment. Goldberg:Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; COTA Inc: Employment; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neostem: Equity Ownership. Jurcic:Astellas: Research Funding. Larson:Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Liu:Astellas: Employment. Ritchie:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding. Schiller:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Strickland:Celator: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutica: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Wang:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Research Funding. Stuart:Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Martinelli:Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bahceci:Astellas: Employment. Levis:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.1069.1069

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 3094-3094

Abstract: 3094 Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective and potent RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of lung and thyroid cancer with RET fusions and medullary thyroid cancer with RET mutations. We provide an efficacy and safety update with more patients (pts) and longer follow-up (data cut-off: 24Sep2021) in RET fusion+ solid tumors with histologies other than lung/thyroid. Methods: The phase 1/2 LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128) enrolled pts with locally advanced/metastatic RET fusion+ solid tumors. Following dose escalation, pts received the recommended dose of 160 mg orally twice daily. The efficacy analysis set consisted of pts enrolled ≥6 months (mo) prior to the cut-off date. If a pt achieved response, an additional ≥6 mo follow-up from the initial response was required. There was no additional follow-up required for non-responders. Response was assessed per RECIST 1.1. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included ORR by investigator (INV), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), and safety. Results: Forty-five pts with 14 unique RET fusion+ tumor types received ≥1 dose of selpercatinib: 12 pancreatic, 10 colon, 4 salivary, 3 unknown primary, 3 sarcoma, 2 each of breast, carcinoma of the skin, xanthogranuloma, and cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 each of lung carcinoid, rectal neuroendocrine, small intestine, ovarian, and pulmonary carcinosarcoma. Median age was 53 years (range 21-85). Forty-one pts received prior systemic therapy (median prior lines: 2, range 0-9); 31% received ≥3 lines. In 41 efficacy-evaluable pts, confirmed ORR by IRC was 44% (18/41, 95% CI: 29-60). Clinical benefit was observed in 63% (26/41) of pts: 2 complete responses (breast, small intestine), 16 partial responses, and stable disease ≥16 weeks in 8 pts by IRC. Responses were observed across a variety of fusion partners. Median TTR was 1.9 mo by IRC. Median DoR was 24.5 mo (95% CI: 9.2-NE) with 50% (9/18) of responses ongoing at a median follow-up of 14.9 mo by IRC. Median PFS by IRC was 13.2 mo (95% CI: 7.4-26.2), with 34.1% alive and progression-free at a median follow-up of 16.4 mo. No new safety signals were identified in this cohort compared to broader safety database. Three grade 5 AEs were observed (unrelated to treatment by INV), and 4 pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (1 deemed related to treatment by INV). Conclusions: Selpercatinib continued to demonstrate durable antitumor activity in pts with RET fusion+ cancers across multiple tumor types. No new safety signals were identified. These results emphasize the importance of comprehensive genomic profiling to identify actionable oncogenic drivers, including RET fusions. The LIBRETTO-001 study continues to enroll pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.3094

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 6_suppl ( 2018-02-20), p. 431-431

Abstract: 431 Background: EV is an ADC that selectively targets and kills cells expressing Nectin-4 by delivering a potent microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E. As mUC tumors express Nectin-4 in almost all pts, the EV clinical profile was assessed in an ongoing Phase 1 study (NCT02091999) at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 1.25 mg/kg) in mUC pts with CPI failure, a population with a high unmet medical need. Methods: Pts with mUC, treated with ≥1 prior chemotherapy or who were ineligible for platinum chemotherapy, and who had disease progression after CPI therapy received an IV infusion of EV at RP2D on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Primary endpoint was tolerability; a secondary endpoint was investigator-assessed antitumor activity per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 2 Oct 2017, 62 pts with mUC and prior CPI failure received EV at RP2D (48 M/14 F; median age, 68 yr [range: 41–83]; ECOG 0/1 29%/71%). Primary tumor site was bladder in 73% pts; 63% pts had visceral and 27% had liver metastasis (LM). Most pts (71%) had ≥2 prior therapies in the metastatic setting, including platinum (87%) or taxanes (26%). CPI was the most recent therapy in 76% pts; time from last CPI to first EV dose was 〈 12 wk for 58% pts. Median treatment duration was 14.8 wk (range: 1.6–40.4); 39 pts continue treatment. Treatment-related AEs occurring in ≥30% pts were fatigue, rash, nausea, alopecia, decreased appetite and diarrhea; most grade ≤2. Grade ≥3 AE reported in ≥5% pts, regardless of attribution, was hyponatremia (6.5%). One fatal AE (respiratory failure) was possibly treatment related. Response evaluable pts (n = 54) had ≥1 post baseline scan or discontinued prior to scan. ORR (confirmed + unconfirmed) was 54% (95% CI: 39.6–67.4); 15 pts had a confirmed PR, 5 had unconfirmed PR, and 9 are pending subsequent assessment. This ORR is similar to CPI-naïve pts (59%; 95% CI: 36.4–79.3). ORR from 17 evaluable pts with LM was 41% (95% CI: 18.4–67.1). Conclusions: EV is tolerable and exhibits antitumor activity in a cohort of pts with mUC and disease progression after CPI. A phase 2 study assessing EV in this population with high unmet need has been initiated (NCT03219333; EV-201 study). Clinical trial information: NCT02091999.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.431

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 18, No. 8 ( 2017-08), p. 1061-1075

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1470-2045

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30416-3

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2017

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 321-321

Abstract: Introduction: ASP2215 is a highly selective inhibitor of AXL and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) receptors. ASP2215 is active against both FLT3 internal tandem duplication [ITD] and D835 mutations. Prior analyses of an open-label, dose-escalation/dose-expansion study in subjects with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) show ASP2215 was well tolerated from 20-300 mg and associated with antileukemic activity in FLT3 mutation-positive (FLT3+) patients at ≥80 mg with minimal activity observed in wild-type FLT3 subjects. Here we describe the tolerability and potent activity of ASP2215 in a large cohort of FLT3+ patients. Methods: Patients (≥18 years) with R/R AML were assigned to treatment in dose-escalation cohorts or were randomized to an open dose level in the dose-expansion cohorts. Although FLT3 mutation was not an inclusion criterion, each expanded dose level enrolled ≥10 FLT3+ subjects; 120 mg and 200 mg dose levels were further expanded with ≥40 FLT3+ subjects. Tolerability was assessed by adverse event (AE) monitoring. Response assessment was based on modified Cheson criteria and duration of response and overall survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: As of June 19, 2015,215 patients with a median age of 61 yr (range: 21-90) had received ≥1 dose of ASP2215 (safety population). Across the safety population, 65% of subjects received ≥2 prior lines of AML therapy, 29% had a hematopoietic stem cell transplant prior to ASP2215 treatment, and 23% had prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Approximately 73% of patients were FLT3+, of which 137 had FLT3-ITD mutation, 7 were FLT3-D835+, and 9 had both FLT3-ITD and D835. Treatment-related AEs of all Grades, reported in ≥10% of the safety population were diarrhea (16%), fatigue (13%), and increased AST (11%); 〈 2% of subjects reported a Grade ≥3 QTc prolongation. Activity was assessed in the 133 FLT3+ patients treated with ASP2215 ≥80 mg. Overall response rate (ORR; composite complete [CRc] plus partial remission [PR] ) for all FLT3+ subjects was 55% (Table). Median overall survival for FLT3+ patients receiving ASP2215 ≥80 mg was ~29 weeks (95% CI: 22-32) and was similar for patients who achieved CRc or PR (Figure). Treatment with ≥80 mg ASP2215 was associated with an ORR of 60% in FLT3-ITD subjects; ORR for the other FLT3 populations was 29% (Table). No difference was observed in median ORR of ASP2215 (≥80 mg) in TKI-naïve patients (55%) and patients with prior TKI treatment (55%). Conclusions: ASP2215, a novel AXL/FLT3 TKI, was well tolerated in subjects with R/R AML and demonstrated a strong antileukemic activity in FLT3+ subjects. Importantly, the ASP2215 response rate in these FLT3+ patients was independent of prior TKI treatment. Even in this heavily pretreated population, the survival of R/R FLT3+ AML patients who received ≥80 mg ASP2215 was longer than prior reports of cytotoxic chemotherapy or other FLT3 inhibitors. Table. ASP2215 Response Assessment 80 mg 120 mg 200 mg 300 mg 450 mg Total All FLT3+ Subjects Population, n 12 52 57 10 2 133 CRc, n (%) 5 (42) 25 (48) 28 (49) 3 (30) 0 61 (46) PR, n (%) 3 (25) 3 (6) 3 (5) 3 (30) 0 12 (9) ORR, n (%) 8 (67) 28 (54) 31 (54) 6 (60) 0 73 (55) Subjects with FLT3-ITD Only Population, n 10 46 50 8 0 114 CRc, n (%) 4 (40) 23 (50) 26 (52) 3 (38) 0 56 (49) PR, n (%) 3 (30) 3 (7) 3 (6) 3 (38) 0 12 (11) ORR, n (%) 7 (70) 26 (57) 29 (58) 6 (75) 0 68 (60) Subjects with FLT3-D835 and Subjects with FLT3-ITD and FLT3-D835 Population, n 2 5 5 1 1 14 CRc, n (%) 1 (50) 1 (20) 2 (40) 0 0 4 (29) PR, n (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ORR, n (%) 1 (50) 1 (20) 2 (40) 0 0 4 (29) CRc, composite complete remission (complete remission + complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery + complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery); ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response. NR, no response. Subjects with non-evaluable data (N=8) were not included in this curve. Figure 1. Overall Survival by Best Overall Response Achieved with ASP2215 ≥80 mg Across All FLT3+ Subjects Figure 1. Overall Survival by Best Overall Response Achieved with ASP2215 ≥80 mg Across All FLT3+ Subjects Disclosures Altman: BMS: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Spectrum: Other: Advisory board; Ariad: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Astellas: Other: Participation in an advisory board December 2013. Off Label Use: ASP2215 is currently under investigation for the treatment of AML and is not yet approved.. Perl:Arog Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Asana Biosciences: Consultancy; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ambit/Daichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas US Pharma Inc.: Consultancy. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy. Levis:Arog: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy. Smith:Plexxikon: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Claxton:NCI: Research Funding; Medimmune, Inc: Research Funding; Ambit Biosciences Corp: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Erba:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GlycoMimetics: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committees ; Jannsen (J & J): Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committees ; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Celator: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; GlycoMimetics: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committees ; Jannsen (J & J): Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committees ; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Gill:Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Employment. Goldberg:Cyclacel: Research Funding; Celetor: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Jurcic:Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Larson:Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lui:Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Employment. Ritchie:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Sargent:Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Employment. Schiller:Sunesis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Strickland:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Steering Committee and Advisory Board Participation; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Other: Advisory Board Particpation. Wang:Immunogen: Research Funding. Stuart:Sunesis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma, Inc: Research Funding. Baldus:Novartis: Research Funding. Martinelli:MSD: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy. Bahceci:Astellas Pharma Global Development: Employment.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.321.321

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 9029-9029

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.9029

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 11580-11580

Abstract: 11580 Background: Gene fusions involving NTRK1/2/3 can generate oncoproteins containing the kinase domains of TRKA/B/C, respectively. Inhibition of TRK signaling has led to dramatic responses across tumor types with NTRK fusions. An estimated 0.1 – 1% of NSCLCs harbor NTRK fusions. To date, clinical and radiographic responses to TRK inhibitors have been reported for 2 NTRK fusion-positive NSCLCs (Farago et al., 2015; Hong et al., 2016). Despite the potential benefit of identifying these fusions, the clinicopathologic features of NTRK fusion NSCLCs are not well characterized. Methods: Physicians across multiple institutions contributed deidentified cases to an NTRK fusion NSCLC database. A central pathologist (M.M.) reviewed tumor histology in cases with available tissue. Results: 10 NSCLC cases with NTRK gene fusions were identified. Of these, TRK kinase domain-containing potentially activating fusions were verified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 7, forming the study cohort. Fusions involved NTRK1 (6) and NTRK3 (1) with 6 different partners. Four (57%) patients were male. Median age at diagnosis was 47.6 years (range 27.9 – 86.0). The average smoking pack year history was 8.9 (range 0 to 30). Five (71%) presented with metastatic disease. No concurrent alterations in KRAS, EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or other known drivers were identified in the study cohort cases. On pathologic review of 4 cases, all were adenocarcinoma, including 2 invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas and 1 adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features. Of the 3 remaining non-study cohort cases, 1 was a non-kinase domain-containing NTRK1 fusion with a concurrent KRAS G12C mutation, 1 was an NTRK2 intragenic deletion disrupting the exon 18 3’ splice site, and 1 was an NTRK1 alteration detected by FISH but not verified by NGS and with a concurrent HER2 L755P mutation. Conclusions: NTRK fusions occur in both men and women across wide ranges in age and smoking history. We therefore suggest that all NSCLC adenocarcinomas without other oncogenic driver alterations be screened for NTRK fusions. Notably, not all NTRK alterations are activating, requiring validation of the specific position of the fusion.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.11580

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2017

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5